our women communicators

Our Women Communicators of Tomorrow

ByJustpaste.in

By Mehreen Imambaksh

Throughout history, women have possessed powerful thoughts, deep emotions, and creative voices; yet, many of these voices have gone unnoticed. Their experiences were frequently limited to their homes, their abilities were questioned, and their intellectual development was neglected. However, literature, history, and social thought expose that women were capable of uttering knowledge, shaping culture, and influencing society, but patriarchal systems often restricted their visibility.
For centuries, women were expected to remain silent in public intellectual areas. Their role was widely limited to household responsibilities, whereas education, authorship, and public speaking were dominated by men. Yet despite these barriers, many women endured to write, think, and challenge the systems that tried to silence them. One beautiful example can be found in the nineteenth century with the eminent novel *Wuthering Heights*, written by Emily Brontë (1847). Today the novel is considered one of the masterpieces in English literature. Moreover, Emily Brontë did not publish it under her original name; rather, she used the pen name Ellis Bell. Similarly, her sisters also adopted the same approaches. Charlotte Brontë published *Jane Eyre* under the name of Currer Bell, and Anne Brontë published *The Tenant of Wildfell Hall* under the name of Acton Bell.
The reason behind these pen names was simple but widely revealing: society frequently refused to take women writers seriously. The Brontë sisters were highly imaginative and intellectually able, yet they felt pressured to hide their identities to ensure their work could be approved. Their circumstances examine the huge restrictions placed upon women’s voices during that time. Long before the Brontë sisters, early feminist thinkers had raised concerns about women’s lack of education and freedom.
In 1792, Mary Wollstonecraft wrote *A Vindication of the Rights of Woman*, challenging that women should have equal access to education and intellectual opportunities. She said that women were treated as inferior in society not because they lacked capability, but because they were refused the chance to advance their minds.
More than a century later, this problem was discussed again by Virginia Woolf in her masterpiece work *A Room of One’s Own* (1929). She famously argued that women in the past were refused both financial independence and private space, which restricted them from freely uttering knowledge. Therefore, she said a woman needs not merely talent but also freedom and equality to express her feelings and thoughts.
Modern scholars have further examined how systems of knowledge can silence subaltern voices. In her essay “Can the Subaltern Speak?” (1988), Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak introduced the idea of epistemic violence, which means how dominant systems of knowledge remove or suppress the voices of certain groups, especially women and colonized communities. When women’s ideas are ignored or removed, their experiences are excluded from the production of knowledge, creating a form of intellectual oppression.
These rooted examples depict that women’s silence was never because of a lack of intelligence or creativity. Instead, it was the result of social systems that demotivated or limited their role in participation in intellectual and public life. Even today, this evidence remains visible in many societies. In many cultures, women still hesitate to talk openly, particularly on public platforms or digital spaces.
Furthermore, social expectations and fear of judgment frequently create unseen obstacles that prevent women from sharing their thoughts and feelings. This hesitation is not always enforced directly; sometimes it evolves internally due to long-standing social pressures. Moreover, I personally experienced this hesitation in my own life. For many years, I believed in the significance of women’s ability, yet I was not actively immersed in initiatives related to it.
One cause for this was my anxiety about visibility on social media platforms to reveal my feelings and ideas because I feared how society, especially as a Baloch student, might react to a woman openly sharing her ideas. This anxiety is not unfamiliar. Many women feel unsure about expressing themselves publicly because they expect critique or misunderstanding.
However, personal growth frequently begins with a small step. For me, that step was creating my social media platforms such as Medium, a LinkedIn profile, and starting to share my writings, including poems and reflections based on my experiences. At the start, this act felt common, yet slowly opened new chances. Through this visibility, I became connected with extensive intellectual and professional networks, which ultimately led me to become immersed in women’s ascension.
Being involved in this initiative has allowed me to interact with women from various cultures, backgrounds, and perspectives. These interactions have been widely improving. They have shown me that when women communicate and share experiences across cultures, they create unique forms of understanding and collective growth. This experience shows that women’s empowerment does not always happen through major changes, but it begins slowly when women start to express themselves, engage in conversations, and share knowledge with others.
Communication is one of the influential tools that helps women to connect their personal experiences with global discussions about equality and justice. However, change needs cooperation. Women’s power should not be seen as an effort between men and women. Instead, it should be perceived as a collaborative struggle to create a fair and inclusive society. Both men and women play a major role in supporting and motivating women’s voices. Traditionally, patriarchal societies frequently reduced women to limited roles, especially examining their function as a child-bearing machine. Whereas motherhood is an essential and valuable role, it should never define the entirety of a woman’s identity. Women have intellectual capabilities, creative skills, and leadership qualities that can contribute importantly to society.
Education plays an essential role in changing these circumstances. When women receive education, they gain the confidence and knowledge necessary to contribute actively in social, economic, and intellectual life. Educated women are more capable of expressing their thoughts, challenging injustice, and participating in the development of their communities. Furthermore, the impact of women’s education extends beyond the individual. When women are educated, they can brighten their children’s lives and motivate the next generations to learn. Historically, when women were denied education, their children often faced the same limitations. Today, an educated mother can support the next generation toward greater opportunities and awareness. Therefore, empowering women’s communication capabilities is equally essential.
Communication enables women to share knowledge, support their rights, and contribute to worldwide communications. Through writing, speaking, and digital platforms, women can be visible and contribute to influencing social change. Meanwhile, society must learn to respect and support women’s visibility. A woman who shares her ideas publicly should not be demotivated. Instead, her voice should be acknowledged as a valuable participation in social communication. The future relies on the ability of men and women to work collectively in building inclusive communities.
On the other hand, the Global Media Monitoring Project, supervised by scholar Dr. Sarah Macharia, reports that women are merely visible in about 24 percent of news stories throughout the world, highlighting a committed gap in representation. This imbalances women’s rights in global media. Research by the International Women’s Media Foundation (IWMF) in its *Global Report on the Status of Women in the News Media* found that women hold far fewer leadership positions in media organizations globally. This not merely limits career opportunities but also affects which stories receive attention and whose voices are enhanced in public debates. UN Women reports that female journalists and communicators often face online harassment, an obstacle that restricts participation and silences vital perspectives.
Media scholar Karen Ross argues that representation in communication spaces is significant because narratives influence how societies understand gender roles. Committing women to these narratives strengthens stereotypes and decreases the diversity of perspectives shaping public decisions. These ideas suggest that strengthening women communicators means motivating women to read, write, and express their feelings and ideas to contribute to knowledge production. When women become visible in intellectual and public spaces, they expand the boundaries of discerning and influence future generations.
The voices of tomorrow’s women communicators are already growing. With education, coordination, and courage, these voices can contribute to meaningful global dynamics and assist in building a future where people, regardless of gender, have the freedom to speak, create, and inspire.
In conclusion, women’s perspectives have shifted from silence to recognition, showing the life-changing capability of conversation. Earlier, from the Brontë sisters to thinkers like Mary Wollstonecraft and Woolf, showcase the value of knowledge, autonomy, and freedom of expression. Nowadays, women are gradually exchanging perspectives, linking through communities like the Women’s Ascension Initiative, and promoting transformation. Encouraging women speakers through learning, self-assurance, and facilitating environments reinforces society and promotes a more equitable future.

Similar Posts

  • Faculty development: beyond classrooms 

    ByJustpaste.in

    By Prof. Engr. Dr. Khuram Pervez Amber The persistent weaker linkage between industries and universities in Pakistan requires strategic interventions from all stakeholders. Pakistan cannot expect systemic industrial growth while its higher education institutions and industrial sectors operate in silos. Number of universities in Pakistan has dramatically increased over the past two decades. At current, there are nearly 280 universities in Pakistan which are producing thousands of graduates every year. But the concerns of industries remain valid that the graduates lack the necessary technical knowledge and skills which are required in the industries. These concerns of industries are particularly reported in disciplines such as engineering, computer science and the applied sciences, where employers frequently report a mismatch between academic preparation and industrial requirements. Although there are some valuable initiatives by the HEC, PEC, and NTC which include mandatory industrial internships of six to eight weeks for the engineering and technology students, the impact of such initiatives is limited due to multiple factors. Another initiative of HEC to strengthen university academia linkage is the establishment of the Office of Research, Innovation, and Commercialization (ORICs) in universities. However, the effectiveness of this initiative has not been successful at the desired level as in many universities, ORICs operate with limited staff and resources, while directors of ORICs are usually on additional charges. Expecting a small office alone to build industrial linkages for an entire university is unrealistic. Currently, out of nearly 260 universities, only 95 universities have established ORICs. In the recent ORIC ranking of HEC, only seven of 95 universities achieved the top category, i.e. “W” category. One of the major unexplored reasons behind this fragile linkage between industry and academia is the limited or no industrial exposure of university teachers. Most university teachers move directly from their bachelor’s degrees into master’s and PhD programs. Through this route, such individuals may become academically qualified teachers, but this route does not make them professionals having knowledge of industrial practices, industrial standards, and industry-oriented innovations. In many cases, a teacher teaches an industrial system which he/she has never experienced. This approach may clear theoretical concepts of students, but such students will certainly struggle when they would face real- life industrial problems after their induction in industry. So why do our university teachers require industrial exposure in their field of research? The answer is simple. A teacher with industrial exposure brings his industrial experience into the classrooms, laboratories, projects, and discussions on daily basis. Industrial experience of such teachers would not only improve the technical understanding of students about various industrial systems but also enhance students’ problem-solving skills. It would further help students to understand industrial expectations. So how could universities help their faculty members to get industrial experience? This could be achieved through implementation of structured industrial placement/professional development programs under ORICs for university teachers particularly working in engineering, technology and applied sciences faculties. Under this program, university teachers can spend six months to twelve months in an industry related to their field of interest/research on a turn-by-turn basis. During this period, such faculty members will keep receiving their monthly salaries as usual. So, what will be the major benefits of this model? There will be significant improvement in the pedagogical skills of faculty members as they will be teaching with practical examples, industrial case studies and real-world problem-solving approaches. During their placement in the industry, faculty members would make connections with the industrial experts/managers/engineers which would help them in future to supervise industry-relevant research, secure collaborative projects and contribute to technology transfer. They would identify operational challenges requiring research-based solutions. Upon returning to universities, they can transform these challenges into student projects, postgraduate research topics and consultancy opportunities. This would help create a healthier research culture focused on solving local industrial problems. University graduates will have problem solving skills that are required by industry. Over time, this model would help bridge the trust deficit that exists between academia and industry. Admittedly, implementing such a policy would not be easy. Challenges such as shortage of faculty, and increased teaching workloads are genuine challenges. There are also cultural barriers within academia, where industrial experience is often valued less than traditional academic achievements. However, these barriers are manageable. HEC and professional bodies such as PEC, and universities can jointly develop and implement structured industrial placement programs for faculty members. The industrial experience can be recognized within promotion criteria of faculty members, accreditation frameworks and quality assurance standards. In the nutshell, to produce industry ready graduates, the industrial exposure of university faculty members is indispensable. Their industrial experience will result in a stronger academia-industry linkage which is essential for economic growth, innovation and technological progress. Until universities and industries begin working together more meaningfully, Pakistan will continue producing degrees faster than opportunities. Prof. Engr. Dr. Khuram Pervez Amber (CEng, MEI, PE, FHEA) The writer is serving as Director QEC at Mirpur University of Science and Technology, AJ&K.

  • Immature Minds Need Nourishment, Not Punishment

    ByJustpaste.in

    By Tuba Khan A nation’s commitment to justice is not judged by the way it treats its powerful citizens, but the way it treats its vulnerable members of society. One of the most fragile creations of God are the children who need love and care, but when they are punished for their mistakes, abused or exploited for their mischievous acts and left unheard in their hour of need, they tend to become juvenile delinquents. They require guidance and encouragement to learn from their mistakes, so that they can grow into responsible and confident individuals. But unfortunately, in Pakistan, children are the most neglected group in terms of justice. Though Pakistan has juvenile justice laws and is a signatory to several international commitments. However, it fails to honor these obligations. According to the KidsRights Index 2020, Pakistan ranks 147th out of 182 nations in access to justice for children. Juvenile delinquency is not inherent; rather, it is often fueled by social, familial, psychological and environmental conditions. Children being observant and curious by nature are highly adaptable to their surroundings. Family, mentors and the community instill values in a child, shaping children’s behavior. However, factors that lead to juvenile delinquency include parental conflicts or separation, peer pressure, exposure to negative, aggressive and violent environments, deprivation of education, financial resources, affection and other basic necessities, impaired cognitive development, poor reasoning skills and psychological issues, such as impulsiveness, antisocial traits and mental disorders. Moreover, drug addiction, access to harmful content on social media, the dark web and illegal means also exacerbate the growing evil of youth delinquency. Together, these factors shape a child’s social and moral development and provoke delinquent behavior. The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) defines a child as one under the age of eighteen. Below this age, children should not be treated with brutality or strict laws. Critics often argue that crime is crime whether it is committed by a child or an adult. However, the philosophy of juvenile justice acknowledges that cognitive development is not yet mature and children have an immense capacity for rehabilitation. A study indicates that the children between 16 and 18 years of age are more likely to commit offences as compared to the younger ones There is always hope for and from every child. Recognizing these realities, the global community embraced a child-centered approach to juvenile justice and adopted basic principles to deal with young offenders. First, it must be made clear that when a child comes into conflict with the law, alternatives should be offered instead of processing him/her through the formal justice system. Second, there needs to be an exclusive juvenile justice system. Third, during the investigation, a juvenile should not be kept in a regular police station and the judicial process needs to be quick. Lastly, it must be ensured that the state gives a message to juveniles that it believes in their potential for reform. International laws promote the reintegration of children into society, but sadly, this approach is missing in the juvenile justice system of Pakistan. Punjab has only two Borstal Institutes & Juvenile Jails at Bahawalpur and Faisalabad, while Sindh has five Youthful Offenders Industrial Schools in Karachi, Hyderabad, Sukkur, Larkana and Dadu, although the facility in Dadu is non-operational. The KPK has one Borstal in Bannu, whereas Balochistan does not have even a single functional Borstal Institute or juvenile jail. This lack of physical infrastructure causes a considerable number of juveniles to be imprisoned in regular prisons. Placing children in such an overcrowded environment exposes them in proximity to criminals and causes psychological distress, which undermines the rehabilitation capacity of prisoners. No less troubling is the lack of juvenile courts across the country. As a result, most children have continued to go through regular courts that cannot cater to their developmental needs. A joint report by UNICEF and the Commissioner for Children’s Complaint Office of Pakistan has found that as of November 2023, 81% of the total juvenile offenders in Punjab were detained in ordinary jails, and only 144 prisoners were housed in Borstal Institutes. In January 2026, Punjab Prison Department released a report, according to which there are 718 juvenile prisoners in Punjab, while the total capacity is 658 prisoners. The shortage of juvenile institutions further highlights the flaws in the juvenile justice system of Pakistan. It is the state’s responsibility to transform vulnerable children into responsible citizens. Therefore, the Government of Pakistan must move beyond merely passing laws that remain largely unimplemented and instead take concrete and pragmatic steps. The country should develop an implementation plan for the juvenile justice system, allocate adequate financial resources, strengthen the diversion mechanism to resolve minor juvenile cases outside the formal justice system, establish child-friendly rehabilitation centers that promote a sense of responsibility towards society, develop specialized juvenile police units to replace the use of police lock-ups for children, protect juveniles from torture and capital punishment while in detention, recruit trained staff, address the root causes of juvenile delinquency, such as poverty, illiteracy, unemployment, unsafe neighborhoods and the growing number of street children through social welfare programs and introduce a real-time Prison Management Information System (PMIS) to monitor juvenile offenders and support evidence-based decision-making. Every child lost to crime symbolizes not merely an individual failure but a social breakdown and failure of state governance. Invest in the rehabilitation of juvenile offenders to build a safer and stable Pakistan tomorrow. Immature minds need nourishment, not punishment.

  • |

    How fiction brain-trains compassion

    ByJustpaste.in

    Empathy is the capacity to understand and share the feelings of another. It’s not merely an inherent personality trait; it is a cognitive muscle that requires exercise. While there are many ways to practice compassion in daily life, neuroscientists and psychological researchers have uncovered a uniquely powerful tool for training this mental capacity: reading deep, character-driven fiction. For decades, society viewed reading literature as a purely intellectual or escapist hobby. However, recent scientific studies using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) have revealed that when we read a story, our brains process the experience in ways remarkably similar to real-world social interaction. When an author describes a character running through a dark forest, struggling with heartbreak, or feeling a sharp pang of injustice, the sensory and emotional centers in the reader’s brain light up as if the reader were experiencing those events directly. This neural simulation allows us to step entirely out of our own shoes and temporarily inhabit the subjective reality of someone else. Psychologists often refer to this ability as theory of mind. It’s the cognitive skill that enables human beings to attribute mental states (beliefs, intents, desires, emotions, and knowledge) to themselves and others. Life only permits us to live a single, localized existence defined by our specific background, culture, and circumstance. Literary fiction breaks through those physical and social barriers. Through the pages of a novel, a reader living in a quiet suburban town can intimately experience the internal struggles of an immigrant navigating a new city, an incarcerated individual fighting for dignity, or a historic figure facing a agonizing moral dilemma. Crucially, fiction tells us what people do. Also, it exposes why they do it. It grants us unprecedented access to the secret thoughts, doubts, and vulnerabilities that real people rarely reveal in public. By witnessing a character’s internal contradictions, readers learn that human behavior is rarely black-and-white. We develop a tolerance for ambiguity and a healthier skepticism toward snap judgments. When we close the book, that expanded perspective lingers in our conscious mind, subtly altering how we interact with co-workers, strangers, and loved ones. Furthermore, reading fiction builds emotional stamina. It asks us to sit quietly with uncomfortable emotions like grief, fear, longing, and regret without fleeing into digital distractions. In doing so, it expands our capacity to hold space for others when they undergo difficult seasons in real life. Literary fiction, therefore, is far more than entertainment. It is a quiet, radical act of bridge-building. Every time we turn a page and immerse ourselves in a stranger’s story, we perform a vital neurological exercise that softens our defenses, broadens our horizons, and reminds us of our shared humanity.  

  • Octopus clings to fisherman’s face

    ByJustpaste.in

    A surprising video from the Philippines is going viral on social media after an octopus was seen clinging tightly to a fisherman’s face. In the video the octopus has wrapped several of its arms around the man’s face. https://www.instagram.com/reel/Db8hqV-jCoX/?igsh=MWFoNmNucmlzNW1ucQ== The fisherman can be seen struggling to remove it from his face. He tries several times to pull the octopus away but its strong suction cups make it difficult to free himself. After several attempts he slowly loosens the octopus’s grip and finally removes it. The fisherman then releases the octopus back into the water. Experts explain that an octopus has hundreds of suction cups on its eight arms. These help it hold onto different surfaces and objects firmly. The octopus may have reacted defensively because of the unusual situation and tried to protect itself by holding on tightly.

  • When global recognition becomes a local burden

    ByJustpaste.in

    In the Carpathian Mountains of central Slovakia lies Vlkolínec, a preserved settlement. This village is renowned for its pastel-painted timber cottages and traditional 19th-century folk architecture. It was inscribed as a UNESCO World Heritage site in 1993. Vlkolínec was celebrated not merely as a set of historical buildings, but as a living community. A rare surviving traditional rural life in Central Europe. However, three decades after receiving this prestigious designation, the small mountain is struggling with an existential dilemma. What was meant to be a cultural preservation has transformed into a challenge for the few villagers who still call Vlkolínec home. Now, frustration among permanent residents has reached a boiling point. There are calls to have the village removed from the UNESCO list altogether. When UNESCO designated Vlkolínec as a World Heritage site, one of the criteria was that it remained an inhabited settlement. At the time of inscription, the village was home to around 200 residents. Today, that permanent population has declined to just 14 to 17 people spread across four core families. In contrast to this dwindling resident count, Vlkolínec receives approximately 100,000 tourists every year. For the remaining inhabitants, the ratio of over 7,000 visitors per resident has basically altered the daily life. Locals report feeling as though they live inside a tourist zoo. The boundaries between public spaces and private homes are routinely ignored. Despite signs requesting privacy, visitors frequently wander into private yards, peer through kitchen windows, and treat active properties as open-access museum displays. The loss of privacy is compounded by anti-social tourist behavior. This conduct has been leaving locals feeling alienated in their own hometown. Overtourism is only one side of the coin. Residents also voice deep frustration over the rigid conservation framework that accompanies World Heritage status. Under national protection laws and strict UNESCO guidelines, historic homes face tight restrictions on modern modifications and physical alterations. Elderly villagers point out that these preservation rules have made customary rural activities increasingly difficult. Small-scale farming, livestock keeping, and land cultivation have gradually vanished. Surrounding agricultural terraces have become overgrown. Traditional meadow mowing has largely ceased as older generations pass away and younger generations move away. Furthermore, many of the village’s timber cottages have been bought up by outside buyers to serve as weekend holiday retreats. This phenomenon has increased the loss of a permanent, cohesive community. Some residents argue that revoking UNESCO status would reduce tourist pressure and ease regulatory burdens. However, municipal officials and heritage experts contend that delisting is neither practical nor the right solution. Local administrators in the nearby town of Ružomberok emphasize that UNESCO status brings significant heritage recognition and funding opportunities. Rather than abandoning the title, officials advocate for smarter tourism management. From a procedural standpoint, voluntary delisting at the request of a local community is virtually unprecedented in UNESCO’s history. The organization typically removes properties only when they lose their outstanding universal value due to severe destruction or irreversible development. The debate unfolding in Vlkolínec highlights a broader issue facing protected historic sites around the globe. How to balance global recognition and economic benefits with the rights and wellbeing of local inhabitants! Small historic communities across Europe and beyond battle with overcrowding and demographic decline. Vlkolínec serves as a reminder that preserving physical architecture alone is not enough. Without protecting the living social fabric of a community, world heritage sites risk turning into empty shells of their former selves.  

  • Online overuse affects mental health

    ByJustpaste.in

    Spending too much time online has become a common habit for many people but it may negatively affect mental well being and everyday life. A study conducted in Germany found that excessive internet use can lead to higher stress levels irritability and less interest in other important activities. Researchers at the University of Duisburg-Essen surveyed around 900 people to learn about their internet habits. Based on the amount of time they spent online participants were divided into three groups. For two weeks each participant completed a short survey every evening. They reported their mood stress levels desire to use the internet and the total time they spent online that day. The researchers also examined how much people enjoyed using the internet and whether it affected their work hobbies studies or personal responsibilities. The study found that people who spent the most time online were more likely to feel stressed become easily irritated, and ignore other parts of their daily lives. Researchers also discovered that many heavy internet users felt a strong urge to go online because it gave them comfort and enjoyment. According to the researchers the findings show that excessive internet use can influence many areas of life and the risks are greater for people who spend long hours online regularly.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *