pamala serena admits
|

Pamala Serena admits using insider tips to bet on cricket matches

Netflix reality show contestant Pamala Serena has sparked widespread discussion after revealing that she used to place bets on cricket matches during her student years.

The 34-year-old content creator made the confession in the latest episode of Lock Upp: Sach Ya Sazaa, which premiered on Saturday, July 25. During the show’s weekly Judgment Day segment, Pamala pressed the buzzer before fellow contestant Sufi Motiwala, earning immunity from elimination while agreeing to reveal a personal secret.

As part of the challenge, the words “match fixing” appeared on the screen, leaving Pamala visibly surprised. She quickly clarified that she had never been involved in fixing matches herself. Instead, she admitted to using insider information to place bets on cricket games while studying.

According to Pamala, she had a close friend who was connected to several cricketers and occasionally received predictions about match performances and likely outcomes. She claimed the information included details about which team might win and which players were expected to perform well.

Pamala explained that she was living in London at the time, where betting through licensed bookmakers is legal. Using the tips shared by her friend, she placed wagers on cricket matches and said she earned a significant amount of money through the activity.

Recalling the experience, she admitted that the opportunity to make quick money appealed to her as a student. However, she stressed that she no longer views those decisions positively and regrets relying on betting for financial gain.

She also clarified that while gambling was legal where she lived, she eventually realized it was not the right way to earn money. Pamala said the experience taught her an important lesson, and she no longer takes pride in that chapter of her life.

Her confession immediately generated conversation among viewers on social media, with many debating the ethics of betting using insider information. While some praised her honesty for openly discussing her past, others questioned whether such actions crossed ethical boundaries despite being legal in the country where they occurred.

Pamala Serena was born in the United Kingdom to Indian parents before relocating to Dubai in 2012. She rose to prominence after winning the titles of Ms Universe Dubai 2021 and Ms UAE World 2022. She later expanded her career as a content creator and reality television personality, gaining international recognition through Netflix’s Dubai Bling.

Lock Upp: Sach Ya Sazaa continues to stream exclusively on Netflix, with new episodes released from Saturday through Thursday. Hosted by filmmaker Farah Khan alongside actor Riteish Deshmukh, the reality series features contestants revealing personal secrets in exchange for advantages within the competition, often leading to dramatic moments and intense reactions from fellow participants and viewers alike.

Similar Posts

  • | |

    Bushra Bibi meets daughter, sister-in-law at Adial…

    The daughter and sister-in-law of former prime minister Imran Khan’s wife, Bushra Bibi, met her at Adiala Jail in Rawalpindi on Tuesday. According to jail sources, Mehr-un-Nisa Maneka and Mehr-un-Nisa Ahmed visited the prison to meet Bushra Bibi. The meeting continued for around 45 minutes. The two family members spent time with Bushra Bibi during the scheduled meeting. Sources said the discussion focused on Bushra Bibi’s health and legal matters. They also exchanged views on issues related to her ongoing legal situation. The family members inquired about her well-being during the meeting. They also discussed developments concerning the cases involving her. The meeting took place at Adiala Jail amid continued legal proceedings involving Bushra Bibi and her husband, Imran Khan. Jail sources said the meeting concluded after approximately 45 minutes. No further details about the conversation were disclosed. After the meeting, Mehr-un-Nisa Maneka and Mehr-un-Nisa Ahmed left Adiala Jail. They departed from the prison premises after completing their visit. The latest meeting comes as legal proceedings involving Bushra Bibi and Imran Khan continue in different courts. Further details regarding their legal matters are expected as proceedings move forward.

  • | |

    Court grants interim bail to business partner’s …

      A Karachi Additional District and Sessions Court has granted interim bail to Abdullah, the brother of the business partner of young trader Mir Raza Ali, in connection with the businessman’s murder case. The court approved Abdullah’s interim pre-arrest bail until September 1, providing him temporary protection from arrest while the investigation into the case continues. Abdullah had approached the court seeking bail before arrest after being allegedly linked to the investigation surrounding Mir Raza Ali’s death. During the hearing, the court also issued notices to the investigating officer and the complainant in the case. The judge directed the applicant to submit surety bonds worth Rs100,000 as part of the conditions attached to the interim bail. According to Abdullah’s lawyer, there was no basis for treating his client as a suspect in the murder. The lawyer informed the court that Abdullah had a business-related connection with Mir Raza and used to supply chocolates to him. The defence further explained that Abdullah had spoken to Mir Raza by telephone on the night when the young trader left his home. According to the lawyer, the phone conversation took place at around 3:30am. The lawyer argued that the late-night phone call should be viewed in the context of their regular business dealings rather than being treated as evidence of involvement in the alleged crime. The defence also accused the police of harassing Abdullah during the investigation. His lawyer told the court that law-enforcement officials were repeatedly troubling the applicant despite the absence of any established evidence connecting him directly to the murder. The lawyer maintained that communication between Abdullah and Mir Raza at around the same time was not unusual. He explained that after completing his work, Mir Raza would generally speak with the applicant around that time. The defence therefore requested the court to provide Abdullah with protection from arrest while the authorities continued investigating the circumstances surrounding Mir Raza Ali’s death. After hearing the arguments, the court granted interim bail until September 1 and directed the relevant parties, including the investigating officer and complainant, to respond to the bail application. The applicant was also ordered to submit the required surety bonds. The court’s decision does not amount to a final determination regarding Abdullah’s involvement in the case. The interim bail merely prevents his immediate arrest while the matter is considered further by the court. The murder investigation remains ongoing, and the police are expected to examine the circumstances surrounding Mir Raza’s death, including his final movements, communications and interactions with people connected to him. The late-night telephone conversation between Mir Raza and Abdullah is among the details that investigators may consider while establishing a timeline of events. However, the defence has maintained that the conversation was consistent with their normal business-related communication. The case has attracted attention because of the young trader’s death and the subsequent investigation into people associated with him. Abdullah’s decision to seek pre-arrest bail indicates that he feared possible arrest during the investigation. The court’s issuance of notices to the investigating officer and complainant means that the prosecution and police will have an opportunity to present their position regarding the allegations and the bail request. For now, Abdullah remains protected by the interim bail order until September 1, subject to the conditions imposed by the court. Further proceedings are expected to determine the next legal steps in the case and whether the investigating authorities have sufficient evidence to proceed against him.

  • |

    Austin Reaves’ Lakers future faces fresh trade questions

    LOS ANGELES: Austin Reaves has just secured a massive new contract with the Los Angeles Lakers, but his long-term future in Hollywood could still become a major talking point after the franchise made sweeping changes to its roster this summer. The Lakers have entered a new era with their focus increasingly centred on Luka Doncic, while the departure of LeBron James has changed the shape and direction of the team. Reaves, meanwhile, remains an important part of the Lakers’ plans. The 28-year-old guard re-signed with Los Angeles in late June on a four-year, $180 million contract, including a player option in the final season. The deal appeared to confirm that the Lakers viewed Reaves as a key piece alongside Doncic. His contract also reportedly gives Los Angeles greater financial flexibility moving forward, including the possibility of pursuing another player with the non-taxpayer mid-level exception next summer. But the Lakers’ subsequent move for centre Walker Kessler has complicated the picture. Los Angeles acquired Kessler from the Utah Jazz in July, reportedly committing significant draft capital in the process. The move reflects the Lakers’ desire to secure a long-term defensive presence in the frontcourt, but it also reduced the number of valuable assets available to the franchise. That situation has prompted NBA insider Zach Lowe to raise an intriguing possibility: Reaves could eventually become a trade candidate. Lowe argued that the Lakers paid heavily for Kessler and now have fewer tradeable assets with which to reshape the roster. “There’s no question that they overpaid for him,” Lowe said, suggesting the Lakers may eventually have to decide whether the current roster is good enough or whether they need to pivot by moving Reaves. The logic behind the speculation is straightforward. Doncic is now firmly positioned as the franchise cornerstone, making it highly unlikely that Los Angeles would consider moving him. Reaves, however, could command significant interest around the league if the Lakers eventually decide they need additional draft capital or another major piece. That does not mean a trade is imminent. In fact, Reaves could be more important to the Lakers than ever during the upcoming season. With James no longer in the picture, the team will need additional scoring, playmaking and leadership around Doncic. Reaves has already demonstrated that he can thrive in a high-pressure environment, evolving from an undrafted player into one of the Lakers’ most valuable contributors. His new contract suggests the organisation believes he can play an important role in its next chapter. Yet NBA roster building can change quickly. If the Lakers struggle to build a championship-calibre supporting cast around Doncic, Reaves’ value could become a tempting trade asset — particularly because the team has already sacrificed considerable draft capital to acquire Kessler. For now, Reaves remains a Laker and an important part of the franchise’s post-LeBron era. But with Doncic at the centre, Kessler anchoring the future frontcourt and the Lakers’ trade assets significantly reduced, one question is beginning to emerge: Could Austin Reaves ultimately become the price Los Angeles pays to build its next championship team?

  • | |

    Bushra Ansari urges people to understand the respo…

    Veteran Pakistani actress Bushra Ansari has sparked discussion with her recent comments about multiple marriages in Islam, urging people to focus on the responsibility and fairness that come with such a decision. While discussing the subject, Ansari emphasized that people often highlight the permission for a man to have up to four wives but pay less attention to the requirement of treating those wives fairly. Her remarks have renewed conversation about how Islamic teachings on marriage are understood and practiced in society. The Quran permits a Muslim man to marry up to four women, but it places an important condition on that permission. If a man fears that he will not be able to deal justly with multiple wives, the Quran directs him to marry only one. (IslamQA⁠) This requirement of justice is at the heart of the discussion surrounding polygamy. It means that multiple marriage cannot simply be viewed as a privilege without responsibilities. A husband is expected to fulfill the rights of each wife and treat them fairly in matters within his control. Ansari’s comments appear to highlight this often-overlooked aspect. In societies where discussions about multiple marriages can become emotionally charged, her message encourages people to consider the consequences for everyone involved rather than focusing only on the number of marriages allowed. Islamic scholarship also emphasizes that justice between wives is a serious obligation. Financial responsibilities, living arrangements, time and other practical rights are among the areas in which fairness is expected. If a person believes he cannot fulfill these responsibilities, choosing one marriage is the safer course. (IslamQA⁠) The subject is particularly sensitive because marriage involves more than a legal relationship. It affects spouses, children and extended families. A decision that is made without careful consideration can create emotional and financial difficulties for everyone involved. Pakistan’s legal framework also places regulations around multiple marriages. Under the Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, a man seeking another marriage while already married is subject to specific legal requirements, including approaching an Arbitration Council for permission. Pakistani courts have also upheld the importance of these legal procedures. (Pakistan Lawyer⁠) Ansari’s remarks therefore arrive amid an ongoing conversation about the difference between religious permission and personal responsibility. The fact that something is permitted under certain conditions does not mean those conditions can simply be ignored. Her comments have encouraged audiences to look at the broader principles behind marriage: fairness, responsibility, respect and protection of rights. For couples and families, these principles can be just as important as the legal question of whether another marriage is permitted. Ultimately, the discussion surrounding Bushra Ansari’s statement is less about simply counting marriages and more about understanding the responsibilities that accompany them. Her message serves as a reminder that when people discuss religious rights, they should also acknowledge the duties and accountability that come with those rights.

  • | |

    Islamabad High Court extends stay on 50% additiona…

      The Islamabad High Court (IHC) has extended its earlier interim order preventing the collection of an additional 50 percent toll tax from vehicles that do not have an M-Tag installed. The relief will remain in effect until the next hearing of the case, providing temporary protection to motorists while the legal proceedings continue. During the hearing, the National Highway Authority (NHA) submitted its written response before the court, outlining its position regarding the policy of imposing an additional toll charge on vehicles that are not registered under the M-Tag system. The response is expected to form the basis of further arguments in the case. The petitioner’s counsel requested additional time to carefully review the written reply submitted by the NHA before presenting a detailed response. Accepting the request, the court adjourned the proceedings to a later date, allowing both parties sufficient time to prepare their arguments. While postponing the hearing, the Islamabad High Court announced that its previous order would continue to remain in force until the next hearing. As a result, authorities have been restrained from collecting the additional 50 percent toll tax from vehicles that either do not have an M-Tag installed or have insufficient balance in their M-Tag accounts. The interim relief means that motorists falling into these categories cannot be charged the extra amount until the court issues further directions. However, the regular toll charges applicable under existing rules may still be collected. The dispute centers on the National Highway Authority’s policy requiring motorists to register their vehicles with the M-Tag electronic toll collection system. Under the authority’s regulations, vehicles that are not registered with M-Tag are subject to a 50 percent higher toll fee when using motorways and designated highways. Similarly, vehicles with an M-Tag account that does not have sufficient balance may also be charged the additional amount under the same policy. The NHA introduced the M-Tag system to modernize toll collection, reduce congestion at toll plazas, promote cashless payments, and improve the efficiency of traffic management on Pakistan’s motorway network. The electronic system enables vehicles to pass through toll plazas more quickly, minimizing delays and reducing manual cash transactions. Despite these objectives, the policy of imposing an additional 50 percent toll charge has faced criticism from some motorists and legal experts. Opponents argue that the surcharge is excessive and places an unnecessary financial burden on drivers, particularly those who have not yet registered for the M-Tag system or encounter technical issues with their accounts. They also contend that such a financial penalty should have a clear legal basis and should not be enforced without proper safeguards. The NHA’s decision has therefore been challenged before the Islamabad High Court, where the petitioner seeks to have the additional toll charge declared unlawful. The court will examine the legal validity of the policy after considering the arguments of both parties, including the authority’s written response and the petitioner’s objections. Until the next hearing, the High Court’s interim order will continue to provide temporary relief to affected motorists by preventing the collection of the disputed 50 percent additional toll tax. The outcome of the case is expected to determine whether the National Highway Authority can lawfully enforce the surcharge in the future or whether changes to the policy will be required.

  • |

    Electricity tariff may rise by Rs2.50 per unit as July FCA pushes recovery above Rs34bn

    ISLAMABAD: Electricity consumers across Pakistan could face an additional burden of around Rs2.50 per unit as the government moves to recover more than Rs34 billion through the July 2026 monthly Fuel Charges Adjustment (FCA), according to sources. The proposed increase is expected to affect consumers of distribution companies (Discos) as well as K-Electric, with the final adjustment to be determined by the National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (Nepra) after reviewing the relevant power purchase and generation costs. Sources said the expected positive FCA for July has largely been driven by higher electricity consumption during the peak summer season and greater reliance on expensive generation sources. Among the key factors behind the anticipated increase are the use of liquefied natural gas (LNG) procured from the spot market and furnace oil to meet additional electricity requirements, particularly during periods of high demand. June FCA already approved The expected July adjustment comes after Nepra approved a positive FCA of Re0.7503 per unit for electricity consumed in June 2026. The adjustment was lower than the Rs1.20 per unit sought by the Central Power Purchasing Agency-Guaranteed (CPPA-G). Under the FCA mechanism, variations in fuel costs and other electricity generation and purchase-related expenses are passed on to consumers through periodic adjustments. For July, CPPA-G will submit its relevant claims to Nepra, which will examine the costs and determine the admissible adjustment before issuing separate decisions for the respective distribution companies. Multiple costs to be examined The regulator is expected to assess several components included in the FCA claim before determining the final amount recoverable from consumers. Separate adjustments will subsequently be calculated for each Disco after taking into account electricity purchased through CPPA-G, bilateral arrangements with small power producers and captive power producers, as well as electricity supplied under net-metering arrangements. The final impact on consumers could therefore vary depending on the individual power procurement mix and applicable tariff structure of each distribution company. Expensive generation raises concerns The expected tariff increase has emerged at a challenging time for Pakistan’s industrial sector, where electricity prices remain a major concern for manufacturers and exporters. Industrial consumers are already facing pressure from elevated production costs, while exporters are also dealing with uncertainty caused by deteriorating security and economic conditions in the Middle East. The latest FCA discussion has also brought the issue of partial-loading charges under scrutiny. During a recent hearing, Nepra raised questions over approximately Rs4.9 billion in partial-loading costs and asked CPPA-G to explain the reasons behind the additional expenditure and measures being considered to control it. Solar power changes demand pattern CPPA-G told the regulator that the partial-loading charges were not primarily the result of inefficient operation by power plants. Instead, the agency attributed the costs largely to changes in electricity consumption patterns caused by the rapid expansion of rooftop solar generation. According to CPPA-G, daytime demand from the national grid has declined as more consumers generate electricity through rooftop solar systems. Conventional power plants are consequently required to operate below their optimum capacity during solar-generation hours. However, demand rises again in the evening when solar generation falls, forcing grid-connected power plants to increase generation quickly. This change in the daily demand curve has created additional operational costs for the power system. The authority noted that partial-loading charges recorded in June 2026 were around Rs1 billion higher than the corresponding amount in June 2025, highlighting the growing financial impact of the changing electricity demand pattern. Plant shutdowns could increase costs The Independent System and Market Operator (ISMO) also informed the regulator that shutting down power plants during periods of lower demand would not necessarily provide a cheaper solution. According to ISMO, taking plants completely offline to avoid partial-loading charges could result in substantial start-up expenses when the units are required again to meet evening demand. The issue has therefore become increasingly important as the rapid growth of distributed solar generation continues to alter the traditional pattern of electricity consumption. Exporters seek cheaper fuel options Amir Sheikh, a prominent textile exporter, called for the removal of the levy imposed on high-speed diesel and furnace oil-related generation costs, arguing that furnace-oil-based power plants could offer an alternative to expensive RLNG-fired generation under certain circumstances. He maintained that allowing more flexible use of available generation sources could help reduce the overall cost of electricity, particularly during periods when LNG prices remain elevated. Sheikh also proposed a change in the way FCA-related surcharges are calculated. He suggested that the additional charges should be recovered on the basis of projected electricity consumption rather than only through the conventional mechanism, similar to the approach followed under quarterly tariff adjustments (QTA). Falling demand creates another challenge Another concern raised during the discussion was the continuing decline in electricity demand and its possible implications for future tariff adjustments. Rehan Javed highlighted the potential impact of lower electricity consumption on the power sector’s financial structure, particularly as fixed system costs are spread over a smaller volume of electricity sales. The Ministry of Energy’s Power Division, however, said the decline in demand was largely linked to the increasing number of consumers using net-metering facilities. The ministry maintained that although distributed solar generation was changing electricity consumption patterns, its impact on future quarterly tariff adjustments would not necessarily be as severe as feared by industrial consumers. Government seeks to avoid costly LNG purchases The Power Division further explained that electricity demand was being managed in a manner designed to reduce dependence on expensive RLNG spot-market cargoes. Officials said excessive reliance on spot LNG during the summer could significantly increase power generation costs and ultimately translate into higher electricity tariffs for consumers. The government is therefore attempting to balance electricity availability, fuel costs and demand management while dealing with the changing structure of Pakistan’s power market. If Nepra ultimately approves an FCA close to the expected Rs2.50 per unit, consumers could face another substantial increase in their electricity bills. The final adjustment, however, will depend on Nepra’s assessment of CPPA-G’s July claim and the costs deemed

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *