Iran says US response to its proposal to reopen Hormuz ‘insufficient’

US Democratic politician Abdulrahman Mohamed El-Sayed has pushed back against attempts to portray criticism of US funding for Israel as antisemitic, arguing that invoking concerns about antisemitism to defend the actions of a foreign government ultimately harms Jewish Americans. Speaking during an interview with a US host, El-Sayed said that criticism of government policies should not automatically be dismissed as hatred against a religious or ethnic community. He stressed that the fight against antisemitism must continue alongside efforts to combat Islamophobia and other forms of discrimination. El-Sayed argued that both antisemitism and Islamophobia represent serious challenges that society must confront rather than use as political tools. He said Americans should be able to question how public funds are being spent, particularly when those funds support the military policies of another country. “We cannot remain silent and ignore why the United States provides billions of dollars in annual assistance and how that support is being used,” he said, questioning whether American aid should contribute to policies he described as involving racial segregation. The Democratic politician also criticized Washington’s approach to military assistance, saying the US should not provide unconditional support to any foreign government. He argued that American involvement in the war in Gaza over the past several years was not inevitable and that Washington should have taken a more critical approach to its relationship with Israel. El-Sayed’s comments reflect a broader debate within the Democratic Party and across the United States over American military and financial support for Israel. While supporters of Israel argue that US assistance helps protect a key ally and supports its security, critics have called for stricter conditions on aid and greater scrutiny of Israel’s military actions. The remarks also highlight the growing political debate over how to distinguish legitimate criticism of Israeli government policies from antisemitism, while ensuring that concerns about antisemitism are not dismissed or minimized.

  Saudi Arabia has issued a forceful warning over escalating security dangers in the region, making it clear that the era of unilateral action is over. In an official statement, Ministry of Defense Spokesman Major General Turki Al-Malki stressed that new and complex threats—ranging from maritime terrorism to drone swarms and smuggling networks—now demand a collective response. “Every country has the right to protect its national interests,” Al-Malki said, “but the scale and sophistication of today’s risks require us to act together. No nation can stand alone.” He specifically pointed to the Red Sea corridor, a lifeline for global oil shipments and trade, as a flashpoint that needs constant vigilance. The nations bordering this strategic waterway, he added, are already in continuous dialogue to align their security strategies. The spokesman made it clear that the multi-national naval defense coalition—first proposed by Saudi Arabia—is not an offensive alliance but a defensive shield. Its core mission: to secure international shipping lanes, deter hostile acts, and ensure freedom of navigation in accordance with international law. The coalition, he emphasized, is open to all nations that share these goals and is firmly rooted in the principles of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Al-Malki warned that the threat landscape has shifted dramatically. Non-state actors now possess advanced unmanned systems, anti-ship missiles, and cyber capabilities that can disrupt maritime traffic within minutes. Piracy and human trafficking add another layer of complexity. “We are not facing traditional navies,” he noted. “We are facing hybrid threats that exploit every gap in coordination. That is why interoperability, intelligence-sharing, and joint patrols are no longer optional—they are survival tools.” In a move that underscores Saudi Arabia’s commitment to this mission, the Ministry of Defense announced the appointment of Rear Admiral Abdullah bin Salim as the commander of the coalition. A distinguished naval officer with decades of command experience, bin Salim has served in multiple high-level posts within the Royal Saudi Naval Forces, overseeing fleet modernization and participating in large-scale international exercises. His leadership is expected to bring operational sharpness, strategic clarity, and a hands-on approach to coalition drills and rapid-response mechanisms. Rear Admiral bin Salim’s appointment is not merely symbolic. It reflects Saudi Arabia’s willingness to shoulder greater responsibility in regional security while maintaining an inclusive, consultative stance. He will oversee the integration of naval assets from partner nations, coordinate joint training missions, and ensure that the coalition can respond within hours—not days—to any maritime breach. Al-Malki also extended an open invitation to the international community. “We welcome all nations that believe in a rules-based maritime order,” he said. “The Red Sea is not just a regional asset—it is a global artery. Its security is everyone’s business.” He called for increased naval presence, technology transfers, and financial backing to sustain the coalition’s operations over the long term. The spokesman concluded with a sobering reminder: in a world of drone warfare, proxy conflicts, and rapidly evolving tactics, waiting for disaster is not a strategy. “The coalition is already active,” he said. “Our patrols are ongoing, our command is in place, and our resolve is firm. We are building a security architecture that will outlast any single crisis.” With Rear Admiral bin Salim now at the helm, the coalition enters a new phase—one defined by action, accountability, and unity. Saudi Arabia has made its position clear: the time for talk is over. The time for collective defense is now.