Immature Minds Need Nourishment, Not Punishment

By Tuba Khan

A nation’s commitment to justice is not judged by the way it treats its powerful citizens, but the way it treats its vulnerable members of society. One of the most fragile creations of God are the children who need love and care, but when they are punished for their mistakes, abused or exploited for their mischievous acts and left unheard in their hour of need, they tend to become juvenile delinquents. They require guidance and encouragement to learn from their mistakes, so that they can grow into responsible and confident individuals. But unfortunately, in Pakistan, children are the most neglected group in terms of justice. Though Pakistan has juvenile justice laws and is a signatory to several international commitments. However, it fails to honor these obligations. According to the KidsRights Index 2020, Pakistan ranks 147th out of 182 nations in access to justice for children.

Juvenile delinquency is not inherent; rather, it is often fueled by social, familial, psychological and environmental conditions. Children being observant and curious by nature are highly adaptable to their surroundings. Family, mentors and the community instill values in a child, shaping children’s behavior. However, factors that lead to juvenile delinquency include parental conflicts or separation, peer pressure, exposure to negative, aggressive and violent environments, deprivation of education, financial resources, affection and other basic necessities, impaired cognitive development, poor reasoning skills and psychological issues, such as impulsiveness, antisocial traits and mental disorders. Moreover, drug addiction, access to harmful content on social media, the dark web and illegal means also exacerbate the growing evil of youth delinquency. Together, these factors shape a child’s social and moral development and provoke delinquent behavior.

The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) defines a child as one under the age of eighteen. Below this age, children should not be treated with brutality or strict laws. Critics often argue that crime is crime whether it is committed by a child or an adult. However, the philosophy of juvenile justice acknowledges that cognitive development is not yet mature and children have an immense capacity for rehabilitation. A study indicates that the children between 16 and 18 years of age are more likely to commit offences as compared to the younger ones There is always hope for and from every child.

Recognizing these realities, the global community embraced a child-centered approach to juvenile justice and adopted basic principles to deal with young offenders. First, it must be made clear that when a child comes into conflict with the law, alternatives should be offered instead of processing him/her through the formal justice system. Second, there needs to be an exclusive juvenile justice system. Third, during the investigation, a juvenile should not be kept in a regular police station and the judicial process needs to be quick. Lastly, it must be ensured that the state gives a message to juveniles that it believes in their potential for reform.

International laws promote the reintegration of children into society, but sadly, this approach is missing in the juvenile justice system of Pakistan. Punjab has only two Borstal Institutes & Juvenile Jails at Bahawalpur and Faisalabad, while Sindh has five Youthful Offenders Industrial Schools in Karachi, Hyderabad, Sukkur, Larkana and Dadu, although the facility in Dadu is non-operational. The KPK has one Borstal in Bannu, whereas Balochistan does not have even a single functional Borstal Institute or juvenile jail. This lack of physical infrastructure causes a considerable number of juveniles to be imprisoned in regular prisons. Placing children in such an overcrowded environment exposes them in proximity to criminals and causes psychological distress, which undermines the rehabilitation capacity of prisoners. No less troubling is the lack of juvenile courts across the country. As a result, most children have continued to go through regular courts that cannot cater to their developmental needs.

A joint report by UNICEF and the Commissioner for Children’s Complaint Office of Pakistan has found that as of November 2023, 81% of the total juvenile offenders in Punjab were detained in ordinary jails, and only 144 prisoners were housed in Borstal Institutes. In January 2026, Punjab Prison Department released a report, according to which there are 718 juvenile prisoners in Punjab, while the total capacity is 658 prisoners. The shortage of juvenile institutions further highlights the flaws in the juvenile justice system of Pakistan.

It is the state’s responsibility to transform vulnerable children into responsible citizens. Therefore, the Government of Pakistan must move beyond merely passing laws that remain largely unimplemented and instead take concrete and pragmatic steps. The country should develop an implementation plan for the juvenile justice system, allocate adequate financial resources, strengthen the diversion mechanism to resolve minor juvenile cases outside the formal justice system, establish child-friendly rehabilitation centers that promote a sense of responsibility towards society, develop specialized juvenile police units to replace the use of police lock-ups for children, protect juveniles from torture and capital punishment while in detention, recruit trained staff, address the root causes of juvenile delinquency, such as poverty, illiteracy, unemployment, unsafe neighborhoods and the growing number of street children through social welfare programs and introduce a real-time Prison Management Information System (PMIS) to monitor juvenile offenders and support evidence-based decision-making.

Every child lost to crime symbolizes not merely an individual failure but a social breakdown and failure of state governance. Invest in the rehabilitation of juvenile offenders to build a safer and stable Pakistan tomorrow. Immature minds need nourishment, not punishment.

Similar Posts

  • Obsession with cannibalism as the metaphor for love

     Social media ecosystems have turned toward a darker trope to articulate the depths of romantic obsession: cannibalism. Curated mood boards are featuring imagery of raw meat, overripe pomegranates, and bloodied lovers. Viral poetry is explicitly framing consumption as intimacy. The internet has revitalized an ancient literary standard. But why has this unsettling imagery captured the imagination of so many digital creators today? If you scroll through modern aesthetic feeds, you will quickly encounter a redundant visual language centered on bodily devotion. The imagery often combines classical romance with motifs of physical destruction and ingestion. Visual art depicting lovers covered in blood or blurring the boundary between violence and affection. Photographs of bruised, overripe red fruits, notably pomegranates, bursting open. Mostly, the graphics are serving as vivid stand-ins for human flesh and emotion. Stills from cinematic works featuring vampires and monsters. The act of biting or feeding is inextricably linked to passion. Images of cuts of raw meat juxtaposed against soft, romantic lighting. Verse that frames complete surrender as allowing oneself to be digested, bitten, or absorbed by a partner. A prime example of this sentiment comes from writer Azra T.’s poem ‘Fruit’: Peel your heart like a pomegranate. Offer it to him, palms outwards. Say ‘eat.’ Watch him come away stained red by you. You’re in his teeth. He’ll kiss you with that mouth. The poem depicts the core ethos of this aesthetic. Total self-offering, emotional vulnerability pushed to its absolute physical extreme, and a desire to permanently mark and be integrated into the person you love. The surge of cannibalism-as-love content feels distinctly accustomed to the melodrama of internet subcultures. However, it is far from a contemporary invention. The urge to frame love as an act of consumption has deep historical and cultural roots.  Why Is the Metaphor Resonating Now? This world is driven by digital interactions and transactional relationships. So, the urge to consume and be consumed represents a longing for absolute vulnerability. When someone invokes cannibalism in a romantic context, they aren’t expressing a literal desire for violence. Instead, they are grasping for a metaphor extreme enough to convey a few core human desires. To be ingested is to become a part of someone else forever. Their body will be physically reshaped by your presence. Traditional closeness still leaves a physical boundary between two individuals. Consumption erases that barrier entirely. Two become one in the most literal sense conceivable. Giving up oneself entirely to be possessed by another is the ultimate gesture of trust. Ultimately, the rise of the cannibalism-as-love highlights an overwhelming power of affection. By reaching for the extreme, internet culture finds a way to express what ordinary romantic language fails to capture. A devotion so grand, so terrifying, and so profound that it borders on the appetite.  

  • The Triangle of Trust and Tension: Pakistan, Afghanistan, and India

    By Engr. Saqlain Abid Geography is destiny. A nation cannot choose its neighbours, but it can choose how to live with them. The strongest defence in any democracy is not perpetual conflict but sustained diplomacy, confidence-building measures, and peaceful negotiations. Pakistan and Afghanistan are two countries bound by centuries of shared history, religion, culture, and ethnic ties. Yet, what was once described as a brotherly relationship has gradually transformed into one defined by mistrust, accusations, and strategic competition. Today, India has emerged as the third player in this evolving regional triangle.   What exactly went wrong? How did decades of goodwill give way to blame games and border tensions? And why is India now finding greater strategic space in Afghanistan? These questions have become even more relevant following Amnesty International’s allegations regarding Pakistan’s reported airstrikes on the Omeed Rehabilitation Centre near Kabul on 14 March. The organisation questioned Pakistan’s justification for the operation, while Islamabad firmly rejected the allegations and maintained that its forces targeted legitimate security threats. The competing narratives deserve careful examination.   The first perspective is that of Afghanistan. Following the withdrawal of US forces in 2021, Pakistan welcomed the Taliban’s return to power. General Faiz Hameed, then ISI chief, was closely associated with the Doha process, while the government of Imran Khan projected Pakistan as a key mediator in Afghanistan’s political transition. Relations initially appeared warmer than they had been for years.   However, the atmosphere soon changed. One of the major turning points was the case of Sharifullah, an alleged ISIS-K commander. Pakistan argued that his arrest strengthened its claims regarding cross-border terrorism and militant networks operating from Afghan territory. The Taliban leadership rejected these accusations, insisting that Afghanistan should not be blamed for Pakistan’s internal security challenges.   Instead of responding through military escalation, Kabul gradually diversified its diplomatic and economic partnerships. Trade with India expanded while commerce with Pakistan declined. Afghanistan increasingly relied on Iran’s Chabahar Port and the India-built Zaranj–Delaram Highway to reduce dependence on Pakistani transit routes. Although these alternatives are longer and more expensive, Kabul appears willing to pay that price in pursuit of greater strategic autonomy. For the Taliban government, sovereignty has become closely linked with economic independence.   The controversy surrounding the reported strike on the Omeed Rehabilitation Centre further widened the trust deficit. Human rights organisations questioned Pakistan’s account of the operation, while Islamabad maintained that the target was linked to militant activity and defended its actions as part of its counterterrorism campaign. The differing claims remain disputed and continue to shape international perceptions.   Pakistan’s narrative is considerably different. Islamabad maintains that the resurgence of Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) attacks represents one of its greatest national security challenges. Successive governments have argued that militant groups continue to exploit Afghan territory to launch attacks inside Pakistan. From Islamabad’s perspective, stronger military action became unavoidable because diplomatic engagement failed to produce sufficient cooperation.   The arrest of Sharifullah also carried broader geopolitical significance. Pakistan’s intelligence cooperation with the United States strengthened Islamabad’s engagement with Washington. At the same time, the government accelerated the repatriation of undocumented Afghan migrants, arguing that national security required stricter border management. Critics viewed these measures as increasing pressure on the Taliban government, while Pakistan defended them as sovereign decisions taken in the national interest.   Perhaps the greatest strategic miscalculation, however, was underestimating how quickly a trusted partner could seek new alliances. History shows that when friends become rivals, they often understand each other’s vulnerabilities better than long-standing adversaries.   India forms the third side of this regional triangle. Over the past two decades, New Delhi has invested billions of dollars in Afghanistan through reconstruction projects, infrastructure, education, and trade. As relations between Islamabad and Kabul have deteriorated, India has found greater diplomatic space to strengthen its presence. Development assistance, expanding trade, and improved connectivity have gradually transformed India into an increasingly influential partner for Afghanistan.   The result is a new regional reality. Pakistan views Afghanistan primarily through the lens of security. Afghanistan seeks strategic independence and diversified economic partnerships. India has capitalised on the growing mistrust by expanding its diplomatic and commercial footprint.   Geography cannot be changed, but policies can. Pakistan and Afghanistan will remain neighbours regardless of political differences. Continued confrontation will benefit neither country, while diplomacy, intelligence cooperation, and mutual respect remain the only sustainable path forward. The future of South Asia will depend not on military victories but on whether Islamabad, Kabul, and New Delhi choose cooperation over confrontation.

  • NASA shares breathtaking full moon photo

    People on Earth see a full Moon almost every month but have you ever wondered what it looks like from space? A NASA astronaut living aboard the International Space Station (ISS) has shared a breathtaking photo showing the full Moon from orbit. The image was released on July 29, when July’s full Moon appeared in the night sky. It was shared on social media by NASA astronaut Anil Menon. While people on Earth watched the full Moon rise above the horizon and shine brightly in the sky astronauts on the ISS enjoyed a completely different view. From space the Moon appears to glow brilliantly against the deep black background of the universe. NASA also shared a message encouraging people to take a moment to look up at the night sky. The space agency said that the full Moon remains one of nature’s most beautiful and timeless sights continuing to inspire people around the world with its beauty.

  • Scientists propose nuclear plan to stop Earth-bound asteroids

    Beijing: Chinese scientists have proposed a new planetary defense strategy to deflect or destroy potentially hazardous asteroids that could collide with Earth. According to the proposed approach, placing a nuclear device inside an asteroid and detonating it could be one of the most effective ways to deal with a major impact threat. According to a report, researchers at the China Academy of Launch Vehicle Technology said that large asteroids have always posed a serious threat to human civilization. In the distant past, asteroid impacts caused mass extinctions and triggered devastating environmental changes. The scientists noted that astronomers have discovered several asteroids hundreds of meters wide passing very close to Earth in recent years prompting increased research into new planetary defense methods. The study suggests that a nuclear explosion could be the most effective strategy for either destroying a large asteroid or deflecting it away from Earth particularly when there is very little time to respond. Under the proposed plan, a spacecraft would first create a deep crater on the asteroid. A nuclear device would then be placed inside the crater and detonated to alter the asteroid’s trajectory or break it into smaller pieces. According to the research, a 100-meter-wide asteroid could be completely destroyed by an explosion with a yield equivalent to 200 times the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima. Similarly, detonating a nuclear device at a depth of 20 meters inside an asteroid about one kilometer wide could change its velocity enough for it to safely miss Earth. The researchers said the study could help pave the way for future planetary defense strategies against large near-Earth asteroids.

  • Surfing dogs impress crowds

    Dogs of all sizes took to the waves at the annual World Dog Surfing Championship in the United States, impressing crowds with their surfing skills. The event was held on Saturday at the beach in Pacifica about 22 kilometers south of San Francisco California. Hundreds of spectators gathered to watch dogs from different breeds ride the waves on surfboards. The competition featured everything from small spaniels to large Labrador retrievers. Judges scored each dog based on how long it stayed on the surfboard the size of the wave, and how confidently it surfed. Now in its 10th year the championship also included a pet adoption campaign and fundraising activities to support local animal welfare groups. Wearing colorful life jackets the dogs were guided onto the waves by their human partners. As the dogs successfully surfed toward the shore the crowd cheered and applauded each ride. One participant Sophia Siedlowski from Huntington Beach said she first placed her Miniature Pinscher, Rusty, on a surfboard just to take photos when he was a puppy. To her surprise he refused to get off the board. She later let Rusty ride a small wave and he successfully surfed to shore amazing everyone and beginning his surfing journey.

  • | |

    Analysing Pakistan’s system collapse through Orwell’s 1984

    Pakistan’s Interior Minister, Mohsin Naqvi, publicly conceded that the nation’s existing governance structure has collapsed. The minister admitted that the administrative machinery can no longer resolve the country’s compounding socio-economic crises. The phrase strategically slipped through while addressing the Pakistan Economic Summit in Islamabad. He warned that adhering to the status quo would drag the nation into the same stagnant cycle  ten years from now. Amidst, he called upon political parties to set aside differences, decentralize power, and establish new administrative units to avert total destabilization. Yet, this public declaration does not occur in a vacuum. It arrives amidst mounting public resentment, economic desperation, and an escalating crackdown on political dissent, particularly in regions like Azad Jammu & Kashmir and urban political centers where mass protests against state austerity and police overreach have intensified. On the surface, the minister’s statement sounds like a candid plea for political reform and democratic unity. Beneath it, lies a far more insidious dynamic. One that mirrors the political theology of George Orwell’s classic dystopian novel, 1984. Big Brother and the Permanent State In Orwell’s 1984, the state of Oceania is governed by a dual reality. On the visible surface sits the Outer Party and its administrative ministries: the Ministry of Peace (which wages war), the Ministry of Plenty (which manages scarcity), and the Ministry of Truth (which manufactures lies). But behind these facade institutions resides the true, unquestionable entity: the Party itself, epitomized by the omnipotent figure of Big Brother. The purpose of the ministers, bureaucrats, and politicians is not to serve the citizenry, but to safeguard the survival of the core entity at all costs. When applied to the political landscape of Pakistan, the Interior Minister’s declaration functions as a quintessential display of Orwellian doublethink. The ability to hold two contradictory beliefs in one’s mind simultaneously and accept both of them. The visible civilians admit powerlessness, yet the hidden apparatus of establishment and the deep-state continues to wield absolute authority. The state apparatus operates under an unwritten constitutional clause: individual rights, democratic mandates, and administrative cohesion may be sacrificed, so long as the core, permanent security apparatus remains untouched and supreme. Echoes From 1971 to Kashmir This pattern of preserving an unseen core entity while allowing civilian institutions to decay is not a novel phenomenon. Rather, it is the recurring motif of the region’s post-colonial history. During the 1971 crisis in East Pakistan, the political leadership and the military high command operated under the illusion that they were protecting the sacred unity of the state. In reality, the democratic mandate of the majority population in Bengal was suppressed to protect the ideological and structural hegemony of the West Pakistani establishment—the ruling entity. The state prioritized the preservation of its central ruling elite over the actual people, ultimately leading to the violent birth of Bangladesh. Similarly, in the context of Kashmir, both regional state apparatuses have historically treated the territory not as a community of citizens with self-determination, but as a hyper-militarized buffer zone. The rights of the local population are routinely suspended under emergency clauses, security regulations, and administrative crackdowns. Kashmir becomes a national security theater where the state justifies its authoritarian measures by pointing to a existential enemy, much like Oceania’s perpetual, shifting wars with Eurasia and Eastasia. The System Has Collapsed Minister Naqvi cautions that the system is broken and warns against civil unrest. The message carries an implicit subtext: the civilian government is simply the expendable skin of the state. The real state must be shielded from public wrath. Public dissent erupts over inflation, human rights abuses, or rigged mandates. However, the state’s reaction is not to adapt to the popular will, but to enforce compliance through force. The plea for political parties to sit together is less about democratic reconciliation and more an invitation to absorb the blame for a crisis created by the underlying apparatus. Ultimately, Orwell’s warning in 1984 was not merely about surveillance or censorship. Instead it was about the total erasure of individual agency in service of an unaccountable entity.  The region remains bound to protecting a shadowy establishment at the expense of its people.  

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *