iran rejects claims
| |

Iran rejects US claims over Strait of Hormuz control 

 

Iran’s military on Thursday rejected US claims that ships were continuing to pass normally through the Strait of Hormuz, insisting that no vessel could safely transit the strategic waterway without permission from Tehran.

According to news agency, Ebrahim Zolfghari, spokesperson for the Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters, said the strait remained under Iran’s “full management and control.” He warned that commercial vessels and oil tankers would not be able to secure safe passage without the permission and supervision of Iran’s armed forces.

Zolfghari’s remarks came amid growing tensions between Tehran and Washington over the strategically important waterway, through which a significant portion of global oil and energy shipments traditionally passes. The conflicting statements from Iran and the United States have further intensified uncertainty surrounding maritime traffic in the region.

Meanwhile, US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth said Washington had the capability to maintain a naval blockade of Iranian ports for as long as necessary. Speaking to reporters, Hegseth said the US Navy could sustain such an operation indefinitely by rotating ships in and out of the region.

His comments came as Washington continued to assert its ability to control maritime activity around Iran. Tehran, however, has strongly disputed those claims and maintained that it retains authority over the Strait of Hormuz.

Iranian officials have also issued increasingly forceful warnings about a potential future conflict. Brigadier General Rasoul Sanaei-Rad said on Thursday that Iran would respond more aggressively if another war occurred.

Sanaei-Rad, who currently serves as a political adviser in the office of Iran’s Supreme Leader, said Iran had stood firm during the recent conflict and would be prepared to respond with greater determination in any possible future war. Although he did not directly name the United States, he accused Iran’s “enemy” of attempting to create divisions inside the country through economic pressure.

According to the general, those efforts had failed to achieve their intended objective. His comments reflected the increasingly confrontational rhetoric coming from Iranian officials as tensions with Washington remain high.

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi also criticised US assessments of the conflict, saying Washington had repeatedly miscalculated because of intelligence failures. Referring to the recent war, Araghchi said the United States had made serious errors in assessing the situation and was now making an even bigger mistake regarding the Strait of Hormuz.

“Worse than fake news is fake intelligence. Be careful,” Araghchi said, warning against what he described as flawed assessments of Iran’s capabilities and intentions.

His comments came a day after US President Donald Trump claimed on his Truth Social platform that the United States had “total control” over the strategic waterway. Iran has rejected the assertion, with officials continuing to emphasise Tehran’s role in regulating passage through the strait.

Iranian officials have also sought to project confidence in the country’s ability to withstand continued pressure. A former Iranian diplomat, Abbas Khameyar, said the United States had failed what he described as a test of economic and military warfare against Iran.

Khameyar argued that Tehran would not accept American conditions or surrender to US ambitions. He also claimed that Washington had effectively fallen into a “trap” involving the Strait of Hormuz.

The latest statements from both sides underline the deepening confrontation over the waterway. While Washington maintains that it has the military capability to sustain a blockade, Tehran insists that maritime passage remains subject to its authority.

With both countries issuing conflicting claims over control and navigation, the Strait of Hormuz has once again emerged as a major flashpoint in the wider regional confrontation.

Similar Posts

  • Nigel Farage reclaims Clacton seat in party-boycotted by-election

    Nigel Farage has won back his parliamentary seat after Reform UK triumphed in the Clacton by-election. The contest was notably boycotted by every other major Westminster party. Farage regained the seat by defeating his closest challenger, satirical candidate Count Binface, in an election he himself triggered by resigning last month. A Survation poll released Monday had projected Farage taking around 75% of the vote, with Binface trailing at 20%. The Reform UK leader declared victory even before the final vote count was completed. According to the Guardian, Farage secured 22,239 votes, while Binface followed with 9,455 votes. Voter turnout for the by-election stood at 44%. Despite the win, the final result wasn’t quite as dramatic as some earlier polling had suggested it might be. Farage and Binface ultimately topped a crowded field that included several joke candidates, independents and minor party representatives. With every major political party sitting the race out, the contest largely became a two-way face-off between the pair. The vacancy stemmed from a deepening scandal involving a £5 million gift Farage received from cryptocurrency billionaire Christopher Harborne. Facing mounting scrutiny, Farage resigned his seat in July and called the by-election himself. As results came in, Farage described the outcome as a convincing and overwhelming win. He said he wanted the people of Clacton, rather than Britain’s mainstream media, to serve as his judge in the matter. He added that voters in the constituency had firmly rejected the broader political establishment through their decision. Despite the win, Farage skipped the official vote count and cancelled a planned victory speech altogether. Addressing the allegations tied to the gift earlier, Farage maintained he had done nothing wrong and broken no laws. Many political observers continue to view him as a potential future contender for prime minister. Farage has pledged tougher migration policies if he gains greater power, including deploying the British navy to intercept asylum seekers arriving by boat. He was first elected to the Clacton seat in 2024, winning with 46.2% of the vote and an 8,400-vote majority.

  • | |

    Trump targets birthright citizenship again after c…

    WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump has signed two executive orders seeking to restrict birthright citizenship, renewing his administration’s challenge to a constitutional provision just weeks after the Supreme Court rejected his earlier attempt. The new orders, signed on Thursday, take a narrower approach than Trump’s previous directive and focus on specific categories of children born in the United States. The administration argues that the measures fall outside the scope of the Supreme Court’s June 30 ruling. Birthright citizenship has been a central issue in Trump’s immigration agenda, with the White House particularly targeting what it describes as “birth tourism” — a practice in which pregnant foreign nationals travel to the US to give birth so their children can obtain American citizenship. At the signing ceremony in the Oval Office, White House aide Stephen Miller said the administration was formally moving to end the practice, declaring that “birth tourism” was banned under the new orders. The executive orders also seek to restrict citizenship rights for children born to certain foreign government employees and children of people classified as “alien enemies.” They could potentially have implications for people born in US territories if Congress approves proposed legislation seeking to end automatic citizenship there. Trump’s latest move comes only weeks after the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 against his earlier attempt to restrict birthright citizenship. His first executive order, issued in 2025, instructed federal agencies not to recognise citizenship for children born in the US when neither parent was an American citizen or lawful permanent resident. The 14th Amendment has traditionally been interpreted as guaranteeing citizenship to people born on US soil, with limited exceptions including children of foreign diplomats and members of an enemy occupying force. Trump criticised the Supreme Court ruling, calling it a “very unfortunate decision” and arguing that businesses and individuals were exploiting the citizenship system through birth tourism. However, legal experts and immigrant rights groups have questioned whether the new orders can withstand judicial scrutiny. The American Civil Liberties Union predicted that the administration’s latest effort would fail in court, while advocates accused Trump of attempting to bypass the Supreme Court. Deborah Fleischaker of UnidosUS said the high court had recently reaffirmed that birthright citizenship was a constitutional guarantee and argued that presidents could not alter it through executive action. The 14th Amendment’s Citizenship Clause states that all persons born or naturalised in the United States and subject to its jurisdiction are US citizens. The Supreme Court’s June ruling, Chief Justice John Roberts wrote, reaffirmed the principle that citizenship represents the right to participate fully in the country’s political community. The latest orders are therefore expected to trigger another legal battle, potentially putting Trump’s immigration policies and the constitutional interpretation of birthright citizenship back before the courts.

  • | |

    Aramco profit soars 44% despite Houthi attack thre…

    Riyadh: Saudi oil giant Aramco has reported a 44% increase in profits, with company officials saying recent attacks by Yemen’s Houthi rebels failed to disrupt its production or operations. Aramco President and CEO Amin H. Nasser said attempts to target the company’s facilities, including sites near the Red Sea, had no significant impact on its oil output or operational capacity. He credited the company’s strong security measures and operational planning for ensuring uninterrupted production and energy supplies. Speaking to reporters, Nasser said Aramco continued to operate normally despite heightened regional tensions, demonstrating the resilience of its infrastructure and workforce. He added that the company’s strong financial performance reflects its ability to maintain stable energy production while reinforcing its position as a leading global supplier. Energy analysts say Aramco’s ability to keep production steady despite ongoing security risks is crucial for maintaining stability in global oil markets. They also believe the company’s latest results highlight investor confidence and the resilience of Saudi Arabia’s energy sector amid continued regional uncertainty.

  • | |

    Zelensky says Russia deploying North Korean missil…

    Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said Russia used North Korean missiles in overnight strikes on Zaporizhzhia that killed at least six people and injured 19 others, as both sides continued exchanging attacks across the front line. In a video address Monday evening, Zelensky said Russia has reached a point where it “cannot wage war without reinforcements from North Korea” for the first time. He warned that continued use of North Korean missiles and troops inside Ukraine and across Europe allows Pyongyang to identify and fix weaknesses in its weapons systems, calling this a growing danger that extends beyond the immediate conflict. Zaporizhzhia regional governor Ivan Fedorov shared images of burning vehicles and damaged buildings, saying Russian forces struck the city with missiles and guided bombs. He said the attack damaged industrial sites, infrastructure and non residential buildings across the city, in addition to causing casualties. The strikes followed a separate wave of Ukrainian drone attacks that killed at least 13 people, including a child, in Russia’s republic of Tatarstan, located more than 1,100 kilometers, or roughly 680 miles, from the Ukrainian border. Ukraine’s Armed Forces said the strikes hit the city’s Tanevo oil refinery, and verified social media footage showed large plumes of smoke and daytime flames at the site as air raid sirens sounded nearby. Officials said at least 75 people were injured in that attack, which ranks among the deadliest single strikes on Russian territory since the full scale invasion began in 2022. Uzbekistan’s consulate in Tatarstan said seven of those killed held Uzbek citizenship. In Kyiv, air raid sirens sounded twice overnight and explosions struck the outskirts of the capital, sparking fires and injuring one person. A strike also damaged a hospital in the city, though officials said staff and patients had already moved to shelter. Separate strikes on power substations in Kherson and Kharkiv caused outages in both cities. In Sumy, a Russian drone strike injured two women, aged 52 and 66, according to Sergiy Kryvosheenko, head of the Sumy City Military Administration. He said both were treated at the scene and that the strike also damaged civilian vehicles, warehouse buildings and other infrastructure. Ukrainian officials said Russia launched 120 drones overnight along with a mix of missile types, though for the first time authorities did not disclose how many missiles were fired or intercepted. The omission followed a statement from Ukraine’s Air Force on Monday asking media outlets to avoid sensationalized coverage or pessimistic framing regarding the country’s shortage of air defence interceptors. Ukraine also struck Russian territory overnight, hitting warehouses belonging to online retailer Wildberries in the Voronezh region in southern Russia. Wildberries, often described as Russia’s answer to Amazon, has faced repeated attacks on its facilities in recent weeks. The company has not confirmed the latest strike but said it evacuated facilities in the border region as a precaution. In July, Ukrainian drone strikes on several Wildberries warehouses disrupted operations for a large number of small and medium sized Russian businesses. Kyiv said at the time that it was targeting logistics hubs Russian buyers used to acquire military equipment, part of a broader effort to disrupt supply lines feeding the Russian military. In his Monday address, Zelensky also praised a separate strike on a Russian petrochemical plant in western Siberia, calling it a significant achievement for Ukraine’s military. He pledged additional long range Ukrainian strikes intended to convince Russia and the Russian public that peace remains necessary. This is not the first time Zelensky has raised alarm over North Korean military support for Russia. He said over the weekend that as many as 50,000 North Korean soldiers have been deployed to fight alongside Russian forces, part of a growing pattern of cooperation between Moscow and Pyongyang that Ukrainian officials say is reshaping the battlefield and raising broader security concerns well beyond the immediate conflict.

  • | | | |

    Trump furious over US weapons shortages as Iran te…

    WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump has grown increasingly angry over reports that the country’s stockpile of key munitions has been significantly depleted during the conflict with Iran, fearing the disclosures could undermine Washington’s leverage as he pushes Tehran toward a deal. Senior US officials told CNN that the issue became a major point of discussion during a Cabinet meeting at Camp David last week. Trump was reportedly frustrated not only by the shortages but by the publication of details about US weapons inventories at a sensitive moment in the conflict. Several officials said Trump had known for months that certain munitions were in limited supply and was not surprised by the underlying situation. His concern, they said, was that public reporting could weaken the image of US military strength while he threatens further action against Iran. Trump sought to push back publicly, saying the United States has “massive amounts” of munitions and that weapons production is expanding. He also threatened severe punishment for officials responsible for leaking classified or sensitive information. However, Trump acknowledged in remarks at the White House that some advanced weapons are in tighter supply, while insisting there is a virtually unlimited supply of less sophisticated weaponry. White House officials said Trump has not blamed Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth for the situation and continues to express confidence in his leadership. Instead, the president has directed the Justice Department to investigate what he described as “treasonous” leaks from within his administration. The concerns have intensified after reports indicated that US forces have used a large share of their air-defence interceptors since the conflict began. CNN reported that the military had consumed nearly four-fifths of its pre-war THAAD missile inventory and about half of its Patriot interceptors. The reported shortages have also alarmed US partners in the Gulf, many of whom rely heavily on American air-defence systems. Regional officials have warned that reduced US stocks could make it harder to defend against potential Iranian missile and drone attacks if Washington launches further strikes. Iran has reportedly warned Gulf countries that renewed US attacks could trigger retaliation against energy infrastructure and desalination facilities across the region. Trump has spoken with leaders in Qatar and Saudi Arabia as his administration weighs its next steps. Senior military advisers have repeatedly raised concerns about dwindling stocks during discussions over potential escalation. The issue predates the current crisis. US military leaders had warned before the war that a prolonged campaign could strain American weapons supplies, particularly after years of support for Israel and Ukraine. Trump has blamed the previous administration for contributing to depleted stockpiles through weapons deliveries to Ukraine, while also acknowledging that the United States needs greater reserves. The administration has moved to expand production, including invoking the Defense Production Act and meeting with major defence contractors such as Lockheed Martin. However, officials acknowledge that expanding weapons manufacturing capacity could take years, meaning increased production may not immediately solve the shortage.

  • | | |

    Trump criticizes oil companies over high profits a…

    US President Donald Trump has criticized major oil companies over their growing profits, saying that energy firms are earning excessive amounts of money amid rising fuel prices. His remarks come as global oil markets face uncertainty due to geopolitical tensions and disruptions affecting energy supplies. Speaking to reporters at the White House, Trump said he supports free markets but expressed dissatisfaction with what he described as unusually high earnings by oil companies. He stated that while businesses have the right to operate freely, current market conditions have allowed some energy companies to generate profits beyond what he considers reasonable. The increase in crude oil prices has significantly boosted the revenues of several major energy companies worldwide. Market uncertainty linked to tensions between the United States and Iran has contributed to higher oil prices, creating favorable conditions for large oil producers and companies. Saudi Arabia’s state-owned oil giant Saudi Aramco reported a significant increase in quarterly profit, announcing earnings of $33.4 billion, compared with $25.2 billion during the same period last year. This represents a substantial rise in profits. US-based energy companies have also recorded strong financial results. ExxonMobil reported quarterly earnings of $14.5 billion, more than double compared with the previous year. Meanwhile, Chevron posted a profit of $12.1 billion, marking a significant increase from the same period previously. British energy company Shell also reported nearly $10 billion in quarterly profits, making it one of the company’s strongest financial performances in recent years. While energy companies benefit from higher crude oil prices, consumers in the United States have faced increased fuel costs. Average petrol prices have risen significantly since the beginning of the conflict-related market disruptions, adding further pressure on households already dealing with inflation. Fuel prices have become a major political issue ahead of the upcoming midterm elections. Lowering petrol costs has emerged as a key priority for the Trump administration, as high energy prices often influence public opinion and economic sentiment. A major factor behind the rise in oil prices has been disruption in key shipping routes, including the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s most important energy corridors. Reduced oil transportation through the region has affected global supply and contributed to market volatility. Although diplomatic efforts have reportedly aimed at reducing tensions and improving shipping access, uncertainty remains in global energy markets. Security concerns in the Red Sea and Bab el-Mandeb Strait have also affected oil transportation routes. Energy analysts believe that major oil companies may continue benefiting from elevated prices in the short term. However, they suggest that increased global supply or improved conditions in strategic waterways could eventually push crude oil prices lower. The ongoing debate highlights the challenge faced by governments worldwide: balancing energy company profits, market stability, and the need to provide affordable fuel for consumers.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *