mills 8220on liberty8221
|

Mill’s “On Liberty” in the era of censorship

In his 1859 political treatise On Liberty, Victorian philosopher John Stuart Mill issued this timeless warning. The greatest threat to humanity is not monarchical despotism, but the tyranny of the majority enforced through state power.

The Harm Principle

At the heart of Mill’s philosophy lies the Harm Principle. The radical assertion that authority can only be legitimately exercised over a member of a civilized community against their will to prevent harm to others. Beyond this minimal threshold, individual autonomy over mind, body, and speech must remain absolute.

Re-reading Mill today reveals a truth. His warnings are no longer abstract political theory. They provide a precise mirror for contemporary state overreach. This overreach is illustrated by the erosion of civil liberties in Indian-administered Kashmir and the systemic suppression of media outlets like Al Jazeera.

The Harm Principle and the Disfranchisement of Kashmir

Mill argued that suppressing individual self-determination degrades both the citizen and the state. In Kashmir, the unilateral revocation of constitutional autonomy, prolonged blackouts, and detentions of political leaders represent a case of majoritarian coercion. A state strips millions of their basic political rights under the justification of order or national integration. So, it violates the core of Millian liberty: consent and self-governance.

Mill cautioned against treating entire populations as passive subjects incapable of directing their own political destiny. By denying Kashmiris the freedom to assembly, political self-expression, and uninhibited digital communication, state machinery replaces organic democratic engagement with enforced compliance. In Mill’s framework, a government that fears the peaceful political expression of its people reveals the fragility of its own moral authority.

Ban on Al Jazeera

Mill’s second chapter, dedicated to freedom of thought provides the intellectual critique of state censorship. He argued that silencing an opinion is a unique crime against humanity because it presumes the state possesses infallibility. Even if an perspective is deemed antagonistic, banning it deprives the public of testing truth against error.

This principle directly challenges the recent enforcement of the Al Jazeera Law, under which the Israeli government shut down the Qatari broadcaster’s local operations, confiscated equipment, and blocked access to its platforms. Citing national security threats, state authorities effectively declared themselves the sole arbiters of acceptable news coverage. Mill would argue that invoking national security to silence reporting—especially during conflicts where independent oversight is most vital—is a classic instrument of state self-protection, not public safety. When a state decides which facts citizens and the international community are allowed to hear, it undermines the very foundation of a free society.

Why Mill Matters Today

 

On Liberty remains an indispensable framework because it demonstrates that liberty is not a luxury granted by governments, but an essential condition for truth and justice. Whether in the militarized silence enforced upon Kashmir or the legislative bans silencing journalists, the modern state increasingly employs legal mechanisms to enforce conformity. Mill reminds us that a society that trades fundamental liberties for state-defined security ultimately preserves neither.

Similar Posts

  • |

    Robot phone launch date announced for August 12

    Beijing – A Chinese company is set to introduce what is being described as the world’s first robot phone and its unique feature is likely to surprise many people. Robots are gradually becoming part of everyday human life and now a Chinese company has announced the launch of its first robot phone. According to foreign media reports, the company will launch the phone in China on August 12. Its most distinctive feature is its camera which is not fixed like the camera on a conventional smartphone. The phone features a unique robotic camera system that can rotate while recording videos offering movements similar to those of a professional camera. In addition, a special camera module is installed on the top of the phone. It can pop out when needed and rotate in different directions. The phone’s camera system does more than simply move. It also uses artificial intelligence (AI) to automatically track a person or object in front of it. Similarly, if someone is walking or recording a video, the camera can automatically follow their movements. This can make video recording smoother and give the footage a more cinematic appearance. The Chinese company has confirmed that the robot phone will feature a triple rear-camera setup. Its primary camera will have a resolution of 200 megapixels. This means the phone will not only be capable of taking high-resolution photos but will also be able to capture better images of objects from a distance.

  • Important of Diplomacy in Modern Conflicts

    By Dhani Bux Wassan Peace cannot be kept by force it can be achieved by understanding (Albert Einstein). In an increasingly interconnected world, disputes and tensions among nations have become more complex, involving geopolitical rivalries, ethnic and religious conflicts, ideological differences, civil unrest, and cyber warfare. These challenges threaten global peace and stability, and destroy the hustle and bustle of cities, turning them into ashes. These assaults lead to violence against innocent people . Amidst humanitarian crises and violence, diplomacy plays a crucial role in maintaining global peace, stability, and mutual prosperity among nations. Diplomacy is the most effective way to mediate disputes among nations through negotiations and table talks, preventing major conflicts and saving thousands of innocent lives. It is a manifestation of wisdom and dialogue. Modern conflicts are far more violent and complex than traditional wars. They arise from the struggle for power, competition over resources, territorial disputes, political instability, nationalism, separatism, and economic inequality. These conflicts have transformed cities into ruins, leaving streets littered with debris and countless lives lost. Millions of people have been displaced, deprived of education, healthcare, and shelter, and forced to live in extreme poverty. They have also left mothers, fathers, sisters, brothers, and children waiting in vain for their loved ones who never returned from the battlefield. Now, let us turn our attention to the Israel–Palestine war. Since October 7, 2023, the conflict has continued for more than 1,000 days. According to the Gaza Health Ministry, more than 73,000 Palestinians have lost their lives, while millions have been displaced and face severe humanitarian conditions. Similarly, the Russia–Ukraine war has continued for more than 1,600 days. The conflict has destroyed homes, schools, hospitals, and vital infrastructure, forcing millions to flee their homes and seek refuge in neighboring countries. History reminds us that when regional conflicts escalate into world wars, the world loses its path to peace. The First and Second World Wars claimed millions of lives and devastated entire nations. If diplomacy fails and violence prevails, humanity risks repeating the tragedies of the past. Therefore, dialogue, cooperation, and peaceful negotiation remain the only sustainable path. As modern conflicts continue to grow the importance of diplomacy cannot be overstated. Diplomacy provides nations with a peaceful means of resolving disputes through dialogue and compromise rather than violence. It prevents misunderstandings from escalating into armed conflicts and helps build trust and cooperation among nations. Strong diplomatic relations create a stable environment that encourages economic growth, attracts foreign investment, expands trade, and creates employment opportunities. Moreover, diplomacy facilitates humanitarian assistance, strengthens regional cooperation, and promotes lasting peace.In an increasingly interconnected world, it remains the most effective instrument for achieving peace, stability, and shared prosperity. History demonstrate that diplomacy repeatedly succeeded where military cops failed .The Camp David Accords (1978) ended decades of hostility between Egypt and Israel, proving that persistent dialogue can transform long-standing enemies into peace partners. Similarly, the Good Friday Agreement (1998) brought an end to years of violence in Northern Ireland through negotiation and political compromise. The Dayton Peace Agreement (1995) ended the devastating Bosnian War, while the Indus Waters Treaty (1960) between Pakistan and India has endured despite multiple wars, demonstrating that diplomatic agreements can survive even during periods of intense political tension. These examples illustrate that meaningful dialogue, mutual respect, and sustained negotiations often achieve what military force cannot. As former UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan wisely observed, “More than ever before in human history, we share a common destiny. We can master it only if we face it together.” In modern world conflicts strengthening diplomacy is essential for building a peaceful, stable, and prosperous future. Governments should prioritize dialogue over confrontation, invest in skilled diplomacy, and promote mutual trust through regular communication. International organizations, regional alliances, and civil society also have an important role in facilitating peaceful negotiations and resolving disputes before they escalate into violence. At the same time, nations must uphold international law, respect sovereignty, and work together to address shared challenges such as climate change, terrorism and cyber threats. By embracing cooperation instead of conflict, diplomacy can prevent wars, protect human lives, and lay the foundation for lasting global peace and sustainable development. To conclude, diplomacy remains the cornerstone of peace and stability in an increasingly turbulent world. While modern conflicts have become more complex due to geopolitical rivalries, technological advancements, and transnational threats, dialogue and cooperation continue to offer the most effective path to lasting solutions. Military force may end battles, but only diplomacy can build enduring peace, restore trust, and promote mutual understanding among nations. As global challenges continue to transcend borders, the international community must strengthen diplomatic institutions, uphold international law, and foster a culture of cooperation. A peaceful and prosperous future depends not on the power of weapons, but on the wisdom of dialogue and the commitment to resolve differences through diplomacy. (The writer is Larkana Cadet College student)

  • Our Women Communicators of Tomorrow

    By Mehreen Imambaksh Throughout history, women have possessed powerful thoughts, deep emotions, and creative voices; yet, many of these voices have gone unnoticed. Their experiences were frequently limited to their homes, their abilities were questioned, and their intellectual development was neglected. However, literature, history, and social thought expose that women were capable of uttering knowledge, shaping culture, and influencing society, but patriarchal systems often restricted their visibility. For centuries, women were expected to remain silent in public intellectual areas. Their role was widely limited to household responsibilities, whereas education, authorship, and public speaking were dominated by men. Yet despite these barriers, many women endured to write, think, and challenge the systems that tried to silence them. One beautiful example can be found in the nineteenth century with the eminent novel *Wuthering Heights*, written by Emily Brontë (1847). Today the novel is considered one of the masterpieces in English literature. Moreover, Emily Brontë did not publish it under her original name; rather, she used the pen name Ellis Bell. Similarly, her sisters also adopted the same approaches. Charlotte Brontë published *Jane Eyre* under the name of Currer Bell, and Anne Brontë published *The Tenant of Wildfell Hall* under the name of Acton Bell. The reason behind these pen names was simple but widely revealing: society frequently refused to take women writers seriously. The Brontë sisters were highly imaginative and intellectually able, yet they felt pressured to hide their identities to ensure their work could be approved. Their circumstances examine the huge restrictions placed upon women’s voices during that time. Long before the Brontë sisters, early feminist thinkers had raised concerns about women’s lack of education and freedom. In 1792, Mary Wollstonecraft wrote *A Vindication of the Rights of Woman*, challenging that women should have equal access to education and intellectual opportunities. She said that women were treated as inferior in society not because they lacked capability, but because they were refused the chance to advance their minds. More than a century later, this problem was discussed again by Virginia Woolf in her masterpiece work *A Room of One’s Own* (1929). She famously argued that women in the past were refused both financial independence and private space, which restricted them from freely uttering knowledge. Therefore, she said a woman needs not merely talent but also freedom and equality to express her feelings and thoughts. Modern scholars have further examined how systems of knowledge can silence subaltern voices. In her essay “Can the Subaltern Speak?” (1988), Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak introduced the idea of epistemic violence, which means how dominant systems of knowledge remove or suppress the voices of certain groups, especially women and colonized communities. When women’s ideas are ignored or removed, their experiences are excluded from the production of knowledge, creating a form of intellectual oppression. These rooted examples depict that women’s silence was never because of a lack of intelligence or creativity. Instead, it was the result of social systems that demotivated or limited their role in participation in intellectual and public life. Even today, this evidence remains visible in many societies. In many cultures, women still hesitate to talk openly, particularly on public platforms or digital spaces. Furthermore, social expectations and fear of judgment frequently create unseen obstacles that prevent women from sharing their thoughts and feelings. This hesitation is not always enforced directly; sometimes it evolves internally due to long-standing social pressures. Moreover, I personally experienced this hesitation in my own life. For many years, I believed in the significance of women’s ability, yet I was not actively immersed in initiatives related to it. One cause for this was my anxiety about visibility on social media platforms to reveal my feelings and ideas because I feared how society, especially as a Baloch student, might react to a woman openly sharing her ideas. This anxiety is not unfamiliar. Many women feel unsure about expressing themselves publicly because they expect critique or misunderstanding. However, personal growth frequently begins with a small step. For me, that step was creating my social media platforms such as Medium, a LinkedIn profile, and starting to share my writings, including poems and reflections based on my experiences. At the start, this act felt common, yet slowly opened new chances. Through this visibility, I became connected with extensive intellectual and professional networks, which ultimately led me to become immersed in women’s ascension. Being involved in this initiative has allowed me to interact with women from various cultures, backgrounds, and perspectives. These interactions have been widely improving. They have shown me that when women communicate and share experiences across cultures, they create unique forms of understanding and collective growth. This experience shows that women’s empowerment does not always happen through major changes, but it begins slowly when women start to express themselves, engage in conversations, and share knowledge with others. Communication is one of the influential tools that helps women to connect their personal experiences with global discussions about equality and justice. However, change needs cooperation. Women’s power should not be seen as an effort between men and women. Instead, it should be perceived as a collaborative struggle to create a fair and inclusive society. Both men and women play a major role in supporting and motivating women’s voices. Traditionally, patriarchal societies frequently reduced women to limited roles, especially examining their function as a child-bearing machine. Whereas motherhood is an essential and valuable role, it should never define the entirety of a woman’s identity. Women have intellectual capabilities, creative skills, and leadership qualities that can contribute importantly to society. Education plays an essential role in changing these circumstances. When women receive education, they gain the confidence and knowledge necessary to contribute actively in social, economic, and intellectual life. Educated women are more capable of expressing their thoughts, challenging injustice, and participating in the development of their communities. Furthermore, the impact of women’s education extends beyond the individual. When women are educated, they can brighten their children’s lives and motivate the next generations to learn. Historically, when women

  • Smartwatch data may trigger anxiety

    Smartwatches have become popular health devices that can track heart rate sleep stress levels physical activity and recovery. While these features can help people understand their health better experts warn that relying too much on the numbers may lead to unnecessary anxiety. According to health experts the problem is not the smartwatch itself. The real issue begins when people trust the watch’s readings more than how they actually feel or the advice of a doctor. Nargiza Neumann Zander, founder of X Technology says health data is useful when it helps people make better choices. However it can become harmful if daily scores start controlling a person’s mood or decisions. One common sign of this is checking the smartwatch immediately after waking up instead of paying attention to how the body feels. Experts say people who naturally worry a lot try to be perfect or want to control everything are more likely to depend too much on smartwatch data.  A poor sleep score or low recovery rating may make someone think they are seriously ill even when there is no real medical problem. They also explain that smartwatch readings are based on algorithms and estimates not complete medical examinations. A low recovery score does not always mean a person is unhealthy because the human body gives many signals that wearable devices cannot fully measure. Constantly checking health data can also change people’s behavior. Normal changes such as temporary tiredness less sleep or a small increase in heart rate may be seen as signs of illness. As a result some people may skip exercise delay important tasks or believe they are not fit enough even though they are healthy. Heart specialists stress that smartwatches can increase health awareness but they should never replace professional medical advice. The devices can provide helpful information about heart rate sleep and activity but every reading should be understood in the context of a person’s overall health. Experts also note that movement poor sensor contact dehydration stress caffeine and environmental conditions can affect smartwatch readings. While a smartwatch may point to a possible issue only a qualified doctor can make a diagnosis after reviewing a patient’s medical history performing an examination and ordering any necessary tests. Health experts recommend focusing on long term improvements such as regular exercise better sleep and healthy daily habits instead of worrying about small day to day changes in smartwatch scores. People with conditions like high blood pressure diabetes or heart disease may benefit from monitoring certain health measures under a doctor’s guidance. They conclude that good health is not about getting the perfect smartwatch score every day. It is about maintaining long term physical and mental well being

  • | | |

    The silence of the state

    Al Jazeera’s digital domain was restricted in Pakistan following its critical coverage of regional unrest and local election turmoil. Pakistan had become the second country after Israel to ban the Qatari broadcaster. While the statement makes for a soundbite, it oversimplifies both history and the mechanics of state censorship. In reality, the history of sovereign states attempting to mute inconvenient journalism is long, systemic, and filled with precedent. The Reality Behind the Headlines The recent digital restrictions in Pakistan emerged after the network broadcast extensive ground coverage of civil protests, Internet shutdowns, and election-related violence in Pakistan-administered Kashmir. State authorities responded by accusing the international news organization of yellow journalism and selective reporting. Shortly after, users across the country reported that the network’s website had become inaccessible. Repeated bans on Al Jazeera However, this action makes Pakistan the first nation to follow Israel’s 2024 ban overlooks press suppression. Over the past two decades, Al Jazeera has faced repeated office closures, revocations and total broadcast bans across numerous jurisdictions. Egypt (2013): Following political upheaval, the government shut down the network’s local operations and detained several of its journalists under allegations of threat to national stability. The Gulf Blockade (2017): During a severe diplomatic rift, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, and Jordan blocked the channel’s signals and shuttered its regional bureaus. Israel (2024): Emergency legislation empowered authorities to halt local broadcasts, raid offices, and seize transmission equipment over national security claims. Far from being a rare sequel, the administrative impulse to silence an uncomfortable mirror is an old story retold. The Architecture of Banishment In literary traditions, the suppression of speech is rarely about the words themselves; it is about who holds the authority to define reality. George Orwell  observed in 1984 that the primary goal of totalitarian control is to limit the perimeter of thought by controlling the historical record. When a state apparatus brands unfavorable reporting as inherently fraudulent or subversive, it engages in an act of narrative containment. The label of yellow journalism becomes a rhetorical wall. This label shield the public from realities that disrupt official consensus. This dynamic reflects the bureaucratic absurdity depicted in Franz Kafka’s The Castle, where an elusive authority governs from above while remaining immune to direct questioning. In Kafka’s vision, the citizen is caught in a maze of unwritten rules and opaque decrees, where seeking transparency is treated as an act of insubordination. When digital portals are quietly restricted without formal public legislation or explicit judicial oversight, the state operates within a similarly Kafkaesque realm. The silence itself becomes an instrument of governance. The Illusion of Total Control There is a profound irony in modern media suppression. In classical literature, exile was absolute. A banished figure like Ovid was removed physically from the city center, their voice fading at the empire’s edges. Today, however, censorship in a hyper-connected world is an exercise in futility. Blocking a website or pulling a broadcast signal rarely extinguishes the narrative. Instead, it often draws greater international scrutiny to the very events the state wished to obscure. A phenomenon akin to the Streisand effect.   When governments resort to digital blockades, they reveal a fundamental fragility. True political stability rests on the capacity to withstand criticism.  To edit reality is like trying to stop the tide by breaking the hourglass. The water continues to rise, and the story, inevitably, finds another way to be told.

  • Anger control tips

    Do you often get angry over small things or take your frustration out on others?  If yes it may be time to pay attention. Health experts say frequent anger can affect both your mind and your body. Many people feel better after expressing their anger but they may not realize the damage it can cause. Experts say uncontrolled anger is linked to several health problems including heart disease digestive issues and poor sleep. Anger is a normal human emotion. In some situations it can motivate people to solve problems make better decisions and bring positive changes. However when anger becomes frequent or difficult to control it can harm both you and the people around you. Research suggests that intense anger can temporarily narrow blood vessels and affect how cells work increasing the risk of damage. It may also raise the chances of serious health problems such as heart attacks and strokes. •How to control anger Health experts recommend a few simple habits that can help you manage your emotions. •Stay physically active . •Regular exercise •improves sleep •reduces stress and •helps control emotions. If you feel your anger rising take a short break and step away from the situation until you feel calmer. Talk to someone you trust about your feelings instead of keeping everything inside. Practice yoga or relaxation exercises as they can improve both mental and physical well being. Learning to manage anger is not only good for your relationships it can also protect your long-term health.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *