one missed bill
| | |

One missed bill enough for Lesco to pull the plug?…

The month of July brings heat and humidity to Lahore. It also brings frequent power cuts, mainly from weather related issues. When it rains, and the atmosphere is muggy, power breakdown occurs and people expect that power will return soon after it goes. But there is a different kind of fear. This fear grows when a house sits dark while every other house on the street still has light. This means the power meter has been disconnected.

Recent reports say that field staff of the Lahore Electric Supply Company (LESCO), have been harassing consumers. These reports say that officials are disconnecting power for people who have missed just one month of bill payment. This goes against the normal rule. Under the normal rule, a meter can only be disconnected after two months of non-payment.

LESCO spokesperson Rabia Qadir has denied these reports. She said the company has not received any complaint about this issue. She said that rules made by the National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (Nepra), protect the rights and safety of consumers. Under these rules, a meter cannot be disconnected simply because one month of bill payment was missed.

She also said that Lesco has not received any formal complaint against any sub-divisional officer, executive engineer, or lineman of any of its circle regarding such incidents. However, she said that some linemen may try to scare or pressure consumers. These linemen may threaten to disconnect a meter if the consumer does not pay the outstanding bill right away. She said this could happen in some cases and this was not the company’s policy. But she stressed that Lesco has a consumer complaint cell. All complaints are recorded there. She said that according to these records, no such complaint has come in.

The situation on the ground appears more complicated. This reporter visited the consumer cell at the office of the Lesco chief officer. Several consumers were present there. Their complaints were about different issues. Some wanted correction of industrial bills. Others reported broken meters.

When asked about the reports of meters being cut for a single month of default, one officer gave an important detail. They said this practice usually happens in June or July. They said the ministry gives instructions during these months to speed up bill recovery. The goal is to reduce financial losses. Staff at the office suggested that a proper response should come from Lesco Chief Executive Officer Ramzan Butt or his public relations office. However, the public relations office said that Ramzan Butt was in Islamabad for a meeting at the time.

This problem is not limited to LESCO areas. Similar reports have come from areas covered by the Multan Electric Power Company. In Muzaffargarh, consumers who missed one month of payment received strict warnings from field staff. These staff members told consumers to avoid another default. If they defaulted again, they were told, their meters would be disconnected.

According to the rules, a power connection cannot be cut through meter removal unless bills for both the current and the previous month remain unpaid. Yet for several months now, Lesco teams have continued cutting connections even when only one month of payment was missing.

Other than power severe threats, the other main issue people face is take notice of a major problem in the new electricity bill format. The Pakistan Hosiery Manufacturers and Exporters Association in a letter to the prime minister said the revised bill has removed a lot of information that consumers used to see. He said this makes it hard for people to check their meter readings, units consumed, tariff calculations and other charges on their own.

They say the changes seem to have been made without following the proper process set by the National Electric Power Regulatory Authority, known as NEPRA. No formal request for changing the bill format was filed with NEPRA and that consumers were never asked for their objections, nor were they given a chance to take part in a public hearing before the change was made.

They say that bills are supposed to show the date when the connection or meter was installed, but this information is now missing. The removal of the meter reading snapshot is a serious problem, because consumers can no longer check if the reading used for their bill matches the actual reading at their home. Also, information about the meter reader, along with the date and time of the reading, has also disappeared.

They say that when a meter is changed, the bill should show a snapshot of the final reading from the old meter, but distribution companies are not properly doing this. The new bills carry a QR code instead, but this cannot replace information that should be clearly printed on the bill itself. Many senior citizens, people living in rural areas, and low income households may not have smartphones or the internet access needed to scan a QR code.

Economist and corporate lawyer Dr Ikramul Haq commented on this situation. He said that the conduct of power distribution companies is not simply a small technical mistake. He called it as a form of pressure against ordinary citizens. These citizens are already struggling with rising prices, high electricity rates, and falling purchasing power. He said that reports of field teams arriving at homes, treating consumers badly, and threatening immediate disconnection show the real human cost of this careless approach. He added that in some cases, meters were removed without any prior notice being given.

Dr said explained that the legal position on this matter is very clear. Under the revised Consumer Service Manual issued by Nepra, electricity cannot be disconnected only because the bill for the current or previous month remains unpaid. A notice of seven days must be given along with the bill for the second month of default. Only after this notice period passes, and the default continues, can disconnection take place. He said that removing a meter involves even more safeguards under the rules. He stressed that Lesco cannot change these rules on its own by calling every consumer who misses one due date a defaulter.

He also addressed reports that the ministry has been pushing for faster recovery of bills. He said that even if these reports are true, they do not excuse the illegal actions being taken. He explained that administrative instructions from a ministry cannot override rules set by law. He said that the financial problems of the power sector, including circular debt, cannot be solved by scaring ordinary households.

Dr Haq said that consumers must pay bills that are lawfully due. But he added that the state and its institutions must also follow the law. He called on Nepra to step in immediately. He said Nepra should order the restoration of power wherever disconnections were carried out unlawfully. He also said that Nepra should investigate the conduct of field officials involved in these incidents. He said the management of these companies must be held accountable. He concluded that recovery targets should never become an excuse to humiliate citizens. Nor should they become a reason to leave families without electricity without following proper legal process.

Similar Posts

  • |

    Harry and Meghan’s brand faces a crossroads with UK return

    In late July, Meghan’s lifestyle range, As Ever, launched a new blackberry spread alongside a softly lit video of her picking the fruit. A month later, she and Prince Harry announced plans to return and live in the UK, just as blackberry season winds down. Whether another such video follows remains unclear, especially since experts say the couple’s wider brand is now at a turning point. Since their departure from royal duties in 2020, most of the Sussexes’ California-based ventures, from streaming deals to fragrance lines, have struggled to draw large audiences. Experts say it’s genuinely unclear what direction they’ll take next. Their UK return has surprised many, and although they will not resume royal duties, questions remain about what comes instead. Oxford marketing professor Andrew Stephen says the couple excelled early at capturing attention and monetising it, but have struggled to turn that into a lasting brand identity. He describes their current portfolio as fragmented, spanning social impact, entertainment and lifestyle, making it hard to define exactly what their brand represents. Their $100 million Netflix deal and $25 million Spotify agreement, both signed in 2020, have delivered underwhelming results by most measures. The Netflix arrangement produced just five shows over five years before being replaced with a lower-commitment, first-look agreement last year. Spotify, meanwhile, parted ways with the couple back in 2023. Branding expert Susan Fournier warns that the couple’s repeated pivots, from royal insiders to critics to media producers to lifestyle influencers, carry real risk. She argues that once a brand shifts direction dramatically, reversing course becomes difficult, and a UK return could look like yet another turn rather than a resolution. Stephen suggests the solution lies in building a focused, coherent set of ventures and credible causes, rather than continuing to diversify. One possibility involves Meghan returning to acting, with reports suggesting talks over a role in Netflix’s “The Gentlemen.” Her lifestyle brand, As Ever, is also expected to continue regardless of the move. A potential relocation to the Cotswolds has also sparked interest, with stylist Laura Stoloff suggesting genuine synergy between Meghan’s brand and English country life. Still, Stephen cautions that a new postcode alone won’t reposition a brand, only consistent action will.

  • | |

    Shazia Marri demands accountability over PIMS trag…

    ISLAMABAD: Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) leader and Member of the National Assembly Shazia Marri has strongly criticised the federal government over the deaths of newborn babies in the Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (PIMS) fire, calling the incident a serious example of administrative negligence. In a statement, Marri said innocent children had lost their lives, yet no one appeared to be taking responsibility for the tragedy. She alleged that ordinary citizens were paying the price for what she described as incompetence and poor management by the federal government. Marri demanded that those responsible for the incident be identified and proceeded against according to the law. She questioned the federal health minister’s position, asking what justification there was for remaining in office if the minister could not ensure the safety and proper administration of a major government hospital. The PPP leader said the deaths of newborns could not simply be dismissed as an accident while ignoring possible administrative failures. She called for a transparent and impartial investigation into the PIMS fire and urged authorities to determine whether negligence or shortcomings in hospital management contributed to the loss of lives. Marri also questioned the hospital’s fire safety arrangements and emergency response. She asked where the required safety measures were when the fire broke out and why immediate rescue and emergency procedures could not prevent the deaths. The PPP leader demanded strict legal action against anyone found responsible following the investigation. She said the federal government should accept responsibility for the incident and ensure justice for the families who lost their children. Marri described the loss of innocent lives as irreparable and said those found guilty of negligence should not be given any concession. Her remarks came amid widespread public anger following the PIMS tragedy, which has prompted demands for accountability, improved fire safety systems and stronger emergency preparedness at government hospitals.

  • |

    Poland’s main opposition party splits following loyalty pledge ultimatum

    Poland’s main opposition Law and Justice (PiS) party has fractured following a severe internal dispute over its political strategy, with former Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki and dozens of his allies breaking ranks with longtime leader Jarosław Kaczyński. The split occurred after Kaczyński issued an ultimatum demanding all PiS lawmakers sign a strict loyalty oath committing them not to collaborate with outside political groups. Dozens of parliamentarians, led by Morawiecki, refused to sign the pledge before the deadline, leading Kaczyński to declare that those who abstained had effectively resigned from the party. The former prime minister confirmed that his faction includes 40 members of parliament, three members of the European Parliament, and one senator, though he maintained that his group sought to preserve unity while broadening the right-wing electoral base toward younger, centre-right voters. The division threatens PiS’s status as the largest party in the Polish parliament, a position it held despite losing power to Donald Tusk’s pro-European coalition in 2023. As the conservative vote increasingly fragments across competing factions ahead of the 2027 parliamentary elections, the formal expulsion of the dissident lawmakers is scheduled to be processed at a party leadership meeting.

  • | |

    Musadik Malik calls for smarter water management

    Climate Minister Musadik Malik has called for a major shift in Pakistan’s water management strategy, saying the country must focus not only on storing water but also on regulating its supply throughout the year. Speaking at a briefing at the National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA), Malik said effective water management was essential for protecting food supplies, supporting agriculture and reducing the impact of climate-related disasters. His remarks came as Pakistan faces another difficult monsoon season. At least 107 people have died and 297 others have been injured since the current rainy season began on June 26, according to disaster management authorities. The Pakistan Meteorological Department has forecast another strong spell of monsoon rains from July 29. Heavy rainfall could trigger urban flooding, flash floods and landslides in several parts of the country. Malik said Pakistan needed different climate strategies for different regions instead of relying on a single nationwide approach. Plans are being developed for cities facing extreme heat, northern areas vulnerable to floods and landslides, and agricultural regions where changing weather patterns are threatening food production. He stressed that water must be available when farmers need it during the Rabi and Kharif seasons. According to the minister, simply allowing large quantities of floodwater to escape without regulating or storing it creates serious risks for agriculture and food security. Malik described water infrastructure as a national security issue. He said the government would focus on improving water regulation, telemetry and storage systems. It would also work with provincial governments to improve zoning and construction standards in disaster-prone areas. National Food Security Minister Rana Tanveer Hussain said Pakistan would require greater water storage capacity in the coming years. He said the country faced two linked challenges: controlling floods and dealing with water shortages. Tanveer said climate change was already changing crop cultivation and sowing patterns. He stressed that agriculture would need to adapt to shifting weather conditions to protect food supplies. The minister said Pakistan was among the countries most vulnerable to climate change, with agriculture facing some of the strongest impacts. He recalled the huge economic losses caused by the 2022 floods but said the country’s disaster response capabilities had improved since then. He said the government had started modifying crop cycles and cultivation patterns in response to changing climatic conditions. Authorities are also working on a broader strategy to strengthen agricultural resilience. Tanveer highlighted several major water projects. He said the Diamer-Bhasha Dam would provide around 6.4 million acre-feet of additional storage capacity, while the Mohmand Dam would add nearly one million acre-feet. He also mentioned progress on the Dasu project and expressed hope that the K-IV water supply project for Karachi would be completed by the end of this year or early next year. Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb described climate change and population growth as major long-term challenges for Pakistan. He called for a coordinated response involving all parts of the government. Aurangzeb said the country was now better prepared financially to respond to natural disasters. He said the government had decided to use domestic resources for rescue and relief operations instead of relying primarily on international assistance. He said Pakistan had launched a $2 billion programme aimed at strengthening climate resilience and reducing environmental risks. Around $700 million annually has also been allocated for disaster management, vulnerability reduction and protection of lives and infrastructure. The finance minister said Pakistan’s disaster financing approach had changed significantly since the 2022 floods. The country had previously relied heavily on international commitments, but authorities are now increasing domestic funding for climate adaptation and emergency response. Information Minister Attaullah Tarar said preparations for the current monsoon season had started before the rains arrived. He credited NDMA’s National Emergencies Operation Centre (NEOC) with improving forecasting and early warning capabilities. Tarar said the system had helped authorities issue timely alerts about dangerous weather events. He urged citizens to follow official warnings and take precautions during periods of heavy rainfall. Meanwhile, flooding continues in parts of Punjab and other regions. The Provincial Disaster Management Authority said water levels in the Chenab River had shown some improvement, while low-level flooding persisted at several locations along the Indus.

  • | |

    AIOU recruitment process declared non transparent …

    Islamabad: A controversy has emerged over the recruitment process of Allama Iqbal Open University (AIOU) after the Wafaqi Mohtasib declared that the selection process for senior academic positions lacked transparency and directed the university to cancel appointments and repeat the process. The decision came after a complaint filed by a female complainant, who challenged her exclusion from the shortlist for Professor and Associate Professor positions despite claiming she met the required eligibility criteria. The Wafaqi Mohtasib, after reviewing documents and hearing both sides, concluded that maladministration was established and stated that serious questions were raised about the transparency of the selection process. The Ombudsman referred the matter to the Vice Chancellor of AIOU with directions to cancel the appointments and conduct the recruitment process again according to proper procedures. The controversy relates to faculty recruitment advertisements issued by AIOU for Professor and Associate Professor positions. According to the findings, AIOU advertised several academic positions on 15 September 2024, and received a large number of applications. Officials informed that 388 applications were received for 25 advertised Professor and Associate Professor positions. The university introduced an Internal Assessment Framework to shortlist candidates before sending applications for further evaluation. According to AIOU, the decision was taken because evaluating hundreds of academic files through experts would create major financial and administrative difficulties. Officials estimated that external evaluation of dossiers could cost around Rs26 million. Under the new system, eligible candidates were assessed through multiple stages including vision statement, leadership assessment, psychological assessment, teaching demonstration and screening interview. The assessment was conducted out of 50 marks, and 24 candidates were recommended for further selection stages. However, the female complainant was not recommended for any position. The female complainant challenged the process, arguing that the university changed recruitment procedures after the hiring process had already started. She claimed that according to the original recruitment rules, eligible candidates were required to appear before the Selection Board and that the introduction of an Internal Assessment as an elimination stage had no legal basis. She also argued that she was not properly informed about all stages of the assessment process. The complainant stated that she was informed about teaching demonstration and leadership assessment but was not informed about psychological assessment and screening interview. The complaint also raised concerns over fair hearing rights, claiming that she was excluded from the final process without written reasons or an opportunity to explain her position. Another serious issue raised was the timing of the Selection Board meeting. The complainant claimed that the Selection Board meeting took place on 10 April 2026, a public holiday, and that the approval process and appointment letters were completed unusually quickly on the same day. She questioned whether the process was properly transparent. She argued that recruitment rules and selection criteria should not be changed after the recruitment process has started. The Ombudsman examined the matter and found that the selection process did not appear transparent. The findings stated that several questions raised by the complainant required attention and that the recruitment process showed signs of maladministration. AIOU officials had defended the process, saying the Internal Assessment Framework was approved by the university’s Executive Council and applied to the advertised positions. They said the system was designed to identify the most competitive candidates while reducing time and financial burden. The case now requires AIOU to report compliance with the Ombudsman’s decision within the given period. The controversy has raised broader questions about transparency, fairness and recruitment procedures in public sector universities, where senior academic appointments directly affect the quality of education.

  • | |

    Punjab University rejects allegations, alleges sme…

    LAHORE: Punjab University has strongly denied allegations recently levelled by two former female athletes, describing the claims as part of a coordinated campaign aimed at damaging the institution’s reputation during its ongoing admissions season. According to university spokesperson Dr. Khurram Shehzad, Punjab University has witnessed an unprecedented response to admissions this year, with more than 85,000 applications received for various academic programmes by July 31. The university also recorded its highest-ever participation in the entry test, while the application deadline remains August 4. He claimed that the institution’s success had prompted certain groups to launch what he termed a deliberate propaganda campaign. The spokesperson said the controversy involving the two former sports students stemmed from disciplinary issues rather than the serious allegations circulated on social media. He maintained that the matter originated after a dispute between members of the girls’ sports hostel and disagreements related to team selection. According to the university, the students were involved in repeated altercations with fellow athletes, prompting the hostel administration to initiate an inquiry. Pending the outcome of the investigation, the students concerned were instructed to vacate the hostel. However, the university alleged that they refused to comply and later became involved in another confrontation, after which police were called following an emergency complaint. The incidents led the hostel inquiry committee to hold emergency meetings and ultimately order the closure of the girls’ sports hostel. The university further stated that one of the former athletes was not selected for the baseball team because of disciplinary concerns rather than sporting performance. It alleged that she later threatened to leave the university if she was not included in the squad and voluntarily applied to withdraw her original academic documents. During the document collection process, the university claims she, along with another former student and several others, attempted to pressure the administration by threatening to release a video portraying an alleged suicide attempt if their demands were not met. Punjab University said both students voluntarily collected their academic documents and left the institution. It also claimed that one of them subsequently joined another university’s sports team while Punjab University went on to win the championship without her. The university said it possesses evidence supporting its position and confirmed that faculty members, staff, and female students from the Department of Sports have submitted a formal complaint to the cybercrime authorities against the two former athletes and individuals allegedly involved in what it described as an organised campaign against the institution. The administration condemned attempts to use former students for what it called vested interests and reaffirmed its commitment to protecting the university’s reputation through legal channels

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *