iqbals philosophy shapes
|

Iqbal’s philosophy shapes modern freedom movements

Ghulami Mein Na Kaam Ati Hain Shamsheerain Na Tadbeerain

Jo Ho Zauq-E-Yaqeen Paida To Kat Jati Hain Zanjeerain

(In slavery, neither swords nor plans are effective but when the taste for conviction is forged, the chains are shattered.)

In these timeless couplets, Allama Muhammad Iqbal captivated a fundamental truth about human liberation. It’s that the physical force (shamsheerain) and strategic maneuvering (tadbeerain) are utterly powerless if a nation or an individual is trapped in a mindset of subjugation. True emancipation does not start on the battlefield or at a diplomatic negotiation table. It begins within the human psyche through Zauq-e-Yaqeen. An unshakeable conviction, profound self-belief, and faith in a higher purpose accordingly.  When one examines the contemporary global events, Iqbal’s words understand modern struggles for sovereignty, social justice, and systemic reform.

In the modern world, servitude rarely presents itself through colonial rule or physical iron chains. Instead, modern subjugation often manifests as economic dependency, cultural imperialism, digital surveillance, and ideological defeatism. Entire populations often find themselves caught in systems that dictate their economic choices. They systems that diminish their local heritage, and undermine their self-reliance. Iqbal’s verse applies to this contemporary reality. The verse reveals why so many political reform efforts or heavily funded technological solutions fail to bring real change. When a society suffers from an internal sense of inferiority, no amount of advancement or external assistance can bring genuine autonomy. Strategy and weapons are just instruments. They remain inert without the driving force of genuine conviction. Psychological emancipation must precede material victory. Until a community believes it is worthy and capable of self-determination, external freedom remains an illusion.

What does it mean to cultivate Zauq-e-Yaqeen (the taste of deep certainty) in today’s complex world?

It represents a transition from passive endurance to active self-realization (Khudi). Historically and in present times, the most profound societal revolutions did not succeed purely because they had superior resources. They succeeded because a critical mass of people developed an unshakeable belief in the justice of their cause. Modern historical struggles show that authoritarian regimes with military apparatuses often crumble when faced with non-violent movements engined by absolute moral certainty. In an era of informational dominance, Zauq-e-Yaqeen requires reclaiming intellectual sovereignty. It demands rejecting narrative manipulation and trusting one’s collective identity and ethical values. Developing nations breaking free from debt cycles and foreign leverage do so by encouraging local innovation, education, and confidence in their human capital.

Iqbal’s poetry is not a eulogy for the past. It is an urgent command for the present. The chains of the modern era: political suppression, economic exploitation, or personal despair, cannot be let go of by adopting foreign systems or waiting for political saviors. Real liberation requires an internal awakening. When a society cultivates faith in its intrinsic worth, its moral foundation, and its capacity to shape its destiny, the structural barriers that once seemed insurmountable inevitably begin to shatter. Strategic plans and practical tools then become effective because they are finally guided by an invincible spirit.

 

Similar Posts

  • Ukraine moves against Russian Kids’ cartoon

    Ukraine has imposed sanctions on the producers and distributors of the popular Russian children’s cartoon “Masha and the Bear.” Ukrainian officials say the show may help spread a positive image of Russia and could pose a risk to the country’s national security. According to Al Jazeera, Ukraine’s Culture Minister Tatiana Berezhna announced the decision on social media.  She said the sanctions could allow legal steps to limit the cartoon’s content and restrict its distribution and earnings on global platforms. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy signed the related decree on Thursday.  The measures include Animaccord the studio behind the cartoon along with other people and organizations connected to the series. A Worldwide Children’s hit “Masha and the Bear” follows the adventures of a playful young girl named Masha and her friend a retired circus bear. The show has become hugely popular around the world. Its YouTube videos have received more than 37 billion views while some individual episodes have been watched more than four billion times.  The cartoon is shown in around 100 countries. Ukraine raises concerns Ukraine and some of its allies, including the UK and Estonia have criticized the show. They argue that it presents Russia in a positive way and could be used as a form of soft power to increase Russian cultural influence. Ukraine’s culture minister said children’s programs should not be used to promote Russian propaganda.  The government wants to reduce the cartoon’s reach inside Ukraine and also limit its income and distribution through international platforms. Still popular in Ukraine Despite the war and restrictions on Russian cultural content, “Masha and the Bear” remains popular among Ukrainian children. According to Ukrainska Pravda, the cartoon’s Ukrainian YouTube channel became the country’s most popular children’s channel in August last year. It now has more than 18 million followers. Russia rejects the claims Russia has rejected Ukraine’s accusations. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov defended the cartoon saying it has become popular worldwide and promotes positive human values. Ukraine had also raised concerns in June when Netflix reportedly sought rights to stream new seasons of the show. Following the latest sanctions Ukrainian authorities may take further steps to restrict the cartoon’s content and distribution in the country.

  • The Kinship Conundrum: Tradition vs. Compatibility in Cousin Marriages

    While cousin marriage often offers a sense of cultural continuity, it frequently introduces complex emotional, financial and relational challenges that can strain familial bonds. In many traditional settings couples grow up together and are engaged at an early age. However this deep familiarity can sometimes work against the union.   Because the groom is already a member of the same extended family there is often less structural or financial obligation such as a substantial dowry or independent financial planning which can lead to early imbalances in the household.   Over time these unions can give rise to deep seated regret between both parties. Paradoxically while the shared family network is originally intended to keep the couple together it can also inadvertently lower the barrier to divorce as broader familial disputes quickly spill over into the marriage itself.   Ultimately cousin marriage represents a delicate conflict between cultural tradition and individual happiness. While it may appear socially practical from the outside it often masks fundamental incompatibilities between partners who were chosen for their lineage rather than their personal alignment. For these marriages to endure families must pivot away from rigid customs and instead prioritize open communication mutual compatibility and emotional well-being.   A bond sustained solely by kinship rarely stands the test of time proving that personal alignment must ultimately take precedence over tradition.

  • Plan your weekly meals

    “What should we cook today?” sounds like a simple question but for many women it has become a daily challenge. Preparing a meal that everyone in the family enjoys while also keeping the budget under control is not always easy especially when food prices are high. Food is an important part of daily life but eating the same dishes again and again can become boring. Family members often want something different and tasty every day. The situation can become even more frustrating when someone says “Cook anything you like” but later complains about the food. A simple solution is to plan the meals for the entire week in advance. A seven day meal plan can reduce daily stress save time and make it easier to manage household expenses. Plan different meals for each day A weekly menu can include different types of food to keep meals interesting. For example. Monday: Vegetables Tuesday: Chicken Wednesday: Lentils Thursday: Rice dish Friday: Fish Saturday: Meat Sunday: A family favorite special meal This gives the family more variety and removes the need to decide what to cook every day. Make meals healthy for children When planning meals for children taste and nutrition should both be considered.  If children do not like vegetables they can be added to chicken dishes or other foods they already enjoy. This can make vegetables easier for children to eat while also giving them important nutrients. Add family favorites The weekly menu can also include the favorite foods of other family members.  If someone gets bored with the same type of meal the same basic ingredients can be prepared in different ways. For example meat can be cooked with vegetables lentils rice or different spices to create completely different flavors. Save money and reduce food waste With food prices rising weekly meal planning can also help control household spending.  Once the menu is decided you can make a shopping list and buy only the ingredients you actually need. This can reduce unnecessary shopping prevent food waste and make grocery spending easier to manage. Most importantly planning meals in advance can make daily life less stressful and finally put an end to the never ending question: “What should we cook today?”

  • Immature Minds Need Nourishment, Not Punishment

    By Tuba Khan A nation’s commitment to justice is not judged by the way it treats its powerful citizens, but the way it treats its vulnerable members of society. One of the most fragile creations of God are the children who need love and care, but when they are punished for their mistakes, abused or exploited for their mischievous acts and left unheard in their hour of need, they tend to become juvenile delinquents. They require guidance and encouragement to learn from their mistakes, so that they can grow into responsible and confident individuals. But unfortunately, in Pakistan, children are the most neglected group in terms of justice. Though Pakistan has juvenile justice laws and is a signatory to several international commitments. However, it fails to honor these obligations. According to the KidsRights Index 2020, Pakistan ranks 147th out of 182 nations in access to justice for children. Juvenile delinquency is not inherent; rather, it is often fueled by social, familial, psychological and environmental conditions. Children being observant and curious by nature are highly adaptable to their surroundings. Family, mentors and the community instill values in a child, shaping children’s behavior. However, factors that lead to juvenile delinquency include parental conflicts or separation, peer pressure, exposure to negative, aggressive and violent environments, deprivation of education, financial resources, affection and other basic necessities, impaired cognitive development, poor reasoning skills and psychological issues, such as impulsiveness, antisocial traits and mental disorders. Moreover, drug addiction, access to harmful content on social media, the dark web and illegal means also exacerbate the growing evil of youth delinquency. Together, these factors shape a child’s social and moral development and provoke delinquent behavior. The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) defines a child as one under the age of eighteen. Below this age, children should not be treated with brutality or strict laws. Critics often argue that crime is crime whether it is committed by a child or an adult. However, the philosophy of juvenile justice acknowledges that cognitive development is not yet mature and children have an immense capacity for rehabilitation. A study indicates that the children between 16 and 18 years of age are more likely to commit offences as compared to the younger ones There is always hope for and from every child. Recognizing these realities, the global community embraced a child-centered approach to juvenile justice and adopted basic principles to deal with young offenders. First, it must be made clear that when a child comes into conflict with the law, alternatives should be offered instead of processing him/her through the formal justice system. Second, there needs to be an exclusive juvenile justice system. Third, during the investigation, a juvenile should not be kept in a regular police station and the judicial process needs to be quick. Lastly, it must be ensured that the state gives a message to juveniles that it believes in their potential for reform. International laws promote the reintegration of children into society, but sadly, this approach is missing in the juvenile justice system of Pakistan. Punjab has only two Borstal Institutes & Juvenile Jails at Bahawalpur and Faisalabad, while Sindh has five Youthful Offenders Industrial Schools in Karachi, Hyderabad, Sukkur, Larkana and Dadu, although the facility in Dadu is non-operational. The KPK has one Borstal in Bannu, whereas Balochistan does not have even a single functional Borstal Institute or juvenile jail. This lack of physical infrastructure causes a considerable number of juveniles to be imprisoned in regular prisons. Placing children in such an overcrowded environment exposes them in proximity to criminals and causes psychological distress, which undermines the rehabilitation capacity of prisoners. No less troubling is the lack of juvenile courts across the country. As a result, most children have continued to go through regular courts that cannot cater to their developmental needs. A joint report by UNICEF and the Commissioner for Children’s Complaint Office of Pakistan has found that as of November 2023, 81% of the total juvenile offenders in Punjab were detained in ordinary jails, and only 144 prisoners were housed in Borstal Institutes. In January 2026, Punjab Prison Department released a report, according to which there are 718 juvenile prisoners in Punjab, while the total capacity is 658 prisoners. The shortage of juvenile institutions further highlights the flaws in the juvenile justice system of Pakistan. It is the state’s responsibility to transform vulnerable children into responsible citizens. Therefore, the Government of Pakistan must move beyond merely passing laws that remain largely unimplemented and instead take concrete and pragmatic steps. The country should develop an implementation plan for the juvenile justice system, allocate adequate financial resources, strengthen the diversion mechanism to resolve minor juvenile cases outside the formal justice system, establish child-friendly rehabilitation centers that promote a sense of responsibility towards society, develop specialized juvenile police units to replace the use of police lock-ups for children, protect juveniles from torture and capital punishment while in detention, recruit trained staff, address the root causes of juvenile delinquency, such as poverty, illiteracy, unemployment, unsafe neighborhoods and the growing number of street children through social welfare programs and introduce a real-time Prison Management Information System (PMIS) to monitor juvenile offenders and support evidence-based decision-making. Every child lost to crime symbolizes not merely an individual failure but a social breakdown and failure of state governance. Invest in the rehabilitation of juvenile offenders to build a safer and stable Pakistan tomorrow. Immature minds need nourishment, not punishment.

  • Justice Delayed, Safety Denied: Why Women Still Fear Reporting Violence

    “How Social Stigma, Institutional Challenges, and Delayed Justice Continue to Discourage Women from Reporting Violence in Pakistan” For many women in Pakistan, reporting violence is not simply the first step towards justice, it is often the beginning of another struggle. While laws have evolved to provide greater protection against domestic violence, sexual assault, workplace harassment, acid attacks, and other forms of gender-based violence, countless women continue to hesitate before approaching the police or the courts. Their reluctance is not always born out of ignorance of the law; rather, it stems from fear of social stigma, institutional barriers, prolonged legal proceedings, and uncertainty about whether justice will ever be delivered. This reality raises an important question: if legal safeguards exist, why do so many women still fear reporting violence? The Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan provides a strong foundation for the protection of women’s rights. Article 9 guarantees the right to life and liberty, Article 14 safeguards the dignity of every individual, Article 25 ensures equality before the law and prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex, while Article 34 directs the State to ensure the full participation of women in all spheres of national life. These constitutional guarantees are reinforced by various legislative measures, including the Anti-Rape (Investigation and Trial) Act, 2021, the Protection Against Harassment of Women at the Workplace Act, the Acid Control and Acid Crime Prevention laws, and provincial domestic violence legislation. Together, these laws demonstrate that Pakistan has made significant progress in recognizing and protecting women’s rights. However, legislation alone cannot guarantee justice. The effectiveness of any legal framework depends upon its implementation. For many survivors, the greatest obstacle is not the absence of legal remedies but the fear of navigating the justice system itself. Reporting violence often means facing uncomfortable questions, social judgment, pressure from family members, financial hardship, and emotional trauma. In many cases, victims worry that their complaints will not be taken seriously or that the legal process will take years to reach a conclusion. Such concerns discourage many women from seeking legal protection altogether. The problem is further aggravated by the slow pace of criminal proceedings. Delayed investigations, repeated adjournments, and prolonged trials can force survivors to relive traumatic experiences for years. Justice delayed not only prolongs suffering but also weakens public confidence in the legal system. When victims believe that reporting a crime will expose them to further hardship without a timely or meaningful remedy, silence often appears to be the safer option. In this sense, delayed justice becomes a denial of safety, discouraging others from coming forward and allowing perpetrators to act with greater confidence. Several high-profile incidents have highlighted both the urgency of reform and the limitations of existing mechanisms. The Motorway rape case in 2020 sparked nationwide outrage and prompted important legislative reforms, including the enactment of the Anti-Rape (Investigation and Trial) Act, 2021. While these reforms strengthened the legal framework, they also reminded the nation that effective implementation, victim-sensitive investigations, and timely prosecution remain equally essential. Similarly, acid attacks and cases of so-called honour based violence have continued to expose the gap between legal protections and the realities faced by many women, particularly in rural and underserved communities. Legal reforms must therefore be accompanied by institutional reform. Police officers, prosecutors, judges, and medico-legal professionals require continuous training to handle cases involving gender-based violence with professionalism, sensitivity, and respect for victims’ dignity. Fast-track procedures for serious offences against women should be implemented effectively to reduce unnecessary delays. Victim and witness protection mechanisms must be strengthened so that survivors feel safe throughout the judicial process. Equally important is ensuring that legal aid and psychological support are readily available to those who seek justice. Beyond the courtroom, society itself has a crucial role to play. Victim-blaming, social stigma, and cultural stereotypes remain among the greatest barriers preventing women from reporting violence. Questions such as “Why did she report it now?” or “What was she doing there?” unfairly shift attention away from the offender and onto the survivor. Such attitudes discourage reporting and perpetuate a culture of silence. A justice system can function effectively only when society supports victims rather than subjects them to suspicion and criticism. Protecting women’s rights is not solely a legal obligation; it is a constitutional, moral, and social responsibility. Laws are meaningful only when they inspire confidence in those, they are designed to protect. A woman should never have to choose between her safety and the fear of navigating the justice system. She should have confidence that her complaint will be heard fairly, investigated promptly, and decided without unnecessary delay. Pakistan has undoubtedly taken important legislative steps to combat violence against women. The challenge now lies in translating those legal guarantees into practical realities. Stronger enforcement, efficient investigations, timely trials, greater institutional accountability, and increased public awareness are essential to restoring confidence in the justice system. Justice cannot be measured merely by the number of laws enacted; it must be measured by the willingness of victims to seek its protection without fear. A society where women hesitate to report violence is a society where justice remains incomplete. The true success of any legal system is not reflected in the statutes it enacts but in the trust it inspires. Until every woman feels secure enough to report violence without fear of stigma, intimidation, or delay, the promise of equal justice will remain only partially fulfilled. Justice delayed is not merely justice denied it is safety denied. A legal system earns public confidence not when it promises protection, but when it delivers it.

  • Woman dies after anti aging injection in New York

    A 27 year old woman in New York has died after receiving an anti aging injection at a private medical clinic raising serious concerns about unlicensed cosmetic treatments. According to foreign media reports the woman became critically ill shortly after the injection. An ambulance was called to take her to the hospital but she died before arriving. Police arrested 55 year old Luis Rojas Cabrera the man who gave the injection.  During questioning he admitted that he did not have a valid New York medical license to practice medicine. Authorities have charged him with practicing medicine without a license and putting another person’s life at risk through reckless actions. The suspect later appeared in a Bronx court. A judge allowed his temporary release but ordered him to surrender his passport until the post mortem report is completed. In court Cabrera said he is a licensed doctor in the Dominican Republic and also holds a medical assistant license in Puerto Rico.  He added that his application for a New York medical license is still under review. He also confirmed that the only license he currently holds in New York is as a cosmetologist not as a licensed physician.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *