pakistan clarifies afghan
| | |

Pakistan clarifies Afghan deportation policy

ByJustpaste.in

Pakistan has clarified that Afghan citizens with valid visas and travel documents have not been expelled from the country.

Foreign Office spokesperson Tahir Hussain Andrabi said the government was following a legal process regarding Afghan nationals staying in Pakistan.

Addressing the weekly press briefing, Andrabi said cases of around 89,000 Afghan citizens were currently being reviewed under the Illegal Foreigners Repatriation Plan (IFRP).

He explained that the process was being carried out according to established procedures and legal requirements.

The spokesperson added that Pakistan was also providing humanitarian relief by extending the stay of nearly 16,000 Afghan nationals.

The extension applies mainly to vulnerable groups, including women, children and elderly citizens, he said.

Commenting on reports of an incident near the Chitral border areas, Andrabi said the Foreign Office had no confirmed information about the matter.

He stated that reports coming from Afghanistan needed proper verification at the ground level before any official response could be given.

The spokesperson stressed that Pakistan would avoid commenting on unverified reports and would share information only after confirmation from reliable sources.

Similar Posts

  • |

    Tanzid Hasan hits century as Bangladesh dominate Australia

    ByJustpaste.in

    Bangladesh strengthened their grip on the Darwin Test against Australia on Friday as opener Tanzid Hasan produced a memorable maiden Test century to put the visitors in a commanding position after the second day. Bangladesh finished the day on 351 for six, securing a valuable 153-run lead and leaving Australia facing an uphill battle in the opening Test. The biggest highlight was Tanzid, who marked only his second Test appearance with a composed century. The young opener spent nearly five hours at the crease, facing 197 deliveries and striking eight boundaries and one six on his way to three figures. His innings provided Bangladesh with the foundation they needed against a strong Australian attack. Tanzid first combined with Mominul Haque to build a 102-run partnership for the second wicket. He then continued Bangladesh’s progress alongside captain Najmul Hossain Shanto, with the pair adding another 93 runs. Shanto played a valuable supporting role before falling for 84, but Bangladesh refused to surrender their advantage despite Australia finding some success with the new ball. Australia managed to take three quick wickets with the second new ball, raising hopes of a late collapse. However, Mehidy Hasan Miraz and Hasan Mahmud responded with disciplined batting to frustrate the hosts. The pair remained unbeaten at the close, putting together an important 43-run partnership for the seventh wicket and ensuring Bangladesh ended the day firmly in control. For Australia, Josh Hazlewood, Mitchell Starc and Pat Cummins claimed one wicket each, but their efforts were not enough to prevent Bangladesh from establishing a substantial advantage. Tanzid’s century was particularly significant given his limited Test experience. Having played only his second match in the format, he showed patience and maturity against one of the world’s most respected bowling attacks. With Bangladesh already 153 runs ahead and four wickets still in hand, Australia face a crucial third day in Darwin. The hosts will need early breakthroughs to prevent Bangladesh from turning their advantage into a potentially decisive position.

  • | | |

    Iran calls Kurdistan drone attack a ‘false-flag?…

    ByJustpaste.in

    TEHRAN: Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has condemned a drone attack targeting the office of the Kurdistan Regional Government’s prime minister in Iraq, while warning Kurdish authorities to remain alert to what he described as possible “false-flag” operations. The remarks came after two drones targeted the office of Kurdistan Region Prime Minister Masrour Barzani in Erbil on Monday. Kurdish authorities said the attack caused no casualties, although the incident has added to concerns over the increasingly tense security environment in northern Iraq. Araghchi said nothing justified what he called a reckless attack and urged Iran’s Kurdish neighbours to be cautious of attempts to create divisions and discord between neighbouring countries. In a statement posted on social media, the Iranian foreign minister said Kurdish communities and officials should remain vigilant against operations designed to provoke tensions. He also referred to Iran’s past support for Kurdish people during conflicts with Saddam Hussein’s government and the Islamic State group. The comments came as questions remained over who was responsible for the latest attack. The Kurdistan Regional Government’s security agency said the drones originated from Iranian territory, according to Reuters. Iranian officials, however, have not directly accepted responsibility for the strike. Instead, Tehran has highlighted the possibility that the attack could have been carried out as a “false-flag” operation aimed at damaging relations between Iran and Iraq’s autonomous Kurdish region. The attack has further complicated an already sensitive regional security situation. Erbil has experienced repeated drone incidents in recent months amid the wider confrontation involving Iran, the United States and Israel. In July, several drones were intercepted over the city, with local authorities reporting no casualties. Kurdistan Region President Nechirvan Barzani has also condemned the latest attack, describing the incident as unacceptable and calling for Iraq’s federal government to fulfil its responsibility to protect the region’s security and stability. The latest confrontation comes as Iraqi Kurdistan attempts to avoid being drawn deeper into wider regional hostilities. The region’s strategic location and close ties with Western partners have repeatedly made it a sensitive point in the broader Middle Eastern conflict. With competing claims surrounding the drone attack, the incident is likely to increase diplomatic pressure on Baghdad, Erbil and Tehran to prevent further escalation and clarify responsibility for attacks on Kurdish territory.

  • | |

    Inquiry Committee formed against Punjab University…

    ByJustpaste.in

    Lahore : The administration of Punjab University has taken a significant step by forming a three-member inquiry committee to investigate multiple complaints submitted against the university’s Public Relations Officer (PRO), Khurram Shehzad. The committee has been constituted with the approval of the Vice Chancellor and has been directed to complete its investigation within one week and submit a detailed report along with recommendations. According to official documents, the inquiry committee comprises Dr Nadir Shah, Dr Imtiaz Shafiq, and the Deputy Registrar (Administration). The committee will review the complaints, examine relevant records, assess available evidence and record statements from concerned individuals before finalising its findings. Sources said that Khurram Shehzad has been serving as PRO on additional charge for several years. During this period, several faculty members reportedly submitted written complaints to the Vice Chancellor, alleging concerns regarding the use of official authority and the handling of administrative responsibilities. The complaints reportedly include allegations relating to misuse of official resources, administrative conduct, procedural issues and other matters connected with the performance of duties. The allegations, however, will be subject to verification by the inquiry committee. The Vice Chancellor has directed the committee to conduct a transparent review and submit its findings within the stipulated timeframe, after which any further administrative action will be considered in light of the inquiry report. The formation of the committee has attracted attention within academic and administrative circles, with university stakeholders awaiting the outcome of the investigation.

  • | |

    Federal Cabinet Interference in CCI matters violat…

    ByJustpaste.in

      Islamabad: The federal cabinet has no constitutional authority to decide matters reserved for the Council of Common Interests, a Senate sub committee has declared, warning that continued cabinet interference in electricity, petroleum, gas, railways, ports and regulatory bodies is damaging provincial rights and weakening constitutional protection for smaller provinces. The Senate Sub Committee on Devolution, chaired by Senator Barrister Zamir Hussain Ghumro, directed that matters falling under the CCI must not be taken to the federal cabinet. The committee said the Prime Minister should place such issues before the CCI and call its meetings frequently. According to the committee, Article 154 of the Constitution gives the CCI responsibility over subjects listed in Part II of the Federal Legislative List. The committee argued that these powers belong to the CCI rather than the federal cabinet. It said this constitutional arrangement was created to protect provinces from decisions dominated by the federal government. The committee particularly highlighted the position of smaller provinces. It noted that Punjab has 141 seats in the National Assembly while the other three provinces together have 122 seats. According to the committee, putting important provincial matters under the CCI provides protection against decisions based only on the strength of the majority in the National Assembly. The committee said the CCI should be reconstituted in a way that ensures equality among provinces. It also called for more frequent CCI meetings so important disputes between the federation and provinces are not left unresolved. The committee said the prices of electricity, petroleum, gas and medicines should be supervised and controlled through the CCI rather than the federal cabinet. It argued that federal executive authority must operate within the Constitution and that Article 154 gives the CCI authority over relevant subjects. The committee also said major national organisations and sectors connected with Part II of the Federal Legislative List should come under the CCI. These include Railways, Petroleum, Electricity, Ports and several regulatory bodies. The committee specifically named OGRA, NEPRA, PEMRA and PTA among institutions whose matters, in its view, should fall under the CCI framework. It said Planning and Development authorities and other bodies working in fields covered by Part II should also operate under CCI authority instead of federal cabinet control. The committee strongly objected to federal cabinet involvement in these areas. It said interference by the federal cabinet in CCI subjects was contrary to Article 97 read with Article 154 of the Constitution. One of the most serious issues discussed was the planned privatization of electricity distribution companies. The committee stated that the privatization of companies including IESCO, FESCO, LESCO, GESCO, SEPCO and HESCO cannot proceed without CCI approval from the Power Division or Privatization Commission. It argued that taking such decisions without the CCI would violate Articles 154 and 157 of the Constitution. The committee directed that the privatization of electricity distribution companies must be placed before the CCI. It also referred to the Supreme Court judgement in the Mian Nawaz Sharif case and said the CCI should be involved before such major decisions are taken. The committee rejected the federal government’s reliance on the Gadoon Amazai ruling regarding CCI meetings. It said Parliament had already addressed the issue of meeting frequency by requiring the CCI to meet at least once every three months or earlier when urgent matters arise. The committee therefore called on the Prime Minister to convene CCI meetings regularly. According to members, failure to use the CCI weakens the constitutional voice of provinces and allows issues affecting the entire federation to be decided through the federal cabinet. The panel also questioned several ministries, divisions and state owned bodies dealing with subjects it believes belong either to the provinces or the CCI. It said federal structures created around provincial or CCI subjects should be devolved or closed where required, without harming employees. Among the institutions and sectors the committee mentioned included Water Resources, Railways, Industries, Statistics, Petroleum, Inter-Provincial Coordination, Planning and Development and WAPDA. The committee also referred to regulatory bodies and other organisations whose functions, it said, should be examined according to the constitutional division of powers. Members said the purpose of the CCI was not simply to hold occasional meetings. They described it as a constitutional mechanism designed to allow the federation and provinces to jointly decide major national matters. The committee warned that bypassing the CCI could create mistrust between the provinces and the federal government. It said smaller provinces need the CCI to ensure they have a meaningful voice in decisions involving national resources, energy, infrastructure and regulation. The committee directed the federal government to amend its Rules of Business within 15 days so that matters falling under the CCI are handled according to the Constitution. It asked the government to submit a report explaining the changes made. The message from the committee was clear. Major decisions involving electricity, petroleum, gas, railways, ports, regulators and other CCI subjects should not be decided by the federal cabinet alone. The committee wants these matters taken back to the Council of Common Interests, with the Prime Minister required to use the constitutional forum regularly to protect provincial rights and build agreement between the federation and all four provinces.

  • | |

    Muhammad Ahmed recalls being humiliated by fellow actor

    ByJustpaste.in

    Veteran Pakistani actor and writer Muhammad Ahmed has opened up about an upsetting experience in which he says he was repeatedly humiliated by a younger male actor on a drama set. Speaking on Sheeba Khan’s podcast Dareecha, the seasoned artist became emotional as he recalled the incident, saying that some actors behave very differently behind the scenes than they do in public. Muhammad Ahmed began by reflecting on how private interactions often reveal a person’s true nature. He said, “Actors show their true colours in private meetings, as I have experienced multiple times. Most recently, I remained calm when I was bullied because I know everyone has mobile phones, and they can record and post videos online with captions like, ‘See the reality of Muhammad Ahmed.’” He then explained why the remarks hurt him deeply. “I know I am bald, tanned, and short. I know this reality and often make fun of it myself, but what if you are told this by an actor who is 40 years younger than you?” He added that the actor frequently tried to attract attention by making loud comments in front of others. Recalling one such moment, Muhammad Ahmed said the actor mocked him for carrying a leather bag. “He said, ‘Oh Muhammad Ahmad, you are carrying a leather bag with you, it’s pure leather.’ He was shouting in front of everyone so that people would notice him because he was doing the lead role.” He further claimed that the actor also referred to comments Muhammad Ahmed had made years earlier about his performance. “Then he again said, ‘This man, Muhammad Ahmed, rated my acting four or five years ago and judged my future on the basis of it, whether I would survive in the industry or not,’ which is true because I had told the producer that this guy is good, and yes, that drama became a hit.” According to Muhammad Ahmed, he later reunited with the same actor on another project. Although he had expressed concerns to the producer beforehand, he was assured that the actor had changed. However, he said the behaviour continued. He recalled the actor saying, “I don’t know why people cast Muhammad Ahmed. He acts the same and has the same hairstyle.” Describing another incident, Muhammad Ahmed said the actor took a handheld fan from a female co-star, held it over his head like a hairdryer and joked, “Look, I am making his hairstyle.” He said he chose not to respond because he did not want to lower himself to that level or create unnecessary conflict on set. The veteran actor admitted that the experience left him deeply hurt. “I was humiliated, I completed my work and came home. I thought, ‘Am I that weak that I should be humiliated by an actor who joined the industry only eight years ago?’” He added that he remained silent out of respect for the producers and the rest of the team. Muhammad Ahmed concluded by saying that maintaining his composure was a conscious decision. “I didn’t say anything because the producers were so respectful. I maintained my calm because of my team. Nowadays, no one takes a stand for anyone.” His candid remarks have sparked discussion on social media, with many viewers expressing support for the veteran actor and calling for greater respect and professionalism within the entertainment industry.

  • |

    Maira Khan’s bold social media transformation sparks debate

    ByJustpaste.in

    Maira Khan is a familiar name in the Pakistani television industry, having appeared in several popular dramas throughout her acting career. She has been part of projects such as Riwaaj, Kisey Awaaz Doon, Cousins, Jalan, Cheekh, and Bewafa, among others. Her performances helped her establish a presence in the entertainment industry, while her appearance on ARY Digital’s reality show Tamasha recently brought her renewed attention from viewers. Apart from television, Maira Khan has also worked in the feature film Durj, a project that received critical appreciation. Over the years, she has remained a subject of public interest, particularly because of her changing appearance, fashion choices, and occasional discussions surrounding cosmetic procedures and her evolving personal style. In recent years, however, Maira has largely stepped away from the Pakistani drama scene. Instead of appearing regularly on television, she is now frequently seen travelling with friends and sharing glimpses of her lifestyle on social media. Her Instagram presence has also become more noticeable, with the former actress posting photographs and reels showcasing her fashion choices and travels. Her recent posts have attracted particular attention because of her preference for Western-style outfits and a more confident approach to fashion. Some of her latest pictures feature outfits that are considerably bolder than the image audiences may remember from her television career. Her transformation has sparked a wide range of reactions across social media, with some people praising her confidence while others have criticised her new appearance. Several social media users have speculated about the reason behind her change in lifestyle and fashion. Some suggested that her reduced presence in Pakistani television dramas may have influenced her decision to pursue a different lifestyle, while others argued that her clothing choices are simply a matter of personal preference. The discussion also took an unexpected turn, with some users questioning her religious identity and making assumptions about her beliefs based on her appearance. Such comments generated further debate, as many people pointed out that a person’s faith cannot be determined simply by their clothing or social media posts. Some critics expressed disappointment over what they described as a shift from her earlier, more modest public image. One commenter said that Pakistani actresses appear to be becoming increasingly bold and prayed for them to receive guidance. Another user wrote that Maira had appeared much more decent in the past. Others shared reminders about morality and the temporary nature of worldly life. At the same time, her supporters believe that Maira has the right to make her own choices regarding fashion, lifestyle, and social media presence. The contrasting reactions demonstrate how strongly Pakistani celebrities continue to be scrutinised for their personal choices, particularly when they adopt a style that differs from their earlier public image.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *