hsa dismissal upheld

HSA VC dismissal upheld in harassment case

ByJustpaste.in

Islamabad: The President of Pakistan rejected the appeal of Health Services Academy Vice Chancellor Dr Shahzad Ali Khan and maintained his dismissal from service. The latest order held that retaliatory action against Dr Ayesha Khan created a hostile work environment and amounted to gender based harassment, justifying the punishment of dismissal.

The decision creates a major legal twist in the high profile HSA case. The President’s legal forum clearly observed that this was not established as a case of sexual harassment in the manner found earlier by the Federal Ombudsperson for Protection Against Harassment of Women at the Workplace.

It said the earlier FOSPAH decision contained serious weaknesses, including failure to properly examine the nature of the relationship between the two parties and failure to frame separate questions on several important parts of the dispute.

However, those weaknesses did not save Dr Shahzad Ali Khan from dismissal. The final order stated that his later conduct, especially the abrupt termination of Dr Ayesha Khan, could not be ignored. It held that the retaliatory measures created a hostile work environment for her and amounted to gender-based harassment.

The President approved the recommendation to dismiss Dr Shahzad Ali Khan’s representation and maintain the penalty of dismissal from service. The final decision also strongly observed that Dr Shahzad Ali Khan had not approached the President with clean hands.

It questioned his claim that he had been honey trapped when that claim was examined together with what the decision described as extreme retaliatory measures taken against Dr Ayesha Khan. One important point was the timing of her removal from service.

The record showed that Dr Ayesha Khan registered an FIR and her employment was terminated the following day. The presidential decision said this sequence was important when deciding whether retaliation had occurred.

At the same time, the President’s legal forum strongly criticised major parts of the original FOSPAH reasoning. It said FOSPAH failed to properly establish the timeline of the different complaints and legal actions between the two parties.

It also found contradictions and unanswered questions in the case. The decision said FOSPAH should have separately examined the exact nature of the relationship, whether any employment benefit was linked to a romantic or sexual demand, whether electronic evidence was reliable, what the financial transactions represented and whether Dr Ayesha Khan’s termination was retaliation.

Instead, FOSPAH had mainly framed the broad question of whether harassment had occurred and who was responsible. The President’s legal forum described that approach as inadequate for such a complicated case.

The order went further and stated that not a single specific incident of sexual harassment had been identified in the complaint. It said the sexual harassment conclusion was reached through indirect reasoning instead of being linked to a particular incident.

The forum therefore concluded that the dispute could not properly be treated as sexual harassment on that basis. The decision described the dispute as involving two people who had remained close for several years before serious differences developed.

Dr Ayesha Khan’s position was that the relationship involved marriage or a promise of marriage. Dr Shahzad Ali Khan denied that a marriage existed and claimed he had been honey trapped. The presidential forum said neither honey trapping nor marriage had been established on the record before it.

It observed that questions over whether a valid marriage existed should be decided by a competent family court rather than through workplace harassment proceedings. The case originally started with complaints and counter complaints between Dr Shahzad Ali Khan and Dr Ayesha Khan.

Dr Shahzad Ali Khan accused Dr Ayesha Khan of blackmail, honey trapping, financial fraud, threats and misuse of authority. He alleged that she extracted Rs 27.44 million from him through threats and manipulation for an alleged property investment. He also alleged that she threatened his wife while demanding Rs 30 million.

According to his version, money from the sale of two vehicles, worth around Rs 10 million, was also handed to Dr Ayesha Khan for investment and was not returned. Dr Ayesha Khan denied those accusations. She alleged that Dr Shahzad Ali Khan made personal and inappropriate remarks, discussed private marital matters with her, promised marriage and later took retaliatory action against her.

She also accused him of workplace harassment and alleged physical harassment in an official vehicle. She maintained that her termination and other actions followed her resistance to him and her pursuit of legal action. The original FOSPAH order took a much stronger view against Dr Shahzad Ali Khan.

It found that he had misused his authority while serving as a teacher and later Vice Chancellor, developed an inappropriate relationship with a student who later became his junior colleague and gave her unusual professional benefits. FOSPAH ordered his removal from service after finding quid pro quo harassment.

WhatsApp messages also became an important part of the original case. The record included messages from Dr Shahzad Ali Khan’s number in which Dr Ayesha Khan was addressed with personal names including Zalim Princess and other affectionate expressions. FOSPAH considered these messages important evidence against the honey trap allegation and viewed them as showing personal communication initiated from a position of authority.

The Ombudsperson also found that allegations of financial misappropriation against Dr Ayesha Khan had not been proved through enough documentary evidence. Dr Shahzad Ali Khan challenged the FOSPAH decision before the President. His lawyers argued that Dr Ayesha Khan had given different versions of important events before different legal forums.

They also challenged the use of WhatsApp screenshots, saying the material was incomplete and had not been properly examined through forensic testing. His side denied any marriage, sexual favour or sexual relationship and argued that the finding of quid pro quo sexual harassment was based on assumptions rather than direct evidence.

Dr Ayesha Khan’s lawyers opposed the appeal. They argued that the original order had followed a full inquiry, evidence and cross examination. Her side said the WhatsApp messages came from Dr Shahzad Ali Khan’s registered number and argued that his claim about phone cloning was unconvincing.

They also pointed to her sudden termination after the FIR and argued that the timing supported her claim of retaliation. Her lawyers asked for the appeal to be dismissed and the original punishment to be maintained. The President’s decision ultimately took a different route from both sides.

It did not accept the original sexual harassment reasoning in full. It also did not accept Dr Shahzad Ali Khan’s request to cancel his punishment. Instead, it found that the retaliation and hostile work environment created for Dr Ayesha Khan were serious enough to uphold his dismissal.

The result is that the legal reasoning behind the punishment has changed, but the punishment itself remains the same. Dr Shahzad Ali Khan’s appeal has been dismissed and his removal from service stands.

Similar Posts

  • NA committee demands action against drug suppliers in universities

    ByJustpaste.in

    ISLAMABAD: A serious debate erupted in the National Assembly Standing Committee on Federal Education and Professional Training after lawmakers questioned whether educational institutions were doing enough to stop the spread of drugs among students, warning that awareness campaigns alone cannot defeat organised supply networks operating around campuses. The committee, chaired by Ms. Mahtab Akbar Rashdi, examined the growing problem of narcotics in educational institutions and demanded practical results instead of only reports, seminars and awareness programmes. The committee stressed that the issue was not limited to students using drugs but also involved people supplying these substances to young people. During the meeting, officials of the Federal Directorate of Education (FDE) informed the committee that no drug use incident had been officially reported inside its public sector institutions. They said multiple measures were being taken, including drug awareness education, life skills programmes, tobacco free zones, monitoring committees and coordination with law enforcement agencies. However, Member of the Committee Dr Shazia Sobia Aslam Soomro expressed dissatisfaction with the briefing and questioned whether awareness campaigns were producing real results. She said simply giving presentations about awareness was not enough and asked authorities how many suppliers had been caught, how many institutions had reported cases and what action had been taken against those involved in supplying drugs. “This is not a joke,” Chairperson Ms. Mahtab Akbar Rashdi said while stressing that the problem required serious action. She questioned why authorities were focusing mainly on awareness while failing to show clear results against those involved in supplying drugs. The committee also raised concerns that drug suppliers were using new methods to reach students. Members pointed towards reports suggesting that drugs were being supplied through online channels and other hidden methods, including delivery systems that make it difficult for institutions to detect the problem. Dr Shazia Sobia informed the meeting that Islamabad Police had reported seizing 370 kilograms of drugs over three years, with 214 cases reported in educational institutions and 263 people arrested. The member questioned why education authorities were mostly discussing awareness instead of providing details about cooperation with police, the Anti Narcotics Force and rehabilitation centres. The committee raised another major concern that disciplinary action was often taken against students, while the people supplying drugs were not being targeted enough. Members questioned why students faced penalties while suppliers operating around educational institutions continued to escape. They demanded stronger action against those bringing drugs into campuses rather than focusing only on students who may already be victims of addiction. Chairperson Ms. Mahtab Akbar Rashdi said educational institutions must take responsibility because they control campuses, hostels and facilities where students spend their time. She said institutions cannot reach inside homes, but they must ensure strict monitoring within their own premises. She further directed that universities and colleges should provide regular reports about drug related cases, actions taken and rehabilitation efforts. She emphasised that the goal should not only be punishment but also helping affected students recover. The Higher Education Commission (HEC) informed the committee that it had implemented a drug and tobacco control policy across around 249 universities. According to HEC officials, committees had been formed in universities, monitoring mechanisms were introduced and coordination was established with the Anti Narcotics Force and other agencies. HEC officials told the committee that around 1,418 drug related cases were reported in 250 institutions. They said penalties, warnings, counselling and other disciplinary actions were taken in different cases. The committee, however, questioned whether these numbers reflected a real improvement or only showed administrative action after incidents had already occurred. Members also raised concerns about suppliers operating near universities, including allegations that some people connected with campus facilities could be involved in supplying drugs. They demanded that authorities investigate suppliers instead of limiting action to students. HEC officials responded that action had been taken against suppliers where evidence was available. They said surveillance systems, including CCTV monitoring, were being used and that students involved in supplying drugs could face suspension or termination. The committee decided that future discussions should include the Anti Narcotics Force, police authorities and relevant rehabilitation experts to develop a stronger strategy against drug supply networks. Officials were asked to return with practical results, including information about suppliers caught, students rehabilitated and improvements achieved.

  • | |

    Sindh announces new school timings

    ByJustpaste.in

    The Sindh School Education and Literacy Department has issued a revised schedule for government schools across the province, outlining new operating hours for primary, elementary, secondary, and higher secondary institutions. According to an official notification, the updated timings will remain in effect from August until October 31, after which a separate winter schedule will be implemented from November 1 to March 31. Under the summer schedule, single-shift primary schools will operate from 8:00 a.m. to 2:30 p.m. from Monday to Thursday, while on Fridays, classes will end earlier, with schools remaining open from 8:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. For secondary and higher secondary schools, the first shift will run from 7:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. until October 31. The department has also announced revised winter timings. From November 1 to March 31, single-shift primary schools will function from 8:30 a.m. to 3:00 p.m., while the first shift for secondary and higher secondary schools will be held from 8:00 a.m. to 1:45 p.m. Schools operating in double shifts will also follow updated schedules. Until October 31, the  second shift will run from 1:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday through Thursday. During the winter months, from November 1 to March 31, the second shift will begin at 12:45 p.m. and continue until 5:45 p.m. On Fridays, second-shift schools will operate from 10:45 a.m. to 2:15 p.m. The revised timings aim to ensure a uniform academic schedule for government schools across Sindh while accommodating seasonal changes in daylight and weather conditions.

  • | |

    JPMC doctor seeks relief amid patient death contro…

    ByJustpaste.in

    A senior doctor at Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre (JPMC) has asked to step down from her responsibilities amid controversy surrounding the death of a 65-year-old patient who was shifted from the hospital’s emergency department to the National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases (NICVD) on July 28. Dr Sanobar Sikandar, JPMC’s only senior emergency medicine specialist, submitted a request to the hospital’s Executive Director seeking relief from her duties as an assistant professor of medicine. She cited mounting professional pressure, internal interference and what she described as an unhealthy working environment. Dr Sanobar said the hospital administration criticised her after asking her to explain the circumstances surrounding the patient’s death. She said the situation had made it increasingly difficult for her to continue managing her medical, teaching and administrative responsibilities effectively. In her application, she highlighted what she described as a lack of professional respect in the emergency department, political interference and inappropriate conduct by some junior doctors. She said these issues had caused her severe mental stress and made it difficult to continue working under the prevailing conditions. The Young Doctors Association (YDA) Sindh has backed Dr Sanobar and urged the JPMC administration to address the dispute immediately. YDA Sindh Chairman Dr Mehboob Noonari said Dr Sanobar is the hospital’s only FCPS assistant professor in emergency medicine. He noted that she also serves as faculty for the FCPS programme and supervises trainee doctors. Dr Noonari warned that her departure could seriously disrupt emergency medicine training at JPMC and may even put the FCPS programme at risk of closure. He also alleged that the administration was pressuring Dr Sanobar to protect the doctor who was in charge of the night shift when the incident occurred. He questioned why the night-shift in-charge was being shielded and demanded that hospital authorities clarify the matter. The YDA chairman further claimed that senior doctors had questioned Dr Sanobar over her decision to issue an explanation regarding the patient’s death, raising concerns about the handling of the case within the hospital.

  • | |

    Pattaya Officials Focus on E-Cigarette Laws and Youth Protection at National Health Conference

    ByJustpaste.in

    NONTHABURI, Thailand On August 7th, 2026, Mr. Poramese Ngamphichet, Mayor of Pattaya City, assigned Mr. Kiatisak Sriwongchai, Permanent Secretary of Pattaya City, to represent the municipality at the 24th National Health Academic Conference (CDoH). The conference, held under the theme “Sweet, Salty, Drunk, Smoke: Traps of Chronic Health-Damaging Products,” took place in the meeting room […]

  • | |

    Suspected food poisoning claims three young lives

    ByJustpaste.in

      In a deeply distressing incident that has sent shockwaves through the small community of Khanpur, located within the Shikarpur district, at least ten individuals have fallen severely ill after reportedly consuming contaminated or unwholesome food. The situation, which unfolded rapidly over the past 24 hours, has tragically resulted in the deaths of three young children, while seven other victims, including women and other minors, remain under intensive medical care. According to official statements released by local police authorities, the harrowing sequence of events began when a group of families, gathered for what is believed to be a communal meal or a private social event, started exhibiting acute symptoms of foodborne illness. The symptoms, described by medical staff as severe and aggressive, included persistent vomiting, acute diarrhea, high-grade fevers, and in some cases, neurological distress such as disorientation and muscle weakness. The rapid onset of these symptoms alarmed family members, who immediately rushed the afflicted individuals to the nearest government-run healthcare facility and private clinics in the vicinity. Police officials, who have been deployed to the scene to maintain order and initiate a formal investigation, confirmed the grim casualty count. In a somber press briefing, a senior police officer stated that three children, all under the age of ten, succumbed to the poisoning shortly after their arrival at the hospital. Despite the frantic efforts of the attending physicians, who administered emergency first aid, intravenous fluids, and antitoxins, the children could not be revived. The deaths have plunged the already impoverished area into a state of profound grief and anger, with residents demanding immediate answers and accountability. The seven surviving victims are currently undergoing treatment in the hospital’s emergency and isolation wards. Among them are several women and more young children, indicating that the affected group was largely composed of families. Medical professionals have described the condition of at least two of the survivors as “critical but stable,” as they continue to battle severe dehydration and toxic shock. The hospital administration has mobilized additional staff and resources to manage the sudden influx of patients, while also sending samples of the victims’ stomach contents and blood to a forensic laboratory in the provincial capital for toxicological analysis. Preliminary medical reports suggest that the contamination could be due to the presence of highly toxic pesticides or spoiled meat, though this has yet to be scientifically verified. In response to the escalating crisis, the district administration has convened an emergency meeting to coordinate relief and investigative efforts. The police have cordoned off the location where the meal was prepared and served, seizing leftover food samples, cooking utensils, and water sources for thorough forensic examination. “We are treating this case with the utmost seriousness,” a police spokesperson emphasized. “We are recording the statements of the survivors, the family members, and the food handlers involved. Our primary objective is to determine whether this was a case of gross criminal negligence by a food supplier, accidental cross-contamination, or, in a more sinister scenario, deliberate sabotage.” The local community, already grappling with poverty and limited access to clean drinking water and quality healthcare, is now reeling from the tragedy. Small gatherings of grieving relatives and concerned neighbors have formed outside the hospital, many expressing outrage over the recurring incidents of food adulteration and poor hygiene standards in the region. Activists have called for a stringent crackdown on unlicensed food vendors and caterers, who often operate without basic health safety certifications. They argue that such tragedies are preventable if local authorities enforce existing food safety laws and conduct routine inspections of commercial kitchens and street food stalls. As the investigation continues, the police have assured the public that they will leave no stone unturned. They have promised to bring those responsible to justice, whether they are individual cooks, wholesale suppliers, or negligent shopkeepers. Meanwhile, the district health officer has issued a public advisory warning residents to be extremely cautious about the source and freshness of their food, particularly during the hot and humid season when perishable items spoil rapidly. This heartbreaking incident in Khanpur serves as a grim reminder of the dire consequences of food insecurity and the critical need for robust public health infrastructure. As the families of the deceased prepare for burial according to Islamic rites, the entire region mourns a loss that could have been avoided. The coming days will be crucial as forensic results are expected to shed light on the exact nature of the poison, potentially paving the way for legal action and, hopefully, preventing future calamities. The police have confirmed that a detailed case report will be filed, and all findings will be shared with the public in the interest of transparency and justice.

  • | |

    KP orders blacklist of corrupt, underperforming of…

    ByJustpaste.in

    PESHAWAR: The Khyber Pakhtunkhwa government has directed all provincial departments to prepare verified lists of corrupt, disreputable, underperforming and suspicious officers by August 7 as part of a major governance reform aimed at improving transparency, accountability and public service delivery. According to official directives, officers included on the verified negative lists will not be posted to sensitive positions or offices involving direct interaction with the public. The government has also instructed departments to ensure that all appointments and transfers are made strictly on the basis of merit, performance and suitability. The directives further emphasize transparency in public procurement and financial management, the establishment of an effective public grievance redressal system, the digitization of government services and ensuring that officers deliver timely and efficient services to citizens. Sources said the instructions were issued following a high-level meeting chaired by Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Chief Secretary Shahab Ali Shah. The meeting was attended by administrative secretaries, director generals and heads of various government departments. According to the sources, if the decisions are fully implemented, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa could become the first province in Pakistan to officially maintain a verified negative list of government officers with poor performance records, corruption allegations or damaged reputations. An official document quoted the chief secretary as saying that providing quality public services and ensuring the welfare of citizens should remain the top priority of every government department

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *