netflix traps man
|

Netflix traps man in billboard to promote new horror film

Netflix has gone with an unconventional approach to promote its upcoming horror film, The Last House. The streaming giant transformed a regular billboard into a live psychological stunt above Hollywood traffic.

The bizarre campaign involves a man hired by Netflix, who is now “living” inside a small room built into the billboard structure itself. Footage circulating widely on social media shows him going about everyday routines like reading and stretching in full public view.

Commuters and passersby along Sunset Boulevard can watch him throughout the day. Unable to speak directly to the crowd below, the performer communicates using a whiteboard instead.

The billboard itself is designed to resemble a vine-covered house, complete with a front door, drainage pipe and chimney. Beneath a window, an ominous message reads: how long can you survive?

According to Netflix, the man will remain inside the structure from August 6 through August 8. The company described the stunt as an eerie echo of the film’s central storyline.

In an official post, Netflix explained that the performer would try to carry on as normally as possible inside the enclosed space. His interactions with the public, they said, deliberately mirror the trapped predicament faced by the film’s characters.

The Last House is a Netflix-presented horror thriller starring Greta Lee and Wagner Moura as parents Ann and Jason. The film also features Riley Chung and Noah Alexander Sosnowski as their children, Ruth and Graham.

The story follows a family who find themselves trapped inside their own home, with a sinister threat lurking somewhere within its walls. The unconventional marketing push appears designed to build intrigue ahead of the film’s streaming debut.

The Last House officially premiered on Netflix on August 7, giving audiences their first chance to see how the trapped-family concept plays out on screen.

Similar Posts

  • | | |

    Imran hospital move: security tightened at Shifa

    Security has been intensified around Shifa International Hospital in Islamabad as the deadline approaches for the government to comply with a Supreme Court directive regarding the transfer of PTI founder Imran Khan for medical treatment. A significant number of police personnel and senior officers were deployed outside the hospital on Thursday. Officials inspected security arrangements and cleared roads around the facility of parked vehicles. The heightened security comes ahead of the midnight deadline set under the Supreme Court’s order issued on Tuesday. The court directed authorities to shift Imran Khan to Shifa International Hospital for medical treatment and also ordered arrangements for weekly meetings between him and his family. The federal government has challenged aspects of the order through a review petition, describing the decision as discriminatory and raising legal concerns over its wider implications. Law Minister Azam Nazeer Tarar said the government still had time until midnight to implement the order. He said the responsibility for making arrangements rested with the Islamabad administration and that officials were working on the matter. Speaking in the Senate, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Tariq Fazal Chaudhry said the government would follow the Supreme Court’s decision. He said the government had no intention of preventing Imran Khan from receiving necessary medical treatment. According to the minister, existing rules generally provide for convicted prisoners to receive medical care through government hospitals. However, he said a legal question concerning the scope of such arrangements was currently before the Supreme Court. Fazal said that if the required treatment was not available at a government hospital, the authorities would have to arrange treatment at Shifa International Hospital or another facility with better medical capabilities. He stressed that the government would comply with the court’s final determination regarding the matter. The minister also addressed concerns about the health of PTI leader Dr Yasmin Rashid. He said the government was concerned about her condition and would again contact the Punjab government and prison authorities to obtain an updated assessment. Meanwhile, Prime Minister’s Adviser on Political Affairs Rana Sanaullah said the government’s review petition was expected to be dealt with by the Supreme Court. Sanaullah said the government had raised technical and legal objections to parts of the court’s order. He argued that the decision could create difficulties for the broader judicial system if similar applications were filed by other prisoners seeking treatment at private hospitals. He maintained that the government would respect whatever decision the Supreme Court reached on its review petition. According to sources, the Supreme Court’s registrar’s office had returned the review petition after raising an objection concerning the completion of required paper books. The government was expected to address the objections and resubmit the petition, with possible amendments to its contents. The development has triggered a fresh dispute between the government and PTI over implementation of the court order. Imran Khan’s lawyer, Khalid Yousaf Chaudhry, announced that he would approach the Supreme Court with a contempt petition if the government failed to transfer his client to the hospital. The lawyer accused the government of delaying implementation of the court’s directive and said the legal team was preparing the contempt proceedings. He also visited Adiala Jail to obtain Imran Khan’s signatures on the required documents, including the contempt petition and power of attorney. Earlier, PTI Secretary General Salman Akram Raja claimed that the government had withdrawn its review petition after objections were raised by the Supreme Court’s filing branch. Raja demanded immediate implementation of the August 18 order and argued that there was no legal justification for further delaying Imran Khan’s transfer. The government, however, maintained that the legal process concerning the review petition was still underway and that it would act according to the law and the final position of the Supreme Court. Imran Khan’s sister Aleema Khanum also reached Adiala Jail amid the ongoing developments.

  • | |

    47 killed in 7.7-magnitude Indonesia earthquake

    JAKARTA: At least 47 people were killed after a powerful magnitude 7.7 earthquake struck eastern Indonesia on Saturday, triggering dozens of aftershocks, landslides and a brief tsunami warning, authorities said. The National Disaster Mitigation Agency (BNPB) reported widespread damage across the affected region, while rescue operations were hampered by blocked roads and disrupted communications. Teams were still unable to reach Nagekeo, the area closest to the epicentre, because landslides had cut off road access. In the port town of Maumere, rescuers recovered 20 bodies and found six injured people, while two others remained trapped beneath rubble. Officials said residents were also trapped in damaged buildings in other parts of the region. Tsunami waves measuring less than one metre were recorded in several coastal areas following the early-morning quake. Authorities lifted the tsunami warning around three hours later. Around 2,000 people in Nagekeo were evacuated as homes, warehouses and government buildings suffered damage. Power outages and severe traffic disruptions were also reported. Rescue teams were attempting to reach isolated communities by alternative routes, including ferry services, as authorities continued assessing the full scale of the disaster.

  • | | |

    IHC asked to frame rules for social media use by c…

    ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court has been petitioned to direct the federal government to introduce legislation and a comprehensive regulatory framework governing social media access by children below the age of 16. The petition, filed by advocates Muhammad Jalal Haider and Yahya Farid Khawaja, calls for a reliable age-verification system to prevent minors from creating or operating social media accounts without appropriate safeguards. The petitioners argue that children face growing risks online, including cyberbullying, harassment, exposure to inappropriate material and other forms of digital harm. They have urged the government to establish clear policies covering children’s digital rights, privacy and physical and psychological safety. They have also sought specific legal responsibilities for social media companies, including stronger safeguards for minors and the creation of an institutional mechanism dedicated to protecting children in the digital environment. The petition refers to measures adopted or proposed in countries including Australia, France, Britain, New Zealand and Spain, where authorities have considered age limits, parental consent and age-verification requirements for children’s social media use. Citing the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child and General Comment No. 25, the petitioners maintain that protecting children’s best interests is a legal responsibility of the state rather than merely a policy choice. They argue that the absence of an effective age-verification mechanism leaves minors exposed to online dangers and makes it difficult to enforce protections designed specifically for children. The Ministry of Information Technology and Telecommunication, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Ministry of Interior, Ministry of Law and Justice, Pakistan Telecommunication Authority and Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority have been named as respondents. Punjab Assembly Resolution The development follows a resolution submitted to the Punjab Assembly last month calling for restrictions on social media accounts operated by children under 16 without parental consent. The resolution, moved by Punjab lawmaker Sarah Ahmad, urged the provincial government to recommend federal legislation aimed at regulating minors’ access to social media and strengthening online protection. It highlighted concerns over cyberbullying, online exploitation, inappropriate content, digital addiction and psychological distress among children, stressing that safeguarding their physical, mental and moral development is a responsibility of the state. The resolution proposed prohibiting children below 16 from creating or maintaining social media accounts without verified parental or legal guardian consent. It also called on the PTA to develop and enforce effective age-verification mechanisms across platforms operating in Pakistan. It further recommended holding social media companies accountable for child-safety standards, including the timely removal of harmful content and measures to provide a safer online environment for minors.

  • | |

    Mir Raza’s father raises new questions over son?…

    The father of businessman Mir Raza Ali has raised fresh concerns about the investigation into his son’s death. Speaking to the media on Monday, Mir Hassan claimed that his son’s business partner went missing after being questioned by police. He said police had questioned the business partner once. The man was allegedly not seen again after the questioning. Hassan said the family had not been informed about the investigation involving employees of the guest house in Gulistan-e-Johar. Mir Raza’s body was found near the guest house. “We have not been told what investigations were conducted with the employees,” he said. The victim’s father also questioned why CCTV footage from the guest house had not been made public. The latest concerns have emerged as investigators continue to review the circumstances surrounding Mir Raza’s death. The case took a new turn after the businessman’s body was exhumed for a second post-mortem examination. The second medical examination found a firearm injury and several wounds that had occurred before death. It also reported signs of internal bleeding. According to the findings, a bullet entered the upper right side of Mir Raza’s back and exited through the left side of his chest. The bullet fractured his sixth rib and caused internal bleeding. The report also documented injuries to different parts of his head, face, neck and chest. Following the medical findings, police added Section 302 of the Pakistan Penal Code to the case. The section relates to murder. The original FIR had been registered under Section 365, which concerns kidnapping. Mir Raza, 25, was allegedly abducted from the PECHS area. His body was later found in bushes near a wedding hall in Gulistan-e-Johar. Police had earlier suspected that he may have been tortured before being shot. The case initially faced uncertainty over whether Mir Raza had been murdered or had died by suicide. His family, however, consistently rejected the suicide theory. The second post-mortem has strengthened the family’s claim that Mir Raza was killed. Questions had also been raised about the first post-mortem report. Karachi Police Surgeon Dr Summaiya Syed had pointed out several issues in the initial examination. She had questioned why the body was not X-rayed and why hand swabs were not collected for gunshot residue testing. She had also raised concerns over the scientific measurement and photography of firearm injuries. Questions were further raised about the documentation of the bullet’s path and the examination of the entry and exit wounds. Following these developments, police dissolved the previous investigation team. A new team was formed under the leadership of DIG Crime and Investigation Amir Farooqi. The new team was tasked with conducting a fresh investigation based on the latest medical findings. Investigators were also expected to revisit the crime scene. They were directed to re-question the victim’s family and other relevant individuals. The team was also expected to examine forensic, technical, physical and circumstantial evidence. Mir Raza’s family has repeatedly criticised the handling of the case. They have maintained that he was murdered and demanded that those responsible be identified and brought to justice. The family’s lawyer, Jibran Nasir, had also alleged that investigators pressured the family to accept a suicide theory. He called for an independent and impartial investigation. The Sindh government has meanwhile decided to establish a judicial commission headed by a Sindh High Court judge. The commission is intended to oversee a transparent and impartial investigation into Mir Raza’s death.

  • |

    ICC member states decide Karim Khan’s future

    The International Criminal Court (ICC) member states met on Friday to decide the future of suspended Chief Prosecutor Karim Khan, who is facing allegations of sexual misconduct made by a former staff member. Khan has firmly denied all accusations and insists he has done nothing wrong. Representatives from the court’s 125 member countries gathered at the United Nations headquarters in New York to vote on whether Khan should continue in office or be removed permanently. The decision is being made through a secret ballot, and an absolute majority is required for a final outcome. Karim Khan stepped aside from his duties in May 2025 after the allegations emerged and an internal investigation was launched. Last month, the ICC’s governing bureau suspended him from office, stressing that the suspension was a temporary administrative measure and did not represent a final judgment on the case. During the meeting, Assembly of States Parties President Päivi Kaukoranta described the issue as a complex and sensitive disciplinary matter. She urged member states to conduct the proceedings fairly while respecting the rights, privacy and dignity of everyone involved and protecting the credibility of the court. The allegations gained wider international attention after the complainant, identified only as Sarah, publicly shared her account in a recent media interview. She alleged that repeated inappropriate behaviour by Khan eventually led to physical assault. She also said the significant difference in authority between them meant there could be no genuine consent. Khan has repeatedly denied the allegations. His legal team recently urged ICC member states not to remove him, arguing that he had not been given a fair opportunity to defend himself during the disciplinary process. His lawyers also warned that dismissing the prosecutor without proper legal safeguards could weaken the independence of future ICC prosecutors. Supporters of Khan argue that the investigation did not conclusively establish misconduct and say the case could create a dangerous precedent for future office holders. Others believe the seriousness of the allegations requires decisive action to maintain public trust in the court. Since becoming the ICC’s chief prosecutor in 2021, Khan has overseen several major international investigations. He gained global attention after seeking arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defence Minister Yoav Gallant over the Gaza conflict. The court also issued arrest warrants for several Hamas leaders during his tenure. Those decisions led to strong criticism from Israel and sanctions imposed by the United States on Khan and several ICC judges, increasing political pressure on the court. Legal experts remain divided over the case. Some argue that removing Khan is necessary to protect the ICC’s credibility and public confidence. Others maintain that any decision must be based strictly on due process and the rule of law rather than political considerations.

  • |

    Eight-year-old girl allegedly raped in Gujranwala, public outraged

    An eight-year-old girl was allegedly subjected to a brutal sexual assault by unidentified perpetrators in the Gujranwala area, triggering widespread grief and anger across Pakistan. The incident has once again raised serious concerns about the safety of children and the growing number of violent crimes being reported across the country. According to reports, the incident took place in Feroze Wala Kala Khatai Gol Pind near Gujranwala. The minor was allegedly taken to nearby fields, where she was sexually assaulted by multiple suspects. Her cries for help alerted local residents, who rushed towards the area and intervened. Police have launched an investigation into the incident and are working to identify and arrest those responsible. The victim was later taken to a police station in critical condition. Reports said that she was in severe distress and was unable to sit comfortably following the alleged assault. The incident has also sparked criticism of the media after the child’s father appeared before news outlets while attempting to conceal his daughter’s face. Despite the family’s efforts to protect the minor’s identity, reports claimed that some media channels broadcast footage showing the child’s face without blurring it. The decision has drawn condemnation from members of the public and celebrities, who argued that protecting the privacy and dignity of a minor victim should be a basic responsibility of the media. Actress Amar Khan expressed her anger over the alleged assault as well as the media’s handling of the victim’s identity. She criticised the decision to broadcast the child’s unblurred face, calling attention to the ethical responsibilities of news organisations when reporting cases involving minors. Maya Khan also reacted emotionally to the incident, urging people to take action against such cruelty. She wrote, “Please do something before Allah reacts to this cruelty and punishes us.” Malik Aqeel was also among those who expressed grief over the disturbing case. The incident has prompted another wave of public outrage on social media, with many users demanding strict action against those responsible. Several commentators questioned whether parents can feel safe raising daughters when children continue to face such horrific violence. Some users called for stronger punishments for perpetrators of crimes against children, while others expressed frustration over what they described as repeated failures to protect vulnerable minors. Many social media users also tagged Punjab Chief Minister Maryam Nawaz, urging authorities to ensure a swift investigation and bring the suspects to justice. The alleged assault comes amid growing public concern over reports of rape, murder, kidnapping and other violent crimes across Pakistan. Recent cases involving children and other vulnerable victims have intensified demands for stronger law enforcement, better protection for minors and greater accountability. As the investigation continues, the public is awaiting concrete action against those responsible for the Gujranwala incident. The case has once again highlighted the urgent need to protect children from violence and ensure that victims are treated with dignity and privacy throughout the legal process.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *