benjamin netanyahu sparks
|

Benjamin Netanyahu sparks diplomatic backlash after labelling UK an “Islamic republic”

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has drawn widespread criticism following a radio interview in which he referred to the United Kingdom as the “Islamic republic of Britain” and suggested it could become the first Islamic republic with nuclear capabilities. The remarks, delivered during a broadcast on Israel’s Army Radio, have drawn condemnation for echoing far-right Islamophobic rhetoric.

During the exchange, Netanyahu contrasted media coverage of the 1967 Arab-Israeli war with modern British politics, questioning whether contemporary UK figures would offer similar support. Pressed by the interviewer on whether such dynamics applied to Europe as a whole, Netanyahu doubled down, repeating the assertion regarding Britain’s nuclear status. His comments notably ignored the fact that Pakistan, officially an Islamic republic, has possessed a nuclear arsenal since the late 1990s.

The incident has heightened existing diplomatic tensions between London and Jerusalem. The British Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office described the statement as completely unacceptable and confirmed the matter had been raised directly with the Israeli government. Domestically, Israeli opposition figures criticized Netanyahu for alienating a strategic international partner amid mounting diplomatic isolation.

Similar Posts

  • | |

    Noah Kahan slams White House over unauthorised song use.

    Noah Kahan has become the latest musician to publicly push back against the Trump administration after the White House used his music without permission, joining a growing list of artists who have objected to their songs being used in administration social media content. The dispute began when the White House posted photographs and video to both Instagram and TikTok showing President Trump touring General Motors’ Milford Proving Ground in Michigan. The posts were set to Kahan’s song American Cars, taken from his chart-topping album The Great Divide. The pairing was clearly intended to evoke a sense of American pride and manufacturing strength, but the artist whose voice and music gave the posts their soundtrack had not been consulted and had not given his approval. Fans were quick to notice and quickly alerted Kahan by tagging him in the comments. His response was direct and unambiguous. “Would never approve of my music being used in support of you or this administration,” he wrote beneath the post. The comment rapidly accumulated tens of thousands of likes, suggesting the sentiment resonated well beyond Kahan’s own fanbase. His frequent collaborator and co-writer on the track, guitarist Noah Levine, also left a response of his own beneath the White House post. His comment was reportedly more direct in its language than Kahan’s, though it was subsequently removed. At the time of publication, the song itself remained attached to the White House’s video despite both objections. The White House did not respond to requests for comment on Kahan’s objection. The incident is part of a pattern that has become increasingly familiar during the Trump administration’s social media operations. Just days before Kahan spoke out, Katy Perry criticised the White House for using her 2010 hit Firework in a TikTok post featuring footage of military strikes. “I’m deeply appalled and angry,” she wrote, adding that she had not approved its use and had not even been asked. Ariana Grande raised similar concerns in June after a version of her song Bye appeared in a White House TikTok post depicting ICE arrests. The list of artists who have previously objected to the administration’s use of their music is extensive. Sabrina Carpenter, Olivia Rodrigo, Celine Dion, Neil Young and the Rolling Stones have all at various points voiced comparable complaints, reflecting a consistent tension between an administration that appears to deploy popular music as a tool of political imagery and the musicians whose work is being used without their knowledge or consent. For Kahan, the issue was clearly not simply procedural but personal. His response made clear that the objection was not only about the absence of permission but about the specific association itself, one he said he would never willingly choose.

  • |

    Trump says Kim Jong Un responds to outreach

    US President Donald Trump says North Korean leader Kim Jong Un has responded to his recent efforts to reopen direct communication with Pyongyang. Trump made the statement after announcing plans to reduce the scale of joint military exercises between the United States and South Korea. A reporter asked Trump why Kim had not responded to his attempts to establish contact. Trump replied that the North Korean leader had responded, but he did not disclose what Kim had said or provide details about the communication. The White House did not immediately provide further information. North Korea’s mission to the United Nations also did not issue an immediate response. Trump has recently adopted a softer tone toward North Korea. He described the country as “unthreatening and respectful” and said Kim had always treated him with respect. The US president said he understood Kim and believed the North Korean leader understood him as well. Trump’s latest comments have revived speculation about a possible meeting between the two leaders. The pair held historic summits in 2018 and 2019 during Trump’s first presidency. Those talks eventually collapsed over disagreements about North Korea’s nuclear weapons programme and the sanctions imposed on Pyongyang. North Korea has since expanded its military capabilities. It has also strengthened its ties with Russia while maintaining close relations with China. The country has faced international sanctions over its nuclear programme and ballistic missile development. North Korea has also provided military support to Russia during the war in Ukraine. Ukrainian officials have accused Russia of using North Korean-made missiles in attacks on Ukrainian targets. Trump’s administration has criticised Pyongyang’s military cooperation with Moscow. Despite this, Trump has continued to speak positively about his personal relationship with Kim. The US president’s decision to reduce military exercises with South Korea has also attracted attention. Trump said the exercises were expensive and argued that they sent an inappropriate and hostile message to North Korea. Pyongyang has long condemned US-South Korean military drills. North Korea considers the exercises preparation for a possible attack. The proposed reduction could therefore create additional space for diplomatic engagement. However, analysts caution that a new summit may not happen immediately. Victor Cha of the Center for Strategic and International Studies said North Korea could take its time before responding more openly to Trump’s approach. He also suggested that Trump may see renewed engagement with North Korea as a way to shift attention from other foreign policy challenges, while still genuinely wanting to meet Kim again. Other analysts believe Kim could benefit from another meeting with the US president. Andrew Yeo of the Brookings Institution said Kim had little to lose from holding talks with Trump. He argued that North Korea’s strengthened relationships with Russia and China could give Kim greater confidence in negotiations. Yeo said another meeting could also enhance Kim’s international status and reputation. Former US National Intelligence Officer Sydney Seiler noted that Trump had taken a similar approach during his first term. In 2018, the US president suspended major military exercises with South Korea as part of efforts to encourage dialogue with Pyongyang. Meanwhile, North Korea has continued to strengthen its relationship with Russia. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov recently reaffirmed Moscow’s close ties with Pyongyang. North Korean state media said Russia and North Korea were working together toward what they described as a new world order. For now, Trump has provided no details about Kim’s reported response. The nature of the communication and whether it could lead to renewed high-level negotiations remain unclea

  • | |

    Mystery deepens over 2 girls’ deaths in Lahore p…

    LAHORE: The deaths of two young women in police custody have raised fresh questions after their autopsy reports revealed black spots on their lungs and blood clots in their hearts, while failing to find visible signs of physical assault or torture. The two women, identified as Amina and Anmol, died while in the custody of Lahore’s Township police. According to sources, their post-mortem examinations found no external injuries or marks suggesting physical violence. Samples of their blood and internal organs have now been sent for histopathological testing, which is expected to help establish the final cause of death. The autopsies were conducted two days after the deaths and the reports were finalised after the medical board reached a consensus. Doctors found the women’s livers, kidneys and stomachs to be in normal condition, while black spots were observed on both sets of lungs and clots were detected in their hearts. The findings have not yet provided a definitive explanation for the deaths. Authorities are waiting for the histopathology results before determining the final cause. The families of the deceased have meanwhile called for an independent and transparent investigation. Tajamul Hussain, the father of one of the women, rejected the police version that the deaths were linked to a medical condition. He questioned how both women could have suffered fatal heart problems while in custody and alleged that they were killed. Police have denied the allegations. SSP Investigation Naveed Ahmed said the women had previous criminal records and were arrested after a passerby contacted Police Emergency 15 and reported that they had allegedly snatched an earring. The officer also claimed that the women used drugs but firmly rejected allegations that they were tortured or mistreated during their detention. With the histopathology reports still awaited, the investigation is expected to focus on the women’s medical condition, their treatment while in custody and the circumstances leading up to their deaths.

  • | |

    Fariha Pervez reflects on motherhood and parenting

    Pakistani singer Fariha Pervez has opened up about not having children and shared her views on the responsibilities that come with parenthood. The singer recently appeared on Ahmed Ali Butt’s podcast “Excuse Me,” where she spoke candidly about motherhood, raising children and the importance of parents giving proper attention to their kids. Fariha said she does not have children but believes she would have been an extremely protective and attentive mother if she had become a parent. She explained that watching children grow through different stages of life makes parenting a major responsibility. The singer stressed that children require time, care and guidance from their parents. She also expressed concern over parents who rely heavily on electronic devices to keep their children occupied. According to Fariha, excessive use of tablets and other devices can have negative effects on children’s wellbeing. She urged parents to pay closer attention to how their children spend their time and to take their responsibilities seriously. She described children as a blessing as well as a test and encouraged parents to value them accordingly. Fariha further emphasised the important role mothers play in a child’s upbringing. She said that bringing a child into the world comes with the responsibility of providing proper care, attention and protection. The singer acknowledged that some parents might disagree with her comments but maintained that her intention was to highlight the significance of responsible parenting. Fariha Pervez has remained a recognised name in Pakistan’s music industry. She rose to prominence with her debut song “Dil Hua Bo Kata” and later became known for Punjabi songs, drama soundtracks and ghazal performances. She stepped away from the music industry in 2016 following her divorce from singer Nauman Javed. Her recent podcast appearance has once again drawn attention to her personal views and experiences.

  • | | |

    Rising chip costs may increase phone prices in Pak…

    The rising cost of semiconductor chips in the global market could lead to another increase in mobile phone prices in Pakistan, as smartphone manufacturers continue to face higher production expenses. Industry experts say the global technology sector is experiencing a sharp rise in the cost of key components used in smartphones. The increasing demand for advanced semiconductor chips, particularly those used in artificial intelligence (AI) data centres, has placed significant pressure on chip manufacturers and global supply chains. In addition to AI-related demand, the prices of memory chips, silicon wafers, chip packaging materials and other electronic components have also increased. These factors have raised the overall cost of manufacturing smartphones, forcing companies to review their pricing strategies. The impact is being felt across the international mobile industry. Manufacturers are facing higher production costs, while suppliers are adjusting prices to cope with increased manufacturing expenses. As a result, smartphone companies are expected to pass part of the additional cost on to consumers. Pakistan’s mobile phone market is closely linked to global supply chains because most smartphones and their components are imported. Any increase in international production costs is likely to affect the prices of devices sold in the local market. Industry analysts say consumers may have to pay more for both premium and mid-range smartphones if the trend continues. They added that the exact increase will depend on international market conditions, import costs and currency exchange rates in the coming months. The expected rise would come at a time when consumers are already dealing with higher prices for electronic goods due to inflation and increased import expenses. A further increase in smartphone prices could reduce purchasing power and slow demand in the local market.

  • | |

    Lawyer explains why Mohsin Naqvi was excluded from…

    ISLAMABAD: Barrister Uzair Bhandari, representing Dr Uzma Khan, has clarified why Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi was not initially named as a respondent in the contempt of court petition filed before the Supreme Court. Dr Uzma Khan, sister of PTI founder Imran Khan, filed the petition in connection with alleged non-compliance with a court order. Questions were subsequently raised over the absence of the interior minister from the list of respondents. In a statement shared on X, Bhandari explained that the respondents were selected on the basis of their alleged involvement, public statements and administrative responsibilities. He said Federal Ministers Azam Nazeer Tarar and Attaullah Tarar were included because they had publicly commented on the relevant court decision and the issue concerning the transfer. Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif was also named, Bhandari said, in line with the legal principle established by the Supreme Court in the Yousaf Raza Gilani case. Under that precedent, the prime minister carries ultimate administrative responsibility for ensuring compliance with court orders. Regarding Mohsin Naqvi, the lawyer said the interior minister had not made any direct statement about the specific court decision at the time the petition was filed. As a result, there was no immediate basis for including him as a respondent. Bhandari, however, clarified that this does not prevent Naqvi from being added to the proceedings in the future. If relevant evidence emerges during the investigation, or if the Supreme Court considers it necessary, the interior minister could subsequently be made a party to the case. The lawyer also explained the inclusion of the Interior Secretary. Under the Rules of Business, 1973, the Interior Secretary serves as the administrative head of the Interior Division. The secretary was therefore named on the basis of the division’s legal and administrative responsibilities.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *