children geared have
|

30 children geared to have been conceived using wrong IVF donors

At least 30 children, most of them believed to be British, may have been conceived through IVF treatment in northern Cyprus using sperm or egg donors different from those selected by their parents. The allegations have emerged from an investigation into fertility clinics in the region, raising serious concerns about the treatment of international patients and the regulation of fertility services.

The parents involved say they carefully chose anonymous donors before undergoing treatment. Their decisions were based on detailed information provided by clinics, including the donors’ medical backgrounds, physical appearance, education, personalities, interests and hobbies. However, after their children were born, some parents began to question whether the donors they had selected were actually used during their IVF procedures.

The latest investigation has identified at least 30 cases in which parents believe the wrong sperm or egg donors may have been used. This is a significant increase from the seven cases .

Around half of the children were reportedly conceived following treatment at Dogus IVF Centre, a fertility clinic in northern Cyprus. Several individuals involved in the treatment of these patients have come under scrutiny, including doctors Firdevs Uguz Tip and Sevket Alpturk, as well as patient coordinator Julie Hodson.

One mother, identified as Rachel, said she recently discovered that the sperm donor used during her treatment may not have been the donor she had chosen. She described the situation as extremely shocking and unacceptable.

The parents have raised concerns that staff members at the clinic may have provided misleading information about the donors. Dr Firdevs Uguz Tip has denied any wrongdoing.

The investigation has also uncovered information about the relationship between Dogus IVF Centre and Cryos International, one of the world’s largest sperm banks. Cryos placed Dogus on its blacklist in 2016, adding another concern surrounding the clinic’s practices.

Northern Cyprus has become a popular destination for British and other international patients seeking fertility treatment. The region offers relatively low treatment costs, reportedly high success rates and access to a wide selection of sperm and egg donors. However, its regulatory system is significantly different from that of European Union countries.

Northern Cyprus is internationally recognised only by Turkey, and EU laws do not apply there. Fertility clinics in the territory have been described as operating under relatively loose regulation, raising questions about oversight and accountability.

According to previous reports on the emerging allegations in March, when seven parents came forward with concerns that they may have been misled about the donors used in their treatments. Following those reports, the Ministry of Health in northern Cyprus said it had opened an official investigation. However, the ministry has reportedly failed to provide further information.

Many parents said clinics had promised them donors who had undergone health screening and were from Western European backgrounds. Their suspicions reportedly grew after their children were born.

DNA testing has provided further evidence that has intensified these concerns. Eleven of the 30 children have undergone commercial DNA tests, with results indicating genetic ancestry connected to Turkey or nearby regions. According to the investigation, these results may suggest that the donors selected by the parents were not the individuals whose genetic material was ultimately used.

The allegations have caused distress among affected families, many of whom travelled abroad believing they were receiving carefully selected fertility treatment. The growing number of cases is now raising serious questions about donor identification, patient information, clinic accountability and the regulation of fertility services in northern Cyprus.

Similar Posts

  • |

    Eggs fly in Kosovo parliament as political crisis …

    PRISTINA: Kosovo’s parliament descended into chaos after opposition lawmaker Time Kadrijaj threw eggs toward acting Prime Minister Albin Kurti during a heated session, highlighting the deep political divisions gripping the country. Kadrijaj, a member of the Alliance for the Future of Kosovo, reportedly threw four eggs in Kurti’s direction while shouting “shame” as lawmakers debated the stalled formation of parliamentary institutions. The dramatic confrontation prompted security personnel and other lawmakers to intervene, and the session was suspended. The incident came after Kurti asked lawmakers for additional time to continue negotiations before proposing a candidate for the speaker of parliament. Kosovo has remained caught in a political deadlock following the June snap elections, with disagreements among political parties preventing the new institutions from being fully established. Kurti’s request for more time has angered opposition parties, which argue that the constitutional deadline has already expired. They have questioned the legality of continuing the parliamentary session under the circumstances. The confrontation inside parliament underscored the increasingly tense political atmosphere in Kosovo, where repeated disagreements have delayed key constitutional and institutional processes. Despite the disruption, Kurti appeared to remain composed. Reports said he indicated that he was willing to face criticism if it helped bring political rivals to the negotiating table. The political impasse follows June’s parliamentary election, in which Kurti’s Vetëvendosje movement emerged as the largest political force but failed to secure enough support to move forward without cooperation from other parties. Kosovo has experienced repeated political instability in recent years, with disagreements over the formation of institutions contributing to uncertainty over the country’s political direction. The egg-throwing incident has now become a striking symbol of that frustration, turning an already tense parliamentary dispute into an extraordinary scene that quickly attracted international attention. For Kosovo, however, the bigger issue remains unresolved: whether political parties can overcome their differences and break the institutional deadlock before the crisis deepens further.

  • |

    Ben Carroll becomes Victoria premier as Labor seeks fresh start before election

    Australia’s state of Victoria has a new premier after the ruling Labor Party selected Ben Carroll as its leader ahead of the closely watched state election in November. The leadership change comes as Labor attempts to improve its standing with voters after months of declining public support under former premier Jacinta Allan. Carroll, who had been serving as Victoria’s deputy Labor leader, was elected unopposed on Tuesday shortly after Allan announced her resignation. He now takes charge of Australia’s second most populous state, which includes the city of Melbourne, at a time when Labor faces a difficult electoral challenge. Allan became premier in 2023 but struggled to maintain public confidence as concerns over the economy and growing dissatisfaction with Labor’s long period in office affected her popularity. The party has governed Victoria for the past 12 years, and recent opinion polls suggested many voters were ready for a change. Several surveys conducted before Allan stepped down indicated that the opposition Liberal Party was on course to win the November election. However, some polls suggested the Liberals might need support from the right wing One Nation party to form a government if they fail to secure a clear majority. Speaking after announcing her resignation, Allan warned that the possibility of a Liberal and One Nation alliance remained the biggest concern for Labor. She argued that such a coalition would pose a significant political challenge for the state and urged voters to consider the implications before casting their ballots. One Nation was founded in 1997 and was once considered a fringe political movement. In recent years, however, the party has gained greater public support through its tough stance on immigration and other national issues. Its leader Pauline Hanson has seen her popularity rise, with some opinion polls showing stronger public approval for her than for Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese. The leadership transition comes just one day after an Australian court rejected Hanson’s appeal against a ruling that found she had racially discriminated against a Muslim senator by telling her to return to Pakistan. The decision kept the earlier judgment in place and added further attention to One Nation during an already important political period. Allan said she had been prepared to contest any leadership challenge within Labor but ultimately decided that stepping aside was in the party’s best interest. She explained that a leadership battle only months before the election would consume valuable time and resources that should instead be focused on the campaign. She also expressed confidence that she could have retained the leadership if challenged, but said avoiding internal divisions would give Labor a better chance of competing effectively in November. With Ben Carroll now leading the party, Labor hopes a fresh face at the top will help reconnect with voters and improve its prospects in one of Australia’s most important state elections. The outcome will be closely watched across the country as a measure of changing political trends and the growing influence of smaller parties such as One Nation.

  • | | | |

    Iraq demands proof over Saudi attack claims

    BAGHDAD: Iraq has rejected allegations that its territory was used to launch attacks against Saudi Arabia and has called for evidence to support the claims. A spokesperson for the Commander-in-Chief of the Iraqi Armed Forces said no country or organisation had presented proof that attacks on Saudi Arabia originated from Iraqi soil. The spokesperson said Iraq remained committed to protecting its sovereignty and preventing its territory from being used to threaten neighbouring countries. He added that the government was implementing measures to strengthen national security and maintain full control over the country’s borders and military activities. The statement came after reports linked Iraq to attacks on Saudi Arabia, increasing tensions in an already volatile region. Following recent US and Saudi military strikes inside Iraq, the Iraqi National Security Council convened an emergency meeting to assess the security situation. During the meeting, the council condemned the attacks and described them as a violation of Iraq’s sovereignty. Officials stressed that all hostile actions carried out on Iraqi territory were unacceptable. The council said the Iraqi government alone has the authority to decide how to respond to any attacks launched from within the country. It warned against any unilateral military action that could further destabilise the region. The office of Iraqi Prime Minister also issued a statement reaffirming Baghdad’s policy of keeping Iraq out of regional conflicts. The statement said the government would continue to pursue diplomatic and legal measures to protect the country’s sovereignty, security and political stability. The latest developments follow joint US and Saudi air strikes targeting locations believed to be used by Iran-backed militias in Iraq. The strikes were reportedly carried out in response to drone attacks on Saudi oil facilities. According to the Popular Mobilisation Forces (PMF), the attacks targeted its headquarters and facilities across seven Iraqi provinces. The group said at least 20 of its personnel were killed, while another 32 were injured in the air strikes. It added that the heaviest attack took place in Nineveh province, where 10 fighters lost their lives. The military action has further raised concerns about growing instability in the region and the possibility of wider confrontation involving regional and international powers.

  • |

    US Court blocks Trump plan to end immigrant work permits

    BOSTON: A US federal judge has temporarily blocked the Trump administration from enforcing a policy that would have revoked work permits for thousands of immigrants and asylum seekers across the United States. The ruling allows affected individuals to continue working legally while the legal challenge against the policy proceeds in federal court. The decision was issued by US District Judge Nathaniel Gorton in Boston after immigrant rights organizations and labor unions filed a lawsuit challenging the administration’s immigration measures. The judge ruled that the policy should not take effect until the court fully reviews its legality. The disputed policy was introduced as part of the Trump administration’s broader immigration agenda following legislation passed by Congress in 2025. The law imposed new fees on asylum applications and introduced stricter rules governing employment authorization for people protected under Temporary Protected Status (TPS). If implemented, the new policy would have affected tens of thousands of immigrants who are legally living in the United States under humanitarian protections. Many of them were at risk of losing their legal right to work, making it difficult to support themselves and their families. Among those expected to be affected are TPS holders from El Salvador, Sudan, and Ukraine, many of whom have lived and worked in the United States for years. The policy was scheduled to come into effect this week before the federal court stepped in to halt its enforcement. The lawsuit argued that the US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) acted unlawfully by implementing the new restrictions without following the proper legal process. The plaintiffs said the policy would cause severe financial hardship for thousands of families and disrupt businesses that rely on legally authorized immigrant workers. Judge Gorton’s order temporarily prevents federal authorities from cancelling work permits while the case remains under judicial review. The ruling does not permanently strike down the policy but ensures that existing work authorizations remain valid until the court reaches a final decision. The Trump administration has consistently pursued tougher immigration policies, including efforts to end Temporary Protected Status for people from several countries. Officials argue that TPS was intended as a temporary humanitarian measure and should not become a permanent immigration pathway. Earlier this year, the US Supreme Court allowed the administration to move forward with ending TPS protections for certain groups of Haitian and Syrian immigrants. However, the latest ruling prevents another major immigration measure from taking immediate effect. Immigrant advocacy groups welcomed the court’s decision, saying it protects vulnerable workers from losing their jobs and income while the legal dispute continues. They argued that the ruling provides temporary relief to thousands of families facing uncertainty over their future.

  • |

    US senators demand probe into conditions aboard US…

    WASHINGTON: US senators are demanding an investigation into reported conditions aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln, as concerns grow over food shortages, broken plumbing, contaminated water and mental health problems during the aircraft carrier’s unusually long deployment in the Middle East. Democratic senators called for answers from the US Navy on Wednesday, citing reports that the nuclear-powered carrier has remained at sea for more than 250 days and has not come ashore for more than 200 days. Senator Richard Blumenthal, in a letter to Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, urged the Pentagon to explain the conditions facing personnel aboard the ship. He said the extended deployment had been accompanied by reports of shortages of basic supplies, water contamination, plumbing failures and deteriorating mental health. The concerns have also reached the Senate Armed Services Committee, with Senator Ruben Gallego calling for an official oversight visit involving a bipartisan Senate delegation. In a post on X, Gallego said lawmakers should be allowed to inspect the carrier and investigate what he described as alarming reports from personnel and their families. The USS Abraham Lincoln left San Diego, California, on November 21, 2025, initially heading for duty in the South China Sea. It was later redirected towards the Middle East as tensions escalated ahead of US and Israeli attacks on Iran that began on February 28. The prolonged deployment has reportedly placed significant pressure on the approximately 5,000 sailors and Marines aboard the carrier. During recent meetings, family members reportedly confronted Navy officials over shortages of food and other basic necessities while seeking clarity about when their relatives might return home. Some accounts have also raised serious concerns about mental health among crew members. Reports cited by lawmakers included alleged suicide attempts and threats by personnel to jump from the ship. Gallego highlighted claims of moldy showers, irregular hot water, rationed meals and soap, broken toilets and exhausting 12-to-16-hour work shifts without regular days off. “These are frightening alarm bells,” Gallego said, arguing that the reported conditions require immediate attention. The allegations come as the Lincoln continues a deployment that has already broken records for consecutive days at sea. Extended deployments can place additional physical and psychological demands on military personnel, particularly when access to supplies, recreation and shore-based support is limited. The US Navy had not immediately responded to an AFP request for comment. For the senators, the immediate priority is accountability and determining whether sailors and Marines aboard the carrier have adequate food, water, medical care and safe working conditions. The growing calls for oversight could now put pressure on the Pentagon and Navy leadership to provide answers about one of the longest and most demanding carrier deployments in recent US military history.

  • |

    Yemeni forces launch 133 operations against Houthis

    Yemeni government forces carried out 133 operations against Houthi militia positions over the past 24 hours, according to a military spokesperson. The spokesperson said the operations targeted key Houthi military infrastructure, including weapons storage facilities and a modern command-and-control centre. Government forces also struck several military vehicles used by the militia. The attacks involved a combination of rocket launchers, artillery fire and drones, with the military saying the strikes focused on disrupting the Houthis’ weapons capabilities and command structure. The Yemeni government forces have also released video footage showing several of the attacks on Houthi positions. The footage reportedly captures military operations targeting weapons facilities, vehicles and other sites linked to the militia. The latest operations come amid continued fighting between Yemen’s internationally recognised government forces and the Iran-aligned Houthi movement, with both sides continuing to target military positions in areas affected by the conflict. The Yemeni military spokesperson said the operations formed part of ongoing efforts to weaken the Houthis’ military capabilities and prevent the group from reinforcing its positions. The strikes focused on facilities and equipment that the militia allegedly uses to support its operations on the ground. According to the military, the use of drones, artillery and rocket systems allowed government forces to target several locations simultaneously. The strikes also aimed to disrupt the movement of Houthi fighters and limit their ability to transport weapons and military equipment. The Yemeni government forces said they would continue operations against Houthi positions as part of their efforts to regain control of areas held by the militia. The latest footage was released as the conflict continues to pose a major security challenge in Yemen.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *