militant facilitator mufti
| | |

Militant facilitator Mufti Zafaryab arrested

Authorities have arrested self-styled cleric Mufti Zafaryab for allegedly facilitating the banned militant group referred to by the Pakistani government as Fitna al-Khawarij.

According to an official statement, the suspect said he completed an eight-year Dars-e-Nizami course at Jamia Nizam-ul-Uloom, Yateem Khana, Bannu, and later completed a three-year specialization in Islamic jurisprudence (Takhassus fi al-Fiqh) at Al-Markaz Al-Islami, Ghoriwala.

In a recorded statement, Zafaryab admitted that he had been in contact with militant commander Hikmat Roshan. He said state institutions were aware of his links, which ultimately led to his arrest.

The suspect alleged that the militant commander sought religious rulings from him to justify extortion carried out in the name of jihad. He further claimed that he, along with several others, had been offered positions and financial incentives by the group.

Expressing remorse, Zafaryab said he regretted his actions and stated that the group has no connection with Islam. He described its activities and ideology as un-Islamic and contrary to Sharia.

He also said the militant group promotes extremist beliefs and considers the killing of Muslims to be permissible, rejecting its ideology and distancing himself from its actions.

The arrest comes as security forces continue counterterrorism operations against militant groups across the country.

Similar Posts

  • |

    Nick Reiner denied $1.5 million trust fund access

    Nick Reiner has suffered another legal and financial setback following his indictment in connection with the deaths of his parents, filmmaker Rob Reiner and his wife, Michelle Reiner. The 32-year-old writer is reportedly being denied access to a trust fund worth more than $1.5 million as he prepares to fight the serious criminal charges against him. According to a report published on Saturday, August 15, a new trustee overseeing Reiner’s trust has refused his request to withdraw money from the account. Reiner had sought access to the funds to help cover his legal expenses and pay for basic necessities while he remains in custody. The decision is reportedly based on California’s so-called “slayer statute.” Such laws are designed to prevent an individual from financially benefiting from the death of someone they are accused of intentionally killing. The statute can restrict a person’s ability to inherit or receive assets connected to the alleged victim. Reiner’s trust was established by his parents after his birth in 1993 and is now valued at more than $1.5 million. In a court filing, Reiner claimed that he was expected to receive half of the trust once he reached the age of 30. However, he said that the money had never been transferred to him. He is now seeking access to the funds, arguing that they are needed to pay his attorneys and support himself while incarcerated. His request reportedly includes money for his commissary account, which he said would allow him to purchase everyday necessities such as socks and personal hygiene products. The dispute over the trust comes shortly after prosecutors secured an indictment against Reiner in the deaths of his parents. On Wednesday, August 12, a Los Angeles grand jury reportedly indicted him on two counts of first-degree murder. The charges relate to the deaths of Rob and Michelle Reiner. Prosecutors presented evidence to the grand jury, which ultimately determined that there was sufficient evidence for the case to proceed toward trial. The indictment also reportedly includes a special circumstance allegation of “lying in wait.” Prosecutors allege that Reiner deliberately waited for his parents before attacking them when they were vulnerable or unaware. The additional allegation could significantly increase the potential consequences if Reiner is ultimately convicted. Depending on how the case proceeds and the applicable sentencing rules, a conviction involving such circumstances could expose him to extremely severe punishment, including life imprisonment without parole or potentially the death penalty. For now, Reiner remains entitled to the presumption of innocence, and the allegations against him have yet to be proven in court. His ongoing legal battle now involves not only the murder charges but also an effort to gain access to the substantial trust established by his parents.

  • | | |

    Oil prices surges avove $91 as Iran war fuels Horm…

    Oil prices climbed on Tuesday, with Brent crude moving above $91 a barrel as stalled diplomacy over the Iran conflict raised fresh concerns about global energy supplies. Brent futures gained 27 cents, or 0.3%, to $91.14 a barrel, while US West Texas Intermediate rose 42 cents to $85.04. WTI had earlier reached $85.37, its highest level since July 31. Markets remained tense after Iran signalled a shift toward a more offensive military posture, while Washington ruled out extending a temporary ceasefire. Progress toward reopening the Strait of Hormuz to normal tanker traffic has also slowed, adding to fears of prolonged supply disruptions. Only a handful of commodity vessels crossed the strategic waterway over the weekend, sharply below normal traffic levels. Concerns were further heightened by attacks in the Red Sea, reinforcing fears over disruptions at both the Strait of Hormuz and Bab el-Mandeb. Despite the growing tensions, reports of possible back-channel contacts between the US and Iran offered a limited sign of hope for renewed diplomacy. Meanwhile, markets are also watching US crude inventories, which are expected to have declined last week. Earlier, Oil prices climbed on Monday as uncertainty over a possible diplomatic breakthrough between the United States and Iran increased, while a sharp slowdown in tanker movements through the Strait of Hormuz heightened concerns about disruptions to global crude supplies. Brent crude futures gained as much as 1% during early trading to reach $89.40 per barrel. The benchmark was later up 72 cents, or about 0.8%, at $89.20 a barrel by 0229 GMT. US West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude also moved higher, rising 44 cents to $82.83 per barrel. Both international benchmarks posted gains of more than 5% last week after a series of attacks involving energy and shipping assets in and around the strategically important Strait of Hormuz. The incidents have intensified fears that further escalation could affect one of the world’s most important oil transit routes. Market sentiment was further affected by developments over the weekend, when Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi said Tehran had yet to decide whether it would resume negotiations with Washington. US President Donald Trump, meanwhile, told Americans to prepare for somewhat higher gasoline prices as the conflict continues. Analysts said the renewed uncertainty had brought geopolitical risk back into crude markets after oil prices had previously come under pressure on expectations that diplomatic efforts could ease tensions. “Oil prices have now rebounded almost completely from the lows seen in early August, as hopes for a more permanent resolution between the US and Iran have faded and geopolitical risk premiums have returned to the market,” said Priyanka Sachdeva, head of market insights at Phillip Nova in Singapore. Sachdeva cautioned, however, that the rally could lose momentum unless there is evidence of a further deterioration in the situation. She said the market would need to see renewed aggression in the Strait of Hormuz, particularly significant damage to oil tankers or energy infrastructure, before prices were likely to move substantially higher. Hormuz shipping activity slows Concerns over physical supply disruptions increased after ship-tracking data showed a marked decline in vessel traffic through the Strait of Hormuz over the weekend. According to data from Kpler, only five commodity vessels crossed the strategic waterway on Saturday, while no such transits were recorded on Sunday. This compared with 31 commodity vessel crossings during the previous weekend. The slowdown is significant because the Strait of Hormuz is a critical route for international energy shipments. Any prolonged disruption could increase transportation risks, raise insurance costs and place additional upward pressure on crude prices. The United Arab Emirates also accused Iran of attacking another vessel operated by Abu Dhabi National Oil Company (ADNOC) while it was passing through the strait on Friday, according to the Emirati state news agency WAM. The UAE had earlier blamed Iran for two separate incidents involving ADNOC-operated vessels on Thursday evening. The latest incidents have added to concerns among traders that the conflict could increasingly affect commercial shipping and energy infrastructure, rather than remaining confined to military and diplomatic confrontation. The Strait of Hormuz remains particularly important to global oil markets because a substantial volume of crude and petroleum products moves through the waterway. Any sustained interruption could therefore have consequences well beyond the region. For now, traders are closely monitoring developments involving US-Iran diplomatic contacts, attacks on shipping and the movement of tankers through the strait. While the latest price gains reflect a higher geopolitical risk premium, analysts remain cautious about predicting a prolonged rally. If shipping activity resumes and diplomatic channels reopen, some of the premium built into crude prices could quickly unwind. Conversely, additional attacks on tankers, oil facilities or other critical infrastructure could trigger a stronger market reaction and push prices higher as traders reassess the security of regional supplies.

  • | | |

    Houthis claim two hypersonic missiles fired at Mok…

    SANAA: Yemen’s Houthi group has claimed it launched two hypersonic ballistic missiles towards the strategically important Mokha port on the Red Sea coast, adding to growing security concerns around one of the world’s busiest maritime routes. According to Turkey’s Anadolu Agency, the Yemeni military said the two missiles were fired towards Mokha port and the surrounding Red Sea area. However, there was no immediate independent confirmation of whether the missiles reached their intended targets or were intercepted before impact. No casualties or material damage were immediately reported following the alleged missile launches. Mokha, located on Yemen’s western coastline, is an important port area overlooking the Red Sea. The region has remained highly sensitive amid continuing tensions and repeated missile and drone attacks linked to the wider Middle East conflict. The latest claim is likely to raise fresh concerns over maritime security in the Red Sea, where attacks on commercial shipping have previously disrupted international trade and forced some vessels to consider longer alternative routes. The Houthis have repeatedly used missiles and drones in attacks around the Red Sea, saying their operations are connected to the broader regional conflict. Such incidents have drawn international attention because the waterway is a major passage for cargo and energy shipments between Asia, Europe and other global markets. For now, key details surrounding Monday’s alleged attack remain unclear, including the exact type of missiles used, their intended targets and whether any interception took place. The Houthi claim has not been independently verified, and further information from Yemeni authorities or other sources is expected to clarify what happened. With tensions already high across the region, the reported launch underscores the continuing risks facing ports and shipping lanes along the Red Sea.

  • | |

    Over 60,000 Gaza children lose parents amid ongoing war

    More than 60,000 children in Gaza have lost at least one parent since the conflict began in October 2023, according to figures released by the Palestinian health ministry on Wednesday. The ministry reported that 60,737 children had either been orphaned or left with only one surviving parent. Of these, 52,095 children lost their fathers, while 5,929 lost their mothers. Another 2,713 children lost both parents during the conflict. The figures highlight the devastating impact of prolonged violence on children across the Gaza Strip. The ministry also reported that thousands of families had been completely erased from Gaza’s civil registry. According to its figures, 2,276 families comprising 8,858 people have been wiped out during the conflict. The overall death toll in Gaza has also exceeded 73,000 since the start of the war, the ministry said. A ceasefire reached in October has failed to end all violence in the territory. Palestinian authorities say Israeli forces have continued carrying out strikes, with more than 1,100 people reportedly killed since the truce began. The latest figures have renewed concerns over the humanitarian consequences of the conflict. Thousands of children have been left without one or both parents, while many families have lost multiple members. The United Nations Independent International Commission of Inquiry has also documented serious violations involving Palestinian children. In a report released in June, the commission said Israeli authorities and security forces had deliberately targeted Palestinian children. It alleged that violations amounted to genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes in Gaza, as well as war crimes in the occupied West Bank. The commission examined alleged violations against Palestinian children since the conflict began on October 7, 2023. It found that children accounted for around 30 per cent of those killed in the Gaza war. In an earlier report released in September, the commission concluded that Israel had committed genocide in Gaza and said senior Israeli officials, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, had contributed to incitement. Israel has rejected the accusations, describing them as unfounded and deeply offensive. The latest Palestinian figures underline the long-term consequences of the conflict for Gaza’s youngest population. Beyond the immediate loss of life, thousands of children are now facing life without parents, while entire families have disappeared from official records.

  • | | |

    Imran Khan’s sons renew concerns over father…

    The sons of former prime minister Imran Khan have once again expressed concern over their father’s health, saying they have been unable to receive reliable information about his condition due to continued restrictions on family access. Speaking in an interview with an international news outlet, Kasim Khan and Sulaiman Khan said they have not been allowed to communicate with their father for several months and claimed that his family, lawyers and personal doctors have also been denied regular access. Kasim said the family has remained in the dark about Imran Khan’s health throughout his imprisonment. He referred to an Islamabad High Court order that directed authorities to facilitate regular phone calls, but claimed the arrangement has not been effectively implemented. The brothers, who were interviewed in London, also said they have been trying to travel to Pakistan but have faced difficulties related to travel documentation. According to them, their National Identity Cards for Overseas Pakistanis (NICOPs) have expired, while visa-related issues have prevented them from visiting their father. The Ministry of Information, however, rejected the allegations, maintaining that the brothers possess NICOPs and therefore do not require visas to enter Pakistan. The ministry described their claims as misleading and said an administrative matter should not be turned into a political issue. The government did not comment on the brothers’ claim that their identity cards had expired. Asked whether Imran Khan might reach a political understanding with the government, both sons expressed doubt. Sulaiman said his father would be unlikely to agree to any arrangement that did not also address the situation of other political prisoners. Kasim added that the family’s inability to obtain updated medical information made it difficult to assess his father’s current health. The brothers also criticised the legal cases against the former prime minister, insisting the allegations were politically motivated. Kasim urged the international community to pay attention to the situation, claiming that his father remained imprisoned despite enjoying widespread public support. Imran Khan has been in prison since August 2023 after being convicted in the Toshakhana case. He is also serving a sentence in the £190 million corruption case and continues to face several other legal proceedings, including cases linked to the May 9 riots. His health has remained a point of dispute between the government and the opposition since he was diagnosed earlier this year with central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO), an eye condition affecting vision. Opposition leaders and members of his family have repeatedly demanded access for his personal doctors and called for his transfer to a private hospital for further treatment.

  • | |

    Trump reportedly eyes Infantino for UN Secretary-General

    US President Donald Trump is reportedly considering FIFA President Gianni Infantino for the post of United Nations secretary-general, according to media reports. The reported move comes shortly after the successful conclusion of the 2026 FIFA World Cup, which ended on July 19. Reports suggest Trump believes Infantino has gained international recognition for his leadership of world football and his ability to bring countries together through sport. The US president is said to view the FIFA chief as a respected global figure capable of promoting dialogue and cooperation among nations. Trump and Infantino developed a closer working relationship during preparations for the 2026 FIFA World Cup. Throughout the tournament, the FIFA president maintained regular contact with US officials and played a key role in coordinating one of the world’s biggest sporting events. Media reports claim Trump was impressed by Infantino’s management of the tournament and believes his international experience could make him a suitable candidate to lead the United Nations. However, neither the White House nor FIFA has officially confirmed the reports. There has also been no indication that Infantino has accepted or is interested in seeking the UN’s top position. It remains unclear whether the matter has been formally discussed between the two sides. The process of selecting the next UN secretary-general is highly competitive. Any candidate must first receive the support of the 15-member United Nations Security Council. The five permanent members of the council each hold veto power, meaning a single objection can block a nomination. The successful candidate must then be approved by the UN General Assembly. The reported development comes as the United Nations prepares for a leadership transition later this year. Current Secretary-General António Guterres is scheduled to leave office at the end of December after completing his second term. Political analysts say the position traditionally goes to experienced diplomats or senior political leaders with broad international support. If Infantino’s name is formally proposed, it would represent an unusual choice because of his background in global sports administration rather than diplomacy.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *