mills 8220on liberty8221
|

Mill’s “On Liberty” in the era of censorship

In his 1859 political treatise On Liberty, Victorian philosopher John Stuart Mill issued this timeless warning. The greatest threat to humanity is not monarchical despotism, but the tyranny of the majority enforced through state power.

The Harm Principle

At the heart of Mill’s philosophy lies the Harm Principle. The radical assertion that authority can only be legitimately exercised over a member of a civilized community against their will to prevent harm to others. Beyond this minimal threshold, individual autonomy over mind, body, and speech must remain absolute.

Re-reading Mill today reveals a truth. His warnings are no longer abstract political theory. They provide a precise mirror for contemporary state overreach. This overreach is illustrated by the erosion of civil liberties in Indian-administered Kashmir and the systemic suppression of media outlets like Al Jazeera.

The Harm Principle and the Disfranchisement of Kashmir

Mill argued that suppressing individual self-determination degrades both the citizen and the state. In Kashmir, the unilateral revocation of constitutional autonomy, prolonged blackouts, and detentions of political leaders represent a case of majoritarian coercion. A state strips millions of their basic political rights under the justification of order or national integration. So, it violates the core of Millian liberty: consent and self-governance.

Mill cautioned against treating entire populations as passive subjects incapable of directing their own political destiny. By denying Kashmiris the freedom to assembly, political self-expression, and uninhibited digital communication, state machinery replaces organic democratic engagement with enforced compliance. In Mill’s framework, a government that fears the peaceful political expression of its people reveals the fragility of its own moral authority.

Ban on Al Jazeera

Mill’s second chapter, dedicated to freedom of thought provides the intellectual critique of state censorship. He argued that silencing an opinion is a unique crime against humanity because it presumes the state possesses infallibility. Even if an perspective is deemed antagonistic, banning it deprives the public of testing truth against error.

This principle directly challenges the recent enforcement of the Al Jazeera Law, under which the Israeli government shut down the Qatari broadcaster’s local operations, confiscated equipment, and blocked access to its platforms. Citing national security threats, state authorities effectively declared themselves the sole arbiters of acceptable news coverage. Mill would argue that invoking national security to silence reporting—especially during conflicts where independent oversight is most vital—is a classic instrument of state self-protection, not public safety. When a state decides which facts citizens and the international community are allowed to hear, it undermines the very foundation of a free society.

Why Mill Matters Today

 

On Liberty remains an indispensable framework because it demonstrates that liberty is not a luxury granted by governments, but an essential condition for truth and justice. Whether in the militarized silence enforced upon Kashmir or the legislative bans silencing journalists, the modern state increasingly employs legal mechanisms to enforce conformity. Mill reminds us that a society that trades fundamental liberties for state-defined security ultimately preserves neither.

Similar Posts

  • Our Women Communicators of Tomorrow

    By Mehreen Imambaksh Throughout history, women have possessed powerful thoughts, deep emotions, and creative voices; yet, many of these voices have gone unnoticed. Their experiences were frequently limited to their homes, their abilities were questioned, and their intellectual development was neglected. However, literature, history, and social thought expose that women were capable of uttering knowledge, shaping culture, and influencing society, but patriarchal systems often restricted their visibility. For centuries, women were expected to remain silent in public intellectual areas. Their role was widely limited to household responsibilities, whereas education, authorship, and public speaking were dominated by men. Yet despite these barriers, many women endured to write, think, and challenge the systems that tried to silence them. One beautiful example can be found in the nineteenth century with the eminent novel *Wuthering Heights*, written by Emily Brontë (1847). Today the novel is considered one of the masterpieces in English literature. Moreover, Emily Brontë did not publish it under her original name; rather, she used the pen name Ellis Bell. Similarly, her sisters also adopted the same approaches. Charlotte Brontë published *Jane Eyre* under the name of Currer Bell, and Anne Brontë published *The Tenant of Wildfell Hall* under the name of Acton Bell. The reason behind these pen names was simple but widely revealing: society frequently refused to take women writers seriously. The Brontë sisters were highly imaginative and intellectually able, yet they felt pressured to hide their identities to ensure their work could be approved. Their circumstances examine the huge restrictions placed upon women’s voices during that time. Long before the Brontë sisters, early feminist thinkers had raised concerns about women’s lack of education and freedom. In 1792, Mary Wollstonecraft wrote *A Vindication of the Rights of Woman*, challenging that women should have equal access to education and intellectual opportunities. She said that women were treated as inferior in society not because they lacked capability, but because they were refused the chance to advance their minds. More than a century later, this problem was discussed again by Virginia Woolf in her masterpiece work *A Room of One’s Own* (1929). She famously argued that women in the past were refused both financial independence and private space, which restricted them from freely uttering knowledge. Therefore, she said a woman needs not merely talent but also freedom and equality to express her feelings and thoughts. Modern scholars have further examined how systems of knowledge can silence subaltern voices. In her essay “Can the Subaltern Speak?” (1988), Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak introduced the idea of epistemic violence, which means how dominant systems of knowledge remove or suppress the voices of certain groups, especially women and colonized communities. When women’s ideas are ignored or removed, their experiences are excluded from the production of knowledge, creating a form of intellectual oppression. These rooted examples depict that women’s silence was never because of a lack of intelligence or creativity. Instead, it was the result of social systems that demotivated or limited their role in participation in intellectual and public life. Even today, this evidence remains visible in many societies. In many cultures, women still hesitate to talk openly, particularly on public platforms or digital spaces. Furthermore, social expectations and fear of judgment frequently create unseen obstacles that prevent women from sharing their thoughts and feelings. This hesitation is not always enforced directly; sometimes it evolves internally due to long-standing social pressures. Moreover, I personally experienced this hesitation in my own life. For many years, I believed in the significance of women’s ability, yet I was not actively immersed in initiatives related to it. One cause for this was my anxiety about visibility on social media platforms to reveal my feelings and ideas because I feared how society, especially as a Baloch student, might react to a woman openly sharing her ideas. This anxiety is not unfamiliar. Many women feel unsure about expressing themselves publicly because they expect critique or misunderstanding. However, personal growth frequently begins with a small step. For me, that step was creating my social media platforms such as Medium, a LinkedIn profile, and starting to share my writings, including poems and reflections based on my experiences. At the start, this act felt common, yet slowly opened new chances. Through this visibility, I became connected with extensive intellectual and professional networks, which ultimately led me to become immersed in women’s ascension. Being involved in this initiative has allowed me to interact with women from various cultures, backgrounds, and perspectives. These interactions have been widely improving. They have shown me that when women communicate and share experiences across cultures, they create unique forms of understanding and collective growth. This experience shows that women’s empowerment does not always happen through major changes, but it begins slowly when women start to express themselves, engage in conversations, and share knowledge with others. Communication is one of the influential tools that helps women to connect their personal experiences with global discussions about equality and justice. However, change needs cooperation. Women’s power should not be seen as an effort between men and women. Instead, it should be perceived as a collaborative struggle to create a fair and inclusive society. Both men and women play a major role in supporting and motivating women’s voices. Traditionally, patriarchal societies frequently reduced women to limited roles, especially examining their function as a child-bearing machine. Whereas motherhood is an essential and valuable role, it should never define the entirety of a woman’s identity. Women have intellectual capabilities, creative skills, and leadership qualities that can contribute importantly to society. Education plays an essential role in changing these circumstances. When women receive education, they gain the confidence and knowledge necessary to contribute actively in social, economic, and intellectual life. Educated women are more capable of expressing their thoughts, challenging injustice, and participating in the development of their communities. Furthermore, the impact of women’s education extends beyond the individual. When women are educated, they can brighten their children’s lives and motivate the next generations to learn. Historically, when women

  • YouTube adds custom thumbnails for shorts

    YouTube has launched a long awaited feature that allows creators to upload custom thumbnails for their YouTube Shorts. According to reports the new feature is currently available for creators who are part of the YouTube Partner Program (YPP). They can now choose and upload their own thumbnail images instead of relying on a frame from the video. This update gives creators more control over how their Shorts appear. They can design eye catching thumbnails that match their brand and make their videos more attractive to viewers. YouTube said custom thumbnails have been one of the platform’s most requested features. The company is rolling it out first to Partner Program members and plans to expand access to more creators in the future. Previously Shorts creators could only select a still frame from the video as the thumbnail making it harder to create a consistent look or build a strong brand identity. The new feature aims to solve that problem and improve the overall presentation of Shorts.

  • Kimchi may help remove microplastics

    Scientists are studying whether kimchi a popular Korean fermented food could help the body remove harmful microplastics. Early research suggests that certain beneficial bacteria found in kimchi may attach to tiny plastic particles during digestion making it easier for the body to remove them through waste. Microplastics are extremely small pieces of plastic that have already been found in human blood lungs and even the placenta. People can take them in through food drinking water and the air they breathe raising concerns about their possible health effects. In the study researchers examined a type of lactic acid bacteria taken from kimchi. They tested it in mice and found that animals given the probiotic passed nearly twice as many microplastic particles in their waste compared with those that did not receive it. Laboratory tests also showed that the bacteria attached to about 57% of the microplastic particles suggesting it may help remove them from the body. However researchers stressed that these findings are still preliminary.  The study does not prove that eating regular kimchi will have the same effect in humans. More clinical studies are needed before scientists can confirm whether kimchi or its beneficial bacteria can help reduce microplastics in the human body.

  • How much peanut butter is good for your bones?

    Peanut butter is more than just a tasty spread. Its creamy texture, protein and healthy nutrients make it a popular choice for snacks and smoothies. Surprisingly it may also support bone health. Strong bones are important for movement, strength and overall quality of life. As we get older poor eating habits and a less active lifestyle can increase the risk of bone weakness and conditions such as osteoporosis. Along with regular exercise getting the right nutrients from food can help keep bones healthy. Peanut butter can be one small part of a balanced diet. Nutrients in peanut butter that support bones Peanut butter contains several nutrients that may benefit bone health. Magnesium helps support bone development and strength. It also provides phosphorus, which is important for healthy bones and teeth. Peanut butter also contains zinc a mineral that plays a role in tissue repair and vitamin B6, which supports normal metabolism and other body functions. Another benefit is its protein content. Protein is important for building and maintaining bones and other body tissues. However peanut butter is not a major source of calcium so it should not replace calcium rich foods such as milk, yogurt or other suitable alternatives. How much peanut butter should you eat? Peanut butter can be healthy but portion size matters. It is easy to eat more than planned because of its rich taste and creamy texture. For most people, 1–2 tablespoons a day can be a reasonable amount depending on their overall diet and calorie needs. Can too much peanut butter cause weight gain? Peanut butter contains mostly unsaturated fats including monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fats.  These fats can be a healthier choice than some saturated fats. However peanut butter is also high in calories. Eating large amounts regularly can add extra calories to your diet and may contribute to weight gain. The right amount depends on your personal goal: For maintaining weight Around 1–2 tablespoons may be enough. For gaining weight: A larger portion may help increase calorie intake. For weight loss Smaller portions can help control calories while still providing protein and healthy fats. Tips Peanut butter can be a nutritious addition to a balanced diet and may support bone health through nutrients such as magnesium, phosphorus, zinc vitamin B6 and protein.

  • | | |

    Parliament should focus on Pakistan’s real c…

    Pakistan is an Islamic republic whose Constitution defines not only the structure of the state but also its ideological foundation. It explicitly states that the country should create an environment in which Muslims can live their lives in accordance with the teachings of the Quran and Sunnah. Against this constitutional backdrop, it is surprising that the issue of women wearing the abaya—or an Islamic financial institution including the abaya in its employee dress code—has become a matter of concern for a parliamentary committee. This naturally raises an important question: Who is setting the country’s priorities, and are these truly the issues that deserve Parliament’s attention? Pakistan continues to face pressing challenges, including rising inflation, unemployment, an unequal tax system, a struggling economy, and serious shortcomings in education and healthcare. These are the issues that directly affect the daily lives of millions of citizens. If a parliamentary standing committee, whose primary responsibility is financial oversight, chooses to focus instead on the dress code of Islamic banks, it is reasonable for the public to question whether legislative priorities are aligned with the country’s most urgent needs. The debate also raises questions about consistency. Critics have objected to the abaya as part of an institutional dress code, yet there is little discussion about uniforms in many government departments that follow Western styles of dress. Women serving in the police, the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA), and several other public institutions are commonly required to wear trousers and shirts as part of their official uniforms. If clothing is to become a matter of parliamentary debate, then similar standards should apply across the board. Selective criticism can create the perception of bias. Supporters of Islamic dress codes argue that the issue extends beyond clothing itself and reflects broader concerns about cultural and religious identity. From this perspective, the concern is not simply about the abaya but about a mindset that views visible expressions of religious identity as obstacles to modernization. They question whether institutions with an Islamic identity should be expected to abandon their traditions in the name of progress. This leads to a broader debate: Who defines what it means to be modern? Does modernization necessarily require reducing the public expression of religious values or adopting Western cultural norms? For institutions operating within Pakistan’s Islamic banking framework, supporters argue that their identity is rooted not only in financial principles but also in ethical and religious values. If such institutions adopt internal policies that comply with Pakistani law and reflect constitutional and religious principles, they contend that those choices should be respected. The discussion also draws comparisons with international examples. In countries such as France, restrictions on religious clothing have generated significant criticism from human rights advocates. Supporters of religious freedom argue that Pakistan, which was established with a distinct religious and cultural identity, should carefully consider whether adopting similar approaches is consistent with its own constitutional framework and historical foundations. Ultimately, the central argument is that Parliament should devote its time and resources to addressing issues that directly affect governance, economic stability, and public welfare. Matters of personal attire, religious belief, and institutional identity, many argue, should not become subjects of unnecessary official intervention when the country faces far more pressing social and economic challenges.

  • Discover the beauty of Shah Jahan Mosque

    Located in the historic city of Thatta, Sindh, the Shah Jahan Mosque is one of South Asia’s most impressive examples of Mughal architecture. Its unique design beautiful tiles and remarkable sound system continue to attract visitors. The mosque was built by Mughal Emperor Shah Jahan between 1644 and 1647 as a gift to the people of Sindh.  The nearly 400-year old building is known for its large number of domes and unusual architectural style. Unlike many other Mughal mosques the Shah Jahan Mosque does not have traditional tall minarets. It is famous for its many domes with local traditions often saying that the mosque has 99 domes.  Interestingly some people claim that the number can appear to be 100 when counted from certain points. One of the mosque’s most fascinating features is its natural acoustics. A person can reportedly speak softly near the prayer area and have their voice heard clearly in another part of the mosque. This is possible because of the way the walls domes and other structures were designed to reflect sound. The mosque was built long before modern speakers and sound systems yet its clever design allows sound to travel across large sections of the building. Over the centuries the historic mosque has gone through different stages of repair and preservation. During the era of former Prime Minister Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, efforts were also made to improve and protect the historic site. The mosque is also known for its huge capacity. It is believed that around 40,000 to 50,000 people can gather there for Friday prayers. Its decoration is another major attraction. While many famous Mughal buildings are known for red stone and white marble the Shah Jahan Mosque features beautiful blue and white glazed tiles.  The detailed tilework reflects the artistic traditions of Iran and Hala a historic city in Sindh known for its crafts. With its centuries old history striking domes, colorful tiles and remarkable acoustics the Shah Jahan Mosque remains a remarkable symbol of Sindh’s rich cultural and architectural heritage.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *