taliban mark five
|

Taliban mark five years in power

KABUL: The Taliban on Saturday marked five years since returning to power in Afghanistan, staging a military parade in Kabul and presenting their rule as a period of stability despite mounting humanitarian and human rights concerns.

Armoured Taliban vehicles moved past the former US embassy in Kabul as officials raised flags and banners for what the government called “victory day” over Western domination.

Interior Minister Sirajuddin Haqqani said in a video message that the Taliban’s return resulted from “morale, courage” and “divine assistance.” He also acknowledged that the country still faces unresolved issues and problems.

The United Nations and international aid organisations have warned that Afghanistan continues to struggle with severe humanitarian and natural crises. They have also criticised the Taliban’s restrictions on women and girls.

According to UNESCO, the Taliban have kept around 2.5 million girls and women out of secondary schools and universities since 2021 and imposed restrictions on their movement. UN Women reported this week that half of Afghan women now leave their homes only once or twice a month.

The Taliban maintain that they uphold women’s rights under Islamic Sharia law.

The group has also faced security challenges, including a series of attacks on officials in northeastern Afghanistan. Islamic State claimed responsibility for the killing of the Taliban’s information director in Badakhshan in late July. The mayor of the provincial capital was also killed in an attack on Thursday, according to local media.

The Taliban seized power in August 2021 as US and allied forces withdrew from Afghanistan. The group initially promised a more moderate form of government than during its previous rule in the late 1990s and early 2000s. However, rights groups say its policies have instead imposed sweeping restrictions on women and girls.

Five years after returning to power, the Taliban government still lacks broad international recognition. Russia remains the only country to have formally recognised it.

Meanwhile, relations with Pakistan have deteriorated. Islamabad accuses Kabul of allowing Pakistani militants to operate from Afghan territory, adding further pressure to an already strained relationship.

Similar Posts

  • | | | |

    Iran accuses EU of hypocrisy as war tensions rise

    Iran has accused the European Union of hypocrisy over its criticism of Iran’s human rights record. Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei made the remarks in response to comments by EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas. Baghaei said the EU could not claim to defend human rights while, in Iran’s view, supporting military actions against the country. He accused European governments of providing logistical and technical assistance that Iran says has helped attacks against civilians and critical infrastructure. Baghaei also criticised the EU for what he described as its failure to condemn attacks on Iran. He said European officials had not shown enough concern over Iranian civilians, including children, killed during the conflict. He said the EU’s position had damaged its credibility and called its approach hypocritical. The accusations come as the conflict between Iran and the United States enters another dangerous phase. US President Donald Trump said Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will visit Washington next Tuesday. The meeting is expected to focus heavily on the ongoing conflict with Iran. The announcement comes after another wave of US military strikes against targets in Iran. Trump has continued to threaten stronger military action while also keeping the possibility of negotiations open. He said Washington is currently talking with Tehran and suggested that Iranian officials appear more serious about negotiations than before. At the same time, Trump warned that the US military remains prepared for further action. He said Washington faces two possible paths. One is to continue expanding military operations. The other is to reach a diplomatic agreement. The Strait of Hormuz remains at the centre of the crisis. The strategic waterway is a major route for global energy supplies. The conflict has already disrupted shipping and pushed oil prices higher. It has also raised concerns about inflation and a wider global economic slowdown. The situation has become more complicated with Houthi attacks in the Red Sea. The group has declared a naval blockade targeting Saudi Arabia and has threatened commercial shipping. A Saudi vessel suffered minor damage in a Red Sea attack on Friday, according to Saudi state media. The Saudi-led coalition later said it had carried out strikes against Houthi military positions in Yemen. The reports could not be independently verified. Iran has also issued increasingly strong warnings to US forces in the region. The US military has carried out air strikes against Iran for several consecutive nights. Iran’s Health Ministry said dozens of people had been killed and hundreds wounded since fighting resumed in late June. Iranian military officials have also threatened retaliation against US personnel for Iranian casualties. The conflict has already resulted in US military deaths and injuries, according to American officials. Meanwhile, Pakistan is exploring possible diplomatic channels to help revive stalled talks between Washington and Tehran. Pakistani officials have reportedly held exploratory discussions as international efforts increase to find a way out of the conflict. China has also been pushing for renewed negotiations. The fighting is also affecting global energy markets and shipping routes. Oil prices surged after attacks on Saudi-linked shipping in the Red Sea. Brent crude later fell but remained close to $100 a barrel. Several tankers have reportedly changed their routes because of security concerns around the Red Sea. Some vessels are taking longer routes through the Suez Canal and around Africa. Shipping through the Strait of Hormuz has also fallen sharply. Iran has meanwhile claimed attacks on US military positions in Kuwait and other parts of the Gulf. Kuwait said its air defence systems were responding to hostile targets launched from Iran. Iran’s Revolutionary Guards also claimed to have damaged a surveillance facility associated with the US Fifth Fleet in Bahrain

  • |

    Netanyahu visits White House for first Trump talks…

    Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu visited the White House on Tuesday for his first in-person meeting with US President Donald Trump since the Iran war began, as the two leaders held closed-door talks dominated by the conflict and regional security. The meeting, described by the White House as “positive and productive,” lasted about an hour and a half. It came amid a recent pause in the fighting between the US and Iran, with Washington signaling it wants to give negotiations a chance. Israel has not taken part in the latest round of hostilities, which flared earlier this month after an April ceasefire collapsed. Relations between Trump and Netanyahu reached a low point in April during negotiations on the ceasefire with Iran, with Trump unleashing profanity-laced tirades against his Israeli ally. Trump later described Netanyahu in an interview as a “very difficult guy,” while Netanyahu downplayed the exchanges as “tactical disagreements” that were “drawn out.” Upon arriving in Washington, Netanyahu attended a private memorial dinner on Monday evening in honor of the late US senator Lindsey Graham, and he was also scheduled to attend Graham’s memorial service later on Tuesday. Observers suggest that any differences between Trump and Netanyahu concern the means  timeline, intensity, and immediate objectives of operations rather than the ends of the war. Analysts believe Trump would mainly seek to focus on his two regional priorities: Iran and the expansion of the Abraham Accords, the US-brokered normalisation agreements signed during his first term that established formal diplomatic relations between Israel and the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, and Morocco. Gaza is seen as less of a priority for Trump, but other observers believe the talks could also address the possible easing of Israel’s military presence elsewhere in the region, such as in Lebanon, Syria, or Gaza. The meeting comes as diplomatic efforts to end the broader conflict continue, with Pakistan and Qatar playing mediation roles between Washington and Tehran.

  • | | | |

    Iran claims destruction of three US F-35 jets

    The conflict between Iran and the United States intensified on Thursday after Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) claimed it destroyed three US F-35 fighter jets during a missile attack on Jordan’s al-Azraq airbase, a key facility used by American forces. According to the IRGC, the attack was carried out in retaliation for a US strike on Iran’s Qeshm Island that allegedly killed members of a civilian family. Iranian officials claimed several ballistic missiles struck aircraft maintenance facilities at the base, destroying three F-35 fighter jets and severely damaging three others. The IRGC also alleged that several US military personnel and technical staff were killed in the attack. No independent confirmation of these claims has been provided by US or Jordanian authorities. The latest exchange came after the United States launched fresh overnight strikes targeting multiple locations in Iran, including Bushehr, Qeshm, Bandar Abbas, Kish and Abadan. Iranian media reported that residential areas on Qeshm Island were hit, killing three members of one family and injuring two children. Iran’s Revolutionary Guards also announced that three of their personnel were killed in separate US missile attacks, vowing retaliation against what they described as American aggression. Meanwhile, Jordan said its air defence systems intercepted and destroyed five Iranian missiles heading toward its territory, marking the fourth consecutive day of missile interceptions. Authorities reported no casualties or damage. Iraq also sought to distance itself from the growing conflict. A military spokesperson stated there was no evidence that recent regional attacks had been launched from Iraqi territory, while stressing that only official security forces would be responsible for the country’s defence and security. Iran’s Foreign Ministry said discussions with Omani officials aimed at reducing tensions remain ongoing in Tehran. Iranian officials blamed the continued closure of the Strait of Hormuz and disruptions to global shipping on US and Israeli military operations, insisting that foreign military actions had created instability in one of the world’s most important energy corridors. The IRGC also claimed two oil tankers attempting to pass through the Strait of Hormuz turned back after a fire broke out on one vessel. The group warned the strategic waterway would remain closed while military pressure against Iran continued. Elsewhere, Iran condemned recent US and Saudi air strikes inside Iraq, calling them violations of Iraqi sovereignty and international law. The attacks reportedly targeted Iran-aligned groups operating in the country. The United Nations expressed growing concern over the escalating hostilities. UN Secretary-General António Guterres urged all parties to end military operations immediately and return to diplomatic negotiations, warning that continued escalation could further destabilise the Middle East.

  • | | | | |

    Protest erupts in Washington over Netanyahu visit

    WASHINGTON: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s visit to Washington has sparked a fresh wave of protests, with demonstrators taking to the streets to oppose U.S. support for Israel and demand that the Israeli leader be arrested. Pro-Palestinian protesters gathered in the U.S. capital carrying Palestinian flags and banners criticising Washington’s backing of Israel. The demonstrations came as Netanyahu arrived in the United States for a scheduled meeting with President Donald Trump. At the heart of the protest was a demand that U.S. authorities enforce the International Criminal Court’s arrest warrant against Netanyahu. Demonstrators argued that the United States should not provide protection to an Israeli leader facing allegations before the international court. The protest reflects the wider political and public debate in the United States over Washington’s relationship with Israel and its approach to the conflict in Gaza. Trump rules out Netanyahu arrest The demonstrations gained additional attention because Trump has already made his position clear. The U.S. president has said Netanyahu will not be arrested while he is in the United States, directly rejecting calls for his detention. Trump has also strongly defended Israel and Netanyahu in connection with the ongoing regional conflict. Netanyahu’s visit comes at a particularly sensitive moment. His meeting with Trump on Tuesday is the first between the two leaders since their joint war against Iran, with tensions reportedly emerging over how the conflict should be handled. Protest adds pressure ahead of Trump meeting The Washington demonstration adds another layer of political pressure surrounding Netanyahu’s visit. Protesters say U.S. support for Israel should be reconsidered and that international legal proceedings should not be ignored. The issue of Netanyahu’s potential arrest has also become prominent in U.S. politics. New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani has said his administration is examining whether the city could enforce the ICC warrant if Netanyahu visits New York for the United Nations General Assembly in September. For now, however, Trump’s administration has made clear that Netanyahu will not face arrest during his stay in the United States. With protests continuing and the Trump-Netanyahu meeting attracting international attention, the visit is likely to keep the debate over Gaza, U.S.-Israel relations and international accountability firmly in the spotlight.

  • | |

    Could Lionel Messi be Argentina’s next President…

    BUENOS AIRES: Football icon Lionel Messi has become the subject of an unexpected political prediction after a Chinese academic claimed the Argentine superstar could become the country’s president within the next five years, a suggestion that has quickly gone viral across social media. The prediction was made by Chinese analyst and academic Jiang Xueqin during an interview on controversial online content creator Sneako’s Kick streaming platform. During the discussion, Jiang argued that Messi’s immense popularity could propel him into Argentina’s highest political office if he ever decided to enter public life. According to Jiang, the eight-time Ballon d’Or winner would not only win a presidential election comfortably but could also remain in office for as long as two decades because of the extraordinary public affection he enjoys. “He is so admired that people would continue to support him even if he made mistakes,” Jiang suggested during the interview, a remark that quickly drew mixed reactions from football fans and political observers alike. The prediction comes at a time when Messi continues to cement his legendary status in world football. At the age of 39, he recently captained Argentina to a second consecutive FIFA World Cup final, extending one of the most remarkable international careers in football history. Although Argentina fell to Spain in the 2026 World Cup final, Messi’s performances throughout the tournament once again earned widespread praise. Many supporters believe his influence on Argentine football remains unmatched, despite the disappointing result in the championship match. The speculation has fueled lively discussions online, with some fans embracing the idea as an interesting possibility while others dismissed it as little more than a fanciful prediction. Social media platforms have been flooded with humorous posts imagining Messi exchanging football boots for political office. However, there is currently no indication that Messi intends to enter politics. The football legend has never announced plans to run for public office or participate in Argentina’s presidential elections. Political analysts also caution against treating the prediction as anything more than personal opinion. Jiang’s remarks have not been independently verified and do not reflect any official political development involving the Argentine captain. Messi has largely kept his public image focused on football, charity work and family life throughout his career, rarely commenting on domestic politics. While the idea of the World Cup-winning captain one day leading Argentina has captured public imagination, it remains entirely speculative. For now, Messi’s future continues to be linked with football rather than politics, leaving fans to debate whether the viral prediction is pure fantasy or an intriguing “what if” scenario.

  • |

    Women allege rape, abuse at UK Army teen college

    Four former female recruits have accused the UK’s Army Foundation College (AFC) in Harrogate of fostering a culture of sexual abuse, harassment and misogyny, with one woman alleging she was raped by several fellow recruits when she was 17 years old. The women, who attended the military training college over the past five years, shared their experiences publicly for the first time. They said they faced sexual violence, harassment and degrading treatment while undergoing training at the college, which prepares teenagers for military service. One former recruit said she accepted an invitation to another recruit’s room, believing it was harmless. She alleged that several male recruits sexually assaulted and raped her over the course of several hours. The traumatic incident forced her to leave the Army within weeks, saying she could no longer continue her training after the attack. Another former recruit alleged that a fellow trainee trapped her inside a room before sexually assaulting her. She said she managed to escape after struggling with the attacker. A third former recruit’s mother said her daughter endured repeated sexual harassment throughout her training and even blocked her dormitory door at night because the room’s lock was broken and she feared male recruits entering. A fourth woman claimed some instructors openly made sexist remarks, rated female recruits based on their appearance and entered female dormitories without warning. She alleged that such behaviour encouraged disrespectful attitudes toward women among male trainees. Official data obtained through freedom of information requests revealed that police received 16 reports of sexual offences linked to the college during the year ending in June. The reported incidents included allegations of sexual assault, exposure and voyeurism. Separate Ministry of Defence figures showed that 176 complaints involving inappropriate sexual behaviour were recorded at the college between January 2018 and June 2025. Most complaints involved junior soldiers, while dozens concerned permanent staff members. The British Army described the allegations as extremely serious and distressing, stating that criminal or unacceptable behaviour has no place in the armed forces. It said several reforms have been introduced to improve victim support and strengthen the handling of serious offences, including specialist investigations conducted outside the normal chain of command. The Army also said it encourages anyone who has experienced or witnessed misconduct to report it and maintained that the college remains committed to providing a professional, safe and supportive environment for all recruits. However, concerns have grown over the safety of young recruits following previous convictions involving Army personnel for sexual offences and wider reports highlighting sexual misconduct within the armed forces.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *