law8217s own labor

The law’s own labor problem

EVERY year, hundreds of fresh law graduates walk into Pakistan’s leading chambers and firms for what is euphemistically called an “internship” or “pupillage.” Most will not be paid a rupee for months, sometimes years, of full-time work drafting pleadings, researching case law and sitting in on client meetings. Some will eventually be “made permanent” on a modest salary; many others will simply be replaced by the next batch of eager graduates willing to work for free.

This arrangement is so normalized within the legal fraternity that it is rarely discussed as a labor rights issue at all. It is treated, instead, as an inevitable rite of passage the price of admission into a prestigious profession. Yet a closer look suggests that Pakistan’s legal industry may be one of the starkest examples of unregulated, exploitative internship practice in the country, and one uniquely ill-placed to defend it, given that the profession exists to interpret and enforce the very laws it is quietly sidestepping.

The scale of the problem has been documented, if informally. Lawyers who have surveyed the profession describe junior associates at reputed firms completing unpaid stints stretching from three months to two years, often working full days while technically still “training.” The practice persists despite Pakistan’s Apprenticeship Ordinance, 1962, which was designed precisely to regulate structured on-the-job training and guarantee apprentices certain minimum protections. Law firms and chambers, however, rarely register their interns as apprentices under this law, leaving them in a legal no-man’s-land: neither students, nor employees, nor apprentices in the statutory sense.

This gap is compounded by the profession’s own regulator. The Pakistan Bar Council and provincial bar councils set the rules for enrolment, requiring aspiring advocates to complete a period of pupillage under a senior lawyer before they can be licensed. But neither the Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Act, 1973, nor the rules made under it, mandate that this pupillage be paid. In effect, the very body responsible for admitting new lawyers to practice has built an unpaid apprenticeship requirement into the licensing process itself a far cry from professions such as medicine, where house officers, despite their own well-documented grievances, at least draw a government stipend during mandatory training.

The consequences fall unevenly. A law graduate from a well-off Lahore or Karachi household, who can rely on family support for rent and daily expenses, can afford to spend two years being trained for free at a top-tier firm. A graduate from Multan or Turbat, or from a household with no such cushion, effectively cannot. Since access to the most prestigious firms is widely understood to run through personal connections and informal referrals rather than open, merit-based recruitment, the unpaid pupillage system quietly filters out precisely those graduates for whom a legal career could be most transformative. What is marketed as a meritocratic apprenticeship is, in practice, a wealth test dressed up as professional training.

Female interns face a related but distinct set of risks. The relative informality of chamber culture, combined with the absence of any real institutional oversight of unpaid interns’ working conditions, leaves young women particularly exposed to harassment with limited recourse. The Protection against Harassment of Women at the Workplace Act, 2010, and its 2022 amendment, extended coverage to a wider range of workplace relationships, but enforcement inside small chambers as opposed to large corporate firms with formal HR departments remains largely theoretical. An unpaid intern hoping for a reference or a permanent position has every incentive to stay silent.

None of this is to say every senior lawyer who takes on unpaid interns is acting in bad faith; many genuinely believe, as the profession has long insisted, that pupillage is an investment in the intern’s own future. But belief is not evidence, and there is little data testing whether unpaid pupillage produces better lawyers than a modestly paid one would, or whether firms would truly stop training juniors if a stipend were required. Given how heavily law firms already rely on interns for substantive work, it seems more likely that a minimum stipend requirement would simply formalize the value interns already provide.

The fix does not require reinventing the wheel. The Pakistan Bar Council could amend its enrolment rules to require a minimum stipend during pupillage, as some foreign bar associations already do. Firms above a certain size could be required to register interns under the Apprenticeship Ordinance, bringing them within existing protections. And bar councils could extend meaningful, monitored harassment complaint mechanisms to chambers of every size, not just the handful of firms large enough to run their own HR departments.

A profession built on the promise of equal treatment before the law owes its own newest entrants rather more consistency between what it argues in court and how it treats them at their desks.

Similar Posts

  • Wave clouds go viral in California

    People in the California city of Santa Cruz were left amazed after unusual wave shaped clouds appeared across the evening sky. According to media reports the stunning cloud formation was seen on Tuesday evening. Dark and white clouds stretched across the sky creating a pattern that looked like ocean waves. As the sun began to set its golden light reflected off the clouds making the view even more beautiful. Many local residents captured the rare moment on their phones and shared photos and videos on social media, where they quickly went viral. One woman at the beach posted a video of the breathtaking sky, and it has attracted widespread attention online.

  • Bad breath causes and prevention

    Almost everyone experiences bad breath at some point in life. In medical terms this condition is called halitosis. While it is often temporary some people may have bad breath for a long time. In certain cases it can also be a sign of an underlying health problem. Experts estimate that about half of all adults experience bad breath at least once in their lifetime. •Common causes of bad breath •Poor oral hygiene One of the main causes of bad breath is not cleaning your teeth gums and tongue properly.  Tiny food particles can stay in the mouth and break down over time. This allows bacteria to grow and produce an unpleasant smell. •Not cleaning the tongue The tongue naturally collects bacteria. If it is not cleaned regularly these bacteria mix with leftover food and can cause bad breath. Cleaning your tongue every day is just as important as brushing your teeth. •Strong smelling foods Foods such as garlic onions and certain spices can make your breath smell bad. After digestion some of the natural oils from these foods enter the bloodstream and reach the lungs where they affect the smell of your breath. •Smoking Smoking is another common reason for bad breath. It leaves a strong smell in the mouth reduces saliva and increases the growth of harmful bacteria. •Dry mouth and not drinking enough water Saliva helps wash away food particles and bacteria. When your mouth is dry bacteria stay longer and produce bad odors. A dry mouth can happen if you sleep with your mouth open take certain medicines have problems with the salivary glands, or simply do not drink enough water. •Gum and tooth problems Plaque can build up around the teeth and gums if you do not brush and floss properly. Over time this can lead to gum disease infections, and bad breath. •Nose throat or sinus infections Bad breath may also be caused by sinus infections throat infections tonsil stones or other conditions affecting the nose and throat. •Certain medical conditions Sometimes bad breath is linked to health problems such as diabetes kidney disease liver disease or acid reflux. If bad breath continues even after improving oral hygiene it is a good idea to consult a doctor or dentist. •Simple tips to keep your breath fresh •Brush your teeth twice a day. •Clean your tongue every day. •Floss regularly to remove trapped food. •Drink plenty of water to keep your mouth moist. •Avoid smoking. •Limit foods with strong odors before social events. Visit your dentist regularly for check ups and cleanings. In many cases bad breath can be prevented with good oral hygiene and healthy daily habits. However if the problem does not go away it may be a sign of an underlying medical condition that should be checked by a healthcare professional.

  • | |

    Theories behind Shakespeare’s true identity

    For centuries, William Shakespeare has been indicated as the undisputed genius of Western literature. His masterworks, ranging from the tragedy of Hamlet to the romantic drama of Romeo and Juliet, form the bedrock of English theater. Yet, beneath the reverence lies one of the most persistent controversies in literary history. Did a provincial actor from Stratford-upon-Avon actually pen these legendary plays? Was Shakespeare merely a convenient alias for another genius working in the shadows? The Paradox of the Bard’s Background Doubts surrounding Shakespeare’s authorship stem largely from the sharp contrast between his known biography and the astonishing depth of his literary canon. Born in 1564, Shakespeare attended the local grammar school where he learned Latin and basic rhetoric. He never pursued higher education at a university, nor did he ever leave England. In contrast, the plays attributed to him demonstrate an extraordinary mastery of complex subjects. They reveal intimate familiarity with international geography, continental languages, high-stakes royal politics, aristocratic court etiquette, and intricate legal doctrines. In an era before public libraries and widespread travel, skeptic scholars often called Anti-Stratfordians question how a man with limited schooling and exposure to foreign cultures could possess such erudition. This discrepancy has led many to speculate that the real Shakespeare acted primarily as a public frontman. As an actor and shareholder in the Lord Chamberlain’s Men, Shakespeare was well-positioned in London’s theatrical community. High-born courtiers or politically vulnerable figures who wished to write plays may have utilized Shakespeare’s name to publish their works safely. The Leading Candidates Over years, prominent figures from Tudor and Jacobean society have emerged as alternatives for the true authorship. Sir Francis Bacon: A brilliant philosopher, statesman, and pioneer of the scientific method. Bacon possessed the intellectual rigor and courtly insight required to craft the plays. Proponents argue that he’s Lord Chancellor and a government insider. So, Bacon couldn’t openly associate with public theater. It would’ve definitely ruined his political standing and risking royal disapproval. Edward de Vere, Earl of Oxford: Educated at Cambridge, well-traveled throughout Europe, and a celebrated poet in his own right, de Vere fits the profile of an elite playwright. However, a major hurdle for the Oxfordian theory is that de Vere passed away in 1604 several years before iconic plays like The Tempest and Macbeth were produced. Christopher Marlowe: Perhaps the most dramatic theory involves Shakespeare’s contemporary, Christopher Marlowe. A gifted Cambridge graduate and spy for the Tudor government, Marlowe officially died in a tavern brawl in 1593. Skeptics suggest he faked his death to escape charges of heresy and treason, subsequently continuing to write under the pen name William Shakespeare. Notably, the first publications under Shakespeare’s name appeared just weeks after Marlowe’s reported demise. Was the Genius a Woman? The authorship debate extends beyond male nobles to include extraordinary women of the Elizabethan court. Shakespeare’s plays are remarkable for their nuanced, highly capable female characters who defy traditional stereotypes of the era. Two prominent women are frequently cited in authorship theories. Mary Sidney, Countess of Pembroke: An accomplished writer, classical scholar, and major patron of the arts, Sidney hosted a renowned literary salon and authored closet dramas meant for private performance. Emilia Bassano: Born to a family of Venetian court musicians believed to have Jewish heritage, Bassano possessed both international ties and formal education. Her background offers a compelling explanation for the Italian settings and Jewish themes present in works such as The Merchant of Venice. An Enduring Literary Mystery Mainstream academic consensus remains firmly with the man from Stratford-upon-Avon. They pointed to contemporary records, theatrical tributes and historical references. The debate surrounding the Bard’s identity continues to fascinate scholars and theater lovers alike. Whether created by a single self-made dramatist or a hidden collective of noble minds, the plays continue to inspire readers across the globe.

  • The Euphemism of Integration: Kashmir Seven Years Later

    By Ahmad Hassan “The convoluted wording of legalisms grew up around the necessity to hide from ourselves the violence we intend toward each other… Elaborate euphemisms may conceal your intent to kill, but behind any use of power over another the ultimate assumption remains: ‘I feed on your energy.’” When Frank Herbert wrote those words in his novel Dune Messiah, he observed that elaborate euphemisms are often used by the state to conceal the raw mechanics of power. In Pakistan, August 5 is observed as Youm-e-Istehsal to condemn the 2019 revocation of Article 370 and its supplementary provision, Article 35A. This act of the Indian government removed Kashmir’s separate constitution, its flag and its control over its own affairs. Last week marked seven years since that day. What began as a dramatic constitutional rupture has now, by design, become quietly normalized. Jammu and Kashmir joined India in 1947 on defined terms. The Maharaja handed over defence, foreign affairs and communications. Everything else stayed with the state. The United Nations later called for a plebiscite. It never happened. Instead, over decades, the protections that were supposed to stand in its place were worn down piece by piece, until August 5, 2019, when the government removed what remained in a single stroke. The method deserves more attention than it usually gets. Article 370 was not directly changed. First, the government reached for Article 367, which was intended to aid in the interpretation of the Constitution, and used it to redefine one phrase: “Constituent Assembly” became “Legislative Assembly.” Kashmir had no sitting assembly at the time, and the state was under President’s Rule. So, the government’s own appointee, the Governor, signed off on the change. India’s Supreme Court had already ruled, in 1959 and again in 1969, that Kashmir’s constitutional status could only be changed after the approval of the Constituent Assembly of Kashmir. When that body no longer existed, no institution had the standing to give that consent on Kashmir’s behalf. New Delhi decided that its own Governor could stand in for the people he had not been elected by. That is not consent. It is a government consenting to itself. The Indian government argued that Kashmiris had lived for decades under an insurgency that killed tens of thousands and emptied the Valley of its Pandit community in 1990. It left the region isolated from the investment and policing coordination. That argument would carry more weight if the method had matched it. What followed the revocation was not the language of integration. It was a total communications blackout, landlines and mobile networks and the internet all cut at once. Independent estimates put the troop presence at 600,000 to 800,000, roughly one soldier for every ten Kashmiris. Even pro-India politicians, former chief ministers among them, were placed under detention. Perhaps a security argument can justify counter-insurgency operations. It cannot by itself justify dissolving a state’s constitutional status, its legislature and its statehood in one move. That too with no elected Kashmiri voice given the chance to object. Jawaharlal Nehru warned Parliament about exactly this shortcut in 1952, while Article 370 was still being drafted. No clause in a constitution, he said, could substitute for the will of the Kashmiri people. Real integration, in his words, comes from the mind and the heart, not from a clause imposed from outside. Actually, there is a longer, quieter project behind the legal manoeuvre. Article 35A once barred outsiders from buying land or settling permanently in Kashmir. Since its removal, more than 3.2 million domicile certificates have gone to outsiders, most of them non-Kashmiri Hindus. This alarming thing is that wherever a disputed territory’s demographics are reshaped before its people are asked what they want, the eventual vote, if one ever comes, no longer reflects the population whose future was originally in question. None of this required an invading army, or an open declaration of intent. It required a redefined word, a signature from an appointee, and a great deal of time. The convoluted legalisms that Herbert warned about have become policy in Kashmir: development, integration, correction. Each euphemism has quietly done the work that an honest admission of purpose could never have achieved. Seven years on, Kashmir’s assembly has voted decisively against the BJP that carried out the revocation, and passed its own resolution demanding the restoration of its special status. New Delhi can easily ignore them. Yet, that very power to ignore an elected legislature proves, beyond any doubt, that the “consent” obtained seven years ago was always a legal fiction.

  • |

    10 technologies replaced by smartphones

    Smartphones are now found in almost everyone’s hands but their rise has also rendered many once-popular technologies obsolete. At the beginning of the 21st century, personal computers, home internet and mobile phones became widely accessible. Few could have imagined that, within a few years, all these technologies would merge into a single device that would transform nearly every aspect of daily life. That device is the smartphone. It serves as a flashlight, bank account manager, weather forecaster, fitness tracker, camera and much more. One of the smartphone’s greatest strengths is its ability to combine multiple functions into a single, easy-to-use device. As a result, many older technologies have largely disappeared. Here are ten of them: 1. Landline phones Landline phones were among the first technologies to be replaced by smartphones. Once common in nearly every home, they have become largely unnecessary because smartphones provide calling capabilities along with numerous internet-based communication apps. 2. Digital cameras Between 2008 and 2021, sales of compact digital cameras declined by more than 97 percent. Modern smartphones feature increasingly advanced cameras eliminating the need for many people to purchase separate digital cameras. 3. Calculators Pocket calculators were once essential tools for students and professionals. Today, every smartphone includes a built-in calculator while dedicated apps can solve even complex mathematical problems. 4. Alarm clocks Traditional alarm clocks have become much less common because smartphones include customizable alarm features allowing users to choose sounds, adjust volume and set multiple alarms. They also function as clocks reducing the need for separate timepieces. 5. Walkie-talkies Walkie-talkies were widely used in workplaces for instant communication. Smartphones now offer voice calls, messaging and group chats providing far more advanced communication options. 6. MP3 players Before smartphones, MP3 players were the preferred way to listen to music. Smartphones now allow users to store songs or stream millions of tracks through music apps without downloading them. 7. Radios Radio was once the primary source of music and news. Today, smartphones can stream live radio stations as well as podcasts and online audio services. 8. Compact Discs (CDs) CD sales peaked in 2002 and remained popular even after the arrival of devices like the iPod. However, smartphones and online streaming services have largely eliminated the need for physical music discs. 9. GPS devices Dedicated GPS navigation systems were once common in vehicles. Today, smartphones include built-in GPS sensors and navigation apps such as Google Maps making standalone GPS devices largely unnecessary. 10. Feature phones Basic mobile phones were once highly desirable and even considered status symbols. However, smartphones have almost completely replaced them leaving feature phones with only a small share of the market.

  • Obsession with cannibalism as the metaphor for love

     Social media ecosystems have turned toward a darker trope to articulate the depths of romantic obsession: cannibalism. Curated mood boards are featuring imagery of raw meat, overripe pomegranates, and bloodied lovers. Viral poetry is explicitly framing consumption as intimacy. The internet has revitalized an ancient literary standard. But why has this unsettling imagery captured the imagination of so many digital creators today? If you scroll through modern aesthetic feeds, you will quickly encounter a redundant visual language centered on bodily devotion. The imagery often combines classical romance with motifs of physical destruction and ingestion. Visual art depicting lovers covered in blood or blurring the boundary between violence and affection. Photographs of bruised, overripe red fruits, notably pomegranates, bursting open. Mostly, the graphics are serving as vivid stand-ins for human flesh and emotion. Stills from cinematic works featuring vampires and monsters. The act of biting or feeding is inextricably linked to passion. Images of cuts of raw meat juxtaposed against soft, romantic lighting. Verse that frames complete surrender as allowing oneself to be digested, bitten, or absorbed by a partner. A prime example of this sentiment comes from writer Azra T.’s poem ‘Fruit’: Peel your heart like a pomegranate. Offer it to him, palms outwards. Say ‘eat.’ Watch him come away stained red by you. You’re in his teeth. He’ll kiss you with that mouth. The poem depicts the core ethos of this aesthetic. Total self-offering, emotional vulnerability pushed to its absolute physical extreme, and a desire to permanently mark and be integrated into the person you love. The surge of cannibalism-as-love content feels distinctly accustomed to the melodrama of internet subcultures. However, it is far from a contemporary invention. The urge to frame love as an act of consumption has deep historical and cultural roots.  Why Is the Metaphor Resonating Now? This world is driven by digital interactions and transactional relationships. So, the urge to consume and be consumed represents a longing for absolute vulnerability. When someone invokes cannibalism in a romantic context, they aren’t expressing a literal desire for violence. Instead, they are grasping for a metaphor extreme enough to convey a few core human desires. To be ingested is to become a part of someone else forever. Their body will be physically reshaped by your presence. Traditional closeness still leaves a physical boundary between two individuals. Consumption erases that barrier entirely. Two become one in the most literal sense conceivable. Giving up oneself entirely to be possessed by another is the ultimate gesture of trust. Ultimately, the rise of the cannibalism-as-love highlights an overwhelming power of affection. By reaching for the extreme, internet culture finds a way to express what ordinary romantic language fails to capture. A devotion so grand, so terrifying, and so profound that it borders on the appetite.  

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *