lab report finds
| | |

Lab report finds 176 substandard samples of oil, g…

ISLAMABAD: A laboratory assessment has found that 176 out of 491 samples of packaged edible oil, ghee and milk failed to meet national quality standards.

According to a statement issued by the Ministry of Planning, a total of 491 samples of packaged cooking oil, ghee and milk products were tested. Of these, 315 samples were found to comply with national standards, while 176 were declared substandard.

The ministry said approximately 36% of the tested samples failed to meet the required quality standards.

The assessment showed significant variations across different products. Of the 204 samples of vanaspati ghee tested, 98 were found to be below the required standards.

Similarly, 40 out of 146 samples of blended cooking oil failed the quality assessment, while 26 of 104 samples of packaged liquid milk were declared substandard.

The report also found quality concerns in milk powder, refined palm oil and refined canola oil. Eight of the 18 milk powder samples failed to meet national standards, while three of four refined palm oil samples were found to be substandard.

In the case of refined canola oil, one out of 13 tested samples did not meet the required standards.

The findings have highlighted concerns over the quality of commonly consumed food products and the need for stronger monitoring and enforcement to ensure that packaged edible oils, ghee and dairy products available in the market comply with national quality requirements.

Similar Posts

  • | |

    Khwaja Asif says Mohsin Naqvi is government’s mo…

    ISLAMABAD: Defence Minister Khawaja Asif has stirred fresh political debate after claiming that Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi is the most powerful minister in the federal government and, in several matters, is not even answerable to Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif. Speaking during a television interview on Monday, Asif delivered unusually candid remarks about Naqvi’s role in the current administration, suggesting that the interior minister operates outside the conventional framework of the federal cabinet. According to Asif, Naqvi has remained largely absent from the government’s routine decision-making process despite holding one of the country’s most influential portfolios. He said he had seen the interior minister attend only “two or three” cabinet meetings since the government took office. The defence minister also questioned Naqvi’s parliamentary presence, claiming the interior minister had appeared in Parliament only seven or eight times. He suggested that if a minister with such influence was publicly expressing dissatisfaction with the existing governance structure, it reflected poorly on the entire government. “If Mohsin Naqvi himself is complaining about the system, then perhaps we should simply go home,” Asif remarked, underscoring what he described as deep institutional weaknesses. His comments came in response to Naqvi’s recent statement warning that Pakistan’s current administrative structure had become too weak to effectively address the country’s long-standing challenges. The interior minister had argued that if the existing governance model continued unchanged, Pakistan could still be facing the same problems a decade from now. He maintained that creating new administrative units or provinces had become essential for improving governance, accelerating development and delivering public services more efficiently. Naqvi said the existing system had outlived its usefulness and was no longer capable of resolving the country’s growing administrative and governance issues. Asif’s remarks have added a new dimension to the ongoing debate over institutional reforms and the balance of power within the federal government. His observations also highlight differing perspectives within the ruling coalition on how Pakistan’s governance challenges should be addressed. The exchange between the two senior ministers is likely to fuel further political discussion, particularly over proposals to create new provinces and reform the country’s administrative framework—an issue that has periodically resurfaced in Pakistan’s political discourse but has remained politically contentious for years.

  • | | |

    Rising energy costs expand trade deficit

      Pakistan’s trade deficit widened considerably in July 2026 as increasing energy prices pushed the country’s import bill higher, despite continued growth in exports. According to data released by the Pakistan Bureau of Statistics (PBS), the trade gap reached $3.95 billion, representing an increase of more than 25 percent compared with $3.15 billion recorded in July 2025. The official figures revealed that imports increased by nearly 18 percent on a year-on-year basis, while exports also recorded an encouraging rise of almost 10 percent during the same period. Although export earnings improved, they were insufficient to offset the rapid increase in import payments. Saad Hanif, Head of Research at Ismail Iqbal Securities, said the latest figures indicate that Pakistan’s demand for imported goods remains strong. According to him, economic activity has continued to recover, resulting in higher import volumes across several sectors. He noted that the country’s reliance on imported products has remained significant despite efforts to improve the trade balance. Import payments climbed to $6.89 billion in July, compared with $5.84 billion during the same month last year. Hanif explained that the main reason behind the sharp increase was the rise in global energy prices, particularly due to ongoing tensions in the Middle East. He said petroleum products and Re-gasified Liquefied Natural Gas (RLNG) became around 40 to 50 percent more expensive than they were a year earlier. Since Pakistan depends heavily on imported fuel, energy purchases typically account for between one-fifth and one-quarter of the country’s total import expenditure. In addition, higher imports of automobiles, industrial equipment and agricultural machinery also contributed to the increase in the import bill. Exports, however, showed positive momentum. Pakistan earned $2.94 billion from exports in July, compared with $2.68 billion in the corresponding month of 2025. Hanif attributed this improvement mainly to stronger food exports, especially rice, which regained momentum in international markets. He also highlighted that the textile industry continues to be Pakistan’s largest export sector, contributing more than half of the country’s total export earnings. Textile exports remained stable throughout the previous fiscal year, helping maintain overall export performance. When compared with the previous month, Pakistan’s trade position showed some improvement. The trade deficit had reached $4.66 billion in June 2026 but narrowed by more than 15 percent in July. This improvement was largely driven by a remarkable 31 percent monthly increase in exports, one of the strongest monthly gains recorded in recent years, while import payments remained almost unchanged. The Ministry of Finance described the development as a positive beginning to the new fiscal year and linked it to government measures aimed at supporting exports, improving industrial productivity and reducing the cost of doing business. Meanwhile, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif has directed authorities to accelerate the privatisation of state-owned electricity distribution companies by attracting reputable international investors. During a review meeting in Islamabad, he instructed the Privatisation Commission to complete its restructuring within one month and ensure that the entire process follows international standards, transparent procedures and fixed timelines. He also stressed that consumer interests should remain fully protected throughout the privatisation process. The prime minister welcomed the positive response received during recent investor roadshows held in Pakistan, Turkey, Saudi Arabia and China for the first-phase privatisation of Gepco, Fesco and Iesco. He further instructed the Privatisation Commission to recruit qualified professionals in finance, law and information technology to strengthen its institutional capacity. In addition, he ordered the establishment of an effective grievance mechanism to address consumer complaints after the companies are transferred to private ownership. The government expects bidding for the three electricity distribution companies to take place between October and December 2026, with the aim of attracting investment from Gulf and other Asian markets.

  • Thai Birth Certificate Fraud Involving Chinese Spreads as Officials Dig Deeper

    NAKHON RATCHASIMA — An investigation into fraudulent Thai birth certificates involving Chinese nationals has uncovered 28 additional cases — including six sets of twins — as authorities dig deeper into a widening scandal that has now implicated officials in multiple provinces. Bangladeshi Woman Arrested at Phuket Airport With Cocaine and Forged Documents Kittipong Pongsurawet, the […]

  • Pakistan says no date fixed yet for new US-Iran talks

    President Donald Trump lashed out on Monday after Iran denied it was holding talks with the United States. He declared in an angry social media post that the American military blockade would continue until there was a deal or what he called total surrender. Trump called Iran duplicitous for openly saying it was not negotiating. He wrote that whether Iran wants to admit it or not, the two sides are talking about a problem that Iran has caused for decades. His post came after Iran denied direct talks were happening, even though Trump had said talks would occur when he called off a threatened bombing campaign over the weekend. Iran’s foreign ministry said on Monday that its only talks were with Oman, focused on sharing control of the Strait of Hormuz, a critical route for global oil trade. Trump insisted Iran had asked for talks, but was now giving what he called usual excuses about controlling Hormuz. He said the strait is already fully controlled by the US Navy, and that nothing would pass through unless Iran agreed to a deal or surrendered completely. Trump launched the war against Iran together with Israel in February. The original goals included destroying Iran’s nuclear industry and missile programs. Pakistani officials told Turkish news agency Anadolu that no date or location has yet been finalised for the resumption of direct US-Iran talks. A senior Pakistani official said no meeting is scheduled in Islamabad within the next day. Pakistani and Qatari mediators remain in contact with both Washington and Tehran to arrange the next round of talks. Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi is expected to visit Tehran soon to discuss reviving negotiations under the Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding, which was signed on June 17. Sources said the first phase of talks would focus on restoring the ceasefire and returning to the situation before hostilities resumed on July 9, rather than addressing the nuclear issue immediately. Under one proposal, Iran would reopen the Strait of Hormuz while the US would lift its blockade of Iranian ports. According to a CNN report, a senior US Central Command officer sent an email to military analysts asking for creative and unconventional ideas to pressure and punish Iran. This unusual request suggests Washington may have limited options left to force Iran into an agreement. Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei repeated that Iran is not holding any current talks with the US. He said reaching an agreement with Oman would not be enough to reopen the strait as long as what he called American aggression continues. He also said the Strait of Hormuz will never return to its pre-war state. Tensions on the ground continued to rise. Iran’s Revolutionary Guard said it shot down a US drone over the Strait of Hormuz. Several oil tankers rerouted away from the Bab al-Mandab Strait to avoid attacks by Yemeni forces, adding millions of dollars to shipping costs. An explosion was also reported near a tanker off the coast of Oman. Israel launched two days of naval and ground military drills as regional tensions grew. Separately, Israel continued attacks on southern Lebanon despite an existing ceasefire, targeting several towns with drones and artillery. Iran also announced it had executed two people accused of spying for Israel’s Mossad intelligence agency. Meanwhile, Iran’s foreign minister held phone calls with Saudi Arabia and Pakistan’s military chief to discuss ongoing diplomatic efforts in the region.

  • | |

    Press freedom across South Asia

    Press freedom across South Asia faces significant structural constraints. Media environments throughout the region share a common historical legacy often relying on inherited colonial-era penal codes alongside modern cybersecurity legislation. However, the legal frameworks and regulatory instruments used to govern the press vary across neighboring countries. Comparative Analysis by Country  Pakistan Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA), Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act (PECA), and administrative policy frameworks like the Foreign Media Facilitation Guidelines. Media regulation in Pakistan relies heavily on administrative controls, licensing restrictions, and broad content advisories prohibiting coverage of sensitive political or national security subjects. While constitutional protections exist under Article 19, exceptions based on glory of Islam, national defense, and public order give authorities broad latitude to issue blackout orders, manage foreign correspondents’ mobility through No Objection Certificates (NOCs), and impose structural pressure on broadcast networks.  India Information Technology Rules (2021), Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Act, and the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA). While India possesses a large and diverse private media market, journalists increasingly face legal scrutiny under broad national security and anti-terror legislation. Amendments to digital media laws allow central authorities to demand the takedown of online content deemed harmful to state interests. Furthermore, criminal defamation suits and restrictions on access to conflict areas (such as Jammu & Kashmir) remain common mechanisms of regulatory pressure. Bangladesh Cyber Security Act (CSA)—which replaced the controversial Digital Security Act (DSA) and state information ministry directives. For years, non-bailable clauses in cybersecurity statutes were widely criticized by media watchdogs for chilling investigative reporting on corruption or state officials. Following recent political transitions, draft media reform policies have been introduced, though press operations remain tightly monitored during periods of political volatility and public unrest.  Sri Lanka Online Safety Act, Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA), and Official Secrets Act. Sri Lanka’s regulatory framework expanded significantly with the passage of the Online Safety Act, which created a government-appointed commission with sweeping powers to classify online content as false statements and order its removal. Critical reporting regarding state response to economic crises or wartime history continues to face legal and physical friction in sensitive provinces. Nepal: Press Council Act and National Mass Communications Policy. Nepal consistently ranks highest in South Asia on global press freedom indices, supported by a constitution that explicitly guarantees press rights without prior restraint. However, challenges persist regarding local government transparency, criminal defamation provisions, and proposed social media regulation bills that civil society groups fear could introduce licensing hurdles for digital outlets.  Afghanistan Direct directives issued by the Ministry for the Propagation of Virtue and the Prevention of Vice and the Ministry of Information and Culture. Following the political shift in 2021, independent journalism in Afghanistan has faced near-total suppression. Women journalists are largely banned from broadcasting, international news services face widespread blocking, and all local reporting is subject to strict pre-publication censorship. Common Trends Across the Region Across South Asia, governments are increasingly shifting control from traditional print/broadcast regulators toward cybersecurity, online safety, and data protection laws to monitor digital newsrooms and independent creators. Constitutional guarantees of free speech throughout South Asia uniformly contain broad public order and national defense exceptions, which states routinely cite to enforce reporting restrictions during regional crises. Beyond direct legal action, states across the region frequently utilize non-judicial levers such as withholding state advertising funds, slow-walking accreditation, or requiring special travel permits to shape editorial stances.

  • | |

    Pakistan Embassy in Ankara marks Kashmir Exploitat…

    The Embassy of Pakistan in Ankara commemorated Kashmir Exploitation Day with national spirit and dignity, reaffirming Pakistan’s unwavering support for the people of Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJK) and their right to self-determination. The event marked seven years since India’s August 5, 2019, decision to revoke the special constitutional status of Jammu and Kashmir. Participants reiterated solidarity with the Kashmiri people and called for a peaceful resolution of the dispute in accordance with United Nations Security Council resolutions. The ceremony was attended by prominent Turkish political leaders, diplomats, academics, members of parliament, representatives of think tanks, members of the diplomatic corps, media personnel, and members of the Pakistani and Turkish communities. The event began with the recitation of the Holy Quran, followed by special messages from President Asif Ali Zardari and Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif. The messages reaffirmed Pakistan’s support for the Kashmiri people’s struggle and urged the international community to play an effective role in implementing UN Security Council resolutions on the Kashmir dispute. Chairman of the Geopolitical Foresight Institute, retired Major General Goray Alpar, highlighted the strategic and geographical importance of Jammu and Kashmir. He said the people of Pakistan and Türkiye share deep historical, cultural, and brotherly ties. He also warned that India’s unilateral actions, constitutional changes, and attempts to use shared water resources as political leverage could threaten peace and stability across the region. SESRIC Director General and former Turkish minister Zehra Zümrüt Selçuk reaffirmed the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation’s principled stance on the Kashmir issue. She said a just and lasting solution could only be achieved by allowing the people of Kashmir to exercise their right to self-determination in line with UN Security Council resolutions. She also drew parallels between the situations in Kashmir and Palestine, urging the international community to fulfil its responsibilities in pursuing a fair and durable solution. Turkish parliamentarian and Deputy Chairman of the Felicity Party, Mustafa Kaya, strongly criticised India’s policies in Indian-administered Kashmir, describing them as “demographic terrorism.” He said efforts to alter the region’s demographic composition, deprive local residents of land rights, and implement settlement policies similar to those seen elsewhere would not suppress the Kashmiri people’s aspirations for freedom. In his concluding remarks, Pakistan’s Ambassador to Türkiye, Dr. Yousaf Junaid, thanked the Turkish government and people for their continued support on the Kashmir issue. He alleged that India was pursuing a policy of demographic change in the region by issuing millions of domicile certificates to non-local residents while maintaining restrictions on independent media and continuing state repression. The ambassador said India’s unilateral constitutional measures could not change the internationally recognised disputed status of Jammu and Kashmir. He stressed that lasting peace, security, and stability in South Asia depended on a just resolution of the Kashmir dispute and reiterated Pakistan’s call for a free, fair, and impartial UN-supervised plebiscite to allow the Kashmiri people to determine their political future.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *