clears hurdle imran
| | |

SC clears hurdle in Imran hospital plea

ByJustpaste.in

An objection raised by the Supreme Court registrar’s office against a contempt of court petition filed by PTI founder Imran Khan’s sister, Uzma Khan, has been removed.

The petition was filed in connection with Imran Khan’s proposed transfer to a hospital for medical treatment. Uzma Khan has sought contempt proceedings against the government and named Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, Law Minister Azam Nazeer Tarar and Information Minister Atta Tarar, among others, as respondents.

The petition also calls for Imran Khan to be shifted to Shifa Hospital for treatment and for his medical tests to be conducted.

PTI Chairman Barrister Gohar Ali Khan and Secretary General Salman Akram Raja had visited the Supreme Court on Monday in connection with the petition. They sought to have the case fixed for an early hearing.

Earlier, the Supreme Court registrar’s office had returned the petition after raising an objection.

According to sources, the registrar’s objection stated that the petition did not include a list of the allegations of contempt levelled against the respondents.

The PTI subsequently addressed the objection and resubmitted the petition to the Supreme Court.

The registrar’s office has now accepted the amended filing and allotted a registration number to the contempt petition.

Uzma Khan’s petition has been registered as Contempt Petition No. 8/2026.

The development clears the procedural hurdle that had previously prevented the petition from moving forward.

The petition seeks judicial intervention over the treatment and medical care of Imran Khan and alleges non-compliance with the court’s directions concerning his hospital transfer.

Similar Posts

  • | |

    PTI rift deepens as Salman Akram Raja, Mashal Yous…

    ByJustpaste.in

    ISLAMABAD: Differences within the Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI) have intensified as senior party figures Salman Akram Raja and Mashal Yousafzai exchanged allegations over party affairs and accusations related to the alleged sale of tickets. Salman Akram Raja criticised those who, according to him, were unable to pursue the matter through legal channels and had instead resorted to what he described as baseless allegations against Mashal Yousafzai over ticket-selling claims. Raja also said he did not know who had nominated Yousafzai as a senator, maintaining that the decision had been made on the instructions of PTI founder Imran Khan. He added that he did not have the authority to remove her from the Senate. In response, Mashal Yousafzai alleged that Raja had made his recent statements after apologising to the PTI founder. She challenged the party leadership to take action against Raja if it had the authority to remove him from the party. The dispute has also drawn comments from PTI leader Shandana Gulzar, who questioned Raja’s remarks concerning money. She raised questions over the whereabouts of millions of rupees allegedly received from the United States and said that those responsible would face serious consequences if the matter was investigated. The exchange has added to growing tensions within the opposition party, with allegations and counter-allegations emerging as its leadership continues to grapple with internal disagreements.

  • | | | | |

    Pakistan played key role in easing US-Iran tensions: analysis

    ByJustpaste.in

    Pakistan played an important mediating role in efforts to ease tensions between the United States and Iran and helped bring the two sides to the negotiating table, according to an analysis by South Asian Voices, a policy platform focusing on security, political and economic developments in South Asia. The analysis said Pakistan stepped in at a critical stage when tensions between Washington and Tehran had escalated sharply and both sides had suffered significant losses. According to the assessment, Islamabad successfully facilitated communication between the United States and Iran and helped bring a global power and a major regional power into direct negotiations. The report described Pakistan’s diplomatic engagement as significant, arguing that Islamabad managed to perform a role that several major powers, including China, France, Germany, India and the United Kingdom, had been unable to achieve. The analysis further noted that talks between American and Iranian representatives in Islamabad continued for more than 20 hours. It described the discussions as the highest-level direct contact between the United States and Iran since the 1979 Iranian Revolution. Although Washington and Tehran subsequently accused each other of violating the terms of a ceasefire, the two sides did not completely abandon the diplomatic process, according to the analysis. The report therefore argued that it would be inaccurate to hold the mediator responsible for the failure of the process, stressing that Pakistan’s role should instead be viewed in the context of its efforts to keep communication channels open between the two sides. The assessment highlights Islamabad’s growing diplomatic role in attempts to reduce tensions between Washington and Tehran and underscores Pakistan’s efforts to facilitate dialogue during a period of heightened regional instability.

  • | |

    Olivia Rodrigo criticizes Trump over Planned Paren…

    ByJustpaste.in

    Olivia Rodrigo has once again spoken out on a political issue, criticizing US President Donald Trump over recent changes to federal funding for Planned Parenthood. The Grammy-winning singer joined a new awareness campaign highlighting the impact that the funding cuts have had on healthcare clinics across the United States. The campaign focuses on the consequences of legislation signed by President Trump that ended federal funding for Planned Parenthood, one of the country’s largest providers of reproductive and preventive healthcare services. According to the campaign, nearly 30 Planned Parenthood health centers have closed since the law took effect, raising concerns about access to medical care in several communities. In the campaign video, Rodrigo voices support for people who rely on the organization’s services. She argues that the closures could make it more difficult for many Americans to receive routine healthcare, including cancer screenings, birth control, sexually transmitted infection testing, and other preventive medical services. The singer has been outspoken on reproductive rights in recent years. She has previously used concerts and public appearances to encourage civic engagement and has supported organizations that advocate for reproductive healthcare access. Her latest campaign continues that advocacy, drawing attention to the real-world effects of policy decisions on patients and healthcare providers. Supporters of Planned Parenthood say the funding cuts will disproportionately affect low-income families and people living in rural areas where healthcare options are already limited. They argue that the organization provides a wide range of essential medical services beyond abortion care and plays an important role in preventive health. Meanwhile, supporters of the Trump administration have defended the funding changes, saying federal money should not go to organizations connected with abortion services. They argue that healthcare funding should instead be directed toward other medical providers that do not perform or support abortions. The debate has once again highlighted the deep political divide in the United States over reproductive healthcare. While advocacy groups continue to challenge the funding changes, supporters of the legislation maintain that the policy reflects their longstanding position on the use of taxpayer money. Rodrigo’s participation in the campaign has sparked widespread discussion online. Many fans praised the singer for using her platform to speak on an issue she believes is important, while others criticized her decision to enter another political debate. As with many celebrity statements on public policy, reactions have been sharply divided across social media. Although the discussion surrounding Planned Parenthood funding remains highly controversial, Olivia Rodrigo’s latest campaign has brought renewed attention to the issue. By speaking out, the singer has added her voice to an ongoing national conversation about healthcare access, government funding, and the role public figures play in shaping awareness of major social and political issues.

  • |

    Kate Middleton reportedly steps in amid alleged royal will dispute

    ByJustpaste.in

    Kate Middleton is reportedly refusing to remain on the sidelines as tensions surrounding the British Royal Family continue to attract attention. New claims suggest that the Princess of Wales has become involved in an alleged dispute over King Charles’ financial arrangements and the future inheritance of Prince William. According to reports circulating about the royal family, King Charles has allegedly made changes to his will that could leave William without the fortune he was reportedly expected to inherit. The claims come at a time when tensions between the monarch and his eldest son are said to be heightened by disagreements over several family matters, including Prince Harry’s expected return to the United Kingdom. Sources cited in the reports claim that Charles’ decision was influenced partly by what has been described as William’s strong-willed personality. Royal biographer Hugo Vickers has previously characterized the future king as someone who believes he knows what is best, a description that has been used in discussions about the alleged differences between father and son. One particularly dramatic claim suggests that William has been removed from Charles’ will, with the fortune allegedly being redirected toward Prince Harry. The reported inheritance has been estimated at around $2 billion, although there has been no official confirmation from Buckingham Palace or the royal family regarding the contents of the King’s will. The alleged disagreement has also been linked to tensions between Kate and Queen Camilla. According to the reports, William and Kate were involved in an awkward moment at a recent royal event after they allegedly passed Camilla without performing the expected curtsy. The incident reportedly fueled speculation about disagreements behind closed doors. Claims surrounding the alleged inheritance dispute further suggest that Kate has sought legal advice from palace lawyers. The Princess of Wales is reportedly taking the matter seriously and is said to be seeking clarification over any financial arrangements that could affect her husband and their family. However, the claims remain unverified, and there has been no public statement from the Palace confirming that William has been removed from Charles’ will or that Harry has been named as the recipient of a multibillion-dollar inheritance. The alleged dispute comes as attention also turns toward Prince Harry and Meghan Markle. The couple are reportedly expected to return to the UK with their children, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet, before the end of August. Harry’s potential return with his family could place renewed attention on the complicated relationships within the royal household. His relationship with William has remained strained since the Duke and Duchess of Sussex stepped away from royal duties and relocated to the United States. With Harry potentially returning to Britain alongside Meghan and their children, speculation surrounding the brothers, their wives and the wider royal family is likely to continue. For now, however, the claims about Charles’ alleged will remain unconfirmed, leaving questions over whether there is any truth behind the reported financial dispute.

  • |

    Petroleum Levy collection hits record Rs1.57 trill…

    ByJustpaste.in

    Pakistan’s petroleum levy collection reached a record Rs1.567 trillion during the fiscal year 2025-26, exceeding both the government’s target and the International Monetary Fund’s (IMF) projection, according to sources. The government also collected an additional Rs50.16 billion as Climate Support Levy during the fiscal year, adding further revenue from petroleum products. Sources said petroleum levy collections increased by Rs347.24 billion compared with the previous fiscal year. The total collection stood nearly Rs100 billion above the government’s target of Rs1.468 trillion for FY2025-26. The collection also surpassed the IMF’s estimate. The global lender had projected petroleum levy revenues of around Rs1.546 trillion for the fiscal year, meaning the actual collection exceeded the projection by approximately Rs21 billion. Petroleum levy revenues have continued to rise sharply in recent years. The government collected Rs1.220 trillion in FY2024-25, compared with Rs1.019 trillion in FY2023-24. In FY2022-23, petroleum levy collection stood at around Rs580 billion. The latest figures reflect the government’s growing reliance on petroleum-related revenues to strengthen its fiscal position and meet revenue requirements under its economic programme. At present, the government charges a petroleum levy of Rs80 per litre on petrol, while high-speed diesel carries a levy of Rs77.28 per litre. In addition, the government imposes a separate Climate Support Levy of Rs5 per litre each on petrol and diesel. The record collection comes as the government continues to seek higher revenues while managing fiscal pressures and meeting commitments under its agreement with the IMF. The increased levy revenue provides additional funds for the federal budget but also adds to the overall cost burden on consumers through petroleum prices.

  • | |

    Iran rejects US control over war’s end as Hormuz tensions persist

    ByJustpaste.in

    TEHRAN: Iran has rejected any suggestion that Washington will decide how the conflict ends, while diplomatic efforts over the Strait of Hormuz continue amid a fragile pause in US-Iran military strikes. Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei said some Gulf countries had been involved in the conflict alongside the United States. He did not identify the countries or provide further details. Baghaei said Tehran would not allow the United States to determine the outcome of the war. He also said Iran had not requested a return to direct negotiations with Washington. He said discussions with Oman over the management of the Strait of Hormuz had been positive. However, he stressed that the waterway remained closed and there had been no change in the situation. The Strait of Hormuz remains one of the main flashpoints in the conflict. It is a crucial route for global energy shipments, making any disruption a major concern for oil markets and international trade. Iranian state media also reported that six vessels were intercepted after attempting to use what Tehran described as an unsafe and unauthorised route through the southern part of the strait. According to the report, the vessels had switched off their navigation systems. One vessel suffered an accident, while the others returned towards the Gulf following intervention by Iranian forces. The situation has also affected shipping activity in other regional waterways. Traffic through the Bab el-Mandeb Strait has slowed following attacks by Yemen’s Houthi movement on Saudi oil facilities along the Red Sea coast. Shipping data showed that only a limited number of commodity vessels crossed the waterway over the weekend. The number of vessels using the Strait of Hormuz also remained unusually low despite the temporary pause in US and Iranian attacks. The slowdown has raised concerns about the wider impact of the conflict on global energy supplies. Oil prices, however, moved lower after Washington and Tehran halted their strikes for the time being. Brent crude fell sharply during Monday trading, while US West Texas Intermediate also declined. The fall reflected hopes that diplomacy could eventually restore normal shipping through the Strait of Hormuz. Oman has been playing a role in diplomatic efforts between the two sides. An Omani delegation travelled to Tehran to discuss possible arrangements for future management of the strategic waterway. Iran and Oman reportedly differ over how the mechanism should operate. Tehran wants a service fee and greater control over the proposed system, while Oman has suggested a regional arrangement without tolls. Meanwhile, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu travelled to Washington for talks with US President Donald Trump. The meeting is expected to cover regional developments and issues of concern to both countries. Netanyahu’s visit comes as the wider conflict continues to affect security across the Middle East. Trump has also rejected reports that the US military is facing shortages of ammunition. He said the United States has more munitions than any other country and has sufficient supplies for its military needs. However, reports have suggested that US military officials have raised concerns about the strain on weapons stocks following nearly two weeks of sustained attacks on Iran. US officials have reportedly warned that continued large-scale operations could put additional pressure on missile interceptors and other defensive systems deployed across the Middle East. The United States has maintained that its forces remain capable of carrying out their missions. The current pause followed 13 nights of US airstrikes against Iran. Tehran had responded to the attacks with strikes on areas in neighbouring Gulf states that host US military facilities. Iran has now also paused its retaliatory operations. A senior Iranian official said Tehran’s position remains linked to Washington’s actions: if US attacks stop, Iran will also halt its operations. US Ambassador to the United Nations Mike Waltz said Trump paused the campaign to give diplomacy more time. Iran, however, remains deeply sceptical about the development. An Iranian source said Tehran viewed the pause as potentially tactical rather than a genuine shift in Washington’s position. The uncertainty has left many people in Iran worried about whether the fighting could resume.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *