best way mix

Best way to mix henna for rich hair color

Henna has been used for centuries as a natural way to color and condition hair. Many people mix henna with either tea water or coffee but which one works better?

The answer depends on the type of color you want. Tea and coffee can give henna a slightly different result.

Using tea water with henna

Tea water is a popular choice for preparing henna. Many people traditionally use strong tea instead of plain water because it can help make the henna color appear deeper.

If you want a deeper red or brown shade strong tea water may be a good option. It can also leave the hair looking soft and shiny. To prepare it boil the required amount of water and add two to three teaspoons of tea leaves.

Let it cook until the water becomes dark. Allow it to cool then slowly add it to the henna powder to make a smooth paste. For a richer color some people leave the henna mixture covered for several hours or overnight before applying it.

Adding coffee to henna

Coffee is another common ingredient used with henna. It may help create a warmer brown tone and can add a darker look to the final color. You can mix one or two teaspoons of coffee powder directly into the henna.

Another option is to make strong coffee let it cool and use it instead of plain water when preparing the paste.

Tea or coffee which one should you choose?

If you want a deeper red brown shade tea water may be the better choice. If you prefer a warmer brown look coffee can be added to your henna mixture. You can also use a small amount of coffee along with strong tea water.  This combination may give the hair a deeper looking color and extra shine.

However, avoid adding too much coffee as it can affect the texture of the henna paste.

A simple safety tip

Henna is a natural hair-coloring method but natural does not always mean risk free. Before applying any homemade mixture to your hair or scalp do a small patch test first especially if you have sensitive skin. Stop using it if you notice irritation or an allergic reaction.

Similar Posts

  • HEC new weighted policy: putting weight on research credibility

    By Ali Abbas Pakistan’s Higher Education Commission (HEC) new weighted research policy has surely raised an eyebrow among a few academics nationwide. Before further dissecting the policy and its implications, it is pertinent to understand the role of HEC as a regulatory authority, which can help clear the air to a greater extent. As stated, “Regulatory”, it is important to accept that the Higher Education Commission of Pakistan is there to implement quality checks irrespective of the decision being popular or unpopular. So, with this lens, it is easy to understand why HEC is weighing this bold step of assigning weights to authorship and what must have been the shortcomings in the previous policy, despite the earlier policy’s apparent benefits. The new policy values first authors and corresponding authors more, acknowledging a reward for the initiators and potential stakeholders in the event that there are more than 3 authors. While HEC is not stopping co-authorship, it aims to credit researchers who have genuine contributions and are adding value as a lead or major contributor. It is entirely up to contributors to choose the number of other co-authors and their desired contribution and commitment in the research article. In fact, this should rather be seen as a measure of transparency that researchers who are expecting to get fewer marks for co-authorship will be doing less work in contrast to the first author. That can actually act as a yardstick for them to allocate their time to multiple projects to get their respective share/ count. However, not to undermine the researchers whose genuine intent surrounds a higher number of publications in less time with real contribution, it is a welcoming sign for authors who stay away from relationship-based and aided research. So, HEC, being a quality custodian of education and research practices for HEIs, has come up with a stance to curb research mills, fraudulent research, and fake authorship, where publications in friends’ journals and contributions following quid pro quo are compensated. And one never knows when these researchers who have worked as co-authors or fall last in the author list make it to the classes; their share of knowledge and impact may be a concern at times as well. The problem is even bigger, as not only papers with 20+ authors can be found, but researchers are co-authoring in different fields that may be beyond cross-domain collaboration. This is where HEC might have to respond and find this weighted policy as damage control.  Well, this research’s credibility is not Pakistan’s dilemma only, but something that is a world issue in a higher education setting. And when HEC addresses these concerns, it might act as a benchmark for other nations’ education systems, especially for the education and accreditation councils of similar demographics. Whether one favors or opposes it, HEC has devised something that raises major concerns, and that is to curb the need to distinguish between real and fake contributors. Now comes the point of demotivating international contributions from this weighted system, as raised by the affected prospective contributors. Well, though not every policy can avoid its collateral, the overall gain may be exploited as well. It is to be remembered that international collaborators are not to be linked with those weights; they can continue to collaborate at any number in the author list as they used to be, i.e., first or second or third, etc. In this case, the logic for local authors will remain the same as stated above about their respective contributions and rewards. The time and effort can then help in identifying multiple avenues as well. Again, there are always two sides to a coin, and in the current dynamics, where co-authorship has appeared to be a business deal, the side with the assigned weights policy bears more weight. Also, on the other hand, the offset can be made by allocating funds and instructing HEIs to devote funding to Gold open access, thus accelerating the pace of the first-author research. All in all, the new policy hints at increasing competitiveness and research credibility while leaving it to the test of time to see if it turns out to be a value addition for researchers by choice or by chance. About the author: Ali Abbas, PhD, works at Beaconhouse National University. He can be reached at aabbas724@gmail.com

  • More than sunshine for Vitamin D

    Vitamin D is important for strong bones a healthy immune system and many other body functions. It is often called the “sunshine vitamin” because the body can produce it when the skin is exposed to sunlight. However a new study suggests that spending more time in the sun may not be enough to raise vitamin D levels especially for people who already have a deficiency. The study published in the European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, followed 299 older adults most of whom had low vitamin D levels. During the summer participants spent more time outdoors so researchers could see whether sunlight increased their vitamin D. The researchers found that sunlight alone had only a limited effect on vitamin D levels in people with a deficiency. They said that eating vitamin D-rich foods such as fatty fish and fortified dairy products and taking supplements when needed are more effective ways to improve vitamin D levels. Most adults need about 1,500 to 2,000 IU of vitamin D each day, depending on their health needs and medical advice. Vitamin D plays an important role in keeping bones strong supporting the immune system and may also help lower the risk of certain long-term health conditions. Experts estimate that around one billion people worldwide have low vitamin D levels.

  • | |

    Greek epic poetry finds a home in Irish literature

    There is an intimacy in the way Irish writers engage with classical mythology including epic poetry. The Odyssey predates Ireland’s earliest written epic, Táin Bó Cúailnge (The Cattle Raid of Cooley), by nearly 1,400 years. The distance in time and geography vanishes the moment an Irish poet puts pen to paper. Universal Image of The Weary Traveler In her modern translation of The Odyssey, classicist Emily Wilson frames Homer’s epic through a deeply human lens. She writes of an exhausted wanderer standing outside a home. A figure who has been displaced and lost for decades. That universal image of the weary traveler searching for home is precisely why Homer’s writing has found such a permanent resonance in Ireland’s literary canon. Across generations, Ireland’s greatest literary minds have treated Homer as a living contemporary. William Butler Yeats, Patrick Kavanagh, and Nobel laureate Seamus Heaney all drew heavily on Homeric motifs to articulate the Irish experience. For these writers, the themes of exiled wanderers, domestic longing, political strife, and tragic return were not abstract concepts from a bygone Mediterranean era. They mirrored the realities of Irish history, rural life, and national identity. Seamus Heaney Seamus Heaney’s engagement with classical literature was particularly profound. Heaney frequently used ancient myths to process modern conflict, finding in Greek drama and epic poetry a framework to speak about political violence, loss, and reconciliation during the Troubles in Northern Ireland. By mapping Homeric echoes onto the Irish landscape, Heaney showed that the struggles of Ithaca were not so different from those of Derry or Ulster. To Heaney and his peers, classical antiquity offered a universal mirror through which local grief and local beauty could be understood. Patrick Kavanagh Similarly, Patrick Kavanagh famously elevated the quiet, local struggles of rural Monaghan by comparing them to the epic siege of Troy, insisting that the everyday life of ordinary people contains just as much drama and dignity as the ancient sagas. Meanwhile, W.B. Yeats wove Homeric imagery directly into the fabric of the Irish Literary Revival, bridging Ireland’s Gaelic heritage with classical antiquity to forge a distinct national identity. Ireland’s Relationship with The Odyssey What makes Ireland’s relationship with The Odyssey so enduring is this sense of shared cultural DNA. Both traditions belong to storytelling cultures rooted in oral performance, mythic memory, and a deep reverence for language. Homer’s tales of displaced heroes, lingering grief, and ultimate return resonate naturally within an island nation shaped by exile, migration, and the constant search for home. Ultimately, the literary bridge connecting Homer to Heaney proves that timeless stories do not belong to a single era or place. As long as readers recognize the tired wanderer standing at the door, The Odyssey will continue to find a home in Irish literature. The Literary Parallel Homer’s The Odyssey predates Ireland’s national epic, Táin Bó Cúailnge, by roughly 14 centuries, yet their thematic overlap remains seamless. Prominent Irish authors including Seamus Heaney, W.B. Yeats, and Patrick Kavanagh frequently adapted Homeric themes into their modern works. Emily Wilson’s modern translation highlights themes of exile and displacement, which reflect Ireland’s history of migration, political conflict, and domestic longing.

  • Inflation fuels mental health crisis in Pakistan

    Rising prices unemployment and ongoing financial pressure are not only reducing people’s buying power in Pakistan but are also affecting their mental and physical health. Mental health experts say that money problems job insecurity growing debt, and uncertainty about the future are leading to higher rates of depression anxiety stress sleep problems irritability family conflicts high blood pressure and heart disease. Clinical psychologist Fatima Tahir explained that when income is lower than household expenses people experience constant stress.  Over time this can develop into depression anxiety anger fear and hopelessness. She warned that without timely mental health support these problems can also lead to physical illness social isolation and family disputes. Psychiatrist and social worker Dr. Ayesha Imran Murtaza who has worked at Fountain House for more than 20 years said inflation unemployment poverty and financial hardship are major reasons behind the growing number of mental health cases in Pakistan. She noted that people with low incomes are more likely to suffer from emotional trauma and mental illness because they often lack family support and cannot afford treatment. According to her poverty and mental illness create a cycle in which each problem makes the other worse. When patients cannot afford medicine their condition often worsens and if the family’s only breadwinner becomes ill the entire household is affected. According to the Pakistan Psychiatric Society National Psychiatric Morbidity Survey (2019–2022) 32.3% of adults in Pakistan are living with a mental health disorder while 37.9% have experienced one at some point in their lives. Anxiety stress and depression are the most common conditions with women low income groups and people living in cities being more affected. The World Health Organization estimates that more than 24 million people in Pakistan need mental health services. However the country faces a severe shortage of specialists. Pakistan has only around 300 to 340 psychiatrists meaning there is roughly one psychiatrist for every 700,000 to 800,000 people. The country also has about 478 psychologists, 3,145 social workers and only 22 occupational therapists working in mental health care. According to Prof. Wajid Ali Akhundzada, one in four young people and one in five children in Pakistan are dealing with mental health issues while around 10% of the population struggles with drug addiction. He stressed that the number of mental health professionals and treatment facilities is far below the country’s growing needs making mental health a national priority. Meanwhile the Punjab government is upgrading the Punjab Institute of Mental Health (PIMH) in Lahore to improve treatment and rehabilitation services. The institute is expanding psychiatric care emergency services addiction treatment rehabilitation programs and professional training under one roof. The government also plans to extend mental health services to district and tehsil level public hospitals so that more patients can receive treatment closer to home.

  • The jaded gender talks

     By Saman Aftab We are so habitual of listening to the gender inequality, women empowerment, and ever growing population talks that now these topics have become an essential subject for the matter of discussing societal issues. But what we people have lacked to unravel is the very essence of these debates. Why gender inequality exists? Why we are still lagging behind in terms of employing more women? Why we are unable to control the growing rate of population in our country? Before addressing the ‘absolutely unavoidable’ questions, let me take the readers down an irksome memory lane of my life. Last year when our maid broke the news of her pregnancy to us, our most obvious question was why now? Considering her age which was 42 years that time and her financial grim along with unsupportive role of her husband in bearing the burden of their five children, this question clicked in every mind. And her answer though not surprising was quite gloomy for the existence of every female in this world; “baji, larka chahye humen” (we need a boy). She had four daughters and a deaf son. Her statement broke my heart because it questioned the capabilities of her daughters who were all physically and mentally sound. This memory was not worth forgetting because as a female it made me feel inferior. But this Babygirl vs Babyboy thing is not new, in fact it is one of the most deeply rooted concerns of our society. The normalcy of demanding the birth of a boy from a married woman is consolidating with the passage of time. The worst part of this matter – it’s getting acceptance. Ironically, majority of mothers in law showcase such demands to the newly married couple, as if it is in their hands to ‘design’ the genetic make-up of their offspring. The heart wrenching memory got afresh, when Tabassum shared her so called good news with us. Tabassum, 35 years old woman who works as a maid in three houses, a mother of four girls is expecting again for the sake of receiving a son this time. Her good news reminded me of her last fourth delivery when she gave birth to a girl in government hospital and she was made to give her daughter to a rich family on the persuasion of her drug addict husband. Whether they got money in return was dubious but chances of such happening were bright. I really hope and pray that this time she gets a son, otherwise the couple will continue to bring unwanted girls in this world and ruin their lives. For all the existing daughters of this couple are living a dark and disowned life. This brutal reality of life is not constrained to lower class people and it has crossed the demarcation of social groupings based on all classes, religions and races. Let us take an example of my sister’s friend, who is married to a well-established businessman and living in a posh locality. The poor lady who has a rich family, is a mother of two cute little girls. Although the little girls born to riches are living a good life, their mother is undergoing severe mental anxiety and pressure for not having a son. And of course, she for the sake of getting rid of such pressure is planning to have another baby neglecting her present deteriorating health condition. Unfortunately, the instances are innumerable and the rate of their occurrences is increasing day by day. Why boy child is mostly preferred over girl child? The answer lies in the heart of several burdens tied with bringing up a girl till her marriage. Among so many liabilities, the extra protection needed by the girls in our society and the curse of dowry have aggravated the scenario to such an extent that today girls are seen as “misfortune”. Of course exceptions are always there. Let us shift the focus from this melancholy to addressing those “absolutely unavoidable” questions raised earlier. 1: Gender inequality; Homo sapiens (humans) are generally categorized into three groups namely man, woman and transgender. Men are always ranked superior for enormous reasons but if we see things more pragmatically, it becomes evident that parents are left with sons in their old age while their daughters somehow abandon them and serve in laws for the rest of their lives. Call it our family system, it is the way it is. Then how can girls be loved or demanded? For voicing rights for equality, women should also bear the responsibilities equally. If a woman is capable of doing an employment being educated or skilled, she must pursue it for sake of giving all the best of resources to her parents that are expected of a son. The root cause of inequality among genders is the leverage given to men of being more useful and thus more needed. As long as the share of women in the society is constrained only to domestic chores and family caretaking, this inequality will never fade away. More women should be encouraged to become financially sufficient and independent. But how? This leads to our second question. 2: Women empowerment; there should be more campaigning with regards to educating girls and investing in their skill building. More powerful the educational background of a woman is, more will be the chances of her getting a good job for the sake of financial security. Thus, the number of women working for the betterment of society and raising capital will rise exponentially. And finally once these two milestones are achieved, the third ordeal of our country will evade automatically. 3: Overpopulation: as discussed in the start, demand and desire for the birth of a son has contributed a lot more towards overpopulation. Men are expected to take care of their parents but the same goes for women also. And in this age of compatibility, women should come forward and play a vital part in developing this society. Instead of placing all the

  • |

    Echoes of 1971 in Pakistan’s Kashmir policy

    History rarely repeats itself in exact terms, but it frequently rhymes through patterns of power, dissent and state responses. In Pakistan, analysts and political observers are increasingly highlighting the parallels between historical missteps. It is specifically the events leading up to the loss of East Pakistan in 1971 and the contemporary public grievances in Pakistan-administered Kashmir. The Cost of Ignoring Electoral Mandates In 1970, General Yahya Khan permitted general elections across Pakistan. The Awami League in East Pakistan secured a decisive democratic victory by winning 162 out of 300 national seats. However, rather than facilitating a peaceful transfer of power, military leaders stalled negotiations in Dhaka through early 1971. This breakdown in dialogue culminated in Operation Searchlight, a military crackdown targeting intellectuals, students, and Bengali civilians. The resulting violence triggered a massive refugee crisis. Approximately ten million people were sent to India. A war that ultimately led to the creation of Bangladesh. Pakistan’s own Hamoodur Rahman Commission concluded that political failure and operational excess by military leadership were central to the catastrophe. Despite these official findings, the report remained suppressed for decades, leaving fundamental lessons about the dangers of military overreach largely unexamined within state institutions.  Unrest in Pakistan-Controlled Kashmir Today, army leadership under General Asim Munir continues to champion strong nationalistic rhetoric regarding Kashmir. He has been asserting it as the nation’s core and a willingness to fight further conflicts over Indian-administered territory. Yet, a  different internal dynamic has been evolving since 2025 within the territories Pakistan actually controls. Local populations have mobilized in widespread demonstrations driven by clear economic and political grievances. Unmanageable costs for basic essential goods. Disproportionately high pricing for local power distribution. Legislative structures that assign disproportionate authority to mainland administrators rather than local residents. State institutions responded with heavy-handed measures rather than operating for meaningful negotiation. The organizing groups were banned, communication blackouts were implemented and arrests occurred. Security forces deployed live fire against demonstrators  and caused dozens of civilian casualties. The Danger of Ignoring Unheard Grievances The concern raised by historians is not that history will reproduce the exact outcome of 1971, but that the state is relying on the same flawed logic. State is again attempting to suppress domestic economic and political grievances through state force. When state policy prioritizes coercion over political engagement, it risks alienating populations. The lingering question for Pakistan’s establishment is whether the lessons of past governance failures will finally be integrated, or whether suppressed grievances will once again lead to deep institutional crises.  

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *