shahood alvi sparks
|

Shahood Alvi sparks controversy with candid marriage remarks

Pakistani television actor and director Shahood Alvi has once again found himself at the centre of social media discussions following his candid remarks about marriage, relationships and the role of women in maintaining a healthy relationship.

Shahood began his showbiz career at Pakistan Television as a boom operator alongside his maternal uncle, Iqbal Ansari. He later moved into acting and gradually established himself as a recognised performer through his work in several popular television dramas.

The actor is married to Saima Shahood, and the couple has three daughters, Areeba, Sajal and Arija, all of whom are now married. Shahood frequently appears on morning shows, particularly programmes that feature discussions about marriage, relationships and family life.

During a recent television appearance alongside actresses Laila Zuberi and Fariha Awan, Shahood shared his views on why some husbands may lose interest in their wives. His comments, however, quickly attracted attention and divided opinions online.

Discussing the possible reasons behind a decline in a husband’s interest, Shahood suggested that women who spend most of their time at home may sometimes carry the smell of ingredients such as ginger and garlic from cooking. He contrasted this with men working in offices, where they may encounter women wearing perfumes.

He questioned why a husband would remain attracted if his wife smelled of cooking ingredients, while women in offices might be dressed up and wearing fragrance.

The actor also made another controversial remark when the discussion turned towards seeking professional help for marital problems. When Fariha Awan suggested therapy as an option for couples facing difficulties, Shahood jokingly questioned what would happen if a therapist ran away with someone’s wife. He repeated the warning while referring to psychiatrists, describing it as a humorous concern.

Shahood further said that spending excessive amounts of time on a mobile phone could be a negative sign in a marriage. He suggested that women should also make an effort to regain their husbands’ attention by preparing food they enjoy and getting ready before their husbands return home.

Laila Zuberi agreed that making an effort to look presentable for one’s spouse has traditionally been viewed positively. Recalling her childhood, she said she remembered her mother applying lipstick before her father returned home.

Fariha Awan also supported the idea that women could make additional efforts to present themselves well before their husbands came home.

Shahood went on to discuss his own marriage, saying he had tried to teach his wife several practical tasks, including paying bills, shopping for groceries and driving. However, he said jokingly that she never learned these skills and referred to her humorously as a “stubborn one.”

He also recalled advice from actress Bushra Ansari, who had discouraged his wife from learning how to drive. According to Shahood, Bushra believed that once housewives learned to drive, their responsibilities could increase because they might then be expected to take children to school and bring them back.

Following the television appearance, Shahood’s comments have sparked mixed reactions on social media. While some users criticised his remarks as outdated or insensitive, others viewed them as part of the informal and humorous nature of morning-show conversations.

Despite the debate, Shahood’s comments have once again placed discussions surrounding marriage, expectations from spouses and gender roles in the spotlight.

Similar Posts

  • |

    Ugandan diplomat Olara Otunnu joins race to become next UN secretary-general

    Ugandan diplomat Olara Otunnu has entered the contest to become the next secretary-general of the United Nations. Nominated formally by the Ugandan government, the 75-year-old former UN under-secretary-general and special representative for children and armed conflict becomes the seventh official candidate seeking to succeed António Guterres when his second term concludes at the end of the year. Otunnu’s vision statement emphasises the urgent need for institutional reforms across the UN, proposing a dedicated body to oversee work on artificial intelligence, prioritising resolution efforts for major international conflicts, and supporting climate action that aligns with economic development. He enters a diverse field of candidates including Rafael Grossi of Argentina, former Chilean President Michelle Bachelet, Rebeca Grynspan of Costa Rica, María Fernanda Espinosa of Ecuador, Carolyn Rodrigues-Birkett of Guyana, and former Senegalese President Macky Sall. The UN Security Council is set to begin its preliminary straw polls this week to narrow down contenders ahead of the final selection.

  • | |

    Perez Hilton’s family gives update on celebrity …

    Perez Hilton’s family has shared an emotional update on the celebrity blogger’s condition following his devastating mental health crisis earlier this month. Hilton, whose real name is Mario Armando Lavandeira Jr., was hospitalized on August 4 after he appeared to harm himself during a TikTok livestream. The disturbing broadcast prompted viewers to contact authorities, who responded to his Miami home and took him to a hospital for medical treatment. (People.com⁠) Now, Hilton’s sister, Barbara Lavandeira, has spoken publicly about his condition and the difficult road ahead. In an emotional interview, Barbara revealed that her brother remains hospitalized and continues to receive treatment for both his physical injuries and mental health. She described the situation as extremely difficult for their family and emphasized that his recovery will not happen overnight. (Page Six⁠) “His physical and mental recovery is going to take a lot of time, but we remain hopeful,” the family has said, according to reports. Hilton reportedly suffered significant blood loss and injuries that required surgery after the incident. He remains under medical care while his doctors and loved ones focus on his recovery. His family has also asked the public to respect their privacy during this painful period. (People.com⁠) Barbara also described the shock of discovering her brother in serious distress. She said the experience was deeply traumatic for everyone involved, particularly because Hilton’s children were also affected by the crisis. The family has been working to protect the children while making sure Hilton receives the support he needs. The blogger’s recent struggles have come after a particularly difficult year. Before the August 4 incident, Hilton had experienced serious health problems, including a battle with sepsis and a blood clot. His sister also revealed that he had voluntarily sought treatment for severe depression just weeks before the livestream. (Page Six⁠) The family has urged people to show compassion rather than focus on Hilton’s controversial past. Barbara has defended her brother against harsh comments online, saying he had been making efforts to change and become a better person. (People.com⁠) For now, Hilton’s loved ones remain focused on his healing. His return home is uncertain, and his recovery is expected to be a long process. Despite the seriousness of his condition, his family says they are hopeful. They are asking fans and the public to give Hilton the time, privacy and support he needs as he continues receiving treatment. The family’s latest message makes one thing clear: the road ahead may be long, but they are standing by him throughout his recovery.

  • | | |

    SC clears hurdle in Imran hospital plea

    An objection raised by the Supreme Court registrar’s office against a contempt of court petition filed by PTI founder Imran Khan’s sister, Uzma Khan, has been removed. The petition was filed in connection with Imran Khan’s proposed transfer to a hospital for medical treatment. Uzma Khan has sought contempt proceedings against the government and named Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, Law Minister Azam Nazeer Tarar and Information Minister Atta Tarar, among others, as respondents. The petition also calls for Imran Khan to be shifted to Shifa Hospital for treatment and for his medical tests to be conducted. PTI Chairman Barrister Gohar Ali Khan and Secretary General Salman Akram Raja had visited the Supreme Court on Monday in connection with the petition. They sought to have the case fixed for an early hearing. Earlier, the Supreme Court registrar’s office had returned the petition after raising an objection. According to sources, the registrar’s objection stated that the petition did not include a list of the allegations of contempt levelled against the respondents. The PTI subsequently addressed the objection and resubmitted the petition to the Supreme Court. The registrar’s office has now accepted the amended filing and allotted a registration number to the contempt petition. Uzma Khan’s petition has been registered as Contempt Petition No. 8/2026. The development clears the procedural hurdle that had previously prevented the petition from moving forward. The petition seeks judicial intervention over the treatment and medical care of Imran Khan and alleges non-compliance with the court’s directions concerning his hospital transfer.

  • | |

    Climate authority summoned again as questions grow…

    Islamabad: The Pakistan Climate Change Authority has been called back before a Senate committee only days after Chairperson Sherry Rehman strongly questioned why a new authority was operating alongside the Climate Change Ministry, asked what new work it was actually doing and raised concerns over staff costs, duplication and the use of public money. The fresh meeting will again focus almost entirely on the authority, its work, projects, programmes and progress. The quick return of the issue to the committee has increased pressure on the authority to clearly explain why it exists and what results it has produced that the Ministry of Climate Change and Environmental Coordination could not already deliver. At the previous meeting, Sherry Rehman repeatedly asked officials what work the authority was doing that the ministry was not already responsible for. She questioned whether the government had effectively created a parallel structure carrying out the same work on climate mitigation, adaptation, coordination and policy implementation. Rehman said the presentation before the committee did not show a clear new role for the authority. She also questioned why another institution was being created at a time when the ministry itself was facing shrinking development budgets. One of the strongest moments came when the committee discussed the authority’s staffing and expenditure. Rehman referred to a sanctioned strength of 24 positions and said employee related expenditure had already reached around Rs 80 million according to the presentation placed before the committee. She questioned why these costs were being incurred when she could not see a clear difference between the work of the authority and the ministry. She warned officials not to treat the meeting as a routine presentation exercise and demanded direct answers about public spending and actual results. Rehman also questioned whether creating the authority had brought new climate experts into government. Members asked whether the purpose was to recruit technocrats who could not otherwise be brought into the ministry. However, Rehman said the presentation appeared to show many of the same officials who had already worked inside government departments. She described the situation as a reshuffling of bureaucracy rather than the creation of a new technical institution. She said fragmentation was already a major government problem, with different organisations working separately on connected climate and disaster issues. According to her argument, creating another body without a clearly different mandate could increase costs while making responsibility more confusing. Rehman also questioned why the authority had been activated years after the law creating it first appeared. She said the law allowed the authority to exist but argued that this did not necessarily mean the government was forced to operationalise it. She said earlier governments had discussed removing such overlapping structures instead. During the exchange, she said she had opposed operationalising the authority while serving as minister because she feared it would create duplication. She told the committee that the result now appeared close to what she had warned about: officials were moving between the ministry and the authority instead of creating a completely new technical team. The authority defended its role. Dr Muhammad Rafiq told the committee that the authority was originally designed to provide technical support to the ministry. He acknowledged that more explanation was needed regarding what the authority was delivering against its original responsibilities. He suggested that the ministry and authority should be given an opportunity to return with a clearer presentation explaining what results they expected to achieve and what the authority could do that the ministry could not. The committee was told that the authority was still incomplete. Officials said a permanent chairperson was still being appointed and that only three members were working at the authority with a limited number of staff against the total positions planned. The authority also presented one of its strongest arguments in defence of its performance. An authority member told the committee that it had become Pakistan’s first public sector organisation to qualify as a delivery partner with the Green Climate Fund through the relevant mechanism. The official said this had been achieved by only three members and without technical assistance. He argued that this status could help the authority develop technical proposals and bring more climate finance into Pakistan. Rehman was not convinced that this achievement alone justified a separate authority. She argued that Green Climate Fund financing had already been coming to Pakistan through government structures and questioned why a completely new authority was needed when a climate finance office could operate within the ministry. She again asked why project development and technical hiring could not be handled directly by the ministry. Her central question remained the same throughout the discussion: what exactly could the new authority do that the ministry could not already do? The ministry told the committee that it had a supervisory and controlling role over the authority and that the authority’s budget passed through the ministry. However, Rehman continued to question how effective that control was if the authority could hire staff and exercise statutory powers separately. She asked officials to explain how rotating officials into a separate authority would make climate work more efficient when the ministry itself was losing development resources. Professor Dr Zahoor Ahmed Bazai, who identified himself as an unpaid member nominated to the authority and as a climate change academic, defended the institution. He told the committee that the authority was included in the climate law and that members had been nominated through the formal process. He argued that the authority was intended to provide expertise and serve an advisory role. Rehman said her criticism was not directed personally at individual members. She said the bigger problem was duplication between institutions and the growing number of attached bodies dealing with similar climate matters. The committee chairperson was also critical of the presentation the authority gave. Rehman said the presentation was not strong enough to be used by Pakistan at an international climate forum and described it as outdated in style. She said that if the authority wanted to demonstrate its value and

  • |

    Zanjeerain takes a dramatic turn as Sarbuland and Rabia marry

    Pakistani prime-time drama Zanjeerain has continued to attract strong attention from viewers with its emotional storyline, intense conflicts and unexpected twists. The Hum TV drama, directed by Shahzad Kashmiri and written by Farhat Ishtiaq, explores tribal traditions and family conflicts in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. The drama has gained significant popularity following several heartbreaking developments, particularly the deaths of Sher Dil, Mudassir and Bano. These events changed the direction of the story and left viewers wondering how the surviving characters would move forward. After airing 30 episodes, Zanjeerain has now reached another major turning point. In the latest episodes, the jirga made a surprising decision involving Sarbuland and Rabia. As part of the traditional practice of Khoon Baha, Sarbuland was expected to marry Rabia, a decision that came as a shock to many viewers. The much-discussed twist finally reached its conclusion in Episode 30 when Sarbuland and Rabia’s Nikah was solemnized. Their marriage has generated a strong reaction online, particularly among fans who had been hoping to see the two characters together following Bano’s tragic death. Many viewers celebrated what they saw as the much-awaited Sarbiya pairing, while others questioned the sudden development and its implications for the story. Some fans were amused by how quickly the characters moved toward marriage despite the tragic events that had taken place before it. One viewer jokingly pointed out that after so many deaths and tragedies, the characters suddenly got married without much difficulty. Another fan expressed excitement over the unexpected development, saying the twist was so surprising that they wanted to celebrate. However, not everyone was pleased with the storyline. Several viewers felt that the marriage did not fit naturally with the emotional journey of the characters. Some questioned what the development meant for Mudassir and Bano, arguing that the story appeared to move on from their relationship too quickly. Others criticised the makers for turning Mudassir’s wish to protect Rabia into a marriage between her and Sarbuland. One disappointed viewer argued that Mudassir had only asked Sarbuland to keep Rabia safe, rather than marry her. Despite the mixed reactions, the Sarbuland-Rabia Nikah has clearly become one of the most talked-about developments in Zanjeerain. The unexpected turn has left fans divided, with many now eager to see how the newly married couple’s relationship unfolds in the upcoming episodes.

  • | | |

    Oil prices surges avove $91 as Iran war fuels Horm…

    Oil prices climbed on Tuesday, with Brent crude moving above $91 a barrel as stalled diplomacy over the Iran conflict raised fresh concerns about global energy supplies. Brent futures gained 27 cents, or 0.3%, to $91.14 a barrel, while US West Texas Intermediate rose 42 cents to $85.04. WTI had earlier reached $85.37, its highest level since July 31. Markets remained tense after Iran signalled a shift toward a more offensive military posture, while Washington ruled out extending a temporary ceasefire. Progress toward reopening the Strait of Hormuz to normal tanker traffic has also slowed, adding to fears of prolonged supply disruptions. Only a handful of commodity vessels crossed the strategic waterway over the weekend, sharply below normal traffic levels. Concerns were further heightened by attacks in the Red Sea, reinforcing fears over disruptions at both the Strait of Hormuz and Bab el-Mandeb. Despite the growing tensions, reports of possible back-channel contacts between the US and Iran offered a limited sign of hope for renewed diplomacy. Meanwhile, markets are also watching US crude inventories, which are expected to have declined last week. Earlier, Oil prices climbed on Monday as uncertainty over a possible diplomatic breakthrough between the United States and Iran increased, while a sharp slowdown in tanker movements through the Strait of Hormuz heightened concerns about disruptions to global crude supplies. Brent crude futures gained as much as 1% during early trading to reach $89.40 per barrel. The benchmark was later up 72 cents, or about 0.8%, at $89.20 a barrel by 0229 GMT. US West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude also moved higher, rising 44 cents to $82.83 per barrel. Both international benchmarks posted gains of more than 5% last week after a series of attacks involving energy and shipping assets in and around the strategically important Strait of Hormuz. The incidents have intensified fears that further escalation could affect one of the world’s most important oil transit routes. Market sentiment was further affected by developments over the weekend, when Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi said Tehran had yet to decide whether it would resume negotiations with Washington. US President Donald Trump, meanwhile, told Americans to prepare for somewhat higher gasoline prices as the conflict continues. Analysts said the renewed uncertainty had brought geopolitical risk back into crude markets after oil prices had previously come under pressure on expectations that diplomatic efforts could ease tensions. “Oil prices have now rebounded almost completely from the lows seen in early August, as hopes for a more permanent resolution between the US and Iran have faded and geopolitical risk premiums have returned to the market,” said Priyanka Sachdeva, head of market insights at Phillip Nova in Singapore. Sachdeva cautioned, however, that the rally could lose momentum unless there is evidence of a further deterioration in the situation. She said the market would need to see renewed aggression in the Strait of Hormuz, particularly significant damage to oil tankers or energy infrastructure, before prices were likely to move substantially higher. Hormuz shipping activity slows Concerns over physical supply disruptions increased after ship-tracking data showed a marked decline in vessel traffic through the Strait of Hormuz over the weekend. According to data from Kpler, only five commodity vessels crossed the strategic waterway on Saturday, while no such transits were recorded on Sunday. This compared with 31 commodity vessel crossings during the previous weekend. The slowdown is significant because the Strait of Hormuz is a critical route for international energy shipments. Any prolonged disruption could increase transportation risks, raise insurance costs and place additional upward pressure on crude prices. The United Arab Emirates also accused Iran of attacking another vessel operated by Abu Dhabi National Oil Company (ADNOC) while it was passing through the strait on Friday, according to the Emirati state news agency WAM. The UAE had earlier blamed Iran for two separate incidents involving ADNOC-operated vessels on Thursday evening. The latest incidents have added to concerns among traders that the conflict could increasingly affect commercial shipping and energy infrastructure, rather than remaining confined to military and diplomatic confrontation. The Strait of Hormuz remains particularly important to global oil markets because a substantial volume of crude and petroleum products moves through the waterway. Any sustained interruption could therefore have consequences well beyond the region. For now, traders are closely monitoring developments involving US-Iran diplomatic contacts, attacks on shipping and the movement of tankers through the strait. While the latest price gains reflect a higher geopolitical risk premium, analysts remain cautious about predicting a prolonged rally. If shipping activity resumes and diplomatic channels reopen, some of the premium built into crude prices could quickly unwind. Conversely, additional attacks on tankers, oil facilities or other critical infrastructure could trigger a stronger market reaction and push prices higher as traders reassess the security of regional supplies.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *