karachi water crisis
| | |

Karachi water crisis: Munem Zafar Khan says citize…

ByJustpaste.in

Jamaat-e-Islami Karachi chief Munem Zafar Khan has expressed concern over the worsening civic problems in Karachi, saying that residents of the city are struggling even for basic necessities such as clean water.

Addressing a press conference in Karachi, Munem Zafar Khan criticized the provincial government over issues related to water supply, electricity, infrastructure, and public services. He said that the city continues to face serious challenges despite repeated promises of improvement.

The Jamaat-e-Islami leader claimed that shortly after the first drops of rain fell in Karachi, around 200 power feeders were affected, causing electricity disruptions in several areas. He questioned the performance of K-Electric, stating that despite receiving significant government support, improvements in power generation and transmission systems had not met public expectations.

Munem Zafar Khan also criticized the Sindh government over urban infrastructure issues, claiming that Karachi lacks adequate facilities and that residents are facing difficulties due to shortages of essential services.

He raised concerns about drainage problems and safety issues, stating that several people had lost their lives after falling into open gutters. He questioned why proper maintenance and safety measures had not been implemented despite repeated incidents.

The JI Karachi chief also criticized the pace of development projects, claiming that funds allocated for drainage cleaning and infrastructure improvements were often utilized shortly before the monsoon season instead of through year-round planning.

Discussing the city’s water shortage, he said that a significant portion of Karachi’s coastal population continues to face difficulties accessing water. He also raised concerns about delays in the K-IV water project, saying that the project remains crucial for meeting the city’s growing water needs.

Munem Zafar Khan further criticized delays in road and transport projects, including water pipeline work and other development schemes, alleging that political interests and poor management have affected progress.

He also mentioned health-related concerns, referring to reports of HIV cases among children and calling for accountability and improvements in healthcare systems.

The Sindh government and other relevant authorities have faced repeated criticism from opposition parties over Karachi’s civic challenges, including water shortages, electricity problems, waste management, and infrastructure development.

Karachi, Pakistan’s largest city and economic hub, continues to face pressure from rapid population growth and increasing demand for public services. Experts have emphasized the need for long-term planning, better governance, and effective implementation of development projects to address the city’s growing challenges.

Similar Posts

  • | |

    British home secretary faces heavy criticism over attempt to deport grooming gang leader to Pakistan

    ByJustpaste.in

    British Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood is facing sharp backlash over the government’s attempt to forcibly deport Shabbir Ahmed, a convicted child sex offender and leader of a grooming gang, to Pakistan. The controversy has sparked a diplomatic row between the United Kingdom and Pakistan, with the British government threatening sanctions against Pakistan if it refuses to accept Ahmed. Ahmed, who was convicted of child sexual exploitation in 2012, was recently released from prison. However, attempts to remove him face significant legal hurdles under the Immigration Act 1971. Under this legislation, Commonwealth citizens who moved to the UK before 1973 and have resided there for at least five years are protected from deportation. Having arrived in the UK during the late 1960s, Ahmed remains shielded by these statutory protections. Members of the British Pakistani community have expressed strong opposition to Mahmood’s approach, alleging that the Home Office is pushing the measure to appease far-right political factions

  • | | |

    Iran and Oman discuss temporary shipping corridor …

    ByJustpaste.in

    Iran and Oman are discussing a proposal to establish a temporary joint shipping corridor through the Strait of Hormuz one of the world’s most important routes for oil and gas shipments. The proposal was discussed during a meeting in Tehran between Omani Foreign Minister Badr Al-Busaidi and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi. A joint statement described their talks as constructive and said both sides discussed developments surrounding the strategic waterway. The discussions come as tensions remain high between Iran and the United States. US President Donald Trump said Tuesday that mines had been removed or destroyed in international waters around the Strait of Hormuz. He warned that any vessel found placing new mines would face immediate military action. Trump also said the United States was closely monitoring the waterway and maintained a zero-tolerance policy toward further mine placement. The Strait of Hormuz is a crucial global energy route with roughly one-fifth of the world’s crude oil and liquefied natural gas flows passing through it before the conflict. Shipping activity has fallen sharply during the current crisis, with only two commodity vessels reportedly using the waterway on Monday. Iran has also communicated its position on the strait through Pakistan. Iranian officials reportedly want provisions of an earlier Islamabad memorandum to be implemented including arrangements requiring safe passage for commercial shipping and consultation with Oman over the waterway’s future management. Meanwhile, Washington has expanded economic pressure on Tehran. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent announced additional sanctions targeting Iranian individuals entities and vessels warning that countries continuing to support Iran’s economy could face consequences. China has criticized the new US measures saying unilateral sanctions could disrupt global economic and financial stability. Beijing is a major buyer of Iranian oil and has urged Washington and Tehran to return to negotiations. The United States has also warned that military action against Iran remains possible. Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth said Washington would use military force if necessary and did not rule out further strikes around Iran or the Strait of Hormuz. Iran, meanwhile, has promised to respond to the expanded sanctions and warned that threats to its infrastructure could trigger attacks against US interests and regional energy routes. The diplomatic discussions involving Iran, Oman and Pakistan could therefore become important for restoring commercial shipping through the Strait of Hormuz. However, continued military threats, sanctions and tensions between Tehran and Washington remain major obstacles to a lasting agreement.

  • 20-kanal government land deal faces Parliament scrutiny

    ByJustpaste.in

    Islamabad: A long running agreement involving government land, a private training institute and millions of rupees came under intense scrutiny as lawmakers questioned the terms of the Hazza Institute of Technology arrangement during a meeting of the National Assembly Standing Committee on Federal Education and Professional Training. Members raised serious questions over how a private institute continued operating on government provided land, why the agreement was extended for another 15 years and whether public interest was fully protected in the deal. The committee was informed that around 20 kanals of land were provided to Hazza Institute under a Public Private Partnership model, but lawmakers questioned whether the government was receiving proper benefits from the arrangement. The issue was discussed during the 25th meeting of the committee after members raised concerns about repeated projects being given to the same institute and questioned whether Hazza had received special preference over other organisations. The Executive Director of the National Vocational and Technical Training Commission (NAVTTC), Muhammad Amir Jan, rejected allegations of favouritism and said no institution was being supported unfairly. He told the committee that decisions regarding Hazza were made by previous administrations and that he was responsible for dealing with the existing agreement according to government rules. According to the briefing, the Hazza Institute project started in 2010 under a Public Private Partnership model. A Saudi Arabia based training company along with its local partner was selected after a process at that time. Under the original plan, the government was supposed to provide land and invest Rs 340 million through the Workers Welfare Fund. Officials informed the committee that while the land was provided, the planned investment was not released. The agreement was later rewritten in 2018 by the National Training Bureau, which transferred responsibilities to NAVTTC. The new arrangement continued for 15 years starting from 2018 and would remain effective until 2033. During the meeting, members questioned why the government did not take action earlier to review or end the agreement. The committee members asked for details of the agreement and questioned why a private organisation was allowed to continue using government property without clear financial benefits for the state. NAVTTC officials explained that the agreement was legally valid and the institute was considered an authorised occupant under the existing contract. However, the Executive Director admitted that some terms of the agreement were one sided and needed to be reviewed. He informed the committee that under the agreement, the government had limited powers to remove the institute before the completion period. Officials said efforts were now underway to renegotiate the terms and ensure that the government receives proper value from the land the institute is using. The committee was informed that NAVTTC had already taken back around 4,000 square feet of built up space from the total area for establishing a NAVTTC incubation centre. The official said the total built up area was around 20,000 square feet and explained that under the Built Operate Transfer model, ownership would eventually return to the government after the agreement period ends. The financial side of the matter also came under discussion. Officials informed the committee that Hazza was linked with an overseas training programme and was expected to train thousands of young Pakistanis for foreign employment opportunities. The committee was told that the institute was involved in a programme targeting 4,000 trainees, out of which 780 had already completed training and moved forward. The Executive Director stated that no additional funds would be released unless the programme produced results and overseas employment targets were achieved. He also informed the committee that disputes and complaints involving Hazza had reached different forums, including government platforms, with competing groups filing complaints against each other. Members demanded greater transparency and said that government land and public resources must be managed in a way that protects national interest. The committee also questioned the extension of the agreement period, noting that the original partnership documents from 2010 and 2011 had different timelines. Officials explained that the agreement was revalidated in 2018, restarting the 15 year period from that year. The committee directed NAVTTC to review the matter carefully and provide a progress report after two months. Chairperson Mahtab Akbar Rashdi said the committee wanted practical action and clear decisions rather than further delays. She stressed that while investment made by private partners should be considered, government interests and accountability must remain the priority.

  • | |

    Rs 71 billion ‘Apna Ghar’ push, 1.5 la…

    ByJustpaste.in

    KARACHI: For millions of teachers, clerks, nurses and daily-wage workers, owning a house has felt like a distant dream. Caught between skyrocketing rents and banks that rarely lend to them, they have spent years waiting for a break. Now, with the Prime Minister’s “Apna Ghar” scheme offering subsidized 20-year loans, that wait may finally be over — if the government can fix the loopholes that sank similar programs in the past. With rents climbing and home ownership slipping further out of reach, the government’s new housing finance push is back in focus. The Prime Minister’s “Apna Ghar” housing scheme unveils a 20-year financing plan backed by Rs 71 billion in federal subsidies allocated in the budget. The urgency is clear: Pakistan faces a housing shortfall of over 10 million units, with demand growing each year due to urbanization and population growth. The State Bank of Pakistan arranged a workshop on the Prime Minister’s Housing Scheme — Wazir-e-Azam Apna Ghar Program — to roll out salient features including financing structure, loan amount, tenure, income requirements, and monthly installment. According to SBP officials Ghulam Muhammad Abbasi, Executive Director, and Dr. Muhammad Saleem, Additional Director, the scheme aims to finance 150,000 houses by June 2027. Under the program, banks will provide loans of up to Rs 10 million for purchase of a ready-made house, flat, or plot, or for construction on a plot. A house of up to 250 square yards and a flat of up to 1500 square feet will be eligible. The loan tenure is 20 years, with a fixed markup of 5% for the first 10 years. Who can apply and how? Salaried individuals can apply with a salary slip, while non-salaried applicants including shopkeepers and daily wage workers can use electricity bills, mobile top-ups, children’s fee challans or other expense receipts as income proof, the State Bank said. An applicant can apply with 3 to 4 co-borrowers — father with sons, brothers with sisters, or husband with wife. The main applicant must not own any property; if found otherwise, the loan will be cancelled. An online portal has been created for applications, and forms are also available at bank counters. “Banks will not charge any processing fee, nor any penalty on balloon payment,” an SBP official added. “Banks will process an application in 15 days. For any complaint, applicants can lodge it on the Prime Minister’s portal against the bank or officer.” To accelerate home ownership and boost construction, the government has expanded the scheme to include overseas Pakistanis. Overseas Pakistanis/Non-Resident Pakistanis holding NICOP/POC may also obtain financing. Participating Financial Institutions may also extend financing for private developer-led housing projects. Housing: A basic need slipping away For Pakistan’s lower and middle class, owning a home has become unaffordable. Rising property prices, inflation, and lack of access to formal credit have widened the 10-million-unit housing gap. Most families either live in rented accommodations, spending 40-50% of income on rent, or in informal settlements without basic facilities. For this segment, “Apna Ghar” could be the first real chance to move from rent to ownership — provided installments stay within budget. The Benefits: Housing for the missing middle 1. Affordability: 5% fixed markup for 10 years is significantly lower than market mortgage rates. 2. Inclusion: Alternate income proof and NICOP/POC access opens doors for informal workers and overseas Pakistanis. 3. No hidden costs: Zero processing fee and a dedicated portal reduce bureaucratic hurdles. 4. Economic boost: Financing 1.5 lakh units will give a direct push to construction, cement, steel, and labor. The Shortcomings and Challenges The scheme may end up benefiting the middle class more than the poor it targets. Most low-income families live in katchi abadis with no legal land titles, which banks require. Without land regularization, the poorest remain excluded. Other challenges: 1. Scale vs Need: 150,000 homes by 2027 address only 1.5% of the 10-million-unit shortage. 2. Bank appetite: Banks have historically avoided mortgage lending due to documentation and recovery risks. 3. Land and title issues: The scheme assumes legal plots, a major bottleneck in cities like Karachi. 4. Affordability ceiling: Rs 10 million cap and installments may still be unaffordable for the poorest. 5. Implementation: SBP’s 15-day timeline will be tested, as past schemes struggled with delays. Skepticism on the ground But for many, doubt runs deep. “We pay Rs 25,000 rent every month. Owning a house feels like a dream,” said Ali, a private school teacher from Nazimabad. “Every time the government announces a scheme, I hear the same thing — in the end, the rich will take loans in the name of their drivers and peons. Let a few months pass. Then we’ll know if this system is transparent or just another test case.” That reflects three questions: Will it reach the right people? Will the process be clean? Will the intent hold? With the scheme only a few months old, experts say implementation will be the real test. Transparency concerns Applicants and housing experts pointed out banks’ history of demanding informal payments to process files. With “Apna Ghar” relying on banks, many wonder how SBP will ensure it remains bribe-free and trackable. The SBP Executive Director said an online portal has been launched and complaints can be registered directly with the Prime Minister’s or SBP portal. “Strict action will be taken against banks charging fees or demanding bribes,” he said. Economic boom Apna Ghar can bring Economists say the push can do more than provide roofs — it can revive construction and the economy. The sector contributes nearly 2.5% to GDP and employs over 8 million people directly. Every house is estimated to create 8-10 direct and 20-25 indirect jobs. With demand for 150,000 units against a backlog of 10 million, orders for cement, steel, bricks and labor are expected to rise. SBP notes housing has one of the highest fiscal multipliers. If targeted well, it could cut into the housing backlog while acting as a grassroots stimulus. An opportunity For Shahbaz-led government to

  • | |

    Kelly Clarkson gets candid about her single life

    ByJustpaste.in

    Kelly Clarkson is thriving on her own, and she made sure her Las Vegas audience knew it. During her residency at Caesars Palace on Friday, the Grammy-winning singer turned a moment of audience banter into one of the most relatable and widely shared comments of her recent public appearances, delivering a set of honest and very funny observations about single life that quickly resonated online. Addressing the question that people apparently keep asking her, Clarkson went straight to the point. “People are like, ‘Oh, why are you single?’ And I’m like, ‘First of all, there are a lot of people out here making single look real good,’” she joked to the crowd. She did not stop there. “And if you didn’t really understand what I meant by that, it’s like you see relationships and you’re like, ‘I am so glad I’m going home alone.’” The audience reportedly laughed along with a recognition that needed no further explanation. She followed that with one more line that landed particularly well. “You know what’s not happening in my house?” she said before adding: “That s–t.” But Clarkson also shifted tone to deliver something more sincere beneath the comedy. She acknowledged that long-term relationships, when they do work, require sustained and conscious effort from both people involved. “If you are in a relationship, the hardest part is just keeping that fire alive and still dating,” she said. “And like still making it feel magical and not monotonous.” It was a moment that balanced her comedic instincts with a genuine insight about why relationships are hard, and why being honest about that matters more than performing contentment. Clarkson has kept her personal life largely private since her divorce from Brandon Blackstock, with whom she shares two children. Since finalising the separation, she has channelled her energy into her music, her long-running talk show and her parenting, rarely speaking at length about romance or the prospect of a new relationship. Her Las Vegas residency has given her a different kind of platform, one that is intimate, live and visibly free of the usual formalities that shape media appearances. In that setting, she has clearly felt comfortable speaking with the kind of unfiltered candour that her fanbase has always responded to. The comments from Friday’s show spread quickly online, with many fans describing the moment as the most relatable thing they had heard in months. For Clarkson, it appears that choosing herself is not a consolation. It is the plan.

  • |

    Netflix addresses Gandhari plagiarism allegations before release

    ByJustpaste.in

    Netflix has finally addressed the plagiarism controversy surrounding its upcoming film Gandhari, following allegations by writer Kalyan Bandi that the project bears similarities to an original story he claims to have developed several years ago. The controversy gained attention after Bandi alleged that he had written a story titled Gandhari in 2019. According to the writer, his concept revolved around a mother who transforms into a powerful, almost divine figure while trying to rescue her child from a human trafficking network. He claimed that he later pitched the idea to Monika Shergill, who was associated with Voot at the time and is now Netflix India’s Vice President of Content. Bandi said he submitted an eight-page document containing his story and synopsis but was informed that the project did not fit the platform’s content slate. However, after Taapsee Pannu’s Gandhari was announced in 2025, he raised concerns over what he believed were similarities between his concept and the upcoming film. The writer subsequently sent a legal notice seeking Rs 40 lakh in compensation. However, Bandi has maintained that financial compensation was never his primary objective. Instead, he has repeatedly said that he wants his contribution to be acknowledged if his original idea was used. Netflix has now responded to the allegations through Ruchikaa Kapoor Sheikh, Director of Original Films at Netflix India. Speaking at the film’s trailer launch in Mumbai, she said the streaming platform takes questions surrounding artistic attribution seriously. She explained that Netflix receives numerous pitches and maintained that the story presented by Bandi is different from the film created by writer Kanika Dhillon and actress Taapsee Pannu. She also urged audiences to watch the movie before drawing conclusions about the allegations. She further emphasized Netflix’s commitment to supporting original storytelling and giving recognition to writers regardless of their previous experience in the industry. According to her, the platform values originality whether a storyteller has already worked on several films or is making their first project. Meanwhile, Dhillon’s production company, Kathha Pictures, has strongly rejected the plagiarism allegations. The production house stated that the claims are false and unequivocally denied them, maintaining that Gandhari is an original project written and produced by Dhillon and developed under Kathha Pictures. The controversy comes shortly before the film’s release, placing additional attention on the project as audiences await its arrival on the streaming platform. Directed by Devashish Makhija, Gandhari features Taapsee Pannu in the lead role and also stars Ishwak Singh, Chhaya Kadam, Swastika Mukherjee, Mita Vashisht and Jatin Sarna. The film is expected to explore themes of motherhood, revenge and the lengths a parent may go to protect a child. Despite the ongoing dispute, Netflix and the filmmakers have maintained that the film is an original work. With the allegations now publicly addressed by the streaming platform, viewers will have the opportunity to watch Gandhari themselves and assess the story when it premieres on Netflix on September 3.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *