book review 8211

Book review – The Broken Wings

ByJustpaste.in

By Sher Jan Qadir,

The Broken Wings is a poetic novel written by Khalil Gibran, first published in Arabic in 1912. It is a touching story of tragic love, set in Beirut at the beginning of the twentieth century.

The novel highlights several important social issues of Eastern Mediterranean society at that time. These include religious corruption, the oppression and limited rights of women, and the strong influence of money and power. Through the story, the author shows how wealth and authority often control people’s lives and decisions, revealing how power and money dominate society.

The story begins when Khalil Gibran is eighteen years old, at an age when love opens his eyes to the intense and magical beauty of a young girl whom he falls in love with. He falls in love with a courageous, generous, and strong woman named Selma Karamy. She is the one and only daughter of Faris Effendi Karamy, who is known as one of the wealthiest men in Lebanon.

As time passes, Khalil Gibran succeeds in finding Selma’s home and becomes familiar with her father, Faris Effendi, who considers Khalil to be the son of his closest friend. After some time, Khalil and Selma become tied by the bond of friendship, as their souls are similar. When they are in heaven, flying with angels and enjoying the delicious fruits of friendship, the devil, Mansur Bey Galib, enters the story. He is responsible for taking Adam and Eve out of heaven.

Selma and Khalil become like Eve and Adam, who make the mistake of not revealing their feelings to Faris Effendi Karamy before the entry of the devil, Mansur Bey Galib. Mansur Bey Galib is a man of both power and wealth. His entry into their lives makes the family of Faris Effendi Karamy worried and horrified. He separates Selma and Khalil and drags them into a life of helplessness and worry.

From here, the story enters a new phase, where Selma’s father, Faris Effendi Karamy, is compelled to give Selma’s hand in marriage to Mansur Bey Galib, who is a roisterer. Selma’s difficulties begin here, but she still remains in love with Khalil Gibran. All the luxuries and the mansion become a prison for Selma, where she is bound to live but finds it difficult to stay.

After some time, Mansur Bey Galib becomes aware of Selma’s secrets—what she does, how she lives, and whom she meets. He forbids Selma from visiting her father’s home and forces her to obey him as her husband.

One day, she secretly visits her father’s home to meet Khalil Gibran and makes him aware of all her circumstances. They then decide to separate with sadness. A few months later, Selma gives birth to a baby boy, but destiny plans the tragic end of the lives of both the child and his mother, leaving Lebanon in mourning.

Similar Posts

  • |

    A portrait of the artist as a young man

    ByJustpaste.in

    James Joyce published A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man in 1916. He did far more than tell the story of a boy growing up in Dublin. He revolutionized the modern novel. As Joyce’s first published novel, Portrait serves as a crucial bridge between classical nineteenth-century storytelling and the radical experimentation of twentieth-century modernism. Over a century after its release, this intimate novel remains a timeless exploration of identity, intellectual rebellion and terrifying price of personal freedom. Sensory Stream of Consciousness The novel follows Stephen Dedalus who’s a thinly veiled avatar for Joyce himself from early childhood through his late adolescence and college years. The book opens not with traditional exposition, but with a sensory stream of consciousness. The baby talk, the texture of a bedsheet, the smell of oilcloth, and songs sung by his family. As Stephen grows, so too does the language of the book. Joyce evolves his prose style alongside his protagonist. He transforms the narrative voice from simple baby phrases into highly philosophical and poetic language as Stephen matures into a young scholar. Extreme Religious Devotion At its core, Portrait is a profound meditation on the heavy burdens of tradition. Growing up in a strictly Catholic, politically fractured Ireland at the turn of the twentieth century, Stephen finds himself trapped between competing pressures. He witnesses fierce family debates over Irish nationalism. He also suffers harsh physical punishments at strict Jesuit boarding schools. Ultimately, he struggles with agonizing guilt over his emerging teenage desires. A central turning point of the novel occurs during a harrowing religious retreat, where a priest delivers a vividly detailed sermon on the eternal torment of Hell. Paralyzed by fear, Stephen briefly attempts a life of extreme religious devotion, only to realize that spiritual conformity destroys his true self. Creative Freedom Over Compliance Stephen’s ultimate breakthrough doesn’t come from religiously pious self . It’s from art. In one of the most famous passages in modern literature, Stephen walks along the shore and catches sight of a young woman wading in the water. Stephen doesn’t see her through a lens of sinful desire or religious symbolism. Rather, he sees her simply as an embodiment of pure, mortal beauty. This aesthetic epiphany awakens his true calling. Now, he must break free from the traditional network of family, church, and nation that seek to hold him back. To become an artist, Stephen realizes he must embrace exile. Thus, he must chose solitude and creative freedom over compliance. Joyce’s genius lies in his ability to make Stephen’s internal struggles feel deeply universal. Anyone who has ever questioned the beliefs they were raised with, felt out of place in their own community. They strived to forge an independent identity will find a powerful reflection in Stephen’s journey. His famous declaration near the end of the book to forge in the smithy of my soul the uncreated conscience of my race is a bold rallying cry for personal independence. A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man is not just the story of one young man’s transformation in turn-of-the-century Ireland, but a brilliant testament to the courage required to think for oneself and forge a truly unique voice in the world.  

  • | |

    The Art of Being Alone 

    ByJustpaste.in

    By  Shokiat Baloch of Kulanch  “Sometimes, being alone is not a sign of loneliness; it is an opportunity to discover yourself.” The book is written by Renuka Gavrani. This book contains many topics because these topics are more important to everyone’s life. This powerful idea lies at the heart of The Art of Being Alone, a thoughtful book that teaches readers how to enjoy their own company and find peace within themselves. The book shows that spending time alone can help us understand our thoughts, emotions, goals, and true personality. Another is saying, “Solitude is my home, Loneliness was my cage. (1)The pain of hiding your true self. This is the first topic in the book. How to hide secrets in your life while everyone has secrets.”Saying, “The most painful and scariest thing in the world is to look in the mirror and not recognise the person staring right at you”A person without hiding cannot live because the false hope that someday someone will magically show up and the fear of looking like a weirdo makes us do things that we never intended to do . Self-love starts with self-acceptance. It means first love yourself; after you should love another, and self-love has become more like self -pity. As clear-cut as possible, Self – love is about two things: (1) Knowing yourself. First, know yourself: you are doing what or for what purpose you live in life, then you have confident to able do something in life. (2) Accepting yourself are those which we do mistake in yourself; then accept yourself because everyone do mistake but the people accept yourself not an other Self. There are many thoughts in the present in a dark structure in the heart, and we should accept ourselves. The book is saying that the “greatest thing in the world is to know to belong to oneself “The love for Solitude.” You cannot be lonely if you like the person you are alone with. This book’s main purpose is solitude, loneliness and love. The book gives more information about love and being alone, how to love and self-love, and yourself.I found the book inspiring because it presents solitude as a chance for personal growth rather than something to fear. Its ideas are especially useful in today’s busy world, where people are constantly connected through phones and social media. “The main purpose of the book “The Art of Being Alone is a meaningful and inspiring book about understanding yourself and finding happiness within. I would recommend it to anyone who wants to become more independent, peaceful, and confident. The book suggest the people read this book because it is one of the most important book everyone life.

  • | | |

    Reason, passion and desire

    ByJustpaste.in

    We often like to view ourselves as unified, consistent individuals guided by singular motives. Yet, almost everyone has experienced an intense internal conflict. It’s wanting to spend on a impulse buy while knowing it defies financial logic. Or feeling overcome with regret immediately after giving in to a temptation. Over two millennia ago, the ancient Greek philosopher Plato set out to explain this psychological friction in Book IV of his masterwork, the Republic. Plato proposed that our psyche is composed of three distinct yet interacting forces rather than treating the human mind or psuche (soul) as a monolithic entity. Plato developed the concept of the tripartite soul. Further, he offered a framework that remains remarkably relevant to modern understandings of human behavior, self-control and moral choice. The Three Components of the Psyche Plato divides the human mind into three primary elements, each responsible for different aspects of our drives and behavior. 1. The Appetitive Element (To Epithumetikon) The appetitive part is the largest and most primal component of human nature. It encompasses our basic instinctual desires, including physical appetites for food, drink, comfort, and sensual pleasure, as well as material wants. Because these cravings are immediate and self-interested, the appetitive drive is inherently impulsive. Left unchecked, it seeks gratification regardless of long-term consequences. 2. The Spirited Element (To Thumoeides) The spirited element represents our emotional drive, passion, and sense of honor. It is the source of courage, pride, and righteous indignation when we witness or experience injustice. Unlike raw bodily appetite, the spirited part is closely tied to our moral identity and self-image. When functioning healthily, spirit acts as an ally to reason. It generates feelings of shame or self-directed anger when we surrender to harmful appetitive urges. 3. The Rational Element (To Logistikon) The rational element is the calculating and reflective mind. It seeks truth through logic, forethought, and critical reflection. What sets rationality apart from the other two components is its scope. While appetite and spirit focus on fulfilling specific, immediate goals, the rational mind evaluates what is best for the entire person in the long run. The Conflict Within: Why the Soul Divides To demonstrate that these three elements are truly distinct, Plato relies on an early formulation of the principle of non-contradiction: a single entity cannot simultaneously move in opposite directions in the exact same respect. Therefore, when a person experiences contradictory impulses such as feeling an intense thirst yet consciously choosing not to drink due to illness or health concerns, different parts of the mind must be in opposition. A classic illustration of this psychological war is the story of Leontius. While walking, Leontius felt a compulsive curiosity to look at execution corpses lying on the ground. Simultaneously, he felt disgust and moral repulsion. Eventually, his base appetite won out, causing him to rush over while angrily cursing his own eyes. This reaction demonstrates the spirited part of the soul becoming angry at the appetitive part for overriding rational judgment. From Conflict to Harmony Plato’s goal was not to suggest that humans should eradicate desire or emotion altogether. Instead, he argued that mental health and moral integrity, what he called justice of the soul, require a proper hierarchy. Reason must govern, serving as the wise leader that understands the big picture. Spirit must protect and enforce reason’s guidance with courage and conviction. Appetite must operate within temperate limits established by reason.   When these three components function in balance, an individual achieves psychological harmony. Conversely, when base desires or untamed emotions usurp the throne, inner turmoil and destructive behaviors follow. Plato’s tripartite framework ultimately serves as a timeless reminder that self-mastery is not about suppressing who we are, but about bringing our competing drives into a balanced, reason-guided unity.

  • | |

    Finding Macbeth among the cul-de-sacs

    ByJustpaste.in

    There is a persistent cultural myth that high art requires crumbling castles, stormed heaths, or the frantic pulse of a metropolitan center. Suburbia, by contrast, is frequently dismissed as a landscape of cultural vacuum. The locality is defined instead by the hypnotic hum of lawnmowers, identical mailboxes, and the predictable choreography of the morning commute. Yet, to truly understand the works of William Shakespeare, one might argue that the quiet cul-de-sac is precisely where his characters feel most alive. Far from being an ivory-tower exercise, reading the Elizabethan canon against the backdrop of modern suburban life reveals a shocking truth. The human heart remains unchanged. It battles with the exact same ambitions, fears, and frailties that obsessed the playwright over four centuries ago. Shakespeare’s Macbeth Consider the iconic image of Macbeth encountering the three witches on a desolate heath. It’s a scene immortalized in classical art where armored men on horseback reel back in shock from supernatural prophets. On the surface, this imagery feels light-years away from a suburban subdivision. And yet, the psychological anatomy of Macbeth’s descent is intensely domestic. The internal dialogue of unchecked ambition, the quiet rationalization of moral compromise, and the creeping dread of consequences do not require a Scottish throne room. They can happen just as easily across a kitchen island or inside a quiet home office late at night. The weird sisters whispering prophecies of greatness are mirrored in modern life by the relentless cultural pressures to achieve. King Lear’s Misjudgment of His Children When we open a volume of Shakespeare, the distance between the sixteenth-century stage and the twenty-first-century lawn collapses. The suburban environment with its heavy emphasis on conformity and respectability provides a testing ground for tragedy. Iago’s subtle manipulations and toxic envy find their modern equivalents in politics, gossip, and the quiet resentments behind closed doors. King Lear’s tragic misjudgment of his children echoes in the universal anxieties of aging, and the desperate search for legacy. The stakes may appear smaller. They’re measured in property values and school districts rather than kingdoms and crowns but the emotional resonance is identical. Reading Shakespeare in Suburbia Furthermore, reading Shakespeare in suburbia changes how we interact with our immediate surroundings. It strips away the sterile academic intimidation that often turns classical literature into a chore to be checked off a syllabus. Instead, the verse becomes a lens through which the mundane details of daily existence are rendered extraordinary. The polite wave to a neighbor takes on a layer of complex subtext; the solitary evening walk under streetlights feels heavy with introspection. We begin to recognize that our neighbors are not merely background characters in a quiet life, but complex individuals harboring their own private comedies and tragedies.    Immutable Patterns of Human Behavior Ultimately, literature serves as a mirror. The suburban landscape offers a surface polished to a clear, sometimes uncomfortable reflection. Shakespeare did not write merely about royalty or historical epochs. He wrote about the immutable patterns of human behavior. By bringing his texts into the quiet corners of modern domestic life, we bridge the gap between antiquity and the everyday. We discover that drama is not something reserved for history books or theatrical stages, but an inescapable part of being human, waiting to be noticed right outside our front doors.

  • |

    Ranjhan Yaar: Reclaiming Waris Shah’s Philosophy of Power and Resistance

    ByJustpaste.in

    By Tallat Naveed Ranjhan Yaar is an original Punjabi play by the eminent philosopher, historian, literary critic, poet, translator, and scholar Dr. Manzur Ejaz, whose profound understanding of Waris Shah’s Heer has earned him recognition as one of the most insightful interpreters of Punjab’s literary heritage. The play was written at the request of the Global Arts drama group, whose objective was not to stage another dramatic adaptation of a familiar folk romance. Instead, they envisioned a theatrical work that would unveil the philosophical and anthropological essence of Waris Shah’s Heer. Accepting this challenge, Dr. Manzur Ejaz produced a play that moves beyond the conventional narrative of romantic love to explore the deeper realities of power, social hierarchy, human dignity, and the contradictions of the feudal order. Rooted in the author’s extensive study of Waris Shah, ‘Ranjhan Yaar’ offers an original and intellectually engaging interpretation of one of Punjab’s greatest literary masterpieces. The play was later performed in Washington, D.C., where it received widespread appreciation for its literary depth, philosophical insight, and compelling dramatic structure. Rather than merely retelling a timeless legend, ‘Ranjhan Yaar’ invites its audience to rediscover Waris Shah’s vision as a profound reflection on society, justice, and the enduring struggle between power and humanity oppressed. Rather than celebrating romance alone, the play unveils the enduring conflict between the feudal ruling class and the dispossessed, revealing how social and economic power shapes human relationships and destinies. Dr. Manzur Ejaz displays remarkable dramatic artistry in ‘Ranjhan Yaar’ by transforming a familiar folk narrative into a philosophical and socially conscious play. The plot is tightly structured, with each scene advancing both the dramatic action and the central ideological conflict. His characters transcend individual identities to embody opposing social forces, lending the play symbolic depth. The dialogue is concise, intellectually engaging, and dramatically effective, revealing character while exposing the contradictions of the feudal order. In its fusion of social criticism and philosophical discourse, the play recalls the dramatic technique of George Bernard Shaw, whose theatre employs dialogue as a medium for intellectual debate. Through its structural coherence and thematic depth, ‘Ranjhan Yaar’ firmly establishes Dr. Manzur Ejaz as a playwright of remarkable literary vision He subverts the conventional hierarchy of folk drama by assigning intellectual and moral authority to the marginalised rather than the feudal elite. Characters such as Rangu, Elmu, and Jammu emerge as the true custodians of wisdom, while Heer’s companions Noori and her maid Rano collectively reinforce the play’s philosophy of resistance against class oppression and feudal hegemony. Heer is transformed into a symbol of resilience and moral defiance, and Ranjha into an embodiment of unwavering devotion and human dignity. Consequently, ‘Ranjhan Yaar’ transcends the limits of a romantic folk tale, evolving into a powerful dramatic critique of class hierarchy, caste prejudice, religious exploitation and the moral bankruptcy of the feudal order.The friendship between Dhedhu (Ranjha) and Rangu dissolves the artificial boundaries of class, affirming that humanity is measured not by birth but by conscience. Even more striking is the contrast between Malki, the wife of the feudal lord Chuchak, and Rano, Heer’s humble maid. Bound by the chains of privilege, she lacks the courage to defend her own daughter, while Rano, though socially insignificant, rises as the moral conscience of the play by standing fearlessly beside Heer. In this profound inversion of power, Dr. Manzur Ejaz revives Waris Shah’s enduring philosophy: society is governed by socio-economic injustice, where class interests eclipse blood relations, justice, and ethical values. This vision closely echoes the Marxist critique of feudal hegemony. Consequently, Heer and Ranjha cease to be merely legendary lovers; they become symbols of equality, human dignity, and resistance, whose tragic end exposes a social order that annihilates every voice raised against oppression. As Rangu reminds us in the closing movement of the play, ایهه سماج چود ہریاں مھراں دا سماج ، ھیراں رانجھیاں نوں اپنے اندر سمو نہیں سکدا جے کر اندر سمون دا جتن کرے آپ پاٹ جاۓ. A society founded upon privilege, caste, and feudal power can never become a sanctuary for truth, love, or justice. Its very structure demands the destruction of those who dare to challenge its authority. Heer and Ranjha are therefore not defeated because they loved; they are sacrificed because they embody equality, integrity, and the freedom of the human spirit. Yet, while the feudal order succeeds in silencing their bodies, it fails to extinguish their ideals. The moral courage of Rangu, Elmu, Jammu, Noori, Dena, and Rano survives as an enduring voice of conscience against oppression. In this lies the enduring greatness of ‘Ranjhan Yaar.’ Dr. Sahib restores Waris Shah’s Heer to its true philosophical stature—not as a romantic legend, but as a profound documentation of power, class hierarchy, and human resistance. The play reminds us that oppressive systems may eliminate individuals, but they can never annihilate the truth they represent. That is why Heer and Ranjha continue to live—not as lovers imprisoned in folklore, but as timeless. More than a reinterpretation of Waris Shah’s Heer, ‘Ranjhan Yaar’ holds a mirror to the society we continue to inhabit. Its critique of class privilege, feudal authority, religious exploitation, and socio-economic injustice remains profoundly relevant. It is an essential read for anyone who seeks to understand that Heer is not merely a love story, but a timeless philosophy of power, resistance, and human dignity. A compelling and indispensable read for every serious student of Punjabi literature. Name of book:Rajhan Yaar Author: Manzur Ejaz Published: Kitab Trinjan, Lahore. Tallat Naveed is Lahore based poetess and literary Analyst.  

  • Exile and The Kingdom

    ByJustpaste.in

    I have always interpreted the quote, “Don’t judge a book by its cover,” as a metaphor, denying the worldly meaning and focusing on the discrete sense it creates. But not until I read the book “Kingdom and Exile” by Albert Camus. Judging by the title, it establishes a scenario of a king ruling in his kingdom with absolute power and authority. But owing to certain reasons, he was compelled to exile and relinquish his power. That’s how I correlated the book with its title. I was totally left bemused when I started reading it, flapping one page after the other and realizing the book isn’t like how its title says; it’s different inside. It’s actually a collection of six intriguing stories, each with different lessons. This book, which contains amusing stories, was written by Albert Camus, a French author and philosopher. He narrated and published his book in 1957, and soon after, he died in a car accident in 1960. For his magnificent write-up, he was awarded a Nobel Prize in literature. ‘Kingdom and Exile’ is a book of 126 pages, completed within approximately 6 days without making us invest more time in it. The flow of stories makes us read them in no time. Each of the stories revolves around a new protagonist with different roles as a character in the story. I enjoyed reading all 6 stories, but I was more absorbed with the first story of the book, “The adulterous woman,” who follows her husband on his business trip when she is asked to. Undoubtedly, her husband loved her and made her existence real, but more often than not, she realized he was more involved in his business, which made her wonder about the probability of his affection. It eventually made certain boundaries between them where she kept her uneasiness to herself, making her feelings isolated within herself. But at the end of the day, he was her husband who always made her feel valued, so she ended up accepting the meager way of being valued. The other five stories were relinquishing; they always made me wonder about the end of them. But woefully, I was baffled by the ending most of the time because I thought there must have been a better ending. Though the book is interesting, it could have been in its best version if it had emphasized explicitness. I was actually finding it hard to understand because of the vocabulary. Overall, it made me willing to read it because I wasn’t bored and stayed focused. The best part of reading it was becoming involved as an invisible character in these stories who secretly observed the characters playing their roles. Since it is always better to surround ourselves with print media, read new things, and expand our domain of learning, this book is relevant to all those who are sluggish enough to start reading. It will keep us interested and focused throughout each story.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *