US-Israel War on Iran

  • | | |

    For key diplomacy Erdogan urges Trump to keep Iran…

    ANKARA: Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has urged US President Donald Trump to keep diplomatic channels with Iran open, stressing that continued dialogue could help ease regional tensions. During a telephone conversation, Erdogan and Trump discussed bilateral ties as well as the ongoing conflicts involving Iran and Gaza, according to the Turkish presidency. The two leaders also exchanged views on defence agreements involving Pakistan and Saudi Arabia, amid growing regional security concerns. Erdogan told Trump that diplomacy should be given every opportunity and said Turkey was prepared to contribute to efforts aimed at maintaining dialogue with Iran. The Turkish president also raised concerns over the situation in Gaza, saying Israel’s military actions against Palestinians were continuing at a time when the second phase of a proposed peace plan was expected to begin. The call comes as Ankara continues to advocate diplomatic engagement to prevent further escalation and promote political solutions to conflicts across the region.

  • | | |

    Iran calls Kurdistan drone attack a ‘false-flag?…

    TEHRAN: Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has condemned a drone attack targeting the office of the Kurdistan Regional Government’s prime minister in Iraq, while warning Kurdish authorities to remain alert to what he described as possible “false-flag” operations. The remarks came after two drones targeted the office of Kurdistan Region Prime Minister Masrour Barzani in Erbil on Monday. Kurdish authorities said the attack caused no casualties, although the incident has added to concerns over the increasingly tense security environment in northern Iraq. Araghchi said nothing justified what he called a reckless attack and urged Iran’s Kurdish neighbours to be cautious of attempts to create divisions and discord between neighbouring countries. In a statement posted on social media, the Iranian foreign minister said Kurdish communities and officials should remain vigilant against operations designed to provoke tensions. He also referred to Iran’s past support for Kurdish people during conflicts with Saddam Hussein’s government and the Islamic State group. The comments came as questions remained over who was responsible for the latest attack. The Kurdistan Regional Government’s security agency said the drones originated from Iranian territory, according to Reuters. Iranian officials, however, have not directly accepted responsibility for the strike. Instead, Tehran has highlighted the possibility that the attack could have been carried out as a “false-flag” operation aimed at damaging relations between Iran and Iraq’s autonomous Kurdish region. The attack has further complicated an already sensitive regional security situation. Erbil has experienced repeated drone incidents in recent months amid the wider confrontation involving Iran, the United States and Israel. In July, several drones were intercepted over the city, with local authorities reporting no casualties. Kurdistan Region President Nechirvan Barzani has also condemned the latest attack, describing the incident as unacceptable and calling for Iraq’s federal government to fulfil its responsibility to protect the region’s security and stability. The latest confrontation comes as Iraqi Kurdistan attempts to avoid being drawn deeper into wider regional hostilities. The region’s strategic location and close ties with Western partners have repeatedly made it a sensitive point in the broader Middle Eastern conflict. With competing claims surrounding the drone attack, the incident is likely to increase diplomatic pressure on Baghdad, Erbil and Tehran to prevent further escalation and clarify responsibility for attacks on Kurdish territory.

  • | | |

    Missile hits ship leaving Strait of Hormuz, UK Mar…

    A commercial vessel sailing out of the Strait of Hormuz was struck by a missile, causing damage to its engine and injuring members of its crew, the United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO) said on Tuesday. The incident has added to growing concerns over maritime security in one of the world’s most strategically important waterways, where tensions have remained high amid the wider conflict involving Iran and regional powers. According to UKMTO, the vessel was hit after leaving the Strait of Hormuz. The missile caused damage to the ship’s engine, while members of the crew were also affected in the attack. Omani coast guard personnel responded to the incident and are providing assistance to the crew, UKMTO said. No further details about the condition of the vessel or the extent of the injuries were immediately available. The agency did not identify who fired the missile. The circumstances surrounding the attack, including the type of missile used and the exact location of the strike, were also not immediately disclosed. The Strait of Hormuz is a critical global shipping route through which a substantial share of the world’s oil supplies passes. Any attack on commercial shipping in or around the waterway can raise concerns about the safety of international trade and energy supplies. The latest incident comes as tensions remain particularly sensitive around the Gulf. Shipping companies and maritime authorities have been closely monitoring developments, with any disruption in the waterway capable of affecting global markets. Meanwhile, Iranian officials have strongly rejected what they describe as repeated claims and threats concerning the Strait of Hormuz. Ibrahim Azizi, chairman of Iran’s parliament’s National Security Commission, criticised US President Donald Trump over his remarks regarding the strategic waterway. In a statement issued from Tehran, Azizi urged Trump to focus on his own security instead of making what he called baseless and endless claims about the Strait of Hormuz. Azizi also made a provocative reference to Trump’s personal safety, saying the US president should think about ensuring his own security. The latest missile strike remains under investigation, and the identity of those responsible has yet to be established. Further information from maritime authorities is expected as officials assess the vessel, crew and circumstances surrounding the attack. For now, the incident has renewed fears that rising regional tensions could spill over into commercial shipping and threaten vessels using one of the world’s busiest energy corridors.

  • | | |

    Iran sets tough conditions for Strait of Hormuz re…

    Iran has warned that the strategically vital Strait of Hormuz will remain closed until the United States meets a series of conditions under a June memorandum of understanding, raising fresh concerns about the future of a conflict that has already disrupted global energy markets. Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf said on Tuesday that Tehran would not reopen the waterway until what he described as the full terms of the agreement had been implemented. According to Iranian state media, Ghalibaf said the blockade must first be lifted, Iran’s frozen assets released, oil sanctions removed and military threats and operations on all fronts brought to an end. He also insisted that other provisions of the memorandum must be fully implemented. “Iran is prepared to impose a heavier defeat on the enemy than before,” Ghalibaf said, warning that Tehran’s response would depend on the actions and aggression of its opponents. The statement came as diplomatic efforts to secure a permanent end to the Iran-US conflict appeared increasingly fragile. Iran Claims Victory in War and Diplomacy Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi separately declared that Tehran had won both the military confrontation and the diplomatic battle. Speaking at an event, Araghchi said Iran had resisted sustained military pressure before entering negotiations. He claimed that those who initially demanded Iran’s unconditional surrender later sought talks with Tehran. “We fought with strength, and we negotiated with strength,” Araghchi said, according to Iranian media. Araghchi also accused Israel of undermining efforts to implement the June memorandum, saying it had worked to prevent the agreement from being reached and subsequently obstructed its implementation. His comments followed US President Donald Trump’s call for Iran to surrender and “raise the white flag”, further highlighting the sharp divide between Washington and Tehran. Hormuz Becomes Central Dispute The Strait of Hormuz has emerged as one of the most important points of disagreement between the two sides. The narrow waterway links the Persian Gulf with the Gulf of Oman and is a crucial route for global oil and liquefied natural gas shipments. Shipping activity has already fallen dramatically during the conflict. Reuters reported that only a handful of commodity vessels crossed the strait over the weekend, compared with more than 130 daily ship transits before the war began. Iran says provisions of the June memorandum give it authority to manage parts of the waterway, while Washington rejects that interpretation. The disagreement has contributed to renewed tensions after an earlier ceasefire failed to produce a lasting settlement. Vessel Hit by Unknown Projectile The latest tensions were accompanied by another maritime incident. The UK Maritime Trade Operations centre said a vessel travelling outbound through the Strait of Hormuz was struck by an unknown projectile. The impact damaged the ship’s engine room and caused a crew casualty. The remaining crew members were assisted by the Omani Coast Guard, while authorities began investigating the incident. No environmental impact was reported. UKMTO urged vessels operating in the area to exercise caution and report suspicious activity. Back-Channel Diplomacy Continues Despite the increasingly hostile rhetoric, reports indicate that Washington and Tehran have continued exploring indirect channels. Media reports said the Trump administration had established a back channel involving figures connected to Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. The reported effort reflected US concerns over whether Iranian negotiators had sufficient authority to deliver an agreement acceptable to the country’s powerful security establishment. US special envoy Jared Kushner also indicated that discussions between Washington and different parts of the Iranian government were more extensive than publicly acknowledged. The developments suggest that diplomacy has not completely collapsed, even as official statements from both sides remain confrontational. Iran Faces Economic Pressure Iran’s leaders also face significant economic challenges. The conflict has added pressure to an economy already struggling with inflation, sanctions, currency weakness, energy shortages and structural problems. Disrupted trade, damaged infrastructure and lost production have increased the financial burden of the war, while prolonged restrictions on shipping through Hormuz threaten Iran’s ability to generate export revenue. Global markets have also felt the impact. Brent crude rose sharply during the conflict, reaching a peak of $126 a barrel before later easing. The prolonged disruption has raised concerns over fuel prices and inflation in countries dependent on Gulf energy supplies. Ghalibaf Heads to Iraq Against this backdrop, Ghalibaf is expected to travel to Iraq for talks on regional developments and bilateral cooperation. His discussions are expected to cover security, border management, counterterrorism, economic cooperation and implementation of existing agreements between Tehran and Baghdad. The visit comes after a drone attack targeted the residence and private office of Iraqi Kurdish Regional Government Prime Minister Masrour Barzani. Iran denied involvement and condemned the incident. Araghchi said nothing justified the attack and warned against attempts to create divisions between Iran, Iraq and the Kurdish region. With the Strait of Hormuz still at the centre of the dispute, the coming days could prove crucial. Tehran’s insistence on sanctions relief, the release of frozen assets and an end to military threats leaves little room for compromise unless Washington and its allies are prepared to make substantial concessions. For now, the strategic waterway remains a powerful bargaining tool for Iran — and a major source of uncertainty for the global economy.

  • |

    Iran shoots down enemy Kamikaze drone over East Azerbaijan Province

    Iran’s integrated air defence network has shot down an enemy one-way attack drone over the country’s East Azerbaijan province, according to the Tasnim news agency. The report, citing the Iranian army, stated that the drone was intercepted and destroyed by air defence systems operating under the country’s unified air defence network. The announcement comes amid escalating tensions in the region, with the US and Iran locked in a dangerous standoff following the collapse of the ceasefire. Both sides have traded military strikes in recent weeks, with Iran launching attacks on US allies in the Gulf region and the US conducting strikes on Iranian targets. The downing of the drone is the latest in a series of incidents that have heightened fears of a wider conflict. The Iranian army did not specify the origin of the drone, but the use of kamikaze drones has been a hallmark of recent attacks in the region. Iran has previously accused the US and Israel of using such drones to target its infrastructure and military sites. The downing of the drone demonstrates Iran’s air defence capabilities and its readiness to protect its territory against what it perceives as aggression. The incident also highlights the growing threat of drone warfare in the region, with both state and non-state actors increasingly using unmanned aerial vehicles for reconnaissance and attack purposes. Iran has developed a robust drone programme and has supplied such systems to its allies, including the Houthis in Yemen and Hezbollah in Lebanon. The international community has urged restraint, but the situation remains volatile. The US has enforced a naval blockade in the Strait of Hormuz, while Iran has targeted vessels that violate its rules on navigating the vital waterway. The downing of the drone is likely to further inflame tensions, with Iran warning that it will respond forcefully to any aggression. As the conflict continues, the risk of further escalations and unintended consequences remains high. The downing of the kamikaze drone serves as a reminder of the volatile security environment in the Middle East and the potential for miscalculation to spark a wider war. The coming days will be critical in determining whether diplomacy can prevail or whether the region will slide further into chaos.

  • | | | | |

    Iran warns US of retaliation if nuclear sites are …

    TEHRAN: Iran has issued a fresh and stern warning to the United States, declaring that any military strike on its nuclear facilities would trigger a direct response against American interests and those of its allies across the Middle East, raising fears of a wider regional conflict. The warning came on Tuesday from Iran’s Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters, the country’s top joint military command, amid growing tensions following recent statements by US President Donald Trump. In an official statement, the military command said that any attack targeting Iran’s nuclear infrastructure would not remain limited in scope and would instead lead to a dangerous expansion of conflict throughout the region. Iranian commanders stressed that the United States and its regional allies would bear the consequences of such military action, warning that their strategic interests could become legitimate targets if Iranian nuclear sites were attacked. The latest warning follows remarks by President Trump, who recently threatened military action against Iran’s nuclear facilities, particularly the underground nuclear complex near Natanz. Trump claimed that an attack on the site could happen soon and asserted that Iran would be unable to stop it. His comments have further heightened tensions between Washington and Tehran, which have remained locked in a prolonged confrontation over Iran’s nuclear programme and regional security issues. While Iranian officials insist their nuclear activities are for peaceful purposes, Western governments have repeatedly expressed concerns over Tehran’s uranium enrichment programme, leading to years of sanctions and diplomatic disputes. Security analysts believe that any direct strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities could dramatically escalate instability across the Middle East, potentially drawing multiple regional actors into a broader conflict and disrupting global energy markets. The latest exchange of threats underscores the fragile security situation in the region, with the international community closely monitoring developments amid growing fears that miscalculation by either side could spark a larger military confrontation.

  • | | | |

    Pakistan, Qatar push US-Iran 10-day ceasefire plan

    WASHINGTON/DOHA: Pakistan, Qatar and Egypt have stepped up diplomatic efforts to prevent a wider conflict in the Middle East by proposing a 10-day ceasefire between the United States and Iran, according to a report by US news outlet Axios. However, neither side has yet agreed to the proposal as military tensions continue to escalate. The report said regional mediators are working behind the scenes to create space for diplomacy after days of intense hostilities between Washington and Tehran. The proposed ceasefire aims to temporarily halt military operations, restore maritime security in the Strait of Hormuz and open the door for renewed negotiations. According to sources familiar with the mediation efforts, the proposal has been shared with both governments, but officials in Washington and Tehran have so far withheld their approval. Diplomats say both countries appear determined to strengthen their military positions before considering any pause in fighting. The report added that US President Donald Trump is weighing two key options. The first is to endorse a limited 10-day ceasefire that could reduce regional tensions and revive diplomatic talks. The second involves expanding military operations alongside Israel in an effort to increase pressure on Iran and force concessions over security and nuclear issues. US officials quoted in the report said no final decision has been made, adding that developments over the coming days are expected to determine Washington’s next move. Despite several days of military operations, the report noted that the United States and Israel have not succeeded in eliminating Iran’s influence over the strategically vital Strait of Hormuz, through which a significant portion of the world’s oil supplies passes. Analysts warn that any prolonged disruption in the waterway could have serious consequences for global energy markets. The report also highlighted growing domestic pressure on the Trump administration as rising fuel prices in the United States fuel public concern over the economic cost of continued military action. Diplomatic momentum reportedly suffered a setback after two American soldiers were killed in an Iranian missile attack in Jordan over the weekend. Following the incident, Washington is said to have adopted a tougher stance while continuing diplomatic contacts. A senior US official confirmed that backchannel discussions remain active but stressed that the United States intends to respond to the deaths of its troops. The official added that military operations could continue for as long as President Trump considers necessary. Regional sources nevertheless expressed cautious optimism, saying negotiations remain the best path forward, as neither Washington nor Tehran is believed to be in a position to impose a lasting solution through military means alone.

  • | | |

    Iran claims drone strike on US base in Kuwait

    Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) says it will continue military operations aimed at responding to what it describes as acts of aggression against the country. Iranian authorities have also claimed that their forces carried out drone strikes against Camp Doha, a US military facility located in western Kuwait. According to Iran’s Tasnim news agency, the strikes targeted weapons storage facilities and logistical equipment used by US ground forces at the base. The Iranian military said the operation came in response to what it called repeated acts of aggression by the United States. Tehran has maintained that its military actions are intended to deter further attacks and demonstrate its readiness to respond to any threats against Iran. In a statement, Iran’s armed forces said they remain fully coordinated and prepared to confront any new military moves or hostile actions. The statement warned that Iran would deliver what it described as a strong and decisive response to any further aggression. Iranian officials described Camp Doha as an important regional support facility for US military personnel and equipment. The base has historically played a role in supporting American military operations and logistics in the Gulf region. The latest claims come amid heightened tensions in the region, with Iran and the United States continuing to exchange warnings and accusations. Any confirmed attack on a US military facility in Kuwait could further increase security concerns across the Gulf and raise fears of a broader escalation in the region. The claims regarding the reported drone strikes have been attributed to Iranian sources, and independent confirmation of the details was not provided in the original report.

  • | | | |

    Trump administration asks Congress for $87 billion…

    WASHINGTON: The Trump administration has asked Congress to approve nearly $87 billion in emergency funding as the United States faces mounting military costs linked to its escalating confrontation with Iran, according to American officials. The funding request was presented after US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth delivered a classified briefing to lawmakers, outlining the financial and operational demands of the ongoing conflict. He later addressed members of a Senate committee, arguing that additional resources are essential to sustain military operations and protect US national security interests. During the briefing, Hegseth said the conflict with Iran has already cost the United States approximately $37.5 billion, reflecting the growing financial burden of extended military deployments, air operations and regional security missions. Warning lawmakers about the consequences of delaying the request, the defense secretary said failure to approve the funding would create what he described as one of the most serious security risks facing the country. He also rejected suggestions that Washington was responsible for the current crisis, insisting that Iran’s actions had driven the escalation. The administration’s request comes as military tensions between Washington and Tehran remain high, with both sides exchanging threats and continuing operations across the region. Analysts say the financial demands of the conflict are increasing as the United States seeks to maintain its military presence while supporting allies in the Middle East. Meanwhile, The Washington Post reported that US funding allocated for military operations against Iran is being depleted at a rapid pace. The report suggested that continued operations without fresh congressional approval could place additional strain on defense resources and future military planning. The funding debate is expected to become a major issue on Capitol Hill, where lawmakers are likely to scrutinize both the size of the request and the administration’s broader strategy toward Iran. Some members of Congress are expected to seek greater clarity on military objectives, projected costs and the potential duration of the conflict before approving additional spending. Political observers say the request highlights the increasing economic impact of the confrontation, which is unfolding alongside rising concerns over global energy markets and regional stability. As Congress prepares to debate the proposal, the administration continues to argue that additional funding is necessary to maintain operational readiness and respond to evolving security challenges. The outcome of the request could play a significant role in shaping Washington’s military posture and diplomatic options in the weeks ahead.

  • | | | |

    NYC Mayor urges US to enforce ICC arrest warrant a…

    NEW YORK: New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani has said the city does not have the legal authority to enforce the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) arrest warrant against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, while urging the US federal government to take action if Netanyahu visits the United States. In a video statement posted on social media, Mamdani said his administration had carefully reviewed whether New York City could execute the ICC warrant under existing laws. After examining all available legal options, he concluded that municipal authorities lack the power to carry out such an arrest. “The federal government, however, does,” Mamdani said, calling on US officials to cooperate with the ICC and enforce the warrant if the opportunity arises. The New York mayor also sharply criticized Netanyahu, describing him as “a war criminal” and accusing him of being responsible for what he called “a horrific genocide against the Palestinian people.” Mamdani added that he supports the ICC’s position, saying that anyone charged by the court should face legal proceedings regardless of their office or nationality. “I agree with the ICC that Benjamin Netanyahu should be arrested and tried for his crimes,” he said. The ICC, based in The Hague, announced in 2024 that it had found reasonable grounds to believe Netanyahu bore responsibility for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity linked to Israel’s military campaign in Gaza following Hamas’ October 7, 2023 cross-border attack on Israel. The remarks come just a day after US President Donald Trump declared that Netanyahu would not face arrest if he attends the United Nations General Assembly in New York this September. Trump’s comments highlighted the gap between the US administration’s position and the ICC’s legal proceedings. Netanyahu’s office swiftly rejected Mamdani’s remarks, dismissing the ICC as a “kangaroo court” and reiterating Israel’s long-standing position that the tribunal lacks jurisdiction over Israeli officials. The issue has reignited debate over the role of international justice, the authority of the ICC and the legal obligations of countries when individuals facing international arrest warrants travel abroad. While the United States is not a member of the ICC and does not formally recognise its jurisdiction, the controversy has drawn renewed international attention as legal, diplomatic and political questions continue to surround Netanyahu’s potential foreign visits. The latest exchange underscores the deep divisions over the Gaza conflict and the growing debate about accountability, international law and the limits of local and federal authority in the United States.