humans may live

Humans may live up to 194 Years

How long can a human live?

No one knows the exact answer but scientists believe there is a natural limit to the human lifespan.

According to a study a person could possibly live as long as 194 years although reaching that age would be extremely rare.

Researchers say living forever is not possible. Even if science discovers new ways to slow aging the body cannot avoid the natural damage that builds up over time.

The study published in the journal Nature looked at how our DNA and genes change throughout life.

Scientists found that many genetic changes are harmless but some damage cells and reduce how well they work.

Over time this damage increases the risk of age related diseases.

The researchers explained that these genetic changes cannot be completely prevented.  They happen naturally when cells divide and can also be caused by viruses certain chemicals and ultraviolet (UV) rays from sunlight.

To estimate the maximum human lifespan the team created a scientific model that included reversible signs of aging while keeping permanent genetic changes in place.

The results suggested that even if future technology slows the aging process the longest a human could live would likely be between 146 and 194 years.

Scientists also noted that some organs such as the skin and liver regularly replace old cells helping repair some damage.

However the heart and brain do not replace most of their cells making genetic damage in these organs much harder to reverse.

The researchers stressed that genetic changes are not always harmful but as they build up over time they may gradually shorten a person’s lifespan.

They also believe that other biological processes may affect aging and more research is needed to better understand them.

At present the longest confirmed human lifespan belongs to Jeanne Calment of France who died in 1997 at the age of 122 years making her the oldest verified person in recorded history.

Similar Posts

  • The royal bloodlines that forged a Balkan powerhouse

    In the heart of the 14th century, a monumental fresco was rendered upon the walls of the Lesnovo Monastery in modern-day North Macedonia. It captured a defining moment in Balkan history. Emperor Stefan Uroš IV Dušan alongside his wife, Empress Helena of Bulgaria, and their young heir, Stefan Uroš V. This wall painting serves as a enduring testament far more than a decorative piece of sacred art. A masterfully orchestrated political union that reshaped the geopolitical landscape of medieval Europe. At the center of this historical narrative is a strategic marriage forged in 1332. The newly crowned Serbian King Stefan Dušan entered into a pivotal treaty with Tsar Ivan Alexander of Bulgaria. He seems desperate to employ peace after years of regional conflict. The cornerstone of this agreement was the marriage of Dušan to Ivan Alexander’s sister, Princess Helena (Elena). This union was far more than a ceremonial gesture. Helena proved to be an immensely influential empress consort whose royal Bulgarian lineage carried significant political weight. Her marriage to Dušan directly altered his formal imperial standing, allowing him to claim authority not only over the Serbs and Greeks, but over the Bulgarians as well. The couple later gave birth to Stefan Uroš V, an heir who embodied the consolidated royal houses of the region. Yet, the Bulgarian connections within the Serbian royal court ran much deeper than Dušan’s marriage alone. Dušan himself was bound to Bulgaria by blood through his mother, Queen Theodora Smilets. As the daughter of Tsar Smilets, who ruled the Second Bulgarian Empire from 1292 to 1298 AD, Theodora brought rich dynastic heritage into the Nemanjić house. Thus, when Dušan rose to power and eventually established the grand Serbian Empire, he did so as a monarch who was inherently a product of both Serbian and Bulgarian elite lineages. The fresco preserved in Lesnovo illuminates this intertwined destiny. Depicting the imperial family dressed in rich, jewel-encrusted Byzantine-style robes, it reflects an era when diplomatic ties, shared heritage, and strategic royal marriages could unite rival realms under a single, dominant imperial banner. Today, these historical records and vibrant monastery paintings remind us that the borders of the medieval Balkans were constantly reshaped not just on the battlefield, but through the formidable power of dynastic unity.  

  • A glass of fruit juice may lift your mood

    Feeling stressed, low or unhappy from time to time is common.  A recent study suggests that adding a small glass of 100% fruit juice or a fruit smoothie to your daily diet may help improve your mood. Researchers from Newcastle University studied 42 people who normally ate very few fruits and vegetables.  The participants were divided into groups and followed for four weeks. The researchers then looked at changes in their diet and mood. The results showed that people who added a glass of natural fruit juice to their daily diet experienced better mood and lower levels of stress. Some people worry that fruit juice contains natural sugar and may be unhealthy. However during this short study researchers did not find any harmful effects on the participants physical health. Researcher Courtney Neal said that eating several portions of fruits and vegetables every day can be difficult for some people.  Having a small glass of 100% fruit juice or a smoothie can be an easy way to add more nutrients to the diet. Newcastle University lecturer oliver Shannon said the results were encouraging but more research is needed especially among people dealing with mental health problems. However this does not mean people should start drinking large amounts of juice. The study focused on small amounts of 100% fruit juice or smoothies while eating whole fruits and vegetables remains important. Experts also stress that depression is a complex mental health condition.  Fruit juice should not be considered a treatment for depression. Anyone experiencing long lasting sadness stress or loss of interest in daily life should speak with a doctor or mental health professional.

  • HEC new weighted policy: putting weight on research credibility

    By Ali Abbas Pakistan’s Higher Education Commission (HEC) new weighted research policy has surely raised an eyebrow among a few academics nationwide. Before further dissecting the policy and its implications, it is pertinent to understand the role of HEC as a regulatory authority, which can help clear the air to a greater extent. As stated, “Regulatory”, it is important to accept that the Higher Education Commission of Pakistan is there to implement quality checks irrespective of the decision being popular or unpopular. So, with this lens, it is easy to understand why HEC is weighing this bold step of assigning weights to authorship and what must have been the shortcomings in the previous policy, despite the earlier policy’s apparent benefits. The new policy values first authors and corresponding authors more, acknowledging a reward for the initiators and potential stakeholders in the event that there are more than 3 authors. While HEC is not stopping co-authorship, it aims to credit researchers who have genuine contributions and are adding value as a lead or major contributor. It is entirely up to contributors to choose the number of other co-authors and their desired contribution and commitment in the research article. In fact, this should rather be seen as a measure of transparency that researchers who are expecting to get fewer marks for co-authorship will be doing less work in contrast to the first author. That can actually act as a yardstick for them to allocate their time to multiple projects to get their respective share/ count. However, not to undermine the researchers whose genuine intent surrounds a higher number of publications in less time with real contribution, it is a welcoming sign for authors who stay away from relationship-based and aided research. So, HEC, being a quality custodian of education and research practices for HEIs, has come up with a stance to curb research mills, fraudulent research, and fake authorship, where publications in friends’ journals and contributions following quid pro quo are compensated. And one never knows when these researchers who have worked as co-authors or fall last in the author list make it to the classes; their share of knowledge and impact may be a concern at times as well. The problem is even bigger, as not only papers with 20+ authors can be found, but researchers are co-authoring in different fields that may be beyond cross-domain collaboration. This is where HEC might have to respond and find this weighted policy as damage control.  Well, this research’s credibility is not Pakistan’s dilemma only, but something that is a world issue in a higher education setting. And when HEC addresses these concerns, it might act as a benchmark for other nations’ education systems, especially for the education and accreditation councils of similar demographics. Whether one favors or opposes it, HEC has devised something that raises major concerns, and that is to curb the need to distinguish between real and fake contributors. Now comes the point of demotivating international contributions from this weighted system, as raised by the affected prospective contributors. Well, though not every policy can avoid its collateral, the overall gain may be exploited as well. It is to be remembered that international collaborators are not to be linked with those weights; they can continue to collaborate at any number in the author list as they used to be, i.e., first or second or third, etc. In this case, the logic for local authors will remain the same as stated above about their respective contributions and rewards. The time and effort can then help in identifying multiple avenues as well. Again, there are always two sides to a coin, and in the current dynamics, where co-authorship has appeared to be a business deal, the side with the assigned weights policy bears more weight. Also, on the other hand, the offset can be made by allocating funds and instructing HEIs to devote funding to Gold open access, thus accelerating the pace of the first-author research. All in all, the new policy hints at increasing competitiveness and research credibility while leaving it to the test of time to see if it turns out to be a value addition for researchers by choice or by chance. About the author: Ali Abbas, PhD, works at Beaconhouse National University. He can be reached at aabbas724@gmail.com

  • Hair dye after Cancer treatment

    For many cancer survivors seeing their hair grow back is more than a cosmetic change. It is a sign of recovery and a return to normal life. As new hair appears many people want to cover gray hair or try a new color. However health experts say it is important not to rush into using hair dye. Chemotherapy and radiation are designed to destroy fast growing cancer cells but they also affect healthy hair follicles. This is why many patients lose their hair during treatment. When hair grows back it is often thinner softer, drier and more sensitive than before. The scalp may also remain delicate for several months. Doctors warn that using permanent hair dye too soon after treatment can irritate the scalp cause allergic reactions and damage new hair. It may also slow healthy hair growth while the scalp is still healing. Several studies have looked at the possible risks of hair dye. A large study by the US National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences involving more than 46,000 women found that frequent use of permanent hair dye and chemical hair straighteners was linked to a slightly higher risk of certain types of breast cancer. Another long term study by the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, which followed more than 117,000 women over 36 years found that hair dye did not increase the risk of most cancers. However long term use of permanent dyes was linked to a small increase in the risk of some types of breast skin and ovarian cancers. Experts advise cancer survivors to carefully read the ingredients before buying any hair dye. Chemicals such as PPD (para-phenylenediamine), ammonia, hydrogen peroxide parabens, and phthalates may be harmful to sensitive skin and newly grown hair. Most doctors recommend waiting at least six months after completing chemotherapy before using permanent hair dye. This gives the scalp and hair enough time to recover. Patients who had scalp cooling or radiation to the head should only use hair dye after getting approval from their doctor. During the first six months after treatment experts suggest avoiding chemical hair dyes and keeping the scalp well moisturized.  Even after six months patients should speak with their oncologist before coloring their hair. Safer options include pure henna or natural herbal dyes that do not contain added chemicals. Ammonia free and peroxide-free semi permanent dyes may also be suitable.  Temporary root powders and color mascaras are another option because they wash out with shampoo. Experts also recommend doing a patch test 48 hours before using any hair color to check for allergies or skin irritation. Whenever possible choose coloring methods that reduce direct contact between the dye and the scalp. Doctors say that caring for your hair again after cancer treatment is an important step in recovery. However taking a careful approach choosing safer products and speaking with your doctor first can help protect your hair and scalp while they continue to heal.

  • Lower protein may boost longevity

    Protein rich foods such as cereals coffee water and many other products have become increasingly popular. However a new study suggests that for many people eating less protein instead of more may actually be better for overall health and could even help people live longer. The review published on July 31 in the journal Cell Press Blue examined more than 350 scientific studies exploring the connection between lower protein intake and healthy aging. Researchers found that reducing protein intake may improve metabolism help cells respond better to nutrients lower cell damage and support normal cell function. Together these effects may promote better health and a longer lifespan. The study’s lead author Dudley Lamming said that protein is important for people who exercise regularly because it helps build muscle and improves workout results. However he added that most people are not very physically active which means they may be eating more protein than their bodies actually need. In some cases this could have negative effects on health. Experts also noted that the right amount of protein is different for everyone.  It depends on factors such as age overall health physical activity and lifestyle. They recommend following a balanced diet and getting advice from a healthcare professional before making major changes to protein intake.

  • Can you solve this tricky fruit math puzzle? 

    At first glance this looks like a simple math question for children. However the way it is designed makes it surprisingly difficult and many people end up with the wrong answer. In the puzzle each type of fruit has a different value. Your challenge is to figure out the value of each fruit and then calculate the final equation. The last line asks you to add one cherry one apple and three bananas. To solve it correctly you need to carefully work out the value of each fruit from the previous equations. For example the first equation shows three apples adding up to 30, so each apple is worth 10. The other equations reveal that each banana is worth 4 and each cherry is worth 1. Using these values: Apple = 10 Banana = 4 Cherry = 1 Final calculation: 10 + (3 × 4) + 1 = 23 Correct Answer: 23 Note If the original puzzle counts each banana as 1 because it changes from a bunch to a single banana or uses a different image in the last row the answer may change. The answer depends on the exact picture shown. The text you provided says 14 but based only on the values stated in the text (apple = 10, banana = 4, cherry = 1) the total is 23.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *