iran condemns israeli
|

Iran condemns Israeli minister’s remarks over Gaza killings

ByJustpaste.in

 

 

Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi has strongly condemned remarks attributed to Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir regarding the killing of Palestinians in Gaza, accusing him of openly advocating mass violence and the forced displacement of Palestinians.

According to media reports, Gharibabadi said Ben-Gvir had set a daily target of killing between 30 and 40 people in Gaza. He described the remarks as further evidence of what Iran considers systematic violence against Palestinians and called for such statements to be preserved as evidence for possible future legal proceedings.

Gharibabadi said that Israeli officials were openly discussing the expulsion of Palestinians from Gaza and the establishment or expansion of Jewish settlements in Palestinian territory. He argued that these statements should not simply be treated as political rhetoric but should be documented carefully because they could potentially become important evidence in future cases involving alleged violations of international law.

“The statements and admissions made by Israeli officials should be preserved as evidence,” Gharibabadi said, according to the reports. He added that such evidence could be presented when Israeli officials are held accountable and legal proceedings are initiated against those accused of crimes against Palestinians.

The Iranian official’s comments came in response to statements attributed to Ben-Gvir concerning Israel’s military campaign in Gaza. Media reports said the Israeli minister had spoken about killing between 30 and 40 people in Gaza every night. He was also reported to have said that the people of Gaza should not remain alive.

Ben-Gvir, a far-right Israeli politician, has repeatedly faced international criticism over his statements and positions concerning Palestinians and the Gaza conflict. His remarks have frequently generated controversy, particularly when he has discussed military operations, Palestinian displacement and the future of Gaza.

Gharibabadi’s response reflects Iran’s broader criticism of Israel’s military operations in Gaza. Iranian officials have repeatedly accused Israel of committing serious violations against Palestinians and have called for international action against Israeli leaders and officials. Tehran has also consistently supported the establishment of an independent Palestinian state and opposed the expansion of Israeli settlements in Palestinian territories.

The issue of accountability has become increasingly prominent amid the continuing conflict in Gaza. Palestinian officials and international organizations have reported extensive civilian casualties and destruction in the territory since the outbreak of the war. Israel, meanwhile, has maintained that its military operations are aimed at Hamas and other armed groups and has defended its actions as necessary for national security and the release of hostages.

The latest exchange between Iran and Israel comes amid continued regional tensions. Iranian officials have frequently used international forums and diplomatic statements to call attention to the humanitarian situation in Gaza and to demand accountability for alleged violations of international humanitarian law.

Gharibabadi’s call to preserve statements made by Israeli officials highlights Iran’s argument that public comments by political and military figures could later be examined in legal proceedings. He suggested that remarks regarding killings, forced displacement and settlement expansion should be documented so they can potentially be used when questions of responsibility and accountability are considered.

The controversy surrounding Ben-Gvir’s reported remarks is therefore likely to add to international scrutiny of Israel’s conduct in Gaza and the statements of its political leaders. As the conflict continues to generate diplomatic and legal debate, allegations concerning civilian killings, displacement and settlement policies remain major points of contention between Israel and its critics, including Iran.

Similar Posts

  • | |

    State Department report calls for greater civilian…

    ByJustpaste.in

    The US State Department said Wednesday that Pakistan needs to strengthen civilian oversight of public finances to improve fiscal transparency, releasing findings that highlighted persistent gaps in how the country discloses key financial information. The department’s assessment described fiscal transparency as a core component of effective public financial management, noting that it allows citizens to understand how government revenues and tax dollars are spent. That visibility into budgets, the report said, gives citizens the tools they need to hold their governments accountable. The findings arrive weeks after Pakistan’s National Assembly passed an 18.8 trillion rupee Finance Bill for 2026 to 2027 in June, which included a defence budget of 3 trillion rupees, with at least 335 billion rupees coming from provincial contributions. In its 2026 Fiscal Transparency Report on Pakistan, the State Department said the country continues to fall short in disclosing important financial data, particularly around debt obligations and the budgets of military and intelligence agencies. The report found that Pakistan’s government did not publish its executive budget proposal within a reasonable timeframe and made only limited information available on debt obligations, including debt held by major state owned enterprises. It further noted that military and intelligence budgets remain outside the scope of adequate parliamentary or civilian oversight. The assessment also pointed to areas of progress. During the review period, the report said, Pakistan’s government made its enacted budget and end of year financial reports widely and easily accessible to the public, including through online platforms. It found that publicly available budget documents offered a substantially complete picture of most planned government expenditures and revenues, including revenue generated from natural resources. The report described the information contained in the budget as generally reliable and subject to audit by the country’s supreme audit institution, which it said meets international standards of independence. Audit reports, the department noted, are published within a reasonable period and contain substantive findings. It also found that the government has specified, and largely followed in practice, clear legal criteria and procedures for awarding natural resource extraction contracts and licenses, while making basic information about such awards publicly available. The report added that Pakistan’s sovereign wealth fund operates under a sound legal framework and that the government publishes accessible information on public procurement contracts. Among its recommendations, the State Department urged Pakistan to make its executive budget proposal available to the public within a reasonable timeframe, disclose more detailed information on government debt, including debt tied to state owned enterprises, and bring military and intelligence agency budgets under parliamentary or civilian oversight. Responding to questions about the report during a weekly press briefing, Foreign Office spokesperson Tahir Andrabi acknowledged that the report had been released the previous day. He said Pakistan adheres to internationally recognized best practices around fiscal transparency, budgeting and financial disclosure, while also operating within its own constitutional, legislative and regulatory frameworks. Andrabi noted that Pakistan remains engaged in an ongoing International Monetary Fund program centered on structural reform and improved fiscal management. He said the country has completed three IMF reviews so far, adding that the reform measures taken under the program have drawn broad recognition, including credit rating upgrades from three international rating agencies as well as positive assessments from the IMF itself.

  • | |

    Zelensky removes army chief Syrskyi after week of …

    ByJustpaste.in

    Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has dismissed the country’s commander in chief, Oleksandr Syrskyi, just days after removing popular Defence Minister Mykhailo Fedorov in a move that triggered widespread street protests across Ukraine. Early speculation that Fedorov’s removal stemmed from tension between him and Syrskyi was soon confirmed. Fedorov, 35, has drawn broad praise for reenergizing the defence ministry, driving reforms across the armed forces and pushing an anti corruption campaign. Syrskyi, 60, has been viewed by many in Ukraine as a Soviet trained commander resistant to sweeping changes within the military. In a farewell message posted on Telegram, Syrskyi defended his record, noting that the army he led through a difficult defensive campaign two years ago now stands on the offensive. He said he was handing over to his successor a force that is not just holding ground but advancing, and expressed hope that the offensive would continue. Zelensky named Mykhailo Drapatyi, 43, a popular and battle tested general, as Syrskyi’s replacement. Drapatyi said on Facebook that he would approach the role with full focus, responsibility and respect for those currently defending the country. He also thanked Syrskyi for his consistent work strengthening the Ukrainian army, saying he had grown up within it professionally. In a video posted late Tuesday, Zelensky thanked Syrskyi for his military leadership, including his role defending Kyiv during the earliest days of Russia’s full scale invasion in 2022. Zelensky also said he met with Fedorov earlier that day and offered him a worthy position within the government, though he did not specify whether Fedorov had accepted. Fedorov had been replaced last week by Yevhenii Khmara, a former senior official at Ukraine’s Security Service. Zelensky said all decisions would be formalized the following day. Fedorov congratulated Drapatyi on his new role, describing the appointment as a new source of hope in the broader fight of free people for freedom and justice, and calling it the voice of change that could no longer be ignored. Fedorov also said he called Syrskyi personally to thank him for defending the Kyiv region and for other significant battles, while adding that Ukraine needs to move even faster and correct past mistakes. Fedorov had only taken over as defence minister in January but quickly earned praise for using data driven analysis to improve battlefield performance. A former minister of digital transformation, he built a volunteer cyber unit known as the IT Army of Ukraine early in the full scale invasion. He later led a successful fundraising initiative called the Army of Drones and introduced elements of gamification into the war effort, creating a system that rewarded Ukrainian military units with credits for striking Russian targets. Fedorov’s removal sparked six days of widespread protests, placing mounting pressure on Zelensky to dismiss Syrskyi. Zelensky appeared to respond to that pressure by replacing him with Drapatyi, viewed as a younger and more innovative commander who is also considered a close friend of Fedorov’s. Fedorov’s clear support for Drapatyi’s appointment is likely to help ease the political tension that built up over the past week. Acting Defence Minister Khmara remains in his position for now, with Zelensky asking him and Drapatyi to develop a new defence strategy addressing issues including reform of the military corps system, weapons supply and drone capabilities. In an op-ed published Monday on the Militarny website, Syrskyi described his relationship with Fedorov as strictly professional and offered an apology if he had offended him. He said decisions surrounding military contracts, procurement and mobilization involve far more complexity than most people recognize, arguing that real progress, not public drama, ultimately determines the outcome of the war. Protesters are expected to continue pushing for Fedorov’s return to a position of genuine authority where he can keep driving innovation in Ukraine’s fight against Russia. Should that happen, Zelensky may succeed in repairing much of the immediate political damage, though many Ukrainians remain unlikely to forgive what they viewed as his original misstep in removing Fedorov in the first place.

  • |

    Diplomatic storm erupts over podcast banter involving Japanese prime minister

    ByJustpaste.in

    Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is facing intense political backlash after a podcast appearance triggered a high-profile diplomatic row with Tokyo. The controversy stems from an episode, recorded in July, in which Albanese discussed a pair of prized crown melons presented to him during a May bilateral meeting by Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi. During the segment, podcast host Nikki Osborne made an explicit joke comparing the fruit to female anatomy, to which Albanese responded with agreement. The exchange went largely unnoticed upon release but reignited publicly after Shingo Yamagami, Japan’s former ambassador to Australia, published a scathing opinion piece accusing the Australian leader of casually mocking a key strategic ally. Yamagami described the remarks as a sexist insult that betrayed the close diplomatic bond between the two nations, noting that crown melons are highly valued cultural gifts in Japan, often worth upwards of 30,000 yen (£150) each. Opposition leaders in Canberra immediately seized on the commentary, demanding an official apology from Albanese for what they termed “classless” and disrespectful conduct. Albanese rejected calls to apologise in parliament, insisting that the partnership between Australia and Japan remains as strong as ever and pointing out that the joke was initiated by the host rather than himself. Senior Labor Party ministers also defended the prime minister, arguing that the comments were taken out of context by political opponents and former diplomats. The episode marks the second time Albanese has faced criticism over his appearance on the show, following a prior apology for crude remarks regarding pop star Kylie Minogue.

  • |

    Chances of US-Iran agreement remain uncertain 

    ByJustpaste.in

      Despite US President Donald Trump’s confident claim that a deal with Iran has effectively been finalized, senior Gulf officials have indicated that the prospects of reaching an agreement this Friday remain uncertain. These officials estimated the likelihood of a successful agreement at only “fifty-fifty,” suggesting that significant obstacles still stand in the way of a final breakthrough. According to the sources, one of the major concerns is the composition of the Iranian delegation currently involved in discussions. They revealed that representatives of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) are not part of the negotiating team. This absence is viewed as highly significant because the IRGC is widely regarded as the most influential military and political institution in Iran and is expected to have the final authority in approving any interim or broader agreement. Without its backing, even a negotiated framework may struggle to gain official approval in Tehran. President Trump has repeatedly expressed confidence in the ongoing diplomatic efforts between Washington and Tehran. Earlier, he stated that American officials were holding “very good talks” with their Iranian counterparts and suggested that negotiations were progressing positively. However, he also issued a stern warning, saying that if Iran were to back away from a potential agreement as it had in previous rounds of negotiations, the United States would respond with decisive and severe measures. His remarks reflected a combination of optimism about diplomacy and a willingness to adopt a tougher stance should talks collapse. Trump also hinted that an agreement concerning the Strait of Hormuz could be reached as early as today. The Strait of Hormuz is one of the world’s most strategically important maritime routes, carrying a significant portion of global oil exports. Any understanding aimed at ensuring safe navigation through the waterway would be welcomed by international markets and regional governments, given the repeated tensions and security incidents that have threatened shipping in recent years. Despite the optimistic statements coming from Washington, Iran has continued to deny that it is engaged in direct negotiations with the United States. Iranian officials maintain that their current discussions are exclusively with Oman and are focused on resolving issues related to maritime navigation and shipping through the Strait of Hormuz. Tehran has consistently rejected claims that formal talks with Washington are underway, emphasizing that its engagement is limited to regional diplomatic channels. Political analysts believe, however, that the ongoing dialogue between Iran and Oman could serve as an important bridge toward eventual negotiations between Tehran and Washington. Oman has long played the role of a trusted intermediary between the two countries, facilitating discreet diplomatic contacts during previous periods of heightened tension. Analysts argue that if discussions between Iran and Oman produce positive outcomes, they could help build confidence, reduce mistrust, and create the conditions necessary for broader US-Iran negotiations in the near future. For now, uncertainty continues to dominate the diplomatic landscape. While President Trump projects confidence that a breakthrough is close, regional officials remain cautious, pointing to unresolved political and military considerations that could still prevent a final agreement. The coming days are expected to determine whether diplomatic efforts can translate into a meaningful deal or whether tensions between the United States and Iran will persist.

  • | |

    Israel quietly receives advanced INS Drakon submar…

    ByJustpaste.in

    JERUSALEM: Israel has quietly taken delivery of the advanced INS Drakon submarine, with the handover reportedly taking place without the usual public ceremony or official fanfare. According to media reports, the submarine belongs to the Dakar-class fleet and was built in Germany by Thyssenkrupp Marine Systems (TKMS). The vessel is regarded as one of the most sophisticated additions to the Israeli Navy’s underwater fleet. Defense analysts say the INS Drakon is designed for long-range covert operations, intelligence gathering, and extended deployments at sea, significantly enhancing Israel’s naval capabilities. The submarine is part of Israel’s ongoing efforts to modernize its maritime defense amid evolving regional security challenges. Some defense experts have also suggested that Israel’s Dolphin-class submarines may be capable of carrying nuclear-armed missiles, although Israeli authorities have never officially confirmed such capabilities. The arrival of the INS Drakon further strengthens Israel’s strategic naval deterrence and expands its ability to conduct long-duration missions across distant maritime regions.

  • |

    Indonesia hit by powerful 7.7 earthquake, Tsunami …

    ByJustpaste.in

    A powerful 7.7-magnitude earthquake struck off Indonesia’s Flores region early Saturday, August 15, 2026, sending strong tremors across parts of eastern Indonesia and prompting authorities to issue a tsunami warning for vulnerable coastal areas. The earthquake struck at around 5:58am local time, with the epicentre near Nagekeo in East Nusa Tenggara. The relatively shallow quake was followed by several aftershocks, intensifying fears among residents living near the coast. Indonesia’s Meteorology, Climatology and Geophysics Agency (BMKG) issued a tsunami warning shortly after the earthquake and urged people in exposed coastal areas to move to higher ground as a precaution. Minor tsunami waves were subsequently recorded in some locations. The powerful shaking caused damage to buildings and other infrastructure in parts of East Nusa Tenggara. Residents rushed outdoors as buildings shook, while emergency teams began assessing the extent of the destruction. At least several people were reported killed or injured, although casualty figures remained subject to change as rescue teams reached affected areas. In some locations, hospitals moved patients outdoors amid concerns over building safety. The earthquake also triggered evacuations, with thousands of residents moving away from coastal areas after the tsunami alert. Authorities continued monitoring sea levels and aftershocks as emergency operations got underway. The tsunami warning was later lifted after officials found no continuing threat of major waves. Australia’s tsunami warning authorities also said the earthquake posed no tsunami threat to mainland Australia, its islands or territories. Indonesia lies along the seismically active Pacific Ring of Fire, making the country particularly vulnerable to powerful earthquakes and volcanic activity. Authorities have urged residents in affected areas to remain alert, follow official instructions and avoid damaged structures while inspections and rescue operations continue.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *