president delays assent
| | |

President delays assent for 19 high court judges

ByJustpaste.in

The appointment of 19 additional judges to four high courts remains pending as President Asif Ali Zardari has yet to approve the summary.

The Judicial Commission of Pakistan (JCP) approved the nominations during meetings held on July 20 and 21.

The proposed appointments involve the Lahore High Court, Sindh High Court, Balochistan High Court and Islamabad High Court.

Nine days have passed since the JCP approved the nominations. However, the president has not yet given his assent to the summary.

The delay has caused concern within the government. A senior cabinet member questioned why the approval had not yet been granted.

The official argued that the summary was initiated by the JCP rather than the prime minister. Therefore, according to the government’s position, the president could not send it back to the prime minister for reconsideration.

The official also warned that continued inaction could create further tension within the superior judiciary.

The government’s legal team is reportedly examining possible options to address the issue.

The matter has also exposed differences between the government and the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP).

According to government officials, the PPP leadership is unhappy with the JCP because some of its preferred nominees were not considered for judicial appointments.

The PPP had shown particular interest in securing the appointment of two candidates to the Sindh High Court.

However, neither the judicial nor executive members of the JCP supported their nominations.

Officials said the candidates were below the age of 45. Both government and judicial representatives reportedly agreed that nominees below that age should not be approved.

PPP Senator Farooq H Naek, a senior legal figure and member of the JCP, had proposed 33 candidates for the four high courts.

His proposed list included 16 candidates for the Sindh High Court, 10 for the Lahore High Court, five for the Balochistan High Court and two for the Islamabad High Court.

A member of the commission said the PPP could potentially have secured appointments for other candidates from interior Sindh.

Some of those candidates were considered sympathetic to the party.

However, the commission member claimed that the party’s insistence on its two preferred nominees affected the outcome.

The dispute comes amid wider political and judicial developments involving Sindh.

JCP judicial members have already reached a consensus on the performance of constitutional benches in the Sindh High Court.

The judges serving on those benches were given three months to demonstrate their performance.

The commission’s judicial members also opposed the confirmation of Sindh High Court Additional Judge Syed Fiaz ul Hassan Shah.

The development was viewed by some political circles as another setback for the PPP.

The party has historically sought influence over judicial appointments in Sindh and other provinces.

Last year, the PPP was able to influence appointments in several high courts, including the Sindh High Court, Peshawar High Court and Lahore High Court.

The judicial landscape has also changed following the 27th Constitutional Amendment.

After the amendment, Justice K K Agha was elevated to the newly established Federal Constitutional Court.

Another judge of the Sindh High Court was transferred to the Islamabad High Court.

Similar Posts

  • |

    Shahzeb Khanzada’s stance for women applauded by celebrities

    ByJustpaste.in

    Shahzeb Khanzada is one of Pakistan’s most prominent television anchors and journalists. He hosts his current affairs show every night, where he regularly discusses important national issues and highlights matters affecting ordinary citizens. Over the years, he has also become known for speaking openly about social injustices and calling attention to issues that often fail to receive the attention they deserve. At a time when concerns about violence, abuse and public safety are growing across the country, Khanzada recently used his platform to speak strongly against violence targeting women and children. His remarks came amid widespread public concern over a number of disturbing cases that have emerged in recent weeks, once again raising questions about the safety of vulnerable members of society. Khanzada strongly condemned violence against women and emphasized the responsibility of individuals and society to stand against such acts. He made it clear that remaining silent after becoming aware of violence against a woman cannot simply be treated as neutrality. According to his stance, people who know that a woman is being subjected to brutality but deliberately choose not to speak up also carry a moral responsibility for allowing such violence to continue. His comments struck a chord with many viewers and public figures. Several celebrities took to social media to appreciate the journalist for using his influential platform to address an issue that requires collective attention. They praised him for refusing to remain silent and for highlighting the importance of protecting women from violence and abuse. Actress Ayesha Omar was among those who appreciated Khanzada’s efforts. She thanked him for consistently speaking up on important social matters and acknowledged his willingness to address difficult subjects publicly. Her response reflected the sentiments of many people who believe that influential personalities have an important role to play in raising awareness about serious social problems. Politician and public figure Mussadiq Malek also expressed his support for Khanzada. He urged people to protect and stand behind individuals who use their platforms to speak against injustice. His comments further highlighted the importance of supporting voices that draw public attention to violence and social issues. Actress Samiya Mumtaz also praised Khanzada for raising his voice. She thanked him for speaking about the issue and joining the conversation surrounding violence against women. The reactions from these well-known personalities demonstrate how strongly Khanzada’s message resonated with people from different backgrounds. His comments have also sparked further discussion about the responsibility of media figures, celebrities and ordinary citizens in confronting violence. Cases involving women and children have repeatedly generated anger and concern across Pakistan, with social media often becoming a platform where people demand justice and accountability. However, public outrage alone cannot address the deeper problems behind such incidents. Greater awareness, responsible reporting, stronger legal protection and a willingness to intervene when someone is at risk are all important parts of creating a safer society. Khanzada’s stance has therefore received appreciation not only because he discussed a sensitive issue on television, but also because he emphasized the importance of refusing to normalize silence around violence. The support from celebrities such as Ayesha Omar, Mussadiq Malek and Samiya Mumtaz shows that his message has found an audience beyond his regular viewers. As conversations surrounding women’s safety and violence continue, Khanzada’s remarks have added another prominent voice to the growing demand for greater accountability and protection. His decision to use his platform for the issue has been widely appreciated by those who believe that speaking against injustice is an important responsibility of public figures.

  • | |

    Supreme Court upholds landlord’s right to us…

    ByJustpaste.in

    The Supreme Court of Pakistan has ruled that a property owner has the exclusive right to decide how to use their property and is not bound by the wishes or preferences of a tenant. The judgment came while deciding a long-running landlord-tenant dispute involving a residential building in Karachi’s Saddar area. In an eight-page verdict authored by Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, the apex court set aside an earlier decision of the Sindh High Court, which had ruled in favour of the tenant. The Supreme Court observed that it is a well-established legal principle that a property owner is the sole judge of their own requirements. The court held that if a landlord submits a sworn statement declaring the need to use their property personally, that statement is sufficient to establish bona fide necessity unless proven otherwise. The judgment further stated that an owner cannot be compelled to use another portion of the property simply because a tenant believes alternative accommodation is available. The court emphasised that the landlord’s choice regarding the use of their property cannot be dictated by the tenant. The case involved a dispute over a flat in a building located in Karachi’s Saddar neighbourhood. During the proceedings, the tenant argued that several other flats in the same building had become vacant and could instead be used by the landlord. The Sindh High Court accepted this argument and ruled in favour of the tenant. However, the Supreme Court disagreed with that reasoning, stating that the availability of other vacant units does not deprive the owner of the right to reclaim a specific property for personal use. Allowing the landlord’s appeal, the Supreme Court ordered the tenant to vacate the flat within six months, bringing the legal dispute to a close while reaffirming the property rights of landlords under the law.

  • | |

    US, Russian envoys congratulate Pakistan on Indepe…

    ByJustpaste.in

    ISLAMABAD: Pakistan’s 79th Independence Day brought messages of goodwill from two major international partners, with the United States and Russia extending warm greetings to the Pakistani people and expressing hopes for continued peace, prosperity and stronger bilateral ties. US Chargé d’Affaires Natalie A. Baker and the US diplomatic mission in Pakistan conveyed their Independence Day wishes to Pakistanis on Friday, marking the country’s 79th year as an independent nation. In its message, the US Embassy recalled the long history of relations between the two countries, noting that the United States was among the early countries to recognise Pakistan after its creation in 1947. The embassy said that Pakistan-US friendship had grown stronger over the decades, highlighting the enduring ties between the two countries and their peoples. “Over the past 80 years, the friendship between Pakistan and the United States has grown stronger,” the message said, while extending wishes for peace, happiness and prosperity to the people of Pakistan. The greeting comes as Islamabad and Washington continue to maintain engagement across several areas, including trade, investment, security, education and people-to-people ties. Russia highlights Pakistani resilience Russia’s ambassador to Pakistan also extended Independence Day greetings, describing the occasion as a reflection of the courage, determination and strong national spirit of the Pakistani people. In his message, the Russian envoy praised the resilience demonstrated by Pakistanis and expressed confidence that cooperation between Moscow and Islamabad could continue to expand. The ambassador said both countries would work together to strengthen mutual understanding and broaden their partnership in areas of shared interest. The message underscored Moscow’s interest in developing closer relations with Islamabad at a time when Pakistan is seeking to expand its diplomatic and economic partnerships. Messages arrive amid wider diplomatic engagement The messages from Washington and Moscow came as Pakistan marked Independence Day with nationwide celebrations, flag-raising ceremonies and tributes to the country’s founding leaders and those who sacrificed for independence. For Pakistan, such diplomatic messages carry significance beyond traditional greetings. They reflect the country’s longstanding relationships with major global powers and its continuing efforts to maintain engagement with partners across different regions. As Pakistan entered its 80th year since independence, the messages from the United States and Russia shared a common theme: a desire for peace, prosperity and stronger cooperation. While the two countries have different strategic relationships with Islamabad, their Independence Day messages highlighted the importance of continued engagement and mutual understanding. For Pakistanis celebrating the day, the greetings added an international dimension to the occasion, with both Washington and Moscow signalling their desire to see Pakistan move forward with stability, prosperity and deeper partnerships.

  • |

    Hammad Azam guides San Francisco Unicorns to thrilling GSL win

    ByJustpaste.in

    San Francisco Unicorns secured a hard-fought five-run victory over Perth Scorchers XI in their Global Super League (GSL) 2026 clash at Providence Stadium on Sunday, thanks to an outstanding all-round team performance led by Hammad Azam. After being put under pressure early in their innings, the Unicorns recovered impressively to post 152-8 in their allotted 20 overs. The foundation of the total was laid by Hammad Azam, who produced a composed unbeaten knock of 64 from 46 deliveries. The Unicorns’ batting line-up struggled at the start, slipping from 42-1 to 46-5 inside the opening six overs as the Scorchers’ bowlers dominated with the new ball. With wickets falling regularly, Hammad steadied the innings and prevented a complete collapse. He mixed caution with aggression, striking four boundaries and five sixes during his match-defining innings. His ability to rotate the strike while punishing loose deliveries helped the Unicorns recover from a difficult position and reach a competitive total. Chasing 153 for victory, Perth Scorchers XI also found themselves in early trouble. Opener Andre Fletcher was dismissed for just one in the opening over, while Joel Curtis managed only 16 before departing. Experienced batter D’Arcy Short anchored the chase with a patient 43, attempting to guide his side through the middle overs. He built useful partnerships with Usman Khan, who scored 14, and Ashton Turner, who contributed 13. Despite those efforts, regular wickets kept disrupting the chase and prevented the Scorchers from building lasting momentum. The turning point came in the 16th over when Short was dismissed with the score on 103-7, leaving Perth Scorchers XI with a difficult task in the closing stages of the innings. Just when the contest appeared to be slipping away, Brody Couch produced a spirited late assault to revive his team’s hopes. The lower-order batter blasted 23 runs from only 12 balls, smashing two fours and two sixes in an entertaining cameo. Couch and Akeal Hosein added 39 runs for the ninth wicket, reducing the target significantly and setting up a tense finish. Hosein also played an important supporting role with 16 runs as the pair pushed the match into the final over. However, the Unicorns held their composure under pressure. Hosein was dismissed on the penultimate delivery of the innings, ending the Scorchers’ hopes of completing a remarkable comeback. Perth Scorchers XI finished on 147-9, falling just five runs short of the target. With the ball, Ghulam Mudassar delivered a match-winning spell for San Francisco Unicorns, claiming four wickets at crucial moments to derail the Scorchers’ chase. His breakthroughs, combined with disciplined bowling in the closing overs, ensured the Unicorns successfully defended their total. Hammad Azam’s unbeaten half-century and Ghulam Mudassar’s four-wicket haul proved decisive as San Francisco Unicorns registered a memorable victory in a closely contested Global Super League encounter, strengthening their campaign with an impressive all-round performance.

  • | |

    Federal constitutional court overturns 16-year-old…

    ByJustpaste.in

    Pakistan’s Federal Constitutional Court (FCC) has overturned a 16-year-old Supreme Court ruling concerning land acquisition and claims for additional compensation, delivering a significant judgment on the legal rights of landowners. A three-member bench headed by FCC Chief Justice Amin-ud-Din Khan announced the decision on review petitions challenging the Supreme Court’s 2010 majority judgment. Justice Ali Baqar Najafi and Justice Syed Arshad Hussain Shah were also members of the bench. The 47-page judgment, authored by Chief Justice Amin-ud-Din Khan, held that parts of the Supreme Court’s earlier decision in the Sadaqat Ali Khan case were not legally sustainable. The court ruled that a landowner who accepts compensation without raising an objection cannot subsequently claim additional compensation. It also held that a landowner who fails to file a reference within the prescribed legal period cannot later seek additional compensation. Another important finding was that landowners who were not parties to earlier proceedings cannot automatically claim the benefit of higher compensation awarded to other landowners through court proceedings. The Federal Constitutional Court observed that the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 provides a comprehensive legal framework for land acquisition and determination of compensation. Anyone seeking additional compensation must follow the procedure established under the law. According to the judgment, once the prescribed period for legal proceedings expires, the award issued by the Land Acquisition Collector becomes final. Courts cannot use their powers to bypass mandatory statutory requirements. The court further clarified that the principle of equality under Article 25 of the Constitution cannot eliminate statutory limitation periods or mandatory legal conditions. Similarly, the power to do complete justice cannot be used to create a new legal right that does not exist under the relevant law. The Supreme Court’s 2010 majority ruling had extended the benefit of additional compensation to certain landowners who were not parties to the original proceedings. The National Highway Authority chairman and other authorities subsequently challenged the ruling through review petitions. The Federal Constitutional Court accepted the review petitions filed by the concerned authorities and also allowed related civil appeals. Decisions of the Peshawar and Lahore High Courts concerning additional compensation were consequently set aside, while the original orders of the Land Acquisition Collectors and other competent authorities were restored. However, Justice Syed Arshad Hussain Shah’s additional note clarified that additional compensation already paid in good faith under the earlier judgment cannot be recovered. Recovery would not be permissible where the money was obtained without fraud, misrepresentation or an unlawful method. The ruling could have significant implications for future land acquisition and compensation disputes by emphasizing statutory procedures, legal deadlines and the finality of compensation awards.

  • |

    French and British coastguards rescue over 150 migrants following engine fire in English Channel

    ByJustpaste.in

    Joint emergency response teams from France and the United Kingdom rescued 157 migrants after their vessel caught fire during an attempted crossing of the English Channel early on Tuesday morning. The vessel, which departed from the northern coast of France near Normandy, was under monitoring by French maritime authorities when its engine caught fire in France’s search-and-rescue zone close to British territorial waters. The blaze caused the boat’s condition to deteriorate rapidly, forcing emergency crews to initiate an immediate extraction operation involving naval helicopters, lifeboats, and medical units from both nations. Prior to the engine fire, French patrol vessels had retrieved five individuals who requested medical aid overnight. Maritime officials noted that passengers making irregular crossings frequently decline preventative assistance from coastal patrols, accepting aid only when confronted with catastrophic emergencies. All rescued individuals were disembarked at the northern French port of Boulogne-sur-Mer for formal health evaluations and processing. Authorities confirmed that no fatalities were recorded during the incident.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *