longing other lives
|

Longing for other lives

You might be driving along a quiet stretch of highway at dusk and notice a remote house set against the rolling hills. Its porch light glowing softly against the fading twilight. It happens in an instant. Your mind steps inside for a fleeting moment. You picture yourself standing in that kitchen, tending to a warm pot of soup, learning the rhythms of the local wildlife and forget the press of unread emails. Or perhaps it happens when you see a cozy cottage on a distant coast. Might be an apartment perched above a neighborhood bookstore. Or a tiny rural train station where only a few passengers wait.

For a few seconds, you inhabit that alternate life. But as quickly as the thought arrives, reality hits back.

For many people, these sudden bursts of romantic daydreaming trigger a wave of subtle unease. It is common to treat such longings like a mild psychological symptom. It is an indicator that something in our current existence is lacking. We wonder if we made wrong turns along the path, selected the wrong career or settled into the wrong neighborhood. We assume that fantasizing about a simpler life means we are secretly desperate to escape our reality.

However, a change in perspective shows that this assumption may misinterpret how the human mind functions.

Understanding Fernweh: The Opposite of Homesickness

The key to re-evaluating this feeling lies in a concept from the German language: fernweh. The word is translated literally as far-pain. Fernweh describes a deep, aching yearning for distant places. It stands as the emotional mirror image of homesickness. While homesickness pulls us back toward the familiar, fernweh pushes toward the unfamiliar.

Fernweh is neither a practical plan for relocation nor a symptom of dissatisfaction. It exists in a unique middle ground. It is more than a mere desire to escape reality, yet far less than a literal plan to manifest a new lifestyle.

When we treat longing as a sign of discontent, we force ourselves into an unnecessary dilemma. We start assuming we must either change our lives or suppress our thoughts entirely. In reality, these brief mental excursions rarely end with us packing a suitcase. Instead, they leave us returning to our daily routine feeling subtly expanded, as if our capacity for wonder has been stretched open.

The Multiple Selves and the Purpose of Imagination

The alternative selves we envision during daydreams: the quiet caretaker of a lighthouse, the keeper of a village shop, or the isolated writer in a secluded cabin, are not criticism on our present choices. They do not demand that we abandon our jobs or start over from scratch.

Rather, these imagined lives serve as quiet reminders that human beings are inherently complex. The person managing household budgets, answering routine emails and searching for misplaced keys is not the entirety of who we are or who we could be.

Human imagination evolved specifically to explore endless possibilities without requiring us to physically execute every scenario.

Seeing Distant Peace as Invitation

Instead of seeing distant places as destinations we failed to reach, we can view them as invitations. They invite us to reconnect with our curiosity, our creativity and our capacity for reinvention. They reassure us that another way of seeing the world remains entirely possible, even within the routine of daily living.

 

Ultimately, longing for another life or a distant land does not mean you chose the wrong life. It simply demonstrates that your imagination remains curious and alive. As long as a distant porch light or a road over a hill can capture your wonder, you can take comfort in a profound truth. The truth is your internal life will always be far larger than the single outer life you happen to inhabit.

Similar Posts

  • |

    How history echoes in our present day

    An unwavering pendulum swings between day and night. Light and shadow. Good and bad. Perhaps it is the same with past and present – they are not completely distinct. They bleed into each other.   We often treat history as a closed volume, a collection of static dates bound safely within dusty books. We comfort ourselves with the notion that the past is a distant land. It’s separated from us by the firm barrier of time. Yet, as the world navigates the shifting landscapes of global headlines from geopolitical realignments to social revolutions, that comfortable boundary dissolves. This reminds us of a fundamental truth: human experience is governed by rhythmic cycles rather than straight lines. The past does not vanish. Rather, it leaks into our modern reality. The past has been shaping our choices and defining our current struggles. Consider the nature of a pendulum. It never remains stationary at one extreme without gathering momentum to travel toward the other. When we examine contemporary events, we witness this exact dynamic playing out on a global scale. Periods of immense technological progress and international cooperation are frequently followed by waves of skepticism, isolationism, and social fragmentation. The transition from light to shadow is rarely sudden. Rather, it is a gradual arc, an unavoidable swing that moves back and forth through the generations. In our current era, news stories frequently mirror the anxieties and triumphs of previous centuries. The debates over economic security, human rights and political sovereignty that dominate today’s news cycles are not novel crises born purely of the twenty-first century. They are the latest iterations of long-standing philosophical battles.  We read about modern diplomatic tensions or economic uncertainty. Similarly, we are observing the pendulum as it swings across familiar ground. The actors may change or the tools may become more sophisticated. However, the underlying human drives such as fear, ambition, hope and the pursuit of justice remain constant. To suggest that the past and present bleed into each other is to acknowledge that our current social fabric is set long ago. Every law passed today carries the DNA of ancient legal traditions. Every cultural movement draws inspiration, or takes warning, from historical predecessors. When we fail to recognize this continuity, we risk viewing modern events in isolation, mistaking recurring patterns for unprecedented anomalies. This fluidity between yesterday and today offers a significant perspective for processing current events. It invites us to move beyond reactive outrage or superficial analysis and instead ask deeper questions. Where have we seen this pattern before? What did our ancestors learn when the pendulum reached this exact point in its arc? How can we prevent the shadows of history from obscuring the light of present possibilities?   Ultimately, the quote serves as both a warning and an invitation. It warns us that progress is never permanent, requiring constant vigilance to maintain the balance toward fairness and truth. At the same time, it invites us to find solace in continuity. The darkness of any given moment is not an absolute end, but merely a phase in an ongoing cycle. As the past bleeds into the present, we are handed the pen to write the next passage. By recognizing the persistent movement of the pendulum, we gain the foresight needed to guide its path toward a more enlightened future.

  • Why does your nose get blocked at night?

    Do you breathe normally during the day but find your nose getting blocked as soon as you lie down at night?  This is a common problem for many people. A blocked nose can disturb sleep force you to breathe through your mouth and leave you with a dry mouth or sore  throat in the morning. Many people think a blocked nose is only caused by a cold but doctors say there can be several other reasons. Your sleeping position One of the most common reasons is the position of your body while sleeping.  During the day when you are sitting or standing gravity helps mucus drain from the nose. When you lie down mucus can collect inside the nasal passages making the nose feel blocked and making breathing more difficult. Natural changes at night The body also goes through natural changes during sleep.  Hormone levels and nerve activity can affect the blood vessels and tissues inside the nose. These changes may increase swelling or mucus in the nasal passages. People who already have allergies or nasal inflammation may notice the problem more strongly at night. Allergies in the bedroom Allergies can be another major reason for nighttime nasal blockage.  If your nose becomes blocked mainly after going to bed check your sleeping environment. Dust, bedding, pillows, curtains and carpets can contain tiny dust mites that may trigger allergies.  Damp walls and mold can also cause sneezing, itching and a blocked nose. Regularly washing bedding cleaning the room and keeping the sleeping area dry may help reduce these triggers. Acid reflux can also play a role Acid reflux may also cause problems at night. Eating a heavy meal and lying down soon afterward can allow stomach acid to move toward the throat. This may cause throat irritation and sometimes a feeling of nasal blockage. If you also experience heartburn a sour taste in the mouth frequent throat clearing or a burning throat in the morning it is better to speak with a doctor. Simple ways to feel better If you wake up with a blocked nose a saline nasal rinse may help clear mucus and make breathing easier.  Use a properly prepared saline solution and follow safe instructions when rinsing the nose. If your throat feels irritated gargling with warm salt water may provide some relief. Good oral hygiene is also important for overall mouth and throat health. When should you see a doctor? Occasional nasal blockage is usually not a major concern. However you should not ignore it if your nose is blocked every night or your sleep is regularly disturbed. See a doctor if you have persistent sneezing, facial pain headaches fever breathing difficulty or ongoing nasal discharge. Finding the real cause of nighttime nasal blockage can help improve both your sleep and breathing.

  • The Population Debate: Curse or Opportunity?

    By Dr Naveeda Katper Different countries have different characteristics regarding population, geography, and natural resources that shape their economic growth. Economists use various indicators to measure development, and population is one of the most debated among them. A large population is often viewed as a hurdle to economic growth. However, every issue deserves to be examined from different angles. The question, “Is a large population a curse or a blessing?” cannot be answered with a simple yes or no. We need to move beyond the idea of population as a burden and understand the concept of the demographic dividend. What appears to be a curse can become a blessing when viewed through the right perspective and supported by the right policies. Research by the RAND Corporation and the World Bank has shown that countries with a growing working-age population can experience faster economic growth when supported by sound education, health, and employment policies. Whether a large population becomes an economic asset depends on governance and public policy. A growing population is not necessarily a curse because every additional mind brings new ideas, different perspectives, and fresh solutions to existing problems. One mind can accomplish one task, two minds can accomplish two, and millions of minds can achieve far more. That is the value of teamwork and collective human potential. Every individual possesses different skills, abilities, and talents that can contribute to national development. What many consider a burden may actually become a country’s greatest strength if those human resources are properly developed. This is the essence of the demographic dividend—the economic advantage that emerges when the working-age population becomes larger than the dependent population. Development economists describe this period as a “window of opportunity” rather than a guaranteed outcome. Highly populated countries can utilize their youthful population to strengthen their economies. After India, China, the United States, and Indonesia, Pakistan is the fifth most populous country in the world. This should be seen as an opportunity rather than a challenge because more than 65 percent of Pakistan’s population consists of young people. That gives the country a significant advantage. A demographic dividend can only be realized when the working-age population is educated, healthy, skilled, and productively employed. When more people are working and contributing to the economy, household savings increase, investment grows, government spending on dependents declines, and both economic output and per capita income improve. The World Bank has repeatedly emphasized that human capital—education, health, and skills—is one of the strongest drivers of long-term productivity and national income. The real challenge is identifying the policies required to achieve this dividend. A country can benefit only if it creates sufficient employment opportunities, provides quality education and skill development, ensures access to healthcare, encourages women to participate in the workforce, and maintains stable economic and public policies. When these conditions exist, the country enjoys faster economic growth, greater productivity, increased investment and savings, improved living standards, and stronger entrepreneurship and innovation. Economic growth becomes inevitable when people are hardworking, equipped with multiple skills from an early age, and capable of adapting to changing economic demands. Skilled and self-reliant citizens become the driving force of national development. Evidence from South Korea, Singapore, and Ireland shows that investment in education and skills transformed youthful populations into globally competitive economies. However, a demographic dividend can quickly become a demographic burden if employment opportunities and skills do not keep pace with population growth. The consequences may include rising unemployment, poverty, social unrest, and migration. Economists and demographers consistently argue that a demographic dividend is not automatic; it is an opportunity that must be earned through effective governance and strong institutions. Without adequate planning and investment, a large youth population can become a liability instead of an asset. The International Labour Organization has warned that persistent youth unemployment can reduce economic productivity and increase social instability. A dynamic economy capable of creating millions of formal-sector jobs each year is essential for absorbing a growing workforce. Human capital development should remain at the center of national policy. Strong educational systems, Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET), science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM), digital literacy, coding, digital finance, and technology-based curricula should be introduced from the early years of education. Equal opportunities for girls and women in education and employment are equally important. Pakistan also needs job creation, labour market reforms, export-led manufacturing, labour flexibility, investment in high-value industries such as technology, electronics, and specialized services, support for youth entrepreneurship and microfinance, and stronger healthcare infrastructure. UNESCO has consistently highlighted that technical and vocational education equips young people with practical skills that improve employability and economic resilience. Pakistan possesses one of the largest youth populations in the region, but this advantage can only be realized through greater investment in education, skills, and employment. In conclusion, population control alone is not a long-term solution to economic growth. Developing people’s abilities, expanding opportunities, and investing in human capital are far more effective. The experiences of countries such as Italy and Japan also demonstrate that declining populations and ageing societies create their own economic challenges. The real question is not how many people a country has, but how well it prepares its people to contribute to national development. Research across both developed and developing countries consistently concludes that people become an economic asset when governments invest in their education, health, productivity, and opportunities rather than viewing population solely as a number. The writer holds a PhD from Malaysia and writes on economic development, public policy, and demographic issues. She can be reached at naveedakatper11@gmail.com

  • HEC new weighted policy: putting weight on research credibility

    By Ali Abbas Pakistan’s Higher Education Commission (HEC) new weighted research policy has surely raised an eyebrow among a few academics nationwide. Before further dissecting the policy and its implications, it is pertinent to understand the role of HEC as a regulatory authority, which can help clear the air to a greater extent. As stated, “Regulatory”, it is important to accept that the Higher Education Commission of Pakistan is there to implement quality checks irrespective of the decision being popular or unpopular. So, with this lens, it is easy to understand why HEC is weighing this bold step of assigning weights to authorship and what must have been the shortcomings in the previous policy, despite the earlier policy’s apparent benefits. The new policy values first authors and corresponding authors more, acknowledging a reward for the initiators and potential stakeholders in the event that there are more than 3 authors. While HEC is not stopping co-authorship, it aims to credit researchers who have genuine contributions and are adding value as a lead or major contributor. It is entirely up to contributors to choose the number of other co-authors and their desired contribution and commitment in the research article. In fact, this should rather be seen as a measure of transparency that researchers who are expecting to get fewer marks for co-authorship will be doing less work in contrast to the first author. That can actually act as a yardstick for them to allocate their time to multiple projects to get their respective share/ count. However, not to undermine the researchers whose genuine intent surrounds a higher number of publications in less time with real contribution, it is a welcoming sign for authors who stay away from relationship-based and aided research. So, HEC, being a quality custodian of education and research practices for HEIs, has come up with a stance to curb research mills, fraudulent research, and fake authorship, where publications in friends’ journals and contributions following quid pro quo are compensated. And one never knows when these researchers who have worked as co-authors or fall last in the author list make it to the classes; their share of knowledge and impact may be a concern at times as well. The problem is even bigger, as not only papers with 20+ authors can be found, but researchers are co-authoring in different fields that may be beyond cross-domain collaboration. This is where HEC might have to respond and find this weighted policy as damage control.  Well, this research’s credibility is not Pakistan’s dilemma only, but something that is a world issue in a higher education setting. And when HEC addresses these concerns, it might act as a benchmark for other nations’ education systems, especially for the education and accreditation councils of similar demographics. Whether one favors or opposes it, HEC has devised something that raises major concerns, and that is to curb the need to distinguish between real and fake contributors. Now comes the point of demotivating international contributions from this weighted system, as raised by the affected prospective contributors. Well, though not every policy can avoid its collateral, the overall gain may be exploited as well. It is to be remembered that international collaborators are not to be linked with those weights; they can continue to collaborate at any number in the author list as they used to be, i.e., first or second or third, etc. In this case, the logic for local authors will remain the same as stated above about their respective contributions and rewards. The time and effort can then help in identifying multiple avenues as well. Again, there are always two sides to a coin, and in the current dynamics, where co-authorship has appeared to be a business deal, the side with the assigned weights policy bears more weight. Also, on the other hand, the offset can be made by allocating funds and instructing HEIs to devote funding to Gold open access, thus accelerating the pace of the first-author research. All in all, the new policy hints at increasing competitiveness and research credibility while leaving it to the test of time to see if it turns out to be a value addition for researchers by choice or by chance. About the author: Ali Abbas, PhD, works at Beaconhouse National University. He can be reached at aabbas724@gmail.com

  • Riyadh, Ankara, Islamabad — and the Empty Chair in New Delhi

    By Rai Saad Ali Three folders, two green and one crimson, changed hands beneath a portrait of Saudi King Salman at Al-Safa Palace in Mecca, the ink still fresh on the pages inside. Erdoğan, Crown Prince Muhammad bin Salman and Shehbaz Sharif held them up for the cameras at the Makkah Al-Mukarramah Summit for Joint Defence on August 7th, 2026. It was a carefully staged image, and the message was unmistakable: three of the Muslim world’s most consequential states, standing together in Islam’s holiest city, making clear that the region’s old security order is no longer one whose terms they are content merely to accept. The Mecca Joint Defence Agreement, signed that day by Türkiye, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, commits each signatory to treat an armed attack against any one of them as an attack against all three. It builds on the bilateral Strategic Mutual Defence Agreement signed by Islamabad and Riyadh in 2025, but Türkiye’s accession changes the strategic arithmetic considerably. What was previously a two-country understanding, rooted in a decades-old relationship, is now a trilateral framework spanning the eastern Mediterranean, the Gulf and South Asia — and it was signed without so much as a courtesy call to New Delhi. That mutual-defence clause is exactly what has prompted comparisons to NATO’s Article 5, which treats an attack on one member as an attack on all. But the parallel does not hold up well under scrutiny. It would be misleading to oversell this agreement as a “Muslim NATO.” It is not one. The pact names no adversary, creates no joint military command, and does not specify what response would be required if a signatory were attacked. It establishes a framework for defence cooperation and coordination rather than a NATO-style alliance with clearly defined operational commitments, and Saudi officials have stressed that the agreement is defensive in character and not directed against any particular country. That distinction matters. NATO is more than seventy years old and has evolved into a mature institutional and military alliance over generations; the Mecca Agreement is still in its infancy. Over time, it could develop stronger institutions and deeper coordination that bring it closer in character to NATO. For now, that remains a possibility rather than an established trajectory. Yet dismissing the agreement as merely aspirational would be its own mistake. Frameworks matter, especially when they are signed in Mecca rather than in a foreign ministry conference room. The choice of venue was not incidental. It was a statement about whose summit this is, and who now gets to convene the Muslim world’s most powerful states at a moment when Washington’s security guarantees have begun to look less than absolute. That erosion of confidence in Washington is precisely what makes the partnership’s internal logic so coherent: each partner brings something the others lack, and that complementarity is the pact’s real substance. Turkey supplies NATO’s second-largest standing military and an increasingly self-sufficient defence-industrial base — the same industry that in 2023 sold Saudi Arabia drones in what Ankara called its largest defence export deal to date, and which has for years supplied Pakistan with warships and trainer aircraft. Pakistan brings the only nuclear deterrent in the Muslim world and a military establishment with decades of experience training and advising Gulf forces. Saudi Arabia brings the capital and the religious legitimacy that only the custodian of the two holy mosques can offer. What ties these three complementary roles together is a detail that deserves precision rather than a slogan. Pakistan’s air force flies the JF-17 Thunder, co-produced with China. Türkiye, a NATO member since 1952, has simultaneously built its own defence-industrial relationship with Beijing even as it remains formally inside the Western alliance system. That a NATO state, a nuclear-armed South Asian state with deep Chinese defence ties, and the Gulf’s foremost oil power can now sit inside the same mutual-defence framework shows how far the unipolar security order of the post-Cold War decades has already eroded. This is not a Pakistani ambition imposed on the region. It is a regional response to a security vacuum that Washington’s and Tel Aviv’s conduct in West Asia has itself created. The timing explains the substance. The pact was signed more than five months into the US-Israel war on Iran, a conflict that has sent missile and drone fire onto Gulf infrastructure and shipping, with Houthi strikes compounding the sense among Gulf capitals that American deterrence no longer covers them the way it once did. Riyadh, battered directly by this spillover, has drawn the obvious conclusion: a security guarantee is only as good as the willingness of the guarantor to honour it, and Washington’s recent conduct has not inspired confidence on that score. Ankara and Islamabad, for their part, were the two capitals best positioned to answer that call — one with hard power, the other with a record of reliability as a security partner to the Kingdom stretching back decades, long before this agreement made it formal. While Ankara and Islamabad were positioning themselves as reliable partners, New Delhi’s response has been telling in its caution. The Ministry of External Affairs said only that India is “closely following” developments and will “study the implications” — the language of a capital reacting to events it did not shape, rather than one setting the regional agenda. That contrast is the real story here, more than any single clause in the agreement’s text. That caution is not merely rhetorical. The substantive concern for India is not abstract: analysts have already flagged the live question of how a mutual-defence clause would be read if India were to conduct cross-border counter-terror operations against targets inside Pakistan, as it has in the past — even as others note such operations sit in a different legal category from state-on-state aggression. That ambiguity is itself a diplomatic cost to India: a Gulf partner it has spent two decades cultivating on energy, trade and counter-terrorism cooperation has now formally elevated Pakistan to treaty-partner status, indifferent to how

  • NASA shares breathtaking full moon photo

    People on Earth see a full Moon almost every month but have you ever wondered what it looks like from space? A NASA astronaut living aboard the International Space Station (ISS) has shared a breathtaking photo showing the full Moon from orbit. The image was released on July 29, when July’s full Moon appeared in the night sky. It was shared on social media by NASA astronaut Anil Menon. While people on Earth watched the full Moon rise above the horizon and shine brightly in the sky astronauts on the ISS enjoyed a completely different view. From space the Moon appears to glow brilliantly against the deep black background of the universe. NASA also shared a message encouraging people to take a moment to look up at the night sky. The space agency said that the full Moon remains one of nature’s most beautiful and timeless sights continuing to inspire people around the world with its beauty.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *