rakhi sawant gets
| |

Rakhi Sawant gets emotional about her Pakistani fans

Rakhi Sawant has always been one of Indian entertainment’s most unfiltered personalities, and a recent interview with BBC Hindi has given her fans on both sides of the border a moment to genuinely pause and reflect. In the interview, the actress and digital influencer spoke with visible emotion about her Pakistani fans, delivering a remarkably candid account of a connection that has quietly shaped her personal life in ways she had perhaps not expected.
Sawant, who now follows Islam and has spoken openly about her affection for Muslims, did not approach the subject diplomatically or with the kind of measured language public figures typically deploy when navigating Indo-Pakistani sentiment. She spoke from personal experience, and the honesty of what she said has resonated widely.
“They love me a lot,” she said, speaking of her Pakistani fans. “We Pakistanis and Hindus share a love-and-hate relationship, but whenever something happens to me, Pakistanis reach out first. Sometimes I have a fever, and no one from India shows up, but they come and take me to the hospital.”
The admission was striking in its specificity. She was not speaking in generalities about cultural warmth or neighbourly affection. She was describing concrete acts of care at moments of genuine vulnerability, people showing up when she was unwell, accompanying her to hospital, filling a gap that others had left empty.
She continued with equal candour, acknowledging the political narrative that frames the two countries as adversaries while making clear that her personal experience simply did not match that framing. “I know they are our enemy, our country’s enemy, but what’s true is true,” she said. “They love me a lot. I am just a neighbour residing in this building, and as neighbours, they are always there for me.”
The online reaction to the interview has been overwhelmingly warm and has prompted a broader conversation that goes well beyond Sawant herself. Both Pakistani and Indian viewers flooded the comments to express agreement with the sentiment she was articulating. The most consistent thread running through the responses was the distinction between the political relationship that governments maintain and the human relationships that ordinary people choose to build across that same divide.
Commenters from both countries wrote that neither people were each other’s real enemies, and that it was politicians who constructed and maintained the hostility that defined the official relationship between India and Pakistan. People on the ground, many argued, wanted something different entirely.
Rakhi Sawant’s emotional honesty in this interview did not resolve any political realities. But it gave voice to something that is rarely said plainly enough in either country: that the warmth that exists between people when it is allowed to breathe is real, and sometimes shows up most clearly when someone needs to be taken to hospital and someone else simply decides to come.

Similar Posts

  • |

    PhD exams face explosive questions over quality

    A renewed debate over the reliability of PhD examinations has emerged following questions surrounding the doctoral thesis of Professor Jason Arday. Arday submitted his PhD thesis at Liverpool John Moores University in July 2015. The controversy resurfaced after Professor Richard Dawkins publicly questioned whether the thesis had been thoroughly examined. Other commentators have also raised concerns about its academic quality and allegations of plagiarism. The debate has now expanded beyond the individual case. It has prompted questions about how universities assess doctoral research and whether the existing system consistently maintains the required academic standards. A PhD normally represents several years of specialised research. A doctoral thesis can contain tens of thousands of words and often requires extensive academic reading and analysis. The assessment is generally carried out by two examiners. One is usually from the candidate’s university, while the other comes from an external institution. Critics argue that the workload involved in examining a thesis is not always matched by the financial compensation provided to examiners. Examiners are commonly paid a relatively modest fee for reviewing lengthy and complex research. This has raised concerns that some may not devote sufficient time to the process. There are also concerns about inconsistencies in examination decisions. Some candidates have reportedly failed their PhDs despite believing that their research met the required standard. Others have received a pass even when questions remained about the quality of their work. The appeal process can be particularly difficult for unsuccessful candidates. A failed PhD can mean years of research being lost. Students who finance their own studies can also face substantial financial losses. For those hoping to build academic careers, the consequences can be even more serious. Another issue is the selection of examiners. Supervisors often play a role in recommending academics to assess their students’ work. Critics say professional relationships within academia could potentially influence the choice of examiners or the assessment itself. Academic misconduct presents another challenge. Universities can spend considerable time investigating allegations of plagiarism and other forms of cheating. Lengthy investigations can involve hearings, appeals and administrative procedures. The discussion has also highlighted the subjective nature of academic assessment. Different examiners can sometimes reach different conclusions about the same research. In some cases, candidates who fail with one set of examiners may later receive a pass from another panel after an appeal. There is no suggestion that these concerns necessarily apply to Arday’s examination. The available debate does not establish whether his thesis met or failed to meet the required standard. However, the controversy has renewed calls for universities to examine their doctoral assessment systems. Questions include how examiners are selected, whether they receive adequate compensation, how thoroughly theses are reviewed and how allegations of academic misconduct are handled. The wider debate is therefore about more than one doctoral thesis. It raises fundamental questions about the credibility, consistency and accountability of the PhD examination process.

  • |

    Progressive Abdul El-Sayed and moderate Haley Stevens lock horns in high-stakes Michigan Democratic Senate primary

    Voters across Michigan headed to the polls on Tuesday for a pivotal Democratic Senate primary that has emerged as a major battleground testing the ideological direction of the party. Former public health director Abdul El-Sayed faced four-term US Representative Haley Stevens in a fierce contest to secure the nomination to replace retiring Democratic Senator Gary Peters. The election night watch party for El-Sayed in Detroit saw left-wing commentator Hasan Piker launch a sharp critique against the Democratic political establishment while speaking to media representatives. Piker praised El-Sayed’s campaign as an “issues-first” movement, asserting that grassroots engagement carried greater weight than financial backing. Piker drew specific attention to external campaign funding, taking aim at the more than $30 million (£23.5 million) poured into the race by political action committees affiliated with the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) in support of Stevens. Describing the influx of negative advertising against El-Sayed as a “heinous smear campaign”, Piker expressed hope that mainstream Democrats would learn from El-Sayed’s approach. He also dismissed suggestions that the candidate or his high-profile backers would prove to be a general election liability, arguing that voters are disillusioned with personality-driven politics and seeking structural policy changes. Throughout the primary, the candidates presented starkly contrasting visions for the party’s future in the battleground state. El-Sayed, who gained endorsement from Senator Bernie Sanders, focused his platform on reducing corporate influence in politics, expanding healthcare access, and providing economic support to working families. Responding to characterisations regarding his political stance, El-Sayed clarified that he advocates for regulated capitalism rather than socialism. Conversely, Stevens leaned on her tenure in the US House of Representatives and her previous role in the Obama administration, positioning herself as a pragmatic candidate with the legislative track record needed to retain the seat. While earlier polling indicated El-Sayed held a slight edge, surveys suggested Stevens might hold broader appeal amongst moderate voters in the upcoming general election. The political friction surrounding the primary also drew public commentary from US President Donald Trump, who characterised the race as a contest between a “communist and a socialist.” The winning Democratic nominee will move on to face Republican candidate Mike Rogers in the November general election, a race anticipated to play a crucial role in determining party control of the US Senate.

  • |

    Peru and Mexico resume diplomatic relations after political dispute

    The diplomatic break occurred when Mexico granted political asylum to former Peruvian Prime Minister Betssy Chavez, who faced conspiracy charges regarding former President Pedro Castillo’s 2022 attempt to dissolve Congress. As part of the bilateral agreement to restore relations, Peru granted Chavez safe-conduct guarantees under the 1954 Caracas Convention on Diplomatic Asylum, enabling her to leave the Mexican Embassy in Lima and travel to Mexico. Peruvian Foreign Minister Carlos Espa confirmed she departed in good health. The Peruvian Ministry of Foreign Affairs maintained that no political persecution exists in the country and stated that granting safe-conduct does not waive Peru’s legal right to request Chavez’s extradition in the future. The diplomatic rapprochement follows commitments made by newly elected Peruvian President Keiko Fujimori ahead of her inauguration to normalize ties with Mexico, an initiative welcomed by Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum.

  • | |

    Insider reveals where Ethan Slater stands with ex-…

    Actor Ethan Slater is not rekindling his relationship with ex-wife Lilly Jay following his recent split from singer Ariana Grande, despite growing speculation online. New reports have dismissed rumors suggesting the former couple could reunite, with a source close to Jay insisting there is no romantic reconciliation taking place.  Speculation began after news broke that Grande and Slater had quietly ended their relationship after nearly three years together. According to sources, the breakup was mutual and amicable, with both stars choosing to remain friends while focusing on their personal and professional lives.  Following the split, social media users questioned whether Slater might reconnect with Lilly Jay, his former wife and the mother of his child. However, a source close to Jay has firmly denied those claims. TMZ reported that the former spouses are “absolutely not” getting back together, adding that reports suggesting Slater is trying to win her back are simply untrue.  The insider also noted that while Ethan and Lilly continue to co-parent their son, their relationship remains focused on parenting rather than romance. They are said to be committed to raising their child in a healthy environment, but there are no plans to revive their marriage.  Slater and Jay’s relationship attracted significant public attention in 2023 after news of his romance with Grande surfaced during the production of Wicked. At the time, both Slater and Grande faced intense media scrutiny. Slater and Jay later finalized their divorce, and both have since moved forward with their separate lives.  Meanwhile, Grande has also reportedly begun a new chapter following the breakup. Recent reports suggest she has reconnected with former boyfriend Ricky Alvarez, although neither has publicly commented in detail on the status of their relationship.  Despite the online rumors, those close to Lilly Jay say she has no interest in revisiting the past. Instead, her priority remains her family and maintaining stability for her son. Likewise, Slater is reportedly focused on his career and fatherhood rather than attempting to rebuild his previous marriage.  For now, the latest reports make one thing clear: while Ethan Slater and Lilly Jay continue to share the responsibility of co-parenting, there is no romantic reunion on the horizon. As public interest in their personal lives continues, sources close to the family hope to put the speculation to rest by emphasizing that both have moved on and are concentrating on the next chapter of their lives. 

  • |

    Australia introduces mandatory pay floor and injury coverage for gig workers

    In a major shift for gig economy rights, Australia’s industrial umpire has ordered delivery platforms to pay food and grocery couriers a mandatory minimum rate alongside compulsory personal accident insurance. The Fair Work Commission (FWC) ruled late on Tuesday that gig delivery workers must earn a minimum rate for active delivery time. The order, set to take effect on 17 August, is expected to benefit roughly 250,000 workers across the country. Beyond baseline wages, platforms such as Uber Eats and DoorDash will now be legally required to provide personal accident cover for couriers on duty, though workers will remain responsible for third-party vehicle insurance. The reform stems from workplace legislation passed by Australia’s Labor government in 2023 and 2024, which empowered the FWC to regulate conditions for independent contractors previously excluded from traditional employment protections. In a joint statement, the Transport Workers Union (TWU), Uber Eats, and DoorDash welcomed the determination. TWU National Secretary Michael Kaine hailed the order as a landmark moment that establishes new standards for a workforce long left outside national workplace systems.

  • | |

    Monica Barbaro reveals ultimate dating red flag

    Actor Monica Barbaro has opened up about what she believes is the biggest warning sign in modern dating while continuing to attract attention for her relationship with actor Andrew Garfield. The 36-year-old actor shared her views during the red carpet premiere of her upcoming film One Night Only, where she was asked about relationship habits that immediately raise concerns. Barbaro said one of the clearest red flags is when a person shows no curiosity about their date and spends the entire conversation talking only about themselves. She explained that several of her friends have experienced similar situations, describing it as a common complaint in today’s dating culture. According to Barbaro, meaningful conversations require mutual interest. She said it is a warning sign when someone fails to ask even a single question about the other person, as it reflects a lack of genuine interest in getting to know them. The actor added that healthy relationships are built on communication, attentiveness and equal participation in conversations. In her view, a one-sided discussion can reveal important aspects of a person’s personality early in the relationship. Barbaro’s comments come as public interest in her romance with Andrew Garfield continues to grow. The pair first sparked dating speculation after they were seen together around the 2025 Academy Awards, with fans closely following their appearances over the past year. Most recently, Garfield attended the premiere of One Night Only to support Barbaro, further fuelling interest in their relationship. Although the couple has largely kept their personal life private, their public appearances together have continued to attract attention from fans and entertainment media. Barbaro is currently preparing for the release of One Night Only, while Garfield remains active with several upcoming film projects. Their relationship has become one of Hollywood’s most talked-about romances, even as both actors continue to focus on their careers

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *