launches countrywide protests
| |

JI launches countrywide protests against inflation

ByJustpaste.in

Jamaat-e-Islami (JI) is holding nationwide demonstrations on Friday against the petroleum levy, rising fuel prices and inflation.

The party has announced protests and sit-ins in major cities and districts across the country. Demonstrations are scheduled to begin at 4pm.

According to the party, protests will be held along hundreds of major roads and highways in around 170 districts. Karachi, Lahore, Islamabad, Quetta, Peshawar, Faisalabad and Rawalpindi are among the cities where demonstrations have been planned.

Several major locations have also been selected for sit-ins. These include Qurtaba Chowk in Lahore, Stop No. 26 in Islamabad, Mian Ghundi Chowk in Quetta and the Toll Plaza in Peshawar.

Other protest points include Bosan Road in Multan, the Indus Highway in Karak, CPEC Chowk in Bannu and the Chakdara interchange.

JI leaders have warned that the protest campaign could be expanded if authorities attempt to prevent the demonstrations. The party said the number of roads and highways involved could increase significantly.

In Karachi, JI leaders said protest caravans would begin moving from several locations at 4pm. These include Shahrah-e-Pakistan, Hub Road, National Highway, Super Highway, Orangi, Korangi, Pakistan Chowk and Sher Shah.

The caravans are expected to gather at Mazar-e-Quaid before moving towards Shahrah-e-Faisal.

Karachi JI chief Monem Zafar Khan said the demonstrations would continue until the petroleum levy was withdrawn. He said roads along some protest routes could remain closed during the demonstrations.

He added that emergency vehicles, including ambulances, would be allowed to pass.

JI Emir Hafiz Naeemur Rehman had called for the nationwide action a day earlier. In a video message, he urged citizens to join the peaceful demonstrations and asked motorists to park their cars and motorcycles on roads at 4pm.

The JI leadership has criticised the government over fuel-related taxes and the rising cost of essential goods. The party says ordinary citizens are facing increasing financial pressure because of higher fuel prices and indirect taxation.

Hafiz Naeem also claimed that prices of several food items had increased over the past month. He said motorcycle users and other low-income citizens were particularly affected by higher fuel costs.

The JI chief argued that people who do not fall within the formal income-tax system are also paying taxes through fuel levies and other indirect charges.

He claimed the government collected around Rs1.9 trillion through the petroleum levy during the past year. The party has warned that further taxation could increase the burden on households if the government does not reconsider its policies.

JI leaders are calling on citizens to participate in the protests and press the government to withdraw the petroleum levy

Similar Posts

  • Thailand’s Bold Plan to Shrink the Civil Service: Will It Work?

    ByJustpaste.in

    BANGKOK – Thailand’s central government is pushing an ambitious plan to shrink its massive public workforce. Officials want to encourage civil servants as young as 40 to take voluntary early retirement. However, critics worry this bold strategy might do more harm than good to the country. Deputy Prime Minister Pakorn Nilprapunt recently shared the details […]

  • | |

    English Football to trial new rule to eliminate go…

    ByJustpaste.in

    English football will implement a trial this season aimed at eradicating the increasingly common practice of goalkeepers feigning injury to secure tactical timeouts, with teams required to temporarily remove an outfield player if their keeper receives treatment . The Football Association, Premier League, English Football League, National League, and Women’s Super League have agreed on the measure, with permission granted by the International Football Association Board (IFAB) . The first game to feature the trial will be the Carabao Cup preliminary round tie between Tranmere and Rochdale on Saturday . Under the new protocol, if a referee signals for a physio to treat a goalkeeper, the team’s coach will have 10 seconds to nominate an outfield player to leave the pitch for one minute after play restarts, informing the fourth official of their choice . If no player is selected within 10 seconds, the captain must leave the field . The tactic of goalkeepers going down for treatment allowing coaches to deliver instructions to outfield players gathered on the touchline has become increasingly controversial in recent seasons . Leeds United fans regularly booed opposing goalkeepers for such delays last season, and the practice has been used to disrupt momentum when opponents are on top . Pro Ref, led by chief refereeing officer Howard Webb, had been in discussions with the leagues to address the issue . English football opted for this trial because it follows the logic already applied to outfield players, who must leave the field for one minute if the physio comes on . The measure is intended as a proactive deterrent rather than a reactive punishment . There are several exemptions: no player will have to leave if the goalkeeper says they do not need treatment and have not stopped play, if the goalkeeper and an outfield player have collided, if the goalkeeper is fouled and needs immediate treatment, if the goalkeeper is bleeding, or if there is a serious injury requiring substitution or concussion . Match of the Day pundit Danny Murphy had previously suggested this exact solution, saying: “If a keeper goes down injured, instead of him having to go off, one of the outfield players should go off then it’s fair all round. It’s a little change that makes a world of difference.” The Australian A-League will trial a variation where the captain must always leave the field . The results of the trials will be assessed by IFAB throughout the season, potentially leading to a permanent global law change from the 2027-28 season .

  • | |

    ECP begins Islamabad local polls preparations

    ByJustpaste.in

    The Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) has started the delimitation process for holding local government elections in Islamabad. The commission said the formal process will begin on August 1, 2026, and will continue until October 13, 2026. The delimitation of constituencies is a major step before announcing the election schedule. An ECP spokesperson said that after the completion of the delimitation process and publication of the final constituencies, the commission will consult the federal government regarding the date for Islamabad’s local government elections. The spokesperson also shared updates about local government elections in Punjab and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. In Punjab, delimitation authorities have been directed to submit their decisions to the relevant committees by August 7. The final delimitation list for the province will be published on August 17. The ECP said it is fully prepared to conduct local government elections in Punjab after completing all necessary legal requirements and consultations. Regarding Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, the commission said delimitation has been completed in 23 districts, while work is continuing in seven more districts. The spokesperson said the ECP held discussions with the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa chief secretary and local government secretary on July 14 about the election schedule. Provincial authorities were given additional time after requesting support for completing arrangements. The commission said recent amendments to the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Local Government Act created legal issues that affected the delimitation process. The ECP informed the provincial government about these concerns and sought cooperation to resolve the matter. The spokesperson said the commission has faced delays in local government elections because federal and provincial governments often change local government laws close to election dates. He said the ECP has repeatedly completed delimitation exercises and prepared election schedules, but changes in legal frameworks affect the process. The commission recommended that major changes to local government laws and boundaries should be completed at least one year before elections. It said this would help ensure a smooth and timely electoral process.

  • | | | |

    Trump weighs massive strike on Iran

    ByJustpaste.in

    US President Donald Trump is considering launching a new large-scale military operation against Iran, raising fears of a further escalation in tensions across the Middle East. According to reports, the proposed operation could be larger than previous US military strikes carried out against Iranian targets earlier this year. Trump said he was close to making a decision but stressed that no final order had been issued. He said the United States was fully prepared to act if necessary and claimed military plans were already in place. US officials, however, said no formal authorization for a new attack has yet been given. The US president also said Israel could join any future military operation if requested, although he maintained that American forces were capable of carrying out such an operation on their own. Trump accused Iran of refusing to accept the latest diplomatic proposal presented through mediation efforts. He claimed Tehran was delaying negotiations despite increasing military and economic pressure. The remarks came amid continued efforts by international mediators to prevent the conflict from expanding. The US president also warned that Washington would hold Iran directly responsible if Yemen’s Houthi movement launched further attacks on commercial shipping. His warning followed Houthi claims that they had targeted two Saudi oil tankers in the Red Sea using missiles and drones. Trump said any future attacks on commercial vessels would trigger a strong military response against both the Houthis and Iran. He accused Tehran of supporting the armed group and said the United States would not tolerate threats to international shipping routes. Iran responded sharply to the US statements. Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei warned American military personnel against targeting civilian infrastructure, saying attacks on facilities such as bridges and power stations would violate international law. He stressed that military personnel remain legally responsible for carrying out unlawful orders. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Washington’s main objective remains preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. He accused Tehran of repeatedly violating previous agreements and said the Iranian leadership continued to support armed groups across the Middle East instead of addressing domestic economic challenges. Rubio also urged Yemen’s Houthis to avoid becoming more deeply involved in the regional conflict. He said further attacks on Saudi Arabia or international shipping would only increase instability and could trigger broader military action. Meanwhile, Oman said it is working with Saudi Arabia, regional partners and the United Nations to revive Yemen’s political peace process. Omani officials called for restraint from all sides and emphasized the importance of protecting freedom of navigation in the Red Sea. Regional tensions continued to grow as Bahrain activated emergency warning sirens following reports of a possible Iranian attack. Authorities advised residents to remain calm and move to safe locations, although no casualties or damage were immediately reported. Jordan’s armed forces also announced that their air defence systems had intercepted several missiles and drones over the past 24 hours. Military officials said three missiles and six drones were destroyed before reaching populated areas, while another missile landed in an uninhabited location without causing damage. The Houthis said they carried out missile and drone attacks on two Saudi oil tankers as part of what they described as a maritime blockade. Shipping companies have already begun changing routes to avoid the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, increasing concerns over global oil supplies and international trade. Iranian military officials warned that if US attacks continue, Tehran will introduce new military strategies designed to make future operations more difficult for its opponents.

  • | | |

    President delays assent for 19 high court judges

    ByJustpaste.in

    The appointment of 19 additional judges to four high courts remains pending as President Asif Ali Zardari has yet to approve the summary. The Judicial Commission of Pakistan (JCP) approved the nominations during meetings held on July 20 and 21. The proposed appointments involve the Lahore High Court, Sindh High Court, Balochistan High Court and Islamabad High Court. Nine days have passed since the JCP approved the nominations. However, the president has not yet given his assent to the summary. The delay has caused concern within the government. A senior cabinet member questioned why the approval had not yet been granted. The official argued that the summary was initiated by the JCP rather than the prime minister. Therefore, according to the government’s position, the president could not send it back to the prime minister for reconsideration. The official also warned that continued inaction could create further tension within the superior judiciary. The government’s legal team is reportedly examining possible options to address the issue. The matter has also exposed differences between the government and the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP). According to government officials, the PPP leadership is unhappy with the JCP because some of its preferred nominees were not considered for judicial appointments. The PPP had shown particular interest in securing the appointment of two candidates to the Sindh High Court. However, neither the judicial nor executive members of the JCP supported their nominations. Officials said the candidates were below the age of 45. Both government and judicial representatives reportedly agreed that nominees below that age should not be approved. PPP Senator Farooq H Naek, a senior legal figure and member of the JCP, had proposed 33 candidates for the four high courts. His proposed list included 16 candidates for the Sindh High Court, 10 for the Lahore High Court, five for the Balochistan High Court and two for the Islamabad High Court. A member of the commission said the PPP could potentially have secured appointments for other candidates from interior Sindh. Some of those candidates were considered sympathetic to the party. However, the commission member claimed that the party’s insistence on its two preferred nominees affected the outcome. The dispute comes amid wider political and judicial developments involving Sindh. JCP judicial members have already reached a consensus on the performance of constitutional benches in the Sindh High Court. The judges serving on those benches were given three months to demonstrate their performance. The commission’s judicial members also opposed the confirmation of Sindh High Court Additional Judge Syed Fiaz ul Hassan Shah. The development was viewed by some political circles as another setback for the PPP. The party has historically sought influence over judicial appointments in Sindh and other provinces. Last year, the PPP was able to influence appointments in several high courts, including the Sindh High Court, Peshawar High Court and Lahore High Court. The judicial landscape has also changed following the 27th Constitutional Amendment. After the amendment, Justice K K Agha was elevated to the newly established Federal Constitutional Court. Another judge of the Sindh High Court was transferred to the Islamabad High Court.

  • |

    US Court blocks Trump plan to end immigrant work permits

    ByJustpaste.in

    BOSTON: A US federal judge has temporarily blocked the Trump administration from enforcing a policy that would have revoked work permits for thousands of immigrants and asylum seekers across the United States. The ruling allows affected individuals to continue working legally while the legal challenge against the policy proceeds in federal court. The decision was issued by US District Judge Nathaniel Gorton in Boston after immigrant rights organizations and labor unions filed a lawsuit challenging the administration’s immigration measures. The judge ruled that the policy should not take effect until the court fully reviews its legality. The disputed policy was introduced as part of the Trump administration’s broader immigration agenda following legislation passed by Congress in 2025. The law imposed new fees on asylum applications and introduced stricter rules governing employment authorization for people protected under Temporary Protected Status (TPS). If implemented, the new policy would have affected tens of thousands of immigrants who are legally living in the United States under humanitarian protections. Many of them were at risk of losing their legal right to work, making it difficult to support themselves and their families. Among those expected to be affected are TPS holders from El Salvador, Sudan, and Ukraine, many of whom have lived and worked in the United States for years. The policy was scheduled to come into effect this week before the federal court stepped in to halt its enforcement. The lawsuit argued that the US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) acted unlawfully by implementing the new restrictions without following the proper legal process. The plaintiffs said the policy would cause severe financial hardship for thousands of families and disrupt businesses that rely on legally authorized immigrant workers. Judge Gorton’s order temporarily prevents federal authorities from cancelling work permits while the case remains under judicial review. The ruling does not permanently strike down the policy but ensures that existing work authorizations remain valid until the court reaches a final decision. The Trump administration has consistently pursued tougher immigration policies, including efforts to end Temporary Protected Status for people from several countries. Officials argue that TPS was intended as a temporary humanitarian measure and should not become a permanent immigration pathway. Earlier this year, the US Supreme Court allowed the administration to move forward with ending TPS protections for certain groups of Haitian and Syrian immigrants. However, the latest ruling prevents another major immigration measure from taking immediate effect. Immigrant advocacy groups welcomed the court’s decision, saying it protects vulnerable workers from losing their jobs and income while the legal dispute continues. They argued that the ruling provides temporary relief to thousands of families facing uncertainty over their future.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *