democrat challenges antisemitism
|

US democrat challenges antisemitism claims over Israel aid

US Democratic politician Abdulrahman Mohamed El-Sayed has pushed back against attempts to portray criticism of US funding for Israel as antisemitic, arguing that invoking concerns about antisemitism to defend the actions of a foreign government ultimately harms Jewish Americans.

Speaking during an interview with a US host, El-Sayed said that criticism of government policies should not automatically be dismissed as hatred against a religious or ethnic community. He stressed that the fight against antisemitism must continue alongside efforts to combat Islamophobia and other forms of discrimination.

El-Sayed argued that both antisemitism and Islamophobia represent serious challenges that society must confront rather than use as political tools. He said Americans should be able to question how public funds are being spent, particularly when those funds support the military policies of another country.

“We cannot remain silent and ignore why the United States provides billions of dollars in annual assistance and how that support is being used,” he said, questioning whether American aid should contribute to policies he described as involving racial segregation.

The Democratic politician also criticized Washington’s approach to military assistance, saying the US should not provide unconditional support to any foreign government. He argued that American involvement in the war in Gaza over the past several years was not inevitable and that Washington should have taken a more critical approach to its relationship with Israel.

El-Sayed’s comments reflect a broader debate within the Democratic Party and across the United States over American military and financial support for Israel. While supporters of Israel argue that US assistance helps protect a key ally and supports its security, critics have called for stricter conditions on aid and greater scrutiny of Israel’s military actions.

The remarks also highlight the growing political debate over how to distinguish legitimate criticism of Israeli government policies from antisemitism, while ensuring that concerns about antisemitism are not dismissed or minimized.

Similar Posts

  • | | |

    Iran unleashes drone barrage on US bases

    The conflict between Iran and the United States intensified on Friday as Iranian military officials claimed to have carried out drone attacks on several military facilities used by US forces in Kuwait, Bahrain and Jordan. The developments came after fresh US airstrikes on Iranian targets, signalling another major escalation in the months-long regional confrontation. According to Iranian military statements, “Arash” attack drones targeted US military warehouses and troop positions at Camp Udairi, Camp Doha and Camp Arifjan in Kuwait. Iranian officials said the attacks focused on weapons storage sites, military equipment and logistical facilities. They warned that further military action would continue if attacks against Iran persisted. Iran also claimed responsibility for drone strikes on Sheikh Isa Air Base in Bahrain and Al-Azraq Air Base in Jordan. Iranian state media reported that fuel storage areas, aircraft hangars, maintenance facilities and accommodation used by US personnel were among the intended targets. However, there was no immediate confirmation from the United States, Bahrain, Jordan or Kuwait regarding the reported attacks. Officials in those countries also did not immediately report casualties or significant damage. Meanwhile, US forces reportedly carried out fresh airstrikes on an Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) naval headquarters in the northern Iranian town of Zibakenar. Iranian authorities said the facility was hit but added that initial assessments showed no casualties. In Iraq, several explosions were reported near Erbil International Airport, where US-led coalition forces are stationed. Witnesses reported hearing air defence systems in operation while drones were seen flying over the area. Smoke was later observed rising near the airport complex. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi warned that any country assisting the United States in military operations against Iran would be held responsible under international law. He said Tehran reserved the right to respond with measures permitted under self-defence. Araghchi also criticised Washington over comments suggesting frozen Iranian assets could be used to compensate for damage caused to commercial shipping. He warned that confiscating another country’s assets would create a dangerous international precedent and undermine global financial stability. The military escalation has also affected global energy markets. Concerns over security in the Strait of Hormuz and the Red Sea have sharply reduced tanker traffic through key shipping routes. Shipping data indicated that only one oil tanker crossed the Strait of Hormuz on Thursday, the lowest daily figure in more than two months. The situation worsened after attacks on Saudi oil tankers in the Red Sea increased fears of further disruption to global energy supplies. Rising tensions pushed international oil prices above $100 per barrel, raising fresh concerns about inflation and the global economy. US President Donald Trump warned that Iran and the Iran-backed Houthi movement would face severe military consequences if attacks on commercial shipping continued. He said Washington was prepared to respond forcefully to any further threats against regional security and international maritime trade.

  • | |

    Iran prepares 40th-day mourning events for Ayatollah Ali Khamenei

    Iran has begun preparations for 40th-day mourning and commemorative ceremonies for former Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei following his burial. Special events will take place in Tehran, Qom, Mashhad and other Iranian cities to mark the occasion. Iran’s current Supreme Leader and Ali Khamenei’s son, Mojtaba Khamenei, will oversee the ceremonies. According to reports, Ali Khamenei’s funeral and mourning ceremonies began on July 4 and continued across several Iranian cities. Officials also held commemorative gatherings in five major cities across Iran and Iraq — Tehran, Qom, Najaf, Karbala and Mashhad. Authorities later buried the former supreme leader in Mashhad. Millions of mourners from Iran and other parts of the world reportedly attended the funeral ceremonies. Senior delegations from several countries, including Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Russia, China and Türkiye, also travelled to Iran to attend the events and convey condolences. Iranian authorities said Ali Khamenei died on February 28, the first day of US and Israeli air strikes on Iran. His death marked a major political transition for the country. Following his death, his son Mojtaba Khamenei assumed the position of Iran’s Supreme Leader. The upcoming 40th-day ceremonies are expected to draw large crowds and provide another major occasion for supporters to pay tribute to the former leader. The events in Tehran, Qom and Mashhad are also expected to carry considerable political and religious significance as Iran continues to adjust to its new leadership under Mojtaba Khamenei.

  • |

    Iran condemns Israeli minister’s remarks over Gaza killings

        Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi has strongly condemned remarks attributed to Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir regarding the killing of Palestinians in Gaza, accusing him of openly advocating mass violence and the forced displacement of Palestinians. According to media reports, Gharibabadi said Ben-Gvir had set a daily target of killing between 30 and 40 people in Gaza. He described the remarks as further evidence of what Iran considers systematic violence against Palestinians and called for such statements to be preserved as evidence for possible future legal proceedings. Gharibabadi said that Israeli officials were openly discussing the expulsion of Palestinians from Gaza and the establishment or expansion of Jewish settlements in Palestinian territory. He argued that these statements should not simply be treated as political rhetoric but should be documented carefully because they could potentially become important evidence in future cases involving alleged violations of international law. “The statements and admissions made by Israeli officials should be preserved as evidence,” Gharibabadi said, according to the reports. He added that such evidence could be presented when Israeli officials are held accountable and legal proceedings are initiated against those accused of crimes against Palestinians. The Iranian official’s comments came in response to statements attributed to Ben-Gvir concerning Israel’s military campaign in Gaza. Media reports said the Israeli minister had spoken about killing between 30 and 40 people in Gaza every night. He was also reported to have said that the people of Gaza should not remain alive. Ben-Gvir, a far-right Israeli politician, has repeatedly faced international criticism over his statements and positions concerning Palestinians and the Gaza conflict. His remarks have frequently generated controversy, particularly when he has discussed military operations, Palestinian displacement and the future of Gaza. Gharibabadi’s response reflects Iran’s broader criticism of Israel’s military operations in Gaza. Iranian officials have repeatedly accused Israel of committing serious violations against Palestinians and have called for international action against Israeli leaders and officials. Tehran has also consistently supported the establishment of an independent Palestinian state and opposed the expansion of Israeli settlements in Palestinian territories. The issue of accountability has become increasingly prominent amid the continuing conflict in Gaza. Palestinian officials and international organizations have reported extensive civilian casualties and destruction in the territory since the outbreak of the war. Israel, meanwhile, has maintained that its military operations are aimed at Hamas and other armed groups and has defended its actions as necessary for national security and the release of hostages. The latest exchange between Iran and Israel comes amid continued regional tensions. Iranian officials have frequently used international forums and diplomatic statements to call attention to the humanitarian situation in Gaza and to demand accountability for alleged violations of international humanitarian law. Gharibabadi’s call to preserve statements made by Israeli officials highlights Iran’s argument that public comments by political and military figures could later be examined in legal proceedings. He suggested that remarks regarding killings, forced displacement and settlement expansion should be documented so they can potentially be used when questions of responsibility and accountability are considered. The controversy surrounding Ben-Gvir’s reported remarks is therefore likely to add to international scrutiny of Israel’s conduct in Gaza and the statements of its political leaders. As the conflict continues to generate diplomatic and legal debate, allegations concerning civilian killings, displacement and settlement policies remain major points of contention between Israel and its critics, including Iran.

  • | | | |

    NYC Mayor urges US to enforce ICC arrest warrant a…

    NEW YORK: New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani has said the city does not have the legal authority to enforce the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) arrest warrant against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, while urging the US federal government to take action if Netanyahu visits the United States. In a video statement posted on social media, Mamdani said his administration had carefully reviewed whether New York City could execute the ICC warrant under existing laws. After examining all available legal options, he concluded that municipal authorities lack the power to carry out such an arrest. “The federal government, however, does,” Mamdani said, calling on US officials to cooperate with the ICC and enforce the warrant if the opportunity arises. The New York mayor also sharply criticized Netanyahu, describing him as “a war criminal” and accusing him of being responsible for what he called “a horrific genocide against the Palestinian people.” Mamdani added that he supports the ICC’s position, saying that anyone charged by the court should face legal proceedings regardless of their office or nationality. “I agree with the ICC that Benjamin Netanyahu should be arrested and tried for his crimes,” he said. The ICC, based in The Hague, announced in 2024 that it had found reasonable grounds to believe Netanyahu bore responsibility for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity linked to Israel’s military campaign in Gaza following Hamas’ October 7, 2023 cross-border attack on Israel. The remarks come just a day after US President Donald Trump declared that Netanyahu would not face arrest if he attends the United Nations General Assembly in New York this September. Trump’s comments highlighted the gap between the US administration’s position and the ICC’s legal proceedings. Netanyahu’s office swiftly rejected Mamdani’s remarks, dismissing the ICC as a “kangaroo court” and reiterating Israel’s long-standing position that the tribunal lacks jurisdiction over Israeli officials. The issue has reignited debate over the role of international justice, the authority of the ICC and the legal obligations of countries when individuals facing international arrest warrants travel abroad. While the United States is not a member of the ICC and does not formally recognise its jurisdiction, the controversy has drawn renewed international attention as legal, diplomatic and political questions continue to surround Netanyahu’s potential foreign visits. The latest exchange underscores the deep divisions over the Gaza conflict and the growing debate about accountability, international law and the limits of local and federal authority in the United States.

  • |

    Cambridge professor Jason Arday resigns following plagiarism and CV investigation

    Professor Jason Arday, who became the youngest Black professor appointed in the history of the University of Cambridge, has resigned from his post with immediate effect following escalating accusations of academic misconduct and misrepresentation of his qualifications. In a statement released on Wednesday via the Good Law Project, the 41-year-old sociologist said he had “concluded that the only way to bring this chapter to an end is to step away”, citing the severe personal cost of public scrutiny. Arday maintained that his resignation should not be interpreted as an admission of guilt or an acceptance of the allegations against him. The resignation coincided with an official announcement from the University of Cambridge confirming the launch of an investigation into new details surrounding Arday’s academic credentials and honorary titles, alongside ongoing complaints handled under its research misconduct policy. Jesus College, where Arday held a fellowship, confirmed a parallel internal review. The controversy began when former Cambridge researcher Nathan Cofnas published allegations detailing extensive textual overlap in Arday’s published academic papers using plagiarism-detection software. Cofnas also questioned several public claims made by Arday regarding his charitable activities, including assertions of running 30 marathons in 35 days and raising more than £5 million for charity. Arday previously acknowledged editorial oversights in his earlier work, attributing textual similarities to processing methods linked to his neurodivergence and autism, while strongly denying intentional deceit or dishonesty. He argued that the scrutiny was part of a racially motivated campaign targeting his position and diversity initiatives within academia. Publisher Simon & Schuster, which is slated to publish Arday’s memoir later this month, issued a statement defending his professional integrity, while Cambridge officials stressed that formal review processes will proceed in accordance with employment law and institutional guidelines.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *